Naturally, this kind of news is something that the media will either ignore or repress, but it’s terribly important to share the real story and the proof behind the Bush doctrine and the reasons to go to war. Nobody is spending time on this, and it’s a story that needs to be disseminated far and wide.

Now as everyone undoubtedly knows about me by now, I am a staunch supporter of the war on terror, and support the war in Iraq. I don’t want to see more terrorist attacks on our soil, and I definitely want to hand over to my progeny a country much like the country I grew up in–a place where we have freedom of religion; not a place where we live as dhimmis under sharia law.

So this war is being fought both in Iraq and at home on many fronts.

There is irrefutable evidence that demonstrates the Clinton administration’s support of terrorists, and the sleazy shift of blame for 9/11 to the Bush administration.

However, as Ben Johnson reports at Frontpage in this article called “9/11 Coverup Commission”, there are explicit connections to Iraq and 9/11. I have to say that no matter what the media and the leftists try to do, the truth has a way of coming out, one way or another. At least until the internet is muzzled, as Hillary is desperately trying to accomplish.

“So was the [9/11 Commission] staff a) protecting the Atta timeline or b) Jamie Gorelick or c) the Clinton administration or d) itself, because it got hold of the information relatively late and the staff was lazy?”

I would say unequivocally a is a check, b is a check, and c is a check.

The really upsetting issue is contained in Podhoretz’s first note. It requires a deeper reading because understanding it fully opens the entire mindset of the hard Left toward terrorism and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Podheretz notes that the Commission was “protecting” its interpretation of Mohammad Atta’s international and domestic U.S. travels. Key in this “interpretation” in the minds of Clinton supporters and Bush haters of all stripes is the necessity to deny all ties between Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and al-Qaeda. After all, in the endless cacophony of criticism against the Iraq War, the two steady drumbeats have been the failure to find WMDs, and the assertion that there were no links between Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and the September 11 attacks. Until now the Left has issued a series of deliberate misinterpretations of a series of reports – including that of the 9/11 Commission, and WMD reports by David Kay and Charles Dueffler. However the unimpeachable “Able Danger” report was at first denied by 9/11 spokesman Al Felzenberg, then was reluctantly confirmed to be correct. Felzenberg said that “the information that [the “Able Danger” briefing officer] provided us did not mesh with other conclusions that we were drawing.” (Emphasis added.)

Well of course, because David Kay and Charles Dueffler’s reports did, in fact show evidence of the WMD that Saddam had, there is evidence in both reports of the WMD shell game Saddam played just before we went in, and endless accounts of actual barrels of pesticides which soldiers had physical reactions to that mirror those of nerve agents, in addition to tons of enriched uranium and the components of the gas centrifuge that Dr. Obeidi turned over to the Americans as we were going into Iraq. Nevermind that the nuclear scientists were helped by the Americans to find other work–other than developing nuclear weapons so that other nations such as Iran, for example, wouldn’t seize them and force them to be accomplices in their nuclear weapons goals.

This last statement in that paragraph about their cherry picking their facts to fit their preconceived notions about what their findings should be, should completely render that 9/11 Commission report to be–if not anything else–not a very reliable source not only for facts regarding the holes in intelligence, etc., but also the conclusions and recommendations that were made.

And here we get to the crux of the matter. The movements of Atta prior to the terrorist attack as detailed by “Able Danger,” if acknowledged, would support statements by the Czech Republic that link Atta, and hence the al-Qaeda attack on America, irrefutably to Saddam’s covert intelligence operatives. This is something that surfaced shortly after 9/11. A former Czech deputy foreign minister, later ambassador to the UN, gave statements that he personally expelled a high raking Iraqi embassy official in Prague for being a covert foreign intelligence agent after the latter was discovered to have met with Mohammed Atta in the international lounge at the Prague airport in August 2001. There the Iraqi transferred a large amount of cash to Atta, sufficient to fund the completion of the September 11 attack. Despite cruel pressure from mainstream media, the hard Left, the U.S. State Department, and the CIA, the Czechs insisted that their report was correct. Former Congressman John LeBoutellier was furious at the Bush administration for bowing to CIA pressure to discount the Czech report because it verified a vital deadly connection within the covert terrorist community. Now it appears as if the Czechs – and those who supported their account – were right.

This Atta-Iraqi meeting did not track well with some of the 9/11 Commission’s pre-ordained agenda and had to be firmly discounted.

Emphasis mine. This is sounding more and more like the strong arm tactics of the SS or the KGB and is scaring me considerably.

For shame! This is the politicization of a deadly serious issue for all of the American people, no matter what side of the political fence we sit on. It’s unfortunate that the Clinton administration and dare I say the Clintonistas who are still in the whitehouse in one capacity or another, and the democrats in general don’t feel that way. The more tha American people discover about what really happened here, and listen to the rhetoric of the hard left with regard to military, security issues and open borders…the more they’re going to abandon what used to be a patriotic party (the democratic party) and has now turned to an abhorrent leftist commie tool party.

• NY Sun: Atta Report Hints Solons May Have Acted Too Quickly
• Deborah Orin: Cover-Up? • IBD: Atta Boy, Democrats
• Levin: Millennial Mistake • CNS: 9/11 Report Missed Key Facts
• Ledeen: What Would James Jesus Angleton Think About A.D.?
• NYT: 9/11 Commission Staff Rejected Report on Early ID of Atta
• Weldon: Rejects 9/11C’s Claim It Never Heard of Able Danger
• Mainstream Media Whitewashes Attagate: AP | Wash. Post