8 Responses to “Vote for Stephen Pearcy!”

1. steve Says:
   November 14th, 2005 at 8:54 pm

   Hey Cao:

   I just wrote about the other Sacramento Jack ***: Michael Newdow… You know the Atheist that wants to take “In God We Trust” off the our dollar bills now. He tried to take “under God” off the pledge because his daughter “is forced” to say it at school.

   I should take a donation for eggs to throw at Pearcy’s Sacramento house. Or golf balls, I got an excellent swing with my driver and the neighbor acrossed the street has a nice tee box style lawn. (I did not just say that) It’s fall and it’s gonna be a long cool winter. It’s about the time these unpatriotic fools ramp up their campaigns of hatred for the year. I think what I hate most is their selfishness for the rest of us. Oh well, it’s America right?

   Steve plays his little games here in Sactown because in Berkeley, his little soldier effigy would look like a holiday decoration. More pictures of his other **** here.

2. Cao Says:
   November 14th, 2005 at 9:44 pm

   My buddy Jay at Stop the ACLU just wrote about Newdow’s new attack against religious values in this post. He talks about “that idiot” referring to Newdow and every time I read that I start to laugh. He’s right, though. That idiot just wants to reshape America into his idea of a secular utopian paradise like Communist China. My thoughts are–instead of fighting capitalism and hating America, these people should just move to one of those utopian paradises they think are so great–like CUBA- and leave us the hell alone.

   Oh and thanks for your comment, I always get a kick out of you.

3. The Random Yak Says:
   November 15th, 2005 at 2:20 am

   Voting is done, Cao.
   Thanks for pointing out this raving moonbat (I’d call him a two-legged yak, but frankly I don’t want to insult the yaks) and giving us the opportunity to make sure he beats out Streisand (ouch…painful even to type, but under the circumstances, I’ll live). He had a handy margin when I was over at the ‘Dog’s just now.

   Come on folks - vote early and vote often!

4. Cao Says:
   November 15th, 2005 at 5:03 am

   Thanks. Personally, I think Streisand has achieved quite enough in terms of leftist accolades and this thing with Pearcy has put him at the top as far as I’m concerned. I don’t think I’ve ever seen Streisand say anything against our troops the way Pearcy has. But then I don’t read “people” or any of that garbage so I could be mistaken.

5. TB Says:
   November 15th, 2005 at 5:19 am

   Is it treason or freedom of speech? I thought outting a CIA agent during a time of war was treason.

6. Cao Says:
   November 15th, 2005 at 5:28 am

   That might be true if the person was actually “undercover”,

   If Plame was “undercover” then explain this. And this. You’d think if Wilson and his wife were so interested in preserving her supposed “covert” status, they wouldn’t be allowing pictures of themselves to be published in VANITY FAIR, :lol:…oh and that completely ignores the fact that she’d already been outed and relegated to a desk job for the past 10 years.

   Many at the CIA, where she now holds a desk job, treat her as a leper, afraid that association with her could damage their own career. “She’s radioactive,” they say.

   At Just one Minute:

   So - Valerie Plame works for a phony company that seems to have come into being a few months after Aldrich Ames put a lot of US agents into early semi-retirement. This has taken maybe a week for our foreign spychaser to learn. Might he wonder if Ms. Plame is still with the CIA?

   If he follows that trail of logic, our spychaser might then have someone follow Ms. Plame to work. Anyone attempting to do so will either learn that Ms. Plame has an extraordinary knack for eluding surveillance, or that she drives in to Langley each day.

   The last shred of her cover will be gone, her photo will be obtained and circulated, her history deduced, her networks identified - all within a few weeks of the NY Times editorial, which was volunteered by Joe Wilson and allowed by the CIA. The dire consequences predicted by Joe will have been realized - yet he published his op-ed anyway. How seriously did he, and the CIA, take her security?

   It’s actually comical that they would complain that she was “outted” by anyone but herself and her husband.

   On the DC cocktail circuit, it was widely known who she worked for.

   From Moonbat Central:

   From IBD: Politics: As special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s mandate expires, Karl Rove’s only crime may be not that he “outed” Valerie Plame as a CIA operative but that he exposed her husband, Ambassador Joe Wilson, as a liar.

   The case involving Rove and who “leaked” Plame’s “secret” identity as a CIA employee to the press is so convoluted that it’s easy to forget the whole thing began with President Bush uttering 16 words in a 5,400-word State of the Union: “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

   It was these 16 words that Wilson spent eight days in Niger investigating on behalf of the CIA, “drinking sweet mint tea and meeting with dozens of people,” as he put it, afterward writing an op-ed piece in The New York Times essentially claiming the Bush administration sent U.S. soldiers to Iraq to die for a lie.

   Wilson, who later was a foreign affairs adviser to the Kerry campaign, turned out to be a physician in need of healing himself when it comes to truth-telling, as revealed on July 9, 2004. That was when the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence issued its report on the CIA’s prewar intelligence on Iraq.

   The report concluded that Wilson lied when he denied his wife got him the Niger assignment. “Valerie had nothing to do with the matter,” he wrote in his book, adding, “She definitely had not proposed that I make the trip.”

   But according to the Senate report: “Interviews and documents provided to the committee indicate his wife . . . suggested his name for the trip.” This included a memo Plame herself sent to the CIA.

   The report also said Wilson lied when he told The Washington Post he knew the Niger intelligence had been based on forged documents. The CIA didn’t obtain the document said to be a forgery until a full eight months after Wilson’s return from Niger.

   Wilson told the public Niger had denied the uranium connection. But the Senate found that Wilson’s own report said that the Niger government had confirmed that Iraq had tried to buy uranium.

   So when Rove, in an e-mail sent to Time magazine’s Matt Cooper in July 2003, said Wilson’s trip to Niger for the CIA was arranged by “Wilson’s wife, who apparently works at the agency,” without providing her actual name, he was not exposing Plame as an agent.
   
   He was exposing her husband as a prevaricator, in effect warning Cooper and others not to take his claims seriously.

   While Wilson was found to have lied repeatedly, an independent British investigative committee on WMD intelligence headed by Lord Butler in its report (butlerreview.org.uk ) found “the intelligence was credible” and Bush’s statement was “well-founded.”

   Rove is said to have blown a CIA operative’s cover. But didn’t Wilson, who was hired as a consultant by the CIA, and presumably signed the routine CIA confidentiality agreement, blow his own cover by afterwards writing an op-ed piece in The New York Times?

   Plame’s name was certainly no secret, appearing in Wilson’s “Who’s Who In America” entry. Nor were her political affiliations and those of her husband. It could be argued that Mrs. Wilson blew her own cover when she made a contribution to the Al Gore for President campaign and listed her CIA cover company as her employer in the FEC filing.

   The 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act, which Rove is accused of violating, was designed to protect the CIA from subversion and treason by those who wished harm upon the agency and the United States. It wasn’t designed to protect the identities of desk jockeys and their spouses who willingly inject themselves into a national political debate.

   If Karl Rove is a criminal, exactly what was the crime?

   There is no crime, according to attorney Victoria Toensing, who drafted the legislation in her role as chief counsel for the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. She says that under the statute the “outed” agent must have operated outside the U.S. within the previous five years, and Plame had given up her role as a covert agent in favor of a desk job in Langley, Va., nine years before the Rove interview, according to New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

   The usual suspects who got even with Newt Gingrich for electing a Republican Congress, and who are pursuing Tom DeLay for pushing the Republican agenda, are now trying to settle the score with the man who got George W. Bush elected twice.

   As we’ve noted, this isn’t the first time an attempt has been made to criminalize political differences or to get even with GOP gurus for their political prowess and success. It is somewhat disheartening to see the administration Rove has served so well not mount a passionate defense of this innocent man, saying merely that anyone found guilty of leaking a CIA agent’s name would be fired.

   This is an attempt to use — or rather, misuse — the law to achieve what Democrats could not at the polls: the neutering of the Republican revolution. As columnist Ann Coulter points out, the only person to have demonstrably lied and possibly broken the law is Joseph Wilson. We can only hope it will not succeed.

7. W Hragyil Says:
   November 17th, 2008 at 9:12 pm

   Republicans have become the party of homeland terrorists, spewing hatred and disconcontent on the airwaves. We Democrats just handed them their asses on a plate and they will not recover for at least 2 decades and then only if they begin to include everyone into their party, not just those who have an average IQ of 60 (the southern vote) or the elitists that are all white men over 40.

8. Cao Says:
   November 18th, 2008 at 6:56 pm

   Right.

   U.S. governed by ‘adults still in their terrible twos,’ says author

Leave a Reply