4/25/2006
Kerry’s 180
I will continue blogging about this until…kingdom come, apparently, because Kerry has moved on to other things…like vacationing in France or flitting around the world to their 6 homes

John Kerry covered up voluminous evidence that a significant number of live American prisoners perhaps hundreds were never acknowledged or returned after the war-ending treaty was signed in January 1973.
The Massachusetts senator carried out this subterfuge a little over a decade ago - shredding documents, suppressing testimony, and sanitizing the committee’s final report when he was chairman of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs.
Kerry defended the shredding by saying the documents weren’t originals, only copies—but the staff’s fear was that with the destruction of the copies, the information would never get into the public domain, which it didn’t. Kerry had promised the staff that all documents acquired and prepared by the committee would be turned over to the National Archives at the committee’s expiration. This didn’t happen. Both the staff and independent researchers reported that many critical documents were withheld.
* Another protest memo from the staff reported: “An internal Department of Defense Memorandum identifies Frances Zwenig [Kerry’s staff director] as the conduit to the Department of Defense for the acquisition of sensitive and restricted information from this Committee . . . lines of investigation have been seriously compromised by leaks” to the Pentagon and “other agencies of the executive branch.” It also said the Zwenig leaks were “endangering the lives and livelihood of two witnesses.”
* A number of staffers became increasingly upset about Kerry’s close relationship with the Department of Defense, which was supposed to be under examination. (Dick Cheney was then defense secretary.) It had become clear that Kerry, Zwenig, and others close to the chairman, such as Senator John McCain of Arizona, a dominant committee member, had gotten cozy with the officials and agencies supposedly being probed for obscuring P.O.W. information over the years. Committee hearings, for example, were being orchestrated to suit the examinees, who were receiving lists of potential questions in advance. Another internal memo from the period, by a staffer who requested anonymity, said: “Speaking for the other investigators, I can say we are sick and tired of this investigation being controlled by those we are supposedly investigating.”
* The Kerry investigative technique was equally soft in many other critical ways. He rejected all suggestions that the committee require former presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush to testify. All were in the Oval Office during the Vietnam era and its aftermath. They had information critical to the committee, for each president was carefully and regularly briefed by his national security adviser and others about P.O.W. developments. It was a huge issue at that time.
* Kerry also refused to subpoena the Nixon office tapes (yes, the Watergate tapes) from the early months of 1973 when the P.O.W.’s were an intense subject because of the peace talks and the prisoner return that followed. (Nixon had rejected committee requests to provide the tapes voluntarily.) Information had seeped out for years that during the Paris talks and afterward, Nixon had been briefed in detail by then national security advisor Brent Scowcroft and others about the existence of P.O.W.’s whom Hanoi was not admitting to. Nixon, distracted by Watergate, apparently decided it was crucial to get out of the Vietnam mess immediately, even if it cost those lives. Maybe he thought there would be other chances down the road to bring these men back. So he approved the peace treaty and on March 29, 1973, the day the last of the 591 acknowledged prisoners were released in Hanoi, Nixon announced on national television: “All of our American P.O.W.’s are on their way home.”
The Kerry committee’s final report, issued in January 1993, delivered the ultimate insult to history. The 1,223-page document said there was “no compelling evidence that proves” there is anyone still in captivity. As for the primary investigative question —what happened to the men left behind in 1973—the report conceded only that there is “evidence . . . that indicates the possibility of survival, at least for a small number” of prisoners 31 years ago, after Hanoi released the 591 P.O.W.’s it had admitted to.
With these word games, the committee report buried the issue—and the men.
We know that Kerry promised on the Tim Russert Show to release his records, and there are still a lot of questions about his military record that remain unanswered. I still think that the American public deserves to get those answers, considering all the damage he has done thus far.
He actually DID sign the form and release SOMETHING–to his biographer, but that’s not exactly what the American people were waiting for…we were looking for the answers (that it appears we won’t get). That is why I continue to point out that he hasn’t made good on that promise.

Image: LindaSog.com
Join the blogbursts to help FREE Kerry’s 180 every Tuesday!
We’ve formed a blogburst group and here are the bloggers who are contributing so far. If you want to join the blogroll for Free Kerry’s 180, click here to email me, include the url for your blog. The blogburst is every Tuesday, so don’t forget to blog about it. All you have to do is encourage Kerry to set his 180 FREE, I’ll send you the code for the blogroll.
The more people we have, the merrier!
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
cheap-cruise linked with cheap-cruise
» Free Kerry’s SF180 linked with Blog Archive »









April 25th, 2006 at 5:59 am
Did you hear him come out and say that McCarthy is a whistleblower? These people would defend the devil if they felt it suited their needs!
April 25th, 2006 at 9:26 am
[…] Cao’s Blog has more and a nifty photoshop… | RSS | Inlinks | Print This Post […]
April 25th, 2006 at 2:03 pm
So we should have gulags? That’s okay? Secret CIA jails where no law applies? Very American.
April 25th, 2006 at 2:57 pm
Hmmm…it is the governments JOB to PROTECT American citizens interests first and foremost, and since America’s enemies see fit to play dirty, so must our government, Station Agent.
Those that take the moral high road end up getting cut off at the pass, ambushed and destroyed.
April 25th, 2006 at 4:05 pm
I know this is gonna piss of those jack-offs at Columbia University …
John “HANOI FONDA” Skerry is guilty of war crimes and lying to the people - he should be:
1. Strung up in a tree.
2. Shoot him in his tight *** at sunrise.
3. Kicked in the nuts.
4. *****-slap his Momma for producing such an ugly ****-bird.
5. Cut off all that butt-ugly hair.
6. Ship his lying *** to the South Pole with nothing but Yachting clothes.
And run his TRAITOR *** out of America along with:
* Ramsey Clark
* Cindy Sheehan
* Louis Farrakhan
* Al Sharpton
* Michael Moore
* Stephen Pearcy
* Ted Rall
* Theodore Kennedy
* Frank Church
Git-R-Done!
April 25th, 2006 at 6:32 pm
Gulags? What planet did that dude drop in from and how do I send him back?
hehehe SSGT, you crack me up.
Too late, though, the libnuts are foaming at the mouth, their heads are spinning, and they have a serious case of both perseveration and echlalia.
Plus, I think some of them have an ADD problem, and a problem with cognition!
May 5th, 2006 at 1:08 am
cheap-cruise