8/20/2006
Democrats are traitors
Dan Riehl has it, and it’s excellent.
and
I particularly like this segment from Part II:
Leading Democrat John Murtha went on television and pronounced several Marines guilty of cold-blooded murder in Iraq. And we now know he did that prior to having any depth of knowledge of the case.
There aren’t enough web pages on this blog to archive the treasonous statements of former Democrat President Jimmy Carter when it comes to current events - and often overseas, at that. Frankly, I could go through the entire Democrat leadership and come up with many more examples.
So, now, what? I’ve provided a link to the definition of the word treason. I have characterized the statements of leading Democrats precisely as they are. Am I supposed to buy into the notion that they, as leaders, are welcome to engage in such destructive discourse, yet, me a humble blogger, is somehow hurting the debate for calling said statements precisely what they are? Sorry, I think not.
Let the individuals who would seek to defend the Democrat’s honor in this regard answer me this - how is it that such statements as displayed above can be seen as anything other than injurious to our nation during a time of war? And as that phrase itself is included in the very definition of treason, why is it so wrong, or dangerous to simply call them what they are?
There should be no problem calling things by their real names.
Go read it now.
