Susan Estrich holds the distinction with two others of publishing a hit book on Ann Coulter. “Soulless” is by Susan Estrich, and hit the bookstores on October 10. The second one is called “Brainless: The Lies and Lunacy of Ann Coulter”, written by Joe Maguire, and I think that one came out on October 10, also.

The third book to hit liberal bookshelves (that’s kind of a contradiction in terms since I don’t believe many of them read much beyond coffee table books with nice pictures in them, or science fiction.) is named “I Hate Ann Coulter!” The four authors of this simply-named book claim they’re anonymous for their own safety. They told the New York Post, “None of us want our real names in the hands of gun-toting, abortion clinic-bombing, self-proclaimed ‘wing nuts,’ who follow Coulter.”

heh. In the best selling book Treason; Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, Coulter writes,

Fifty years ago, Senator Joe McCarthy said, “the loyal Democrats of this nation no longer have a Party.” Since then, the evidence has continued to pour in. Liberals mock Americans who love their country, calling them cowboys, warmongers, religious zelouts, and jingoists. By contrast, America’s enemies are called “Uncle Joe”, “Fidel”, “agrarian reformers”, and practioners of a ‘religion of peace’. Indeed, Communists and terrorists alike are said to be advocates of “peace”.

Seeing that I’ve not seen any conservative writers promote their books with videos showing breaking chairs over liberals backs (ala Al Franken), or conservatives running up to liberals speaking at podium and throwing pies in their faces (ala Al Pieda), I have to wonder what alternate universe they’re living in. I doubt that their tremendous egos will allow them to remain anonymous very long, although it’s humorous that they’re afraid of those who actually BELIEVE in the 2nd amendment and realize that we might in fact have real guns behind the NRA stickers on our windows and cars. But generally we don’t go running down the street waving our shotguns at liberals for things they’ve said. However, liberals have no compunction or reservation to threaten our toddlers, either (ala Deb Frisch on Jeff Goldstein at Protein Wisdom). There are no liberals in recent memory who have been assaulted like the Minutemen were at Columbia University just recently. They weren’t even allowed to finish what they were doing; they were physically rushed on stage and shouted down. This is what Columbia University and liberals call ‘free speech’. It’s ‘free speech’ only for one side; theirs. So I haven’t seen any liberal fired from teaching at any University because of their political persuasion, like Thomas Klocek was from DePaul University. So what they’re saying as opposed to reality is rather amusing.

It would seem as though Susan Estrich, completely jealous of Ann’s attractive blonde physical attributes, tried to morph herself into the image of Ann on the cover of her “Godless”. She might be making a complete mockery simply of herself. There is no way that this woman should envision herself as the liberal conterpoint to Ann Coulter, no matter how hard she tries. You can definitely see why she wouldn’t have a real picture of herself on the cover of her book; nobody would buy it.

It might be artfully packaged, but liberals have no new ideas, that’s why Air America ended up filing Chapter 11. Nobody wants to hear them on talk radio. Nobody wants to listen to their ideas unless you’re talking about the same people who bought Bill Clinton’s boring book, “My Lies”. Or “My Life”. Whatever.

You can see how liberals are obsessed with Ann over at Youtube, also. They make fun of her, they deride her, but they can’t seem to pick a hole in the message that she delivers. They might not agree with how she delivers it, but the truth in what she’s saying sure packs a whollop and seems to take the wind out of their arguments. Plus, she gives a lot of us ammunition in our battles with liberals. Instead of getting upset about it anymore, it’s called ‘laugh at liberals’. Because if you really consider the lack of substance to the arguments, you’re really left with very little in the end.

This is the sole reason to put a book out about her, wouldn’t you think? In “How to Talk to a Liberal”, Coulter writes:

In the dozens and dozens of panic-stricken articles the New York Times has run on mel Gibson’s movie “The Passion of the Christ, the unavoidable conclusion is that liberals haven’t the vaguest idea what Christianity is. The Times may have loopy ideas about a list of things, but at least when they write about gay bathhouses and abortion clinics, you get the sense they know what they’re talking about.

So is this the reason that Estrich is wearing a Star of David instead of a cross on her neck in this cover? Who does she think she is. Madonna?

They have no new ideas, they have nothing to add to the public discourse. Liberals turn arguments into ad hominem attacks, which I suppose is the entire reason these three books have popped up to begin with. Shoot the messenger. Because they obviously can’t do anything about the message she delivers, it’s right on. Liberals are at a loss for how Ann’s books could possibly be so successful when they’ve tried to get her fired, and have lampooned her efforts in every way imaginable. Even an idiot can tell that what they say about her isn’t true. If she’s a fringe lunatic, then why are her books best sellers? Who are these ‘fringe’ lunatics who are pushing her books into the New York Times’ best sellers’ list? They can’t possibly be ‘fringe’ if that’s happening, and it’s happened repeatedly. We get a kick out of the message, and in particular, the delivery of the message. Plus, it gives us fodder for future debates with liberals.

We’ll see who’s out of touch by taking careful notice of how successful these three books will be; “Soulless”, “Brainless” and “I hate Ann Coulter!”

Coulter wrote in her book Slander, Liberal Lies about the American Right:

“A central component of liberal hate speech is to make paranoid accusations based on their own neurotic impulses, such as calling Republicans angry, hate-filled, and mean… There is maybe just the tiniest element of projection and compulsion in all this.”

Now how can you argue with that.