1/21/2007

incoherent ramblings of a leftist

By: Cao, Filed under: Communist, Socialist & Nazi , Demonrats , General , Hitlery , Keyes/Obama @ 7:54 am

I just love when I get incoherent ramblings from leftists. This idiot sends me a practically incoherent email opening with this:

Are you working for the anti-people league…. against Obama??

What you really mean is do I oppose the big government, tax and spend liberals? Why, yes, I do. And is Obama a part of that? Well most certainly he is, when you look at his voting record. And that somehow gives you headache? I’m sorry, maybe you shouldn’t read my website, then. From CNS:

“He’s more of a socialist than he is even a Democrat,” said a critic, Cathy Santos, co-founder of the Chicago-based Republican Young Professionals. “A lot of his policies have the government taking care of people. Instead of giving people a leg up, he would rather give them a leg.”

Soros initially was attracted to Obama because of his vision on education and health care, Vachon said. But Santos said if Obama got his way, the U.S. health care system would be worse than what Clinton proposed after her husband was elected president. She also said voters should be wary of Obama’s “any time, anywhere” stance on abortion.

I don’t know what ‘anti-people league’ means, but the term strikes me funny. Isn’t it the environmentalists who lobby for the environment over ‘people’ concerns? Didn’t “Silent Spring” bring on the anti-DDT revolution which has now brought about millions of deaths in third world countries due to preventable malaria from mosquitos?

Capitalism Magazine quotes just a few statistics in this article, Silent Spring: RIP 2004:

According to the World Health Organization, worldwide malaria infects 300 million people. About 1 million die of malaria each year. Most of the victims are in Africa, and most are children.

The malaria-ridden mosquitos of yesteryear wouldn’t exist today, and millions of people including children wouldn’t be dying of it if it weren’t for the environmentalists who campaigned against the use of DDT for the sake of ‘the environment’. So it’s a natural conclusion that the ‘green’ environmentalists are the ‘anti-people league’.

No, I don’t support the ‘power to the people’ movement, because time has proven that it has no merit. You empower people not by enslaving them under government bureacracy, but by lessening the size of government and giving them more personal freedom and personal responsibility. Our founders clearly understood this concept. Increasing the number of regulations that intrude on so many areas of our lives doesn’t empower anyone.

Our founders were completely aware of what could happen, they read history and took note of the demise of previous republics. From The

Founding Fathers & the Classics, by Dr. Joe Wolverton II

They heeded the warnings about power elites who used corruption, intrigue, and personal immorality to neutralize public concern and dampen zeal for the protection of liberty. From the 18th to the 21st century, it would seem, times have changed very little.

James Madison insightfully noted that most of the tyrants of history masqueraded as democrats, and over time, revealed themselves to be power hungry dictators and shameless demagogues. Alexander Hamilton, an astute student of classical history, devoted his first contribution to the Federalist Papers to a writing against tyrants of “men who have over-turned the liberties of republics, commencing as demagoguges and ending as tyrants.”

I don’t ‘work’ for anyone but myself and my family. But here at CB, I just expose liberal hypocrisy in word and deed, and share and proselytize conservative values (and the meaning of proselytize here is ‘espousing one’s doctrine’ not necessary ‘recruit’ or ‘convert’). But yes, you have the ‘giste’ of what it is I do; I do not support Obama, never have, and never will, unless he suddenly sees the light and starts to NOT support environmental issues, national health care and the rest of the socialist crap that the others in George Soros’ group seem to come out in favor of. I don’t support any of George Soros’ hand-picked handful of candidates; Kerry, Obama, Howard Dean, Tom Daschle, Patrick Leahy, Barbara Boxer, or Hillary Clinton, and for a number of reasons. Hillary and Kerry, to my knowledge, have not welcomed and been proud of Soros’ support, perhaps understanding that some people have an incling as to what that man is all about. Obama, however, is oblivious, in that he actually COVETS George Soros’ support. Most Democrats endorsed by Soros, like Kerry, haven’t actually met him. Obama is different because of his willingness to embrace Soros in the open. After Soros made a comparison between the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Obama joined Soros at his home for a New York fund-raiser.

Obama is one of only a handful of candidates to get a personal contribution from George Soros. The others include Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), Bob Graham (D-Fla.), John Kerry (D-Mass.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos, and former Vermont governor Howard Dean

Think carefully about where those people have stood on issues, and compare them with the rhetoric coming from the Rosenbergs’ son. Or of their granddaughter, Rachel Meeropol. You remember Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, don’t you? And the Verona Cables? If not, you have some catching up to do.

The leftist makes this odd little taunt in the email:

I see that you have begun the communist scare, cry…. cry like a baby… cry ..”look a communist coming…. run, run..” with a back in times melody

If people like Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, and George Galloway weren’t out there admitting what their political affiliations are, (Galloway is a Brit, a card carrying member of the Revolutionary Russian Communist Party, who travelled across the US with Jane Fonda talking against the war, was Saddam Hussein’s buddy, and benefitted financially from the Oil For Food Program and in other ways from Saddam’s Iraq) their position on the conflict in the Middle East is identical with the World Worker’s Party, the Revolutionary Communist Party, Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists and Maoists. This is something that doesn’t go unnoticed by Osama Bin Laden, who has said that the goals of the socialists are the same as the goals of the terrorist mujahideen in their quest of destroying western values and the western way of life.

Perhaps it wouldn’t be so glaringly obvious to those of us who oppose communism and are paying attention to history and the testimonies of people like Reverend Wurmbrand and his wife who were imprisoned and tortured by communists. I’m sorry, but I think it’s terribly and vitally important to fight that ideology that would have us killed for what we believe. Soon, I see that we will be forced to sneak around to worship God, and that we will soon be arrested, as people were in the Soviet Union, Romania and other countries, for worship, Bible study, or reading the Bible in public. Americans are like frogs in the frying pan, with organizations and individuals alike working to turn the heat of the fire up. Card carrying members of the CFR feed us propaganda portrayed as news, Hillary Clinton and her husband are fawned over by the media when they demonize the military and belittle the mission in Iraq, not unlike Cindy Sheehan and the marxists of Code Pink.

democrats-crybaby.jpg

Nobody is ‘crying’, I’m just pointing it out. It’s leftists who seem to consistently cry and make themselves out to be victims; and then portray the government as the entity that will save them. What I don’t understand is why people object to my talking about these things so much; to me, they are simple matters of historical record and fact. The democrats have long been allies with the communists, Engels and Marx actually made mention of that fact. Ever hear of the Verona (aka Venona) Cables which proved that McCarthy was right?

Here are two names that should either jog your memory or wake you up: Robert Hansson, the FBI agent turned Soviet spy, and Aldridge Aimes, the CIA man serving a life term because he was revealed and proven a Soviet spy.

You’re either supporting what the enemies within are doing, or you’re completely oblivious, which makes you really dangerous, in my estimation. Plus, your need to go after me in email with these immature little taunts! What ever happened to ‘agreeing to disagree’? In the world of the leftist, the rightist should not speak!

My little whiney leftist continues in the email:

This morning Hillary Clinton, said she is in ( the white house race ) ..to win..

What are you going to cry about NOW … cry baby.. ?

Are you going to try to scare me with …. Hillary,dracula stories??

Unless America is brain dead, I sincerely doubt that people will vote to have the return of a Clinton Whitehouse. I talked about the Clintons’ cowardly history here and more specifically Hillary’s in this paragraph:

Young lawyer and college student Hillary Rodham Clinton marched against the warin Boston, pledged her support to the Black Panthers, and aligned herself with the Communist movement through her work with radical leftists like Robert Treuhaft, a former lawyer for the Communist party; his wife, writer Jessica Mitford; and Robert Borosage of the Institute for policy studies, which supported Communist-backed groups in Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America.

No, we don’t need to ’scare’ anyone, all we actually need to do is read the first hand accounts of people who worked in the Clinton Whitehouse. There’s Buzz Patterson, who wrote one incredible book about it; Reckless Disregard: How Liberal Democrats Undercut Our Military, Endanger Our Soldiers, and Jeopardize Our Security (Hardcover), and another about his experience with the Clintons, Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Endangered America’s Long-Term National Security . There is a ton of material out there about how scarey Hillary is, and we don’t need to consult fiction to do it; we just need to read the experiences of people who worked in the Clinton Whitehouse, and have harrowing stories to tell about the Clintons from personal experience.

Barbara Olson, The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House (Hardcover) . That one is particularly chilling since 9/11 happened as a result of the wall that the Clinton administration constructed between the agencies that prevented them from sharing information about the hijackers.

People like Peggy Noonan, who wrote “The Case Against Hillary Clinton”, or watch ‘the path to 9/11′. A sentient thinking person would be wrong to ignore the fact that the path to 9/11 was paved in large part by the Clinton Administration. And that fact in itself makes me wonder what planet people are on when they support Hillary’s candidacy for the Oval Office. If you stopped to read Jayna Davis‘ book “The Third Terrorist”, about the OK City Bombing and the Clinton administration’s coverup of the Iraqis who were involved in it, I don’t think the American people would consciously vote for that kind of irresponsible leadership. If the OK City Bombing trials of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols had been run properly, and the agencies allowed to come forward with the evidence of the members of Saddam’s mukharabat that ran back to Iraq afterwards; we may have never watched the horror of those people jumping out of the flaming towers in New York.

A vote for Hillary would undoubtedly invite even more government bureacracy and mishandling of our money, lead to more horrible terrorist led disasters to happen right here on our own soil, and a disastrous national health care which will lead to a bankrupt system along the lines of Cuba’s. Nobody’s crying for the Cubans, but most people don’t realize they won’t end up like Castro, benefitting from health care that no one else is able to obtain there.

I will never give up fighting against the ideology that would result in the murders of millions, poverty for most, and elitists fighting and killing each other over who will be the next powermonger.

So it is with a nod to the past and to the brave and noble men who lost their lives in the cause for liberty that I continue to carry the torch for truth, but I will not apologize for it.

If big government overregulating every little aspect of human behavior is so great, then why is South Korea more prosperous than North Korea, (where millions starved to death in the ’90’s), why was West Germany more prosperous than East Germany, why is Taiwan more prosperous than China, and why is the U.S. still thriving while the Soviet Union lies on the trash heap of history?

“When young men seek to be like you, when lazy men resent you, when powerful men look over their shoulder at you, when cowardly men plot behind your back, when corrupt men wish you were gone and evil men want you dead. Only then will you have done your share.” -Phil Messina

Well, I guess I’ve done my share, but guess what? I’m not going to stop. And when I get emails and trolling comments, and letters to my employer, and photoshopped images of personal photographs, it just spurs me on!

Thanks to Jo’s cafe

OTB

6 Responses to “incoherent ramblings of a leftist”

  1. The Wide Awakes Says:

    Hillary and Obama

    Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are being hailed in the media as the two candidates who can save America from the evil Bush regime. Similar to the fawning anti-war coverage that the media lavishes on marxists like Code Pink, the Raging Grannies, Inte…

  2. Pirate's Cove Says:

    Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

    And a Happy Sunday to all. Global Warming as caused by Man is sure making it cold outside, eh? Well, you know that Global Warming, er, Climate Change, is going to make things hotter, colder, wetter, drier, right? Snicker.
    BTW, this one was by Peter Dr…

  3. booted cat Says:

    I recommend this short movie mocking Kim Jong Il and his secret agent buying Hennessy XO wine from Chinese black market :=)

    http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=EE52D9ED01495685

  4. Jason Pappas Says:

    Hillary is revolting but Barak Hussein Obama is scary. Let the Dems shoot at each other while we duck.

  5. Point of fact Says:

    Get your facts straight, friend.

    George Galloway is not a member of any “Revolutionary Russian Communist Party” - no such thing exists. Where did you even come up with a fake name like that?

    George was never a friend of Saddam Hussein. If you even bothered to check your facts, you’d know he organised more demonstrations against him, spoke more times in Parliament against him, and detested him more than any other UK politician. As George says, he met Saddam the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld - only George was trying to campaign against sanctions not sell Saddam weapons. He might’ve said some dumb things, but if we’re gonna condemn people for saying dumb things, I think you’re top of the list my friend.

    George did not benefit in any way at all from oil for food. He has won substantial amounts of money in the UK courts against newspapers that claimed he did (and in the UK, it is VERY hard to win libel cases - the entire case has to be proved by the person bringing it, unlike in the US). The newspapers themselves even accepted that the documents were a forgery. The Senate had nothing on him at all. Even when they sent their “evidence” to the police in the UK, absolutely nothing happened because there WAS no evidence.

    All in all, from one paragraph a series of disgraceful lies that discredit everything else you say.

    Ridiculous - you have no credibility at all.

  6. Cao Says:

    Kiss my ***, friend. Someone who defends the nonexist credibility of George Galloway while in the same breath questions mine because I’ve exposed what he’s actually done, make me want to offer you a leftist droolbib with a hammer and sickle on it…you has no credibility here, your objections are idiotic particularly when there is so much evidence to support what I said.

    Galloway, other leaders named in oil-food bribery-By David R. Sands-THE WASHINGTON TIMES-October 28, 2005

    British lawmaker George Galloway, a former French interior minister and the head of the Russian Communist Party are among a slew of politicians fingered as having accepted bribes from Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in the massive report on the U.N. oil-for-food scandal.

    If you’d follow any of the links you’d find that George is, in fact a member of the Russian Communist Party, and did, in fact, visit with Saddam Hussein and make a profit off the oil for food program. I can’t find where precisely that was about the Russian Revolutionary Communist Party, but here is an article and here is another link. To my knowledge he’s a member of the Russian Communist Party, I’ve seen that in numerous places. You’re merely playing a game of semantics and not a clever one, at that.

    Unmitigated Galloway
    From the May 30, 2005 issue of the Weekly Standard: Saddam’s favorite MP goes to Washington.
    by Christopher Hitchens
    05/30/2005, Volume 010, Issue 35

    Georgeous George, in fact,

    visited Baghdad after the first Gulf war and, addressing Saddam, said: “Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability.”

    And Gorgeous George also, in front of an investigative committee denied his ties to Saddam, but what do you expect from a communist? The truth?

    In addition, he has a fake charity that he still funnels money from, called the Miriam Appeal, which was originally for a little girl in Iraq who had Leukemia. She is well now, but that hasn’t stopped him from taking money from people.

    Galloway, other leaders named in oil-food bribery

    By David R. Sands
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    October 28, 2005

    The Saddam Oil Bribes: The Complete al-Mada List

    The Fall of George Galloway

    Harder to put aside with an airy wave are the accusations that he used the proceeds from his Miriam Appeal – which he started ostensibly to bring an Iraqi child sick with leukemia to Britain for treatment, for personal purposes. It did not cost the hundreds of thousands of pounds that were donated to the fund by members of the British public, and also Middle Eastern governments, to cure Miriam. Long after Miriam was declared leukemia-free, the charity rocked along, mutating as it went into an appeasenik organisation protesting the war in Iraq. Because it is not a registered charity, it has never had to open its books to the public. The fact that it is not a registered, tax-deductible charity might lead one to believe that charity was never its purpose.

    It has now come out that Galloway’s Jordanian wife, Dr Amineh Abu-Zayyad, believed to be a niece of Yasser Arafat, was paid £18,000 ($27,000) out of it for “taking care of Miriam, which she is very qualified to do,” Galloway assured skeptics. How being a microbiologist qualifies the degree holder for a nursing job for a leukemia patient is unclear. And Galloway didn’t mention whether his wife had a leave of absence from her important position as a microbiologist at Glasgow University while she was “taking care of Miriam.” It also paid for a flight for her to her native Jordan and for some Arabic computers. More importantly, it paid for travel by Galloway himself to such interesting destinations as Jordan, Romania, the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, and the U.S. And it allegedly provided cover for many a trip to Baghdad. It has now been revealed, at the insistence of the Charities Commission, that the Mariam Appeal received about £800,000 ($1.2m) over a four year period, with more than £500,000 ($750,000) provided by the United Arab Emirates and about £100,000 ($150,000) by Saudi Arabia. The bulk of the remainder was provided by the Jordanian businessman, Fawaz Zureikat, a long-time opponent of sanctions against Iraq and the campaign’s chairman. No wonder they never bothered to register it! Why were the governments of Saudi Arabia and the UAE so generous? What did they expect of this British Member of Parliament in return?

    Galloway’s ex-chauffeur was often bemused by his attitude to money. His own salary came partly from Galloway’s legitimate expenses as a Member of Parliament, but also from other sources. Said the ex-chauffeur, “As time went by, [the money] would come from the strangest places. Usually, his wife would pay me with checks from a company called Finjan Ltd - a company of which Mr. George and his wife are the only directors.” Earlier, he was paid with a check from the Emergency Committee on Iraq and Palestine [a campaign chaired by Galloway, that raised funds among anti-war protesters to campaign against the U.S. and Israel]. The check was signed by Stuart Halford [who was the secretary of the Mariam campaign].

    The chauffeur claimed that after the events of September 11, Galloway remarked, “The United States has killed much higher numbers in Iraq with the sanctions.” A somewhat touching concern for the ordinary Iraqi in the street, given that the money trail leads to payments from the Saddam regime directly to the oil-for-food-and medicines UN administered program. Some of the oil revenues meant to provide the means for the purchase of food and medicine for the Iraqi people were being diverted into the silk lined pockets of Armani suits worn by one Rt Hon. George Galloway, MP.

    For a man born in an attic in a slum in the industrial city of Glasgow, Gorgeous George developed some expensive tastes round about the time he became committed to the Palestinian cause and forged a relationships with an old friend of his wife’s from university in Jordan. Fawas Zureikat claimed that catch-all Middle Eastern term, “a businessman.” He had also at one time been involved as an oil trader. He was also the Chairman of the Miriam Appeal.

    But funds from the Miriam Appeal pale beside funds from Saddam Hussein who allegedly authorized payments to Galloway of approximately $550,000 per year, filtered out of the oil-for-food program, over a period of 10 years.

    The Beneficiaries of Saddam’s Oil Vouchers: The List of 270

    George Galloway received 1 million barrels.

Leave a Reply