1/27/2007

Green Nazis and Green Commies

By: Cao, Filed under: Communist, Socialist & Nazi , Environmentalism , General @ 9:32 am

I thought I’d preserve this since it appears as though it’s going down the memory hole.

Fred Costa - Contributor
11202000

Would you vote for the Communist Party? Would you vote for the Nazi Party? If you voted for the Green Party, you voted for both. The Green Party Platform, what the Greens call the “Green Program”, is the Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf printed on recycled paper. The Green Party has recycled and repackaged the ideas of Lenin, Hitler, and Marx.

The Green Communists don’t like the American primary system, where voters decides who will be the candidate. They want to eliminate our primary elections and install the communist model where the party decides who will be the candidate and the voter simply rubber-stamps the party’s choice. The Green Communists don’t like the U.S. Congress. They want to eliminate our bi-cameral, U.S. Congress and install a single chamber modeled after the Soviet Duma.

What does statehood for the District of Columbia have to do with the environment? What does an inheritance tax, equities trading tax, currencies trading tax, and a 100% income tax have to do with the environment? What does the mandatory break up of the 500 largest American Corporation, and 200 largest American banks have to do with the environment? What does the unilateral disarmament of the United States, gun confiscation have to do with the environment? What does universal health care, jobs for all, and lifelong public education have to do with the environment? Nothing – which is exactly what the Green Party has to do with the environment. These points are all part of the Green program. The Green Party is not interested in the preserving the environment. The Green Party’s interest is installing a Socialist model of government in the United States, be it of the Soviet or Third Reich variety.

The Green Party has recycle the Nazi political program and called it Green. Hitler’s political program included these points:

• The first duty of a citizen is to work for the common good.

• We demand that the State take over large businesses.

• We demand profit sharing in large concerns.

• We demand land reform.

• We demand a ruthless struggle against profiteers.

• We demand our whole system of education be revised.

• State must provide for the improvement of public health.

The Green Party’s symbol, a sunflower, is not original. The Nazis used sunflowers as a symbol of honor. Nazis planted sunflowers on soldiers’ graves as a memorial to their fallen dead.

Hitler gave the German people a new god – the soil of the mother country.

“I address myself to all those, who detached from their mother country…now, with poignant emotion, long for the hour which will permit them to return to the heart of their faithful mother.” – Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf.

The Greens new god is the earth, a living organism, Gaia. They simply enlarged Hitler’s god from the nation to the planet.

“No compromise in defense of Mother Earth” – Green slogan.

Hitler blamed the Jewish people for Germany’s problems. The Greens blame Americans, corporations and capitalism for environmental problems. Hitler and his band of Nazis lied to the German people in order to get the nation to try out his socialist ideas. In so doing, they destroyed Germany and left their exalted mother in ruins. The German people did not have the historical example of the Holocaust to refer to as we do. Hitler lied to the German people and the Greens are lying to the American people. In their arrogance, the Greens are betting that Americans are gullible enough to surrender their liberty in order to protect the environment.

A German monk named Martin Luther sparked the Protestant reformation when posted his 95 theses on the door of Castle Church in Wittenberg on October 31, 1517. In 1520, Luther authored “Address to the Christian Nobility of the German Nation.” The German people were not ignorant of God’s Commandments and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. America was founded as a Christian nation, upon Christian principles. Reading the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, the Northwest Ordinance and any of the Founding Father’s personal writings, would dispel any doubt. Both countries have a rich Christian history. Why did Hitler succeed in Germany? An apathetic church stood by and let him.

The Creator of Heaven and Earth has already given the answer, it is up to Americans to take a stand.

“What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” - Ecclesiastes 1:9.

“We don’t get fooled again.” – The Who.

3 Responses to “Green Nazis and Green Commies”

  1. Laura Bush Says:
    January 27th, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    Wow, you are truly a dumbass.

  2. Dick Cheney Says:
    January 29th, 2007 at 9:38 am

    what do big corporations have to do with the environment? Dunno, if there’s one word that sums it all up, oh yeah: pollution. You neo-cons are running out of steam, thank god for the rest of us…

  3. shifthappens Says:
    January 30th, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    It is not about control and it is not about blame, it is about accountability. Something truly lacking in the US these days as you help accentuate. Were the nazis and communists set up to be accountable to the electorate?…

    Cao: I’m not sure what that means, but I have a clear idea of where the peacenik environmentalist movement comes from and it’s not from capitalism.

    Here we have the socialist party with an article on their website entitled “How Capitalism Puts Our Planet At Risk”.

    socialistpartyhowcapitalismputsourplanetatrisk.JPG

    Just to set the records straight for one who openly degresses women, lives in fear of any other culture and glorifies violence as political extremism and nationalism (oh wait, that is what communism and facism/nazism did). Read your political science books over. USA! rarararara

    Cao: Yeah, typical that you would call us an antiquated patriarchal society, what you’ve conveniently left out is that we place women on pedastal; that women are to be revered and protected, which is not true in your alternative universe of ‘equality’. The terms you use have a different meaning in your world than in mine. As far as living in fear of other cultures, we welcome people of all cultures, but expect them to assimilate and be a part of the whole instead of remain separate with their separate cultural identities. It is a matter of the salad bowl mentality, where you strive to keep everyone separate instead of the ‘melting pot’. Instead of striving to emphasize the things we have in common, you strive to emphasize our differences.

    The Green Party - Ten Key Values

    1. GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY
    Every human being deserves a say in the decisions that affect their lives and not be subject to the will of another. Therefore, we will work to increase public participation at every level of government and to ensure that our public representatives are fully accountable to the people who elect them. We will also work to create new types of political organizations which expand the process of participatory democracy by directly including citizens in the decision-making process.

    Cao: This is talking about ‘a deep democracy’ when in fact, our political system started out as a republic, which is something we’re trying to preserve. Conservatives are about CONSERVING, not destroying; yet you’re working to destroy the beautiful system that our founders set up. Yes, it would do you some good to go back to some of the original texts of our founding documents.

    2. SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY

    All persons should have the rights and opportunity to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment. We must consciously confront in ourselves, our organizations, and society at large, barriers such as racism and class oppression, sexism and homophobia, ageism and disability, which act to deny fair treatment and equal justice under the law.

    Cao: Oh, I just love this one. “Social Justice and Equal Opportunity”. See Rockwell’s Anti-Environmentalist Manifesto and Global Warming Theory is Defective, Global Warming: Socialism’s Trojan Horse

    Dr. George Reisman’s magnum opus Capitalism:

    …it should not be surprising to see hordes of former Reds, or of those who otherwise would have become Reds, turning from Marxism and becoming the Greens of the ecology movement. It is the same fundamental philosophy in a different guise, ready as ever to wage war on the freedom and well-being of the individual.

    So who are these former Reds who have converted to Green Socialism? One excellent example is Mikhail Gorbachev. Mr. Gorbachev is now the president of Green Cross International (a non-governmental environmental organization). Among the many issues with which Green Cross International has become involved, global warming is right at the top of its list. Gosh, when Mikhail Gorbachev, Ronald Reagan, and Margaret Thatcher became so chummy in the mid-1980s, I never once heard the Soviet dictator express concern about the environment. Clearly, Mr. Gorbachev has identified environmentalism as a Trojan horse capable of resurrecting socialism on a global scale

    How can I say that about Mikhail Gorbachev? Didn’t he bring glasnost (freedom of speech) and perestroika (economic and political reforms) to the Soviet Union? Indeed he did. Yet, these were means to his end of trying to save Soviet Communism and, therefore, to save his absolute and unspeakable power (that brought human misery to millions).

    3. ECOLOGICAL WISDOM

    Human societies must operate with the understanding that we are part of nature, not separate from nature. We must maintain an ecological balance and live within the ecological and resource limits of our communities and our planet. We support a sustainable society which utilizes resources in such a way that future generations will benefit and not suffer from the practices of our generation. To this end we must practice agriculture which replenishes the soil; move to an energy efficient economy; and live in ways that respect the integrity of natural systems.

    Cao: This is interesting, too, on its face, when you consider that Bin Laden, Ghorbachov and Muammar Al Qadhafi all subscribe to greening of the world. You think it’s because they CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT? We must practice agriculture which replenishes the soil (we don’t?); move to an energy efficient economy; this means, of course, that we’re not allowed to use any energy. Examples? Hydropower, nuclear power and windmills! Damns are mean to fish! Windmills are mean to birds! They make it more difficult for us to drive our vehicles, cut our grass and do anything with motorized vehicles, and eliminate hunting and fishing. What they’re really striving for us for us NOT TO TOUCH ANY NATURAL RESOURCES. That’s a little bit different than ‘future generations will benefit’. What “benefit” can we have from our natural resources if we’re not allowed to use them because of green fearmongers?

    Are there other examples of socialists that have come to embrace environmentalism? Indeed, there is an environmentalist in power today. Libya’s dictator, Muammar Al Qadhafi is an unabashed Green Socialist (I prefer to call him a Green Communist). In fact, Qadhafi has written a book that many Greens believe is the manifesto for Green Socialism. This book is titled The Green Book (it is a three volume set). I have read all three volumes and each one was quite disturbing. In this book, he talks about capitalist exploitation, money, profits, plants, animals, people, and families: all in a manner that ring familiar with the dogma chanted by such groups as Greenpeace, PETA, Earth First!, among others. The following points highlight several of Colonel Qadhafi’s views as conveyed by The Green Book:

    * Under capitalism, wage workers are slaves.
    * Land is no one’s property. But everyone has the right to use it.
    * The only thing a man really owns are his own needs. It is up to a socialist society to provide for such needs (i.e. food, clothing, shelter, and transportation).
    * Upon the overturning of capitalist societies (via revolution), money and profit will disappear.
    * Collective needs, rights, demands, and objectives of a nation are bound by a single nationalism. Nationalism in the world of man, and group instinct in the animal kingdom, are like gravity in the domain of mineral and celestial bodies. Nations whose nationalism is destroyed are subject to ruin.
    * The family is exactly like an individual plant in nature which is composed of branches, leaves, and blossoms. If human society reached the stage where man existed without a family, it would become a society of tramps, without roots, like artificial plants.
    * All living creatures are created free and any interference with that freedom is coercion.

    First and foremost, Qadhafi is an anti-capitalist as reflected in the first four points. Without question, he has adopted Marx’s views about capitalism’s alleged exploitation of workers and Marx’s loathing of money. Secondly, as shown by the last three points, he has melded National Socialism into his brand of communism (which I call Green Communism). Much like Hitler viewed Germany as an organic whole (i.e. made up of people, plants, animals, natural resources, etc.), Qadhafi views Libya as a collective organism with a “life” of its own. Naturally, global warming poses a threat to Libya’s “life”.

    4. NON-VIOLENCE

    It is essential that we develop effective alternatives to society’s current patterns of violence. We will work to demilitarize, and eliminate weapons of mass destruction, without being naive about the intentions of other governments.

    We recognize the need for self-defense and the defense of others who are in helpless situations. We promote non-violent methods to oppose practices and policies with which we disagree, and will guide our actions toward lasting personal, community and global peace.

    Cao: Typical peace bullcrap. There are certain situations where violence is absolutely necessary. By taking away our arms, you’re leaving us helpless at the ‘mercy’ of totalitarianism. And we all know what that means.

    5. DECENTRALIZATION

    Centralization of wealth and power contributes to social and economic injustice, environmental destruction, and militarization. Therefore, we support a restructuring of social, political and economic institutions away from a system which is controlled by and mostly benefits the powerful few, to a democratic, less bureaucratic system. Decision-making should, as much as possible, remain at the individual and local level, while assuring that civil rights are protected for all citizens.

    Cao: Decentralization is kind of an interesting concept. Social and economic injustice, environmental destruction, and militarization. So this would be one of the reasons why environmentalists stick their noses into the war, when it has little to do with environmentalism. You didn’t seem to care about the environment when Saddam was using cropdusters to kill the kurds with chemicals, so this is kind of an odd things to talk about. “Less bureaucracy”? You’re talking about MORE bureaucracy, tying us up in bureacracy in order to stop industry, which provides jobs and promotes a free economy. But illiteracy on economics and free markets is a prerequisite for environmentalists.

    6. COMMUNITY-BASED ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE

    We recognize it is essential to create a vibrant and sustainable economic system, one that can create jobs and provide a decent standard of living for all people while maintaining a healthy ecological balance. A successful economic system will offer meaningful work with dignity, while paying a “living wage” which reflects the real value of a person’s work.

    Local communities must look to economic development that assures protection of the environment and workers’ rights; broad citizen participation in planning; and enhancement of our “quality of life”. We support independently owned and operated companies which are socially responsible, as well as co-operatives and public enterprises that distribute resources and control to more people through democratic participation.

    Cao: Already covered. You want no economic justice; you want to destroy our economic system in favor of one that has been proven repeatedly throughout history to be a dismal failure.

    7. FEMINISM AND GENDER EQUITY

    We have inherited a social system based on male domination of politics and economics. We call for the replacement of the cultural ethics of domination and control with more cooperative ways of interacting that respect differences of opinion and gender. Human values such as equity between the sexes, interpersonal responsibility, and honesty must be developed with moral conscience. We should remember that the process that determines our decisions and actions is just as important as achieving the outcome we want.

    Cao: Now why would this have anything to do with environmentalism? Except to attract more victims to the cause? This is one of the reasons there are so many societal rejects who belong to this movement; environmentalism attracts them.

    Just to give you an additional “taste” of how bizarre Qadhafi’s book is, here is a biocentric excerpt from volume three of The Green Book:

    To dispense with the natural role of woman in maternity – i.e. nurseries replacing mothers – is a start in dispensing with the human society and transforming it into a biological society with an artificial way of life. To separate children from their mothers and to cram them into nurseries is a process by which they are transformed into something very close to chicks, for nurseries are similar to poultry farms in which chicks are crammed after they are hatched. Nothing else would be appropriate for man’s nature, and would suit his dignity, except natural motherhood, (i.e. the child is raised by his mother…) + in a family where the true principles of motherhood, fatherhood, and brotherhood prevail, + rather than in a center similar to a poultry breeding farm. Poultry, like the rest of the members of the animal kingdom, needs motherhood as a natural phase. Therefore, breeding them on farms similar to nurseries is against their natural growth. Even their meat is closer to synthetic meat than natural meat. Meat from mechanized poultry farms is not tasty and may not be nourishing because the chicks are not naturally bred, i.e. they are not raised in the protective shade of natural motherhood. The meat of wild birds is more tasty and nourishing because they grow naturally and are naturally fed. As for children who have neither family nor shelter, society is their guardian, only for them should society establish nurseries and the like. It is better for those to be taken care of by society rather than by individuals who are not their parents.

    Obviously, Qadhafi is taking a stab at nurseries and daycares which are now prevalent in capitalist societies. The comparison of children to chickens must warm the hearts of animal rights activists (this is biocentrism at its best). For Libya to remain a strong collective organism, nothing less than free-range children will do. This is truly bizarre stuff.

    8. RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY

    We believe it is important to value cultural, ethnic, racial, sexual, religious and spiritual diversity, and to promote the development of respectful relationships across these lines. We believe that the many diverse elements of society should be reflected in our organizations and decision-making bodies, and we support the leadership of people who have been traditionally closed out of leadership roles. We acknowledge and encourage respect for other life forms than our own and the preservation of biodiversity.

    Cao: More Red Than Green

    ….targeting those who feel dissatisfied with their lives and, in this country of abundance and unlimited opportunities, feel as if they never will have enough simply because others have too much. He [Nader] is appealing to those who feel discriminated against because of “race, gender, tribal status, class, disability or sexual preference” — basically anyone who wants to have a “pity party” can fit neatly into one of Nader’s oppressed groups.

    Nader compares those in his “movement” to the revolutionaries who fought King George III, to antislavery drives, to women suffrage movements, to the farmers’ revolt of 1887 against the large banks and railroads.

    He says that all of these movements took on “excessive power” and then “pressed for the relinquishment or sharing of that power.” However, power sharing never has been one of Nader’s fortes. In 1984, Dan Burt detailed some of Nader’s authoritarian practices in his book, “Abuse of Trust: A Report on Ralph Nader’s Network.” Burt wrote that, of the 19 groups associated with Nader, the most important and powerful are all directly controlled by Nader himself and that there is nothing democratic about them.

    At some point we should address Michael Moore’s green ideology. And these aren’t people ‘on the fringe’, these are people who have declared themselves as members of the Green Party, so get a clue and find out about these people and what they’re actually striving for.

    9. PERSONAL AND GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY

    We encourage individuals to act to improve their personal well-being and, at the same time, to enhance ecological balance and social harmony. We seek to join with people and organizations around the world to foster peace, economic justice, and the health of the planet.

    Cao: Global responsibility? This is one of the reasons why you and the United Nations are perfect for each other. The environmentalists honestly think they’re promoting ‘ecological balance and social harmony’? This is a laugh.

    10. FUTURE FOCUS AND SUSTAINABILITY

    Our actions and policies should be motivated by long-term goals. We seek to protect valuable natural resources, safely disposing of or “unmaking” all waste we create, while developing a sustainable economics that does not depend on continual expansion for survival. We must counterbalance the drive for short-term profits by assuring that economic development, new technologies, and fiscal policies are responsible to future generations who will inherit the results of our actions.

    Cao: Ha! Already covered, this is a bunch of hooey, too. “unmaking’ all waste created…this means stopping industrial progress, and going back to living in teepees.

    QUALITY OF LIFE
    Our overall goal is not merely to survive, but to share lives that are truly worth living. We believe the quality of our individual lives is enriched by the quality of all of our lives. We encourage everyone to see the dignity and intrinsic worth in all of life, and to take the time to understand and appreciate themselves, their community and the magnificent beauty of this world.

    Cao: Greens care more about the quality of life for a suckerfish than they do for starving people. This has evidenced itself time and again when Greens warn starving people of the dangers lurking in the food that is sent to them. That is one of the reasons why millions of people are dying of malaria; because of “Silent Spring”’s disaster. And Greens are not even able to face up to the disasters of the past, so why should we trust what they have to say about the mythical threat of ‘global warming’ or anything else?

    I’m going to make this a post, I think.

Leave a Reply