Huh. The WaPo is talking about the IPCC report, which to me seems very odd. The IPCC report is actually a series of conclusions and recommendations which do not supply any data for scientists to review. In fact, it follows the religious dogma of leftists in their puff pieces on politicians, the war in the Middle East, and issues like global warming: first, decide your conclusion. Next, back all evidence into it that fits, or manufacture evidence that fits, and then throw away *or ignore* the rest. In the religious dogma of the leftist, censorship is paramount. This reminds me of the nazi propaganda of the 30’s.

Which reminds me; before I move on to talk about the environmentalist’s touting the generalizations made in the conclusions that were ‘likely’ in the IPCC report, you should take a look at how Switzerland is killing off its mental patients over at Raven’s. This is another example of how eugenics is incapable of compassion or feeling; and propels and ideology akin to Nazi Germany in the ’30’s. But I see this all as a bigger picture; the Green movement in America, and eugenics is alive and well here in the US killing off our infants and our sick and helpless in a horrible silent holocaust. As much as the leftist communist and socialist organizations will bang on the ’social justice’ drum, they’re not for ‘justice’ at all. Look at the countries who have those ‘utopian’ forms of government; they are rife with corruption, greed and murder. They might have very little crime, but the people have very little freedom. Ok back to the Green wackos and the IPCC report.

Pat Cleary at the Shop Floor does point out that the WaPo suggests at the end of their article that the George Marshall Institute says we should exercise caution about conclusions one might draw from what I would categorize as ‘wondering is not analysis’ in the IPCC report, until we receive the scientific documentation which backs up the conclusions that were just published.

Two important points in Pat’s post at the Shop Floor are:

• The WaPo is now going to make it a policy to mention the funding sources of the groups citing the ’scientific research’.
• And we can look up at Capital.org to see where on the political spectrum 1 being radical environmentalist, and 8 being free market right.

We should probably further make a dilineation and call the 1-8 scale from left to right as Green Environmental Nazis on the 1 scale, and 8-Capitalists for the Disappearing Free Enterprise System.