1/17/2008

global warming and methane gas

By: Cao, Filed under: Environmentalism , General @ 7:09 am

I couldn’t find a lot about this, but after ordering a couple of books, I have more information. My husband and I are both poring over these books to counter the environazi hysteria that’s taken over; even in our office buildings from blind people who are just willing to accept what’s fed to them by the hysterical MSM.

xformed over at The Wide Awakes who’s actually worked in the field of ‘recycling’ and has some familiarity with science, lol, who filled us all in.

So, a couple of scientists (ones who “get it”) (Frank Keppler and Thomas Roeckmann) do some research: “Plants, Methane and Global Warming.” Here’s a summary sidebar quoted (page 54):

Overview/Nature’s Surprise

* The established view [ed - The wackadoos try to tell others what is true in the face of other evidence] has been that methane (natural gas) is produced by microbes that thrive without oxygen, but experiments [ed - the “study” real scientists do] by the authors’ team unexpectedly [ed - sounds like many discoveries of not too arrogant humans] revealed that living plants [ed - not animals, and not humans] also manufacture this potent [ed - that’s a really industrial strength word] greenhouse gas.

There is more to the observations, but you get the point: methane gas isn’t a pollutant, it’s something that’s produced in nature. DUH! Just like CO2; the two of them are produced when vegetation rots, for one thing. And the natural response to that is; vegetation grows because it feeds on those gases. Then xformed asks today’s million dollar question:

If the understanding of plants making methane is a newly acquired knowledge point, how can it be summarily dismissed as having no effect on the “current” conditions?

Because that’s the way it’s done today, that’s how. Because if it doesn’t fit into their preconceived notion, you just throw out that data.

Like the El Nino effect, the Sun, and any other effect on temperatures that ruin the dramatic claim that we’re causing ‘warming’. They had to inflate man’s contribution to ‘warming’ in order to compel us to take action, and they did so by manipulating the models and the math. Remember those? Thrown into the memory hole, along with the middle ages temperatures which screwed up their hockey stick.

And if all that doesn’t give you pause about this laughable idea, there’s this at the end of xformed’s post at TWA “Well Isn’t This Interesting?“:

Dateline 2/13/2007, Washington, DC: HOUSE HEARING ON ‘WARMING OF THE PLANET’ CANCELED AFTER SNOW/ICE STORM (H/T: Drudge Report)

You just can’t make this stuff up.

Leave a Reply