6/2/2007
meaty bugger off
Stop sending me stuff, I have better things to do in my life than entertain notions of lavendar fantasy from leftyworld in your mother’s basement.
A classic example of a negative attention seeker who’s excited that someone has paid attention to him! Meaty, I’ve given you more today than I’ve given you in the past year or more, so count your blessings and beat it.
PS: The UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF VALERIE WILSON’S CIA EMPLOYMENT AND COVER HISTORY is the 3 page Summary, [not the pdf itself, but it’s in the pdf]. So my comment about “a document he claims is ‘unclassified’ that isn’t dated” is still true, despite your spinning. The pdf is not what was unclassified, it was the Summary. Sorry that you have trouble grappling with details. Those 3 pages are apart from Plame’s testimony which he quotes from in the rest of the 30-page document, as I’ve already said. The Summary and the Referral are what Fitgerald is playing a shell game with, which Al Johnson clearly spells out in his piece at the American Thinker. The Unclassified Summary is undated. Is there any way that I can spell this out more clearly other than draw a picture for you? Sheesh, what a maroon.
PPS: I know you’re not going anywhere. But I don’t have to respond to you, even when the Huffington Post is linking to me. 
June 2nd, 2007 at 6:12 pm
This is on Caos blog because Meathead is too much of a coward to let it be seen on his.
I have a question, Pal Meatybites, if this is in the custody of Fitzgerald, what other documents did he withhold from the defence in discovery? What other documents did he say he did not have when the case went to trial?
Why was the defence not shown these at the trial?
And to this day there has been not one shred of proof of any shape or size that says that ANYONE “leaked” her name, including Armitage who ADMITTED IT…the trial was a farce.
This is like that farcical ’sealed vs sealed” which the DUmpmonkeys believed was the “indictment”…that never was…add to that the Truthout LIE that Karl Rove had been indicted (he hadn’t been and never will be, and you have..nothing.
What you have is a political witch hunt which has yielded zero results and zero proof..and if he had hard evidence, why wasn’t it used AT the trial?
So what we have, rump chops with garlic, is a whole lotta nothing.
God, you’re getting desperate. In all these years there has not been one shred of proof of any kind of wrongdoing by the Bush administration.Had there been, do you think for one minute that the supposed majority who hate him would hesitate to use it???
Wake up and smell the coffee, Meathead, what you have are a slew of allegations, and no hard proof of any kind.
To use an Aussie phrase, put up…or SHUT UP.