8/3/2007
The Nazis were not Right-Wing Conservative Creationists: they were Left-Wing Darwinian Evolutionary Socialists

So let’s call a spade a spade, shall we?
Every now and then I piece more history together that is relevant to today. My most recent discovery is the Pink Swastika. I downloaded it, and I’m about half-way through. I would suggest that you check it out -or get an abbreviated introduction to it through Dr. Judith Reisman here.
From Page 10:
It must be clarified-The Nazis were not Right-Wing Conservative Creationists: they were Left-Wing Darwinian Evolutionary Socialists.
The idiots who come here calling me names for my views should read that sentence over a couple of times. It is the leftwing ideologues who are spouting the Nazi rhetoric…there are no similarities between Christian Creationist Capitalists and Left-wing Evolutionary Socialists.
What are the similarities between Nazi Germany and America today? Euthanasia, abortion, special rules for different groups (racism or ‘affirmative action’), and support for homosexuality.
p.15:
American civilization rests on the basic principles of Christian morality, which have their origin in the Hebrew scriptures. The reason why the Nazis first attacked the Jewish people and swore to exterminate them physically and spiritually is because the teachings of the bible, both the Torah and the New Testament, represent the foundations on which the whole system of Christian ethics rests. Remove the Bible as the constellation that guides the American Ship of State and the whole edifice of American civilization collapses.
What is the most important part of this? That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.
p. 21: At our founding we were the only nation, among many autocratically-governed states, which truly offered and guaranteed freedom of thought and expression. Our founding fathers attempted to write our inestimably precious freedoms in stone because they foresaw (indeed, it was gong on even then) that there would be an incessant drift back to the power-in-the-hands-of-a-few school of thought. How far have we drifted today, and what does this mean for the behavioral fringe groups of our society (just as the Nazis were a behavioral fringe group of theirs), who feel compelled to re-shape American hearts and minds to resemble their own?
Very good question. This is about authoritarianism, of that there can be no doubt; the people like Cindy Sheehan, who have no problem talking about throwing all the right-wingers in jail. Ideologically speaking, she’s not that far away from her Nazi brothers, or the Islamofascists of the Bin Laden variety. There are some odd parallels with that thinking here, too…the idea of -women are for breeding, men are for pleasure’.
History discloses that most war like nations are those whose male leaders were the most addicted to sexual relations with young boys. (p.11).
What is spelled out in the book is a horrifying detailed account of the homosexuals in Hitler’s inner circle, and charges that Hitler was in fact a male prostitute early in his bohemian artist career. The Nazis did, in fact, meet in a gay bar….
The political agenda which has as its focus a plan to legalize and coerce a bewildered and unsuspecting public into accepting or regarding sodomy as normal or dignified, is based on falsehood, self-deception, and skewed scientific research.
That would be the Kinsey research that began our ’sexual revolution’. Kinsey was a pervert who circumcized himself in a bathtub with a pocketknife. He was a sadomasochist who performed experiments on children that had them screaming and fainting, and which he took down in notes as ‘pleasure.’ One of the infants was only 2 months old.
In light of the medical record, history and the fact that sodomy represents a corruption of the natural and moral orders of creation, any positive affirmation of homosexuality is totally without merit. Human sexuality is never merely a physical concern, nor is it a purely private matter. It always has social implications. What goes on between partners influences society as a whole. In sexual matters, the issue is “what is advocated and what is practiced publicly” far more than what happens privately.(p.11).
It’s spelled out in the book what the ramifications were - one interesting point that was brought out was two homosexual factions - the ‘butch’ faction and the ‘fem’ faction. The “Butch” homosexuals were those that engaged in pederasty and found positions in the SS, and in the Hitler Youth where they found opportunities to sodomize young boys.
As they were during the Weimar period, 1918-1933, psychiatry and academia have been hijacked and pressed into the service of establishing homosexualism as the basis of a new Kultur. Professor Hans Blueher, a practicing physician whose specialty was psychiatry, was accepted by the Nazis as the apostle and higher authority of a new social order. Blueher’s school held that male homosexual lovemaking is in itself a good thing and spiritually energizing. Blueher’s teaching became popular in Nazi circles during the period between the two World Wars and promoted the idea that a well-regulated ritual of homosexualism was a unique force capable of creating the State and assuring its leadership. The resulting creed relegated women to a purely biological function and eliminated the family as a constituent cell in the community.
This is also a marxist philosophy; where the family unit is broken down, the government raises the children, women are passed around like a 6-pack of beer, and the sexes no longer trust one another. You can see that happening across the country today; one example is the much publicized case between Alec Baldwin and his ex-wife, Kim Bassinger-and the much publicized example of parental alienation.
In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association was also hijacked by American “gay” activists. Basing its decision largely on the skewed evidence of the 1948 Kinsey report Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, the APA removed homosexuality from its Diagnostic and Statistics Manual and declared it a normal variant of human sexuality. Homosexuals, sensing that the burden of change had been lifted form them and shifted onto society, were able to present themselves as innocent victims of what they referred to as society’s bigoted and “homophobic” attitudes towards them as persons.
Which is disingenuous mudslinging. But it has the effect that they’re looking for-silencing any opposition.
Columnist Charles Krauthammer, in Defining Deviancy Up,” an essay published in the November 22, 1993 edition of the New Republic (pages 20ff), in describing the real effect of the APA decision, stated that a majority of society was made deviant while homosexuality was elevated to the status of normal. Krauthammer writes, “as part of the vast social project of moral levelling, it is not enough for the deviant to be normalized. The normal must be found to be deviant.” In fact, the greatest single victory of the “gay” agenda over the past decade has been to shift the debate from behavior to identity, thus forcing opponents into a position where they are seen as attacking the civil rights of homosexual citizens rather than attacking specific antisocial behavior.
Taking it off the list of psychiatric disorders, not because of new science, but for political reasons, changed the scope of the public debate.
Victim-plunder ideology is at the core of “gay political strategy. Homosexualists exploit the public status of homosexuals to impose their new definition of human sexuality upon society. “Victim ideology” and “reductionist” thinking is destroying America from within. Today’s new victims see no reason to modify their own behavior. Victim psychology and philosophies undermine the legitimate workings of government and justice, health and social systems. Like their Nazi predecessors, today’s homosexualists lack any scruples. Homosexuality is primarly a predatory addiction striving to take the weak and unsuspecting down with it. The “gay” agenda is a colossal fraud’ a gigantic robbery of the mind. Homosexuals of the type described in this book have no true idea of how to act in the best interests of their country and fellow man. Their intention is to serve none but themselves.
As Keyes said, it’s ’selfish hedonism’.
The Storm Troopers and the Gestapo were schooled in what the authors call the “Hellenistic” Greek ideal of man-youth pedagogy. Concerned about the man-boy aspect of homosexuality, the Pink Swastika connects-the-dots for readers from the homosexual power structure in Germany to the current social debate in the United States. The naked, copulatory San Francisco “gay rights” parades, the violent homosexual burning of buildings when Governor Pete Wilson originally refused gay minority rights, the bullying attcks on Cardinal O’Conner and former HHS Secretary Louis Sullivan and scores of others, note the authors, are a replay of the homoerotic Nazis. (Reisman, p. 9)
All heady, but fascinating reading. The book version of the Pink Swastika shows some pictures of Hitler and his ‘band of merry men’.
We’re also reminded not only of the relatively well-known-Goering dressing up in drag and wearing camp makeup, but of others, such as Karl Fischer (a homosexual teacher) who began the Wandervogel (a German version of the boy scouts), which became the Hitler Youth in 1933, and another pederast, Hans Bluher, who wrote of man-boy love, the predecessor of today’s American NAMBLA - the North American Man-Boy Love Association.










August 3rd, 2007 at 9:39 pm
Pleeeese:
Provide sources for your research other than Jews!
Reisman, Kinsey (of who you at least recognize bias), “The Pink Swastika”(wholly a Jewish production): Dr. Howard Hurwitz,Stan Goodenough, Dr. Mordechai Nisan, and Norman Saville.
Gentile, non-Zionist sources please!
August 4th, 2007 at 5:20 am
How interesting…someone comes here and starts railing against the evil joooos.
That fits right in with the Nazi ideology and you don’t even try to conceal it!
Sorry, if you don’t like the source material, lol…but if you’re going to attack them for their race, then I think the point has been made.
Which part needs further documentation? You left that out by attacking the validity of the whole thing because the sources are Jews. But you have Jews on your side that are anti-semitic…but those don’t count, I guess…Karl Marx in fact was a Jew. Then there are Alex Cockburn, Norman Finkelstein, Gilad Atzmon, and numerous others…
Guess it depends on what is coming out of their mouths or pens as to whether or not you’ll listen, heh?
August 4th, 2007 at 12:46 pm
This sounds like a very interesting book. Notice if we say anything like, “Homosexuals are responsible for the spread of AIDS by their own behavior,” we are considered homophobic? Okay. Call me names, but how is it that AIDS is on the rise again in one area of life? Hmm.
Nice smack down.
August 13th, 2007 at 12:29 am
Hitler didn’t care much for social democrats and liberals much either… he GASSED them.
August 13th, 2007 at 12:30 am
Right-wing Authoritarianism:
Right-wing Authoritarianism (RWA) is a psychological personality variable or “ideological attitude”.
It is defined as the convergence of three attitudinal clusters in an individual:
Authoritarian submission — a high degree of submission to the authorities who are perceived to be established and legitimate in the society in which one lives. “It is good to have a strong authoritarian leader.”
Authoritarian aggression — a general aggressiveness, directed against various persons, that is perceived to be sanctioned by established authorities. “It is acceptable to be cruel to those who do not follow the rules.”
Conventionalism — a high degree of adherence to the social conventions that are perceived to be endorsed by society and its established authorities. “Traditional ways are best.”
High scorers on the RWA scale (High RWAs) tend to have a rigid, often fundamentally religious, view of morality tending toward anti-homosexual, racist and patriarchal beliefs. High RWA scorers tend to support authority figures, such as the government, taking action to censor certain social groups — often those they view as physically or morally threatening.
It is not an ideological measure, but a social psychological one that, in spite of its name, is not necessarily associated with right-wing political views. The nature of the RWA scale leads to predictions that High RWAs will tend to support the current political authority, regardless of the ideology expounded by those in power. For example, it was predicted, and confirmed that in the old Soviet Union, high RWAs were supporters of the Communist Party because it represented the established authority even though it would be described as a left wing Party. (The Authoritarian Specter)
August 13th, 2007 at 4:15 am
Heh. Where’d you get that…from one of our liberal indoctrination centers? LOL
Hitler gassed the Jews–buthe also killed his perceived enemies…including some of his own, like Captain Ernst Röhm.. During the Night of the Long Knives. He got rid of people who were plotting to kill him, and also went after their family members.
But none of this is relevant to you, because you’re still trying to allege that the socialist ideology has something to do with the ‘rightwing’…lol
Which it doesn’t, unless you’re a communist then it’s slightly to the right of you. The KKK was an arm of the democratic party - Robert Byrd, a former member of the Klan, is a Senator. But why bother with trivial details when you’re trying to broadbrush Republicans as ‘authoritarians’? There is nothing ‘authoritarian’ about capitalism.
Again; Hitler was a Darwinian Evolutionary Socialist - not a Creationist Republican Capitalist.
Hitler got rid of the Weimar Republic, much like the democrats are trying to get rid of ours, today…by legislating their constitution out of existence, taking rights away from ordinary citizens, and encouraging gang violence so that people are afraid to walk the streets.
Examples: Your Black Muslim Bakery, “Amnesty” for Illegals where they say DEATH TO THE MINUTEKLAN - and push Minutemen in front of moving cars, and smash their cameras, flatten tires and destroy their property–
I even had a lefty here say that Republicans must die.
Sorry, you people are vicious - just like Nazi stormtroopers…which fits into what Hillary Clinton wrote in her senior thesis at Yale (one of the most glaring examples)…In 1969 she wrote her 92-page senior thesis on the theories of radical Chicago organizer Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals (1971) and Reveille for Radicals (1947). Substantial portions of Hillary Clinton’s 1969 senior thesis are about the benefits of “test(ing) whether the mechanisms of (Chicago) gang structures could not assist in shifting attitudes toward productive adult citizenship.” (p. 34.) Hillary’s mentor, Saul Alinsky, spent years working with Al Capone’s Chicago gang.
During her years as First lady, she told Newsweek that she treasured the 1966 article “Change or Containment”, by Marxist/Maoist theoretician Carl Oglesby, which defended Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro and Maoist tactics of violence.
It’s pretty funny that you people try to show yourselves as victims of the evil republicans…even the *** movement can be traced to Nazi Fascism…but the violence that leftists today are using against our free speech shows us that you’re simply employing fascist tactics like those of the Nazi stormtroopers.