Pat Schroeder, who ramrodded through some feminist crap after Tailhook, is busy making sure we have fresh new revisions of text books in schools these days. She’s hailing back to the days of the socialist nazis.

She is now a member of a trade organization (union, anyone?) - calling itself “The American Association of Publishers”, which lobbied before congress in 2004 to make sure that ‘updated’ - read ‘revised’ - read ‘revisionist’-freshly pumped with more propaganda text books are fed to our nation’s schools as the ‘most current’ available.

I’m not sure where the poll came from, what size the sampling was of people polled, or what their political persuasion was, but it was interesting to read at Newsmax that Pat Schroeder came out and announced that Liberals read more books than Conservatives do.

That practically made me laugh out loud, as I recall that Ann Coulter had said-”Liberals don’t read books – they don’t read anything,” she said. “That’s why they’re liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges.” I would call that EMOTIONS. They base a lot of their decisionmaking in Congress as a result of EMOTIONS, which is the precise reason why Pat Shroeder’s caterwauling after tailhook gained some traction. She used the inverted rhetoric that sexual harrassment at tailhook was unacceptable, so the only way to prove women are equal to men is to expose them to combat. So…as long as a woman is being raped by the enemy, it’s perfectly okay.

In fact, the only part about the conflict in the Middle East that liberals are in support of is women abandoning their traditional role- wife and mother-in order to take an active role in our nation’s defense, which has morphed into little more than social workers on the streets of Iraq. God forbid anyone should try to kill a terrorist…that’s ‘inhumane’, according to libs. Turning a nurturer into a killer is what Schroeder has been a part of - the social engineering that has brought us new ‘heroes’ of a sort - the ones who are against spousal abuse directed at women; the feminist kind which doesn’t want us to value the role of a mother raising her children; instead, let the state do it. Because after all, as Hillary has said, ‘it takes a village’. Right?

The liberal media spews headlines that liberals swallow up because they don’t read books. They’re not all that bright; which also punctuates the point that you have to be dumbed down to accept socialism, and Schroeder is actively working for it, as are other people who seem to be missing a few brain cells, like Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, and the tank humping Jane Fonda of yesteryear.

I have piles and piles of books here, which tell all kinds of interesting stories that will never hit the airwaves, and I oftentimes talk about them, refer to them and even quote them here. Being well-read means being well-versed on all sorts of topics, so when those wet-behind-the-ears- journalism students decide to pull the wool over my eyes, I’m not all that willing to a) fall for it, or b) think of it as journalism. Today, it’s partisanship that seems to matter in writing–particularly out of the media, which is why I probably do more reading than the average Hillary Clinton-Barack Obama loving citizen.

And by the way, Feminism has lost their war. Feminists like Schroeder, for all their shrill talk about society and it’s lack of progress, -that society is discriminatory against women, that attitudes and behaviors are societal constructs, science has proven otherwise.

The differences between men and women are not social constructs-they are the product of biological differences. No amount of government intervention is going to change that. No amount of government intervention is going to create the feminist utopia, and government is a poor replacement for a sugardaddy. If gender differences are natural, then the feminist idea of progress isn’t progress at all. The feminist agenda makes men and women worse off by driving them away from their biological preferences in pursuit of a fantasy that will never be reached.

And people like Schroeder are pushing for it to go further down the tubes than it has already.