1/4/2008

is Terry Bisson lying?

By: Cao, Filed under: Blogosphere , General , moonbat hysteria @ 1:27 pm

I’m honored because in the tradition of David Horowitz, I am responding to an onslaught of lies from a socialist moonbat. Meatbrain is not only a socialist, he is a STUPID socialist (but those two words are redundant). He is living proof that Amerikka has been dumbed down sufficiently enough for socialism–if he’s the litmus test. Luckily, he’s not–because he lives in the science fiction world where he fantasizes about being William Shatner, but-to qualify:

The only thing that seems to be confirmed here besides tired retreads of the same old slogans (all meathead’s opponents are stupid, and only meathead has the keys to unlock the truth)-is meaty’s identity. After a deafening silence in the blogosphere about the charge of his being Terry Bisson’s lookalike the limp-wristed socialist sci-fi writer, and associate of Kathryn Cramer and David Hartwell- while mumbling to himself, drinking Mountain Dew and searching for the Jergens, he put up a lukewarm troll-like baiting negative attention seeking example of how much of a moron he is, with the withering claim that he’s about to ’set me straight’. bwahahahaha! He may or may not be Bisson’s lookalike, but he is definitely a socialist moonbat.

So I will answer it now, particularly the part about the copyright agreement. The agreement is plain and in full view-in my left hand side bar on the hard-nosed theme- along with the link, which he didn’t bother to read because he’s so sanctimonious about his elitist superiority complex, he doesn’t need to know anything! SHOCKA!~ Just like the rest of his ilk!

This is the dumb leftard’s excuse for a response to my post here. So below, I have his comments to me in bold, my original post is in regular font, and my new comments are in red. I’m using Bisson’s lookalike pic here for when meathead talks.

——————————————————————-

snaggletooth3.jpg
Setting Cao straight
- by Terry Bisson’s lookalike

The title of this post is wishful thinking. It’s clear that there is no way in hell that anyone could ever set Cao straight.

cao2.jpgthat depends on your definition of ’straight’, lol. and …i hate to tell you, terry (or whatever your name is), but -you’re so full of $–t, your eyes are brown. And your teeth are brown, too, you really ought to buy a toothbrush.

snaggletooth3.jpgBut it is always fun to poke her with the facts and watch her squeal.

cao2.jpgyou’re mistaking the reverberation of your phacochoerus aethiopicus-like squeals against the idiotarian walls of thinkingmeat.net. for something else. and facts? bwahahahaha! give me a break! sheesh! the term “communist pig” was coined for a reason, LOL!

snaggletooth3.jpgSo let’ s have look at her latest bucket of offal:

cao2.jpghe embarrasses himself, but he is fully exemplifying evan sayet’s description of ‘how the modern liberal thinks’. so with that thought in mind, let’s look at the vomit in his pig trough, but hold your nose when it’s snaggletooth’s turn:

writing.jpgLately I’ve been thinking about Kathryn Cramer, Terry Bisson and his alter ego, Thinking Meat, and this other fellow at Millard Fillmore’s bathtub; they are all so self-involved. They’re very similar to the commies who came swooping in from the Frog Blog back when I first started blogging.

snaggletooth3.jpgNote carefully: Anyone who disagrees with Cao in any way whatsoever is a “commie”. One wonders if Cao ever learned what the term “Communist” really means. When she uses it, it is essentially a content-free all-purpose epithet… like “duh”.

cao2.jpgtalk about ‘duh’! what a devastatingly false and odious thing to write! one wonders if meathead or meathead’s two readers are really that stupid. this idiocy, willful blindness and obfuscation over the word “communism” is typical, because leftists generally don’t dare call things by their real names, particularly amerikkan ones, because in the u.s.-they can’t yet sell it by its brand name.

This stuff is real, these people are real, and for Bisson’s lookalike to make fun of my pointing it out as though it’s a figment of my imagination is worse than disgraceful. But socialists make exceptionally skilled liars, as we’ve seen with Hillary Clinton, etc.

The formula I use to figure out where someone is coming from is called critical thinking. Bisson’s lookalike doesn’t know anything about that, it seems he’s living in a complete vacuum, and views the world only through his socialist-tinted rose-colored glasses.

Where communists are concerned it’s not that hard; they leave some pretty unmistakable clues. Plus, communists love putting up pictures of their protests and to brag about their perceived “wins” in the public square. All you have to do is look for a Code Pink website, pictures and video of International ANSWER’s participation in minuteman protests or anti-war protests, or the the Revolutionary Communist Party anti-war website “The World Can’t Wait-Drive Out the Bush Regime”. It’s usually the same faces, and Indymedia is often there.

But taking it one step further, it’s relatively plain to see using that simple formula, that the democrats of today are repeating the same slogans that actually belong to the aforementioned groups. Just compare the platform the democrats ran on during the last presidential election; their talking points were interchangeable with and indistinguishable from what was being said on the International Socialists website. So it’s easy to draw a conclusion if one looks for answers and has the ability to reason. If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, talks like a duck, etc.., it’s probably a duck. DUH! Does Bisson’s lookalike malign me for using the word “communist” or “communism” because he knows that from China to Laos, Vietnam to the Soviet Union, Afghanistan to Cambodia, history shows that communism doesn’t work? Or that people who’ve survived communist concentration camps have a compelling story about socialism and communism that springs from it? Saddam’s Baathists were socialists, too, Meatbrain’s ideological brethren such as Saddam’s Mukhabarat sure were compassionate to the people they disagreed with when they weren’t engaging in ethnic cleansing!!! Or do his constant attacks come from my relating that Hitler was an anti-war peacenik socialist, just like him?

for equal rights and peace.jpg

It reads: “Mit Adolf Hitler “Ja” fuer Gleichberechtigung und Frieden” — which translates as “With Adolf Hitler “Yes” for equal rights and peace” — the same old standby slogans that the Left trot out to this day, of course. And like meatbrain, Hitler admired Islam, not Christianity.

Not that leftists ever bother with facts, LOL! One never knows when one is dealing with someone who is not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer. But it’s always fun to point it out when it’s as ridiculous and stoopid as the BS that meatbrain likes to spread around. Aw, I’m sorry, is that making fun of the handicapped?

marxengelsche1.jpgas you can see in this book by a socialist hero on college campuses and in meathead’s delusional mind- che guevara, che was an admirer of marx and engels just like saddam hussein, another socialist was. “this book includes che’s recommended reading list of essential marxist classics, making it a popular choice for students and political activists.” - lol–(and in case people don’t know who marx and engels were, they wrote the “communist manifesto”.) socialism is the ultimate goal for communists, as they aim to grow it directly out of capitalism. this comes from marx and engels themselves. engels, in fact, saw democrats as partners towards achieving communism. and socialism is the first step toward the “new” society; communism is the “higher stage” of socialism….so i hardly see how terry bisson’s lookalike is setting me ’straight’ at thinkingmeat.net on this post, anywhere. just go take a look at any moonbats holding signs at an anti-war protest, you’ll see the international socialists standing right alongside the revolutionary communists, and their signs proudly proclaim who they are. to me, there is little difference between the socialists, anarchists and communists; their goal is to take down capitalist amerikkka. but a socialist like meatybytes will argue the point as if it’s an important one. Double DUH!

But the commies from the frog blog (which has moved about three times) made it much easier, because they weren’t ashamed to call it like it was. Whynot said on his bio: “My socio-political views are extreme left in ideology - Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and Che Guevara were my guidelines when I was a teenager, and have been an essential thinking instrument in making me who I am now.” Oh, gee, idiot brain, his idols were some of the most notorious communists in history! Duh, duh, DUH! The frog blog is comprised of an assorted collection of elitist losers- full-fledged unapologetic Che Guevera wannabe types who brag about it and fully identified themselves as such.

whynot.jpghowever, similar to meathead, whynot at pourquois pas? has a vivid imagination. the “debates” i’ve had here with whynot- aka philippe maire and his adoring idiot “wife”, who i called frenchie, otherwise known as dianne maire, are infamous to long-time cb readers. oh, my sides! just recalling this makes me laugh, although in retrospect, like the altercations with kathryn cramer, meatbrain and the rest, simultaneously it’s kind of pathetic.

Dianne’s fantastic fictional story was much easier to swallow for the French than it was to us Americans reading. She claimed to be an American expat from Louisiana if I remember correctly, who was ‘afraid’ to speak against the evil Amerikka and ran to France to her hero, Philippe Maire. And she was hurt when we didn’t fall for it, poor thing. I’m sure the story made her big and famous on the kaufeehaus circuit and attracted quite an audience of weeping frenchmen when she told it, though. She layered that sob story with another victim story about being part of one of the communists’ favorite ‘oppressed groups’ –a native American…Cherokee, if I recall it correctly. When I called her on that, she was mortified that I dare question it. When I pointed out Dr. Yeagley’s article about communists loving Indians, she and whynot had very little to say about it, LOL

Philippe’s fiction was that he was a successful french ‘businessman’ who saved her from the horrible fate of living in the theistic imperialist US where she was a persecuted woman of native American heritage. He also was very green in his ideology; “I value lives of all species equally to that of human beings. Yep, sorry about that - I don’t believe in souls, especially not in humans having ones but not other species.” This conjures up the ‘a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy’ mentality of PETA. His story was a load of hogwash like the rest of their pinko BS. With fascination, we watched as things began to unravel.

It was particularly interesting when Cindy Sheehan began her tour across America and received all that press. Here was Sheehan speaking against Amerikka and getting accolades with Code Pink members very visible in her entourage, getting front page newspaper coverage and enjoying highly publicized photo shoots including a spread in Vanity Fair–supposedly for doing the same thing Dianne was askeered for her life to do! Sheehan’s socialist lovefest with the media, courtesy of Fenton Communications rendered what Dianne had been saying about her fantasy escape to France completely transparent commie propaganda-type bull-$**t.

It’s not all that surprising, really. Read through these threads here and here, I still have them, and probably more. Whynot went viciously after people through email and from what I can tell, completely chased some offline. So Meathead is a socialist copycat, because why else would he be a) so obsessed with us and b) so relentless in his attacks on those he ‘disagrees with’?

Whynot also went after Raven in a similar way, but Raven was better equipped to handle his malicious America bashing and intense hatred of the American military. Whynot simply couldn’t understand why Raven is attracted to manly men in uniform, lol…a completely stupid man whose ability to reason, like meatbrain’s, is completely obliterated by the cloak of his leftism. Similar to Bisson’s lookalike, crying about oppressed groups, bigoted against Christianity, adoring and supporting terrorists, propping victimhood when it suited them, and hysterical fearmongering. Like children afraid to go to bed at night, looking for ghosts and goblins in the shadows, little if anything materializes when we shed some light on it. And if it does, it rarely resembles the stories that they tell. This is even true with the stories they spin about their pathetic lives.

asshatjuenefille.jpgthis is dianne. notice the native american coloring? (lol) after bush won the election, and their hero jean kerrie lost, they were relegated to half-assed movie reviews and attacking human events online for burning books. c’est la vie!

Apparently, the Native American sweetgrass isn’t always greener on the other side, because Dianne Maire left Philippe. Here you can see she’s selling photographs she’s taking of the European countryside. So you can see she’s still around. Somewhere. Here’s her tblog, which was called Bouillabaisse. It doesn’t appear as though it’s been updated for quite some time.

Not only was whynot a proud frenchman in the tradition of radical socialist Thierry Meyssan, president of the virulently anti-American and pro-Communist French think tank Reseau Voltaire and author of l’Effroyable imposture and le Pentagate-but whynot also has virtual wet dreams since he was a child and even into adulthood about Che Guevara. This is similar to the moonbats sporting Che t-shirts at protests. I’m certain, understanding Meathead’s affiliations, that he probably has a Che t-shirt of his own in his underwear drawer, next to the Jergens lotion bottle.

In his bio whynot writes as though he himself was the Che Guevera character in the movie “The Motorcycle Diaries”. He pictured himself racing his motorcycle through the harrowing dangerous winding roads on the french countryside, while he daydreamed about being chased by the gendarmes Even Eric at ¡No Pasarán! tangled with whynot once or twice during our brushes with his socialist irrational arguments. whynot, like the rest of his comrades, was completely unhinged.

But-it’s terrorist chic! It’s vogue; it’s part of the communist latte-sipping European kaffeehaus culture. And it’s invaded Amerikka’s university campuses for decades. whynot and his little mob of socialist saps claimed the US government killed over 600k Iraqi civilians-women and children during the Iraq war, and were perfectly serious about it. This is the same claim made by Medea Benjamin’s Code Pink, and they’re a bunch of marxists, but oh-you can’t call anything by its real name in Bisson’s lookalike-world. After a while, though, you just have to start questioning someone’s credibility, mental health and level of intelligence. It didn’t take long before their smug little socialist enclave began to implode.

whynot turned out to be a bigamist who is reported to have been married five times with only one divorce filing on record. This could be one of the reasons why his “wife” left him. (Rumor has it she’s now somewhere in Canada. Probably Quebec, where she can use her French language skills and pretend she’s still in France.) The other reason she probably left is because he lied about being a ’successful businessman’, too. He was a security guard, the last I knew, complaining about his hours-35 hours as week as is prescribed by French law isn’t that tough-and was complaining about his work conditions and wages. Since his boss didn’t like him very much (surprise) and was sending him to far away dangerous neighborhoods. How much of this is actually true, though, we will never know.

After whynot and his minions attacked me for being a racist, I found it rather amusing when he himself was confronted with Islamic radicalism and complained about how muslims were torching cars there and rioting in the streets. Political correctness has really raised its ugly head in socialist france, and the citizenry is paying the price. Not that Bisson’s lookalike would know anything about that, they’re taking a different approach here, although now and then we do hear cases of honor killings or cases like that of the Armanious family in New Jersey who were murdered in the halal way after they received threats on paltalk.com.

But back to whynot. Whatever this all meant to his clueless wife, in France, bigamists are denied the right to VOTE. It looks like -even the French have their limitations. And of course, like meathead, he incessantly squealed about it.

Originally whynot et al came in attacking me in a similar manner to which meatbrain frames his arguments. This was my introduction to the blogosphere, and one of the reasons we formed the Wide Awakes. So in spite of the loud whines and moans emenating from meathead’s website about what I’ve written, I’ve simply been comparing apples to apples, noting similarities between leftists. Some are Delicious, some are McIntoshes, some are Jonathan. But they are all RED in some way or another, some are watermelons (green on the surface, red underneath). They agree and repeat mindless slogans like “no blood for oil”, “the world can’t wait, drive out the Bush regime”, and join together in marching against the War (similar to when they wore the headbands of the Vietcong during Vietnam [and they weren’t communists, either, were they, brain trust?]), support cop killers like Mumia, and murderers such as the New Haven 9 (Black Panthers) Tookie Williams, and refer people to Rage against the Machine when asked about the “FREE MUMIA” campaign, among other things. Surely Terry Bisson’s lookalike recalls Mumia!


Part of the legal team acting on Abu Jamal’s behalf challenged most of the facts in the case and waged an international propaganda campaign to rehabilitate their client’s image. The leading attorney on the team was Leonard Weinglass, a Fidel Castro supporter who once served as Co-Chairman of the International Committee of the National Lawyers Guild.

Of course a Fidel Castro supporter couldn’t be called a communist, could he, because that would mean Ted Turner is one (that could be one of the reasons people call CNN the Castro News Network, or the Communist News Network). And the National Lawyers Guild (an active affiliate of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, which served as a Soviet front group during the Cold War, seeking to weaken America’s intelligence-gathering agencies)-of which *surprise* the infamous communist spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg’s granddaughter Rachel Meeropol is a member. But stop! They weren’t communists, were they. And Rachel couldn’t be a communist, could she? Because in idiotaria, the Rosenberg’s weren’t communists, either.

What is it that binds moonbats around this Mumia cop-killer in particular?

Well, ignorance, for one. Ed Asner once complained to Philadelphia Magazine that there were no African Americans on the jury that convicted Mumia. But Asner was wrong, there were two. In a December, 1998, broadcast of ABC’s 20/20 he claimed that police had performed no ballistics tests in their investigation. He was wrong about that, too.

Then there’s fanaticism. Rage Against the Machine’s (what machine are they raging against, Terry?) website dedicates much space to the band’s egalitarian, utopian views, inveighing against capitalism, industry, and corporations—while they earn millions precisely because of those very institutions. For hard-core leftists, Mumia, (like Alger Hiss before him) is innocent, or at least the question of his guilt is irrelevant, because he is a comrade.

Who was Alger Hiss, Terry? LOL…certainly, not a communist, because you don’t have that word in your vocabulary, but it doesn’t mean they don’t and have never existed. Do you have any inkling about the Venona Cables? Probably not, LOL, which is just part of the reason why this stupidity of meathead is so resonant and rings so clearly of blind clueless moonbattery. The other thing that Mumia has in common with people that meathead defends is his conversion to Islam–one of the many reasons why Mumia’s cause is sacrosanct to leftists. I’m sure that’s why meathead came here defending Jose Padilla so venomously.

But God forbid I should notice these similarities or call an organization like International ANSWER a front group for the World Worker’s Party, which is what it is. Leftists seem to have this annoying habit of calling people names in response to a fact, when what they’re actually displaying is that they have a problem with truth. Not that it matters much. Terry Bisson’s lookalike has a bucket full of bullshit science fiction stories, and through them, he spreads the fertilizer of his socialist ideology. Like the “Peace Professor” in Park Ridge who was a full-time leftist activist and fully admitted it when asked what he did for a living- and was given a position with the U.N. when he was exposed, leftists make a place for other leftists in the world. They don’t succeed because of their own efforts–they succeed because they share a utopian ideology that will never come to fruition. This has sadly been proven through history.

And so…we had Dianne Maire and her husband Philippe polluting our comments sections, who referred to themselves as the ‘real left’ when they chastised democrats for losing the election to Bush. They were so disgusted with the democrats particularly when their idol Jean Kerrie lost the election, it was hilarious. They felt they had blogged and attacked people viciously enough that their side should have won. And of course, Kerry claimed he ran guns for the Khmer Rouge. And the Khmer Rouge weren’t commies, either, were they now, brain trust?

The other people who idiot without-a-brain refers to as ‘people I don’t agree with’ - are the Marxists of Code Pink (who gave $600,000 to the terrorists in Fallujah), the International Socialist organization, the World Workers Party, etc., and organizations affiliated with them such as Leslie Cagan’s United For Peace and Justice, whose ideology is pretty well-defined and documented, no matter what kind of semantic hairsplitting you engage in.

Unless, of course, you live in the distant alternate universe of science fiction moonbattery like Terry Bisson’s lookalike, who enjoys ad hominem attacks on those he disagrees with but doesn’t dare call things by their real names.

writing.jpgSo for them to imagine that they’re really bothering me in any way is just a testament to their stupidity.

snaggletooth3.jpgGet this: None of the people she names bothers Cao in the least. That’s why she devotes post after post after post to whining about the terrible “commies” who dare to disagree with her. Riiiiiiiiiiiight…

cao2.jpgactually, i find this rather amusing. when i post on you and your lies, i’m just pointing out some facts, you have a problem with that, terry? tsk tsk. no, none of you “bother” me…at least in the way you think, LOL. Get a grip on your silly old self, and how unimportant you are in my world, girlie man!

An honest comparison of this web site with Terry’s, post-after-post pops up of his inability to deal with people he disagrees with. Bisson’s lookalike is engaging in something that psychologists call transference; transferring the traits he hates in himself onto others. SHOCKA! Just like Cafasso! If you scroll down here on my main page and go to the second page here, you’ll find I’m interesting in other things besides meatbrain and ‘the people that disagree with me’. Although I do enjoy a good fisking now and then, it doesn’t run my life-or my blog. Terry Bisson’s lookalike blog, on the other hand, seems to be completely devoted to people he disagrees with! It’s what he lives for! The proof is plastered all over his blog! His hysteria is unchecked! It’s diarrhea of the keyboard! All a person has to do is scroll down each miscreant post of pusillanimous spew including the ad hominem, which he has somehow convinced himself is reasonable rational discourse. Yet, the lofty Socialist Scholars (a contradition in terms)-of which Terry is apparently a member, pretend they’re open to ideas:

The Socialist Scholars Conference has always been an open forum for ideas on the Left. We have never excluded those with whom we disagree.

What a joke! If Terry Bisson’s lookalike is any representation, he should have his membership card revoked. He’s one socialist who can’t lie (or write) his way out of a paper bag.

writing.jpgIt seems to me that none of these people work…

snaggletooth3.jpgIt seems blazingly obvious that Cao doesn’t have the slightest idea what any of her critics do for a living, and the accusation that those who disagree with her are unemployed is a pathetically transparent personal attack. Cao makes personal attacks because she is utterly incapable of answering the criticisms made against her.

cao2.jpgi guess that depends on what your definition of ‘do for a living’ is.

What’s blazingly obvious is meathead’s admission that he’s Terry Bisson’s lookalike, and that he knows these people, and that what I’ve put together with my internet sleuthing friends is entirely true!~

As far as my critics are concerned, I really could give a damn except that I’ve noticed a propensity for a lot of whining and complaining that seems to take up a lot of their time. They aren’t ‘pro’ anything, they’re always ‘against’. Meatbrain must be monitoring my website, because I get regular trackbacks from his website when he responds, whining, oinking and squealing about something I’ve written. I usually just ignore it. His website is completely reactionary and hysterical, and I’m not the only one he’s fixated on. It’s an unfortunate affliction for which I doubt there is a cure.

Let’s take Kathryn Cramer, as an example of someone with a lot of time on her hands. She’s a stay-at-home mom, who spends a lot of time uploading pictures of her family to flickr and writing and editing the bio on herself at Wikipedia and arguing with the editors there. Although she claims she “works” for Wolfram research, she also claimed she “worked” for the CIA when she was running around with Joe Cafasso, but she didn’t even know he was Joe Cafasso! And now she’s out over $20 grand. That might be a historical reference, and we know you hate those Terry, but it’s one of those nasty but real destestable little facts about at least one of your brilliant friends. She also had the time to pull her kid out of school to go running around with Cafasso, so if she had a job, was Cafasso her job? LOL

The man in the bathtub is another example; someone who is incessantly leaving comments even though they are held in moderation, because he has this childish beligerent insistance that people should READ WHAT HE SAYS! This guy is on the internet at 2:00 in the morning leaving comments. One has to wonder about what he does for a living since he never seems to be offline!

As far as what I’m capable of, I think it’s obvious here that I’m perfectly capable of adequately defending myself, hehehe. Unlike the pinko piggy Bisson’s lookalike, LOL…

writing.jpgMeatbrain has this weird affliction; he tries to make it a ‘gotcha’ and he ’saves pages’ as if we even care. It’s an implied threat, as though he’s going to pursue a person for writing something, and keeps the pages on his own server.

snaggletooth3.jpgNo, idiot. I keep the pages because you and your ilk like to change your posts when you get caught being stupid or dishonest. For instance, you got caught admiring Nazi propaganda when it was rewritten to denigrate Muslims. When you were called on your obvious bigotry, you changed your words ex post facto to try and cover your hateful ass.

cao2.jpgthat’s interesting, brain trust, lol, coming from someone who claimed to be “tania” or “tiffany amber” in my comments, baiting me with a trick question (using hitler’s words substituting muslims for jews) in order to manipulate a ‘gotcha’, that is rich! it’s like a coerced confession, isn’t it. and doesn’t even masquerade as honesty; it was pure deception! i remember that happening, and i remember how little i thought of the tactic then. i think even less of it now. a fugly grown man who doesn’t recognize his own sick behavior, intentionally tricks people into doing things and then maligns them for it. It reminds me of the behavior of an alcoholic that beats his wife.

As far as denigrating muslims is concern, that’s another lie. Muslims are denigrating themselves with their death threats for publishing cartoons, etc.. Bisson’s lookalike can’t face up to any facts, but that isn’t my problem. Terrorism didn’t hit Amerikka until 9/11 and it happened to be people yelling ‘allah akbar’. Unfortunately this must be pointed out, because political correctness of the Terry Bisson’s lookalike type will bring another 9/11 if we’re not careful. Bin Ladenist mosques are going up all over this country in the extreme wahhabist tradition paid for with Saudi money, and it should be pointed out. The proposed winning design for the Flight 93 Memorial is a memorial mosque to the 9/11 terrorists, and so on. I’m sorry meathead hates facts and is determined to lie about people, but those are just plain and simple facts. Should I bend over for people because they’re stupid and have their heads in the sand? I don’t think so.

writing.jpgThat, if I’m not mistaken, is against the TOS with his hosting company.

snaggletooth3.jpgYou’ve already given the entire world permission to copy and redistribute your work. Stop whining, dimwitted crybaby.

cao2.jpgno, i haven’t given the ‘entire world world permission’, asshole.

I’m honestly beginning to wonder if you know how to read.

legalproblems.bmp

STOP CONTENT THEFT

askfirst2.gif


Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

And I also wonder if you know how to follow directions or written instructions. I doubt if you’ve even read the terms of this agreement, there are qualifiers. You are supposed to link here, as is expressly written in the agreement. But you’re also not allowed to ‘build’ on my work. But in meathead’s world, I’m the one who’s dimwhitted! bwahahahahha! Maybe he should go through his emails because Mike at TRK Hosting sent one to Meatbrain and Raven on this very subject. My design is copyrighted just as Raven’s is. tsk tsk! I even put up a post about Meatbrain copying my pages and hosting them on his server, and he took them down, although he couldn’t help but put up a post crying and squealing about it. Poor little piggy.

It is interesting that someone who is so much better than everyone else and so ‘intelligent’ would remove those saved pages from the server; why would you remove them, Terry? Could it be because your hosting company agrees-when you mirror our sites you are indeed violating the copyright?

TRK Hosting said in their email to you: “Direct copies and display of entire websites or parts thereof are not allowed and do indeed infringe on copyrights if they exist.”

writing.jpgI am limited on time, and refuse to allow moonbats to dictate what I spend my time on with their diarrhea of the keyboards…
snaggletooth3.jpg
Too late. You just did. Again.

cao2.jpgit’s too bad, isn’t it, pighead? I will do as I d*mn-well please on my own website, despite your leftist authoritarian desire to order me around in the space that I pay for and insult me on your website and in general employ that negative attention seeking trick you learned as a child, but your issues are not my problem.

Of the 15 or so posts on my front page, less than 2 are devoted to trolls, and that, only due to the holidays and a little spare time. But your front page seems to be completely devoted to TWA, still, and now you’ve taken on the creationist argument, thanks to your brainless pal over at Millard Fillmore’s bathtub.

Blind clueless moonbattery of the Bisson’s lookalike variety is fun to point and laugh at it, just as Van Helsing does daily at his site. Terry Bisson’s lookalike and the rest of his ilk, just like whynot and frenchie, Hillary’s plants, TNR’s publication of Scott Beauchamp’s fiction, cannot weather the tests of close scrutiny. And that’s why we should constantly challenge them!

But in due time, and on our own timeframe; when and IF we feel like it.

It’s also good to see his objection to my attacks on the antiquated victorian-age Theory of Evolution versus ID or creationism…that cranks up the ratio of 4-out-of-10 articles devoted to TWA members to an even more impressive ratio (because I’ve been discussing some of that at Cao2’s blog as of late). Who’s controlling who, you have to wonder? Since he is completely obsessed with ‘people he disagrees with’! But we’re not supposed to pay attention to what he DOES, we’re supposed to pay attention to what he SAYS! bwahahahaha! Stupid libtard.

5 Responses to “is Terry Bisson lying?”

  1. GM Roper Says:

    Does “OUCH” cover the bases? Methinks it does! LOL

  2. Cao Says:

    I don’t hear the little piggy squealing yet, but the guy can never shut up, so you know it’s coming.

  3. Kender Says:

    Damn…what an all encompassing smackdown

  4. Cao Says:

    LOL

  5. HannahJ Says:

    Nicely done. “OUCH!” indeed–bring on the squeals. (At least it’ll keep leftists of the Islamic persuasion away, no? That’s got to be at least a little comfort.:mrgreen:)

Leave a Reply