stinky-the-brownshirt a.k.a. terry bisson the self-described socialist science fiction writer, sure didn’t waste any time putting up a response, but this time he’s outdone himself on the stupidmeter! He must be rationing his medication. LOL

Here is the latest ignorant burble from the Cowster…

excuse me…but…you sure live up to that dumb cracker from kentucky phrase you use as a descriptor for yourself, because my name is gaelic and isn’t pronounced that way. not that you’re smart enough to know what gaelic is, but of the numerous things i pointed out on this post, you manage to come up with one thing to congratulate yourself about, saying it’s a ‘further example of cao’s invincible ignorance’. if that’s what you think you’re accomplishing with it, -showing an example of my ignorance- you’re even more obtuse than I thought.

Terrorism didn’t hit Amerikka until 9/11 and it happened to be people yelling ‘allah akbar’.

herewith, a selection of terrorist incidents that took place in america (note the correct spelling, bovine one) prior to 09/11/2001 (source: Wikipedia)…

bin laden is purely a socialist icon, and it’s a mutual admiration society because bin laden said- “the interests of muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists in the war against crusaders.” when it suits him, ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’.

So true to his socialist ideology which aligns itself with Bin Ladenist Al Qaeda terrorists like Jose Padilla, Bisson’s lookalike posts a cut and paste from Wikipedia– the international music-hall joke for inaccuracy, which shows a list of terrorist acts around the globe. This list– like the Clinton administration after OK City– implies that rightwingnuts are terrorists. It lists abortion clinic bombings, the Feinian brotherhood, the IRA, Church fires and that sort of thing. It DOES mention a few Islamic terrorist acts, but they are competing for space with the rest. Meatbrain conveniently skirts and fails to confront the issue of Islamic terrorism as a worldwide problem; and the fact that as in this video, the people who are physically assaulting people and breaking the law are the people on his side of ideological spectrum; the extreme left.

Rightwing-ers are law abiding citizens on the most part, just as a large majority of our men and women serving in the military voted for Bush. An example of that is the young Marine, on the eve of his second deployment to Iraq, who recently had his car keyed by the leftist anti-war lawyer in Chicago. The marine wanted to respond within the confines of the law; and that’s how most of us behave in our lives (even at protests). Grodner, the leftist lawyer, had his law license suspended back in 1984, and was charged for the December key-ing incident with a class “A” misdemeanor — criminal damage to property — punishable by up to one year in jail and up to a $2,500 fine. Shocka! A law-breaking jerk, just like the rest of their ilk!

Meat-turd, you can’t tell me you’ve forgotten about this post about spocko now, have you? You people have had no new ideas since the communist manifesto.

Bisson’s lookalike doesn’t care about rules because he steals our web pages and hosts them on his server, and lies about it, purposely baits people under different pseudonyms and lies about it, etc..

Stinking meat hates those who stand up for the US, those who serve in our military, those who love our military, those who defend our borders, or those who dare point to or are disturbed by- instances of Islamic terrorism or the cultural problems muslims have imported to the United States, such as honor killings. In other words Bisson hates the majority of people living here in the US. The only way he gets attention and can live with himself, I guess, is to constantly talk about his hatred, and transfer it onto other people.

I put up a post back in July of 2005- which is a list of Al Qaeda terrorist attacks going all the way back to 1968, but the point is, the jihadis got our attention on 9/11, and they happened to be named Satam Suqami, Waleed Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari, Khalid Almihdhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaf Alhazmi, Salem Alhazmi, Hani Hanjour, Fayez Rashid, Marwan Al-Shehhi, Hamza Alghamd, Mohand Alshehri, Ahmed Alghamdi, Saeed Alghamdi, Ahmad Haznawi, Ahmed Alnami, and Ziad Samir Jarrah—they were all muslims. We can’t alter that fact; and we can’t alter the fact that after 9/11, the majority of Americans were mobilized to do something about this act of war by Islamic radicals.

But there can be no doubt that terrorism, much of it homegrown, has a long history in the United States, and predates by more than a century the attacks of 09/11/2001.

so what? i’m talking about the islamic variety that launched the war on terror, and you’re skirting the issue.

Medea Benjamin and other Code Pink Marxists organized sometimes-violent protests against free trade across the globe, targeting large corporations with high-profile campaigns and lawsuits that cost consumers and companies like Gap, Nike and Starbucks millions of dollars. As with today’s anti-war movement, the Marxist World Worker’s Party website has played a crucial organizing role in their anti-corporate activities, letting would-be agitators know when and where to show up for demonstrations.

Meanwhile, other Code Pink organizers were making a name for themselves in domestic and eco-terrorism in the 1990s. Earth Liberation Front (ELF), which along with the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) is ranked the No. 1 domestic terrorism threat by the FBI. The FBI attributes over 600 criminal acts and $43 million in damages to the two groups since 1996. Wherever RAN (Rain Action Network) pops up, you’ll also tend to find the Ruckus Society, which has trained activists for ELF/ALF. Ruckus Society organizer Steve Kretzmann, also a Code Pink coordinator, has helped train activists in the agitation tactics that have earned the Ruckus Society its reputation. The Ruckus Society, it’s also worth mentioning, is a coalition member of Benjamin’s United for Peace and Justice.¹

- Isn’t it strange :grin:….None of the over 600 criminal acts committed by ELF and ALF appear in the Wikipedia entry.

Islamophobic or Informed?

A new Newsweek Poll on American attitudes toward Muslims and Islam has found that 46 percent of Americans believe that the United States is taking in too many Muslim immigrants. 32 percent think that Muslims in America are less loyal to the United States than they are to Islam. 28 percent believe that the Qur’an condones violence, and 41 percent hold that Islamic culture “glorifies suicide.” 54 percent are either “somewhat worried” or “very worried” about Islamic jihadists in this country, and 52 percent support FBI surveillance of mosques, with the same percentage rejecting the claim of American Muslim advocacy groups that Muslims are being singled out by investigators and police.

the recent Pew Research Center poll of Muslims in America revealed: twenty-six percent of Muslims between the ages of eighteen and twenty-nine affirmed that there could be justification in some (unspecified) circumstances for suicide bombing, and five percent of all the Muslims surveyed said that they had a favorable view of Al-Qaeda. Given the Pew Center’s estimate of 2.35 million Muslims in America, and the total of thirteen percent that avowed a belief that suicide bombings could ever be justified, that’s over 300,000 supporters of suicide attacks. And 117,500 supporters of Al-Qaeda.

If you think this is not a problem, dear friend, you are delusional.

The motivation for Cao’s ignorant claim is, of course, the by-now-familiar wingnut meme of HATE MUSLIMS! HATE MUSLIMS! HATE MUSLIMS! HATE MUSLIMS! HATE MUSLIMS!

the motivation for bisson’s lookalike is, “little eichmann! little eichmann! little eichmann!” just like ward churchill. give me a break, bisson, this stuff isn’t even original.

i’ll quote robert spencer here… because what idiot without-a-brain sees as bigotry is in reality common sense, based on world events, terrorist attacks, what the jihadists are saying, and what his hero bin laden has been saying. essentially, if muslims want to end “islamophobia” in an instant, here’s how they can do it:

1. Focus their indignation on Muslims committing violent acts in the name of Islam, not on non-Muslims reporting on those acts.

2. Renounce definitively not just “terrorism,” but any intention to replace the U.S. Constitution (or the constitutions of any non-Muslim state) with Sharia even by peaceful means.

3. Teach Muslims the imperative of coexisting peacefully as equals with non-Muslims on an indefinite basis.

4. Begin comprehensive international programs in mosques all over the world to teach against the ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supremacism.

5. Actively work with Western law enforcement officials to identify and apprehend jihadists within Western Muslim communities.

If Muslims do those five things, voila! “Islamophobia” will vanish.”

Muslims against sharia are taking a stand against what the radicals like Hamas and CAIR are promoting here in the US. They warn that muslims are killing muslims - and that moderate muslims are also targets of Islamic terrorism. Not all muslims are terrorists, but unfortunately, a whole lot of terrorists are muslims.

From Muslims Against Sharia:

OUR GOALS

* to educate Muslims about dangers presented by Islamic religious texts and why Islam must be reformed
* to educate non-Muslims about the differences between moderate Muslims and Islamists (a.k.a. Islamic Religious Fanatics, Radical Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Islamic Extremists or Islamofascists)
* to educate both Muslims and non-Muslims alike that Moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic Terror

OUR MANIFESTO
Acknowledging mistakes
The majority of the terrorist acts of the last three decades, including the 9/11 attacks, were perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists in the name of Islam. We, as Muslims, find it abhorrent that Islam is used to murder millions of innocent people, Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

Inconsistencies in the Koran
Unfortunately, Islamic religious texts, including the Koran and the Hadith contain many passages, which call for Islamic domination and incite violence against non-Muslims. It is time to change that. Muslim fundamentalists believe that the Koran is the literal word of Allah. But could Allah, the most Merciful, the most Compassionate, command mass slaughter of people whose only fault is being non-Muslim?

The Koran & the Bible
Many Bible figures from Adam to Jesus (Isa) are considered to be prophets and are respected by Islam. Islamic scholars however believe that both the Old and the New Testament came from God, but that they were corrupted by the Jews and Christians over time. While neither Testament calls for mass murder of unbelievers, the Koran does. Could it be possible that the Koran itself was corrupted by Muslims over the last thirteen centuries?

The need for reform
Islam, in its present form, is not compatible with principles of freedom and democracy. Twenty-first century Muslims have two options: we can continue the barbaric policies of the seventh century perpetuated by Hassan al-Banna, Abdullah Azzam, Yassir Arafat, Ruhollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Hizballah, Hamas, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, etc., leading to a global war between Dar al-Islam (Islamic World) and Dar al-Harb (non-Islamic World), or we can reform Islam to keep our rich cultural heritage and to cleanse our religion from the reviled relics of the past. We, as Muslims who desire to live in harmony with people of other religions, agnostics, and atheists choose the latter option. We can no longer allow Islamic extremists to use our religion as a weapon. We must protect future generations of Muslims from being brainwashed by the Islamic radicals. If we do not stop the spread of Islamic fundamentalism, our children will become homicidal zombies.

Accepting responsibilities
To start the healing process, we must acknowledge evils done by Muslims in the name of Islam and accept responsibility for those evils. We must remove evil passages from Islamic religious texts, so that future generations of Muslims will not be confused by conflicting messages. Our religious message should be loud and clear: Islam is peace; Islam is love; Islam is light. War, murder, violence, divisiveness & discrimination are not Islamic values.

Religious privacy
Religion is the private matter of every individual. Any person should be able to freely practice any religion as long as the practice does not interfere with the local laws, and no person must be forced to practice any religion. Just as people are created equal, there is no one religion that is superior to another. Any set of beliefs that is spread by force is fundamentally immoral; it is no longer a religion, but a political ideology.

Equality
Islam is one of the many of the world’s religions. There will be no Peace and Harmony in the World if Muslims and non-Muslims do not have equal rights. Islamic supremacy doctrine is just as repulsive as Aryan supremacy doctrine. History clearly shows what happens to the society whose members consider themselves above other peoples. All moderate Muslims must repudiate the mere notion of Islamic supremacy.

Sharia
Sharia Law must be abolished, because it is incompatible with norms of modern society.

Outdated practices
Any practices that might have been acceptable in the Seventh Century; i.e., stoning, cutting off body parts, marrying and/or having sex with children or animals, must be condemned by every Muslim.

Outdated verses
The following verses promote divisiveness and religious hatred, bigotry and discrimination. They must be either removed from the Koran or declared outdated and invalid, and marked as such.

Outdated words & phrases
Use of the following words and phrases or their variations must be prohibited during religious services:
• Infidel / Unbeliever: these terms have negative connotation and promote divisiveness and animosity; Islam is not the only religion
• Jihad: this word is often interpreted as Holy War against non-Muslims
• Mujaheed / Holy Warrior: no more wars in the name of Islam
• American (Christian / Crusader / Israeli / Zionist) occupation: these terms promote bigotry; at this point in time, Muslims living in non-Muslim lands have more freedoms than Muslims living in Muslim lands

Islam vs. violence
Islam has no place for violence. Any person calling for an act of violence in the name of Islam must be promptly excommunicated. Any grievances must be addressed by lawful authorities. It is the religious and civic duty of every Muslim to unconditionally condemn any act of terrorism perpetrated in the name of Islam. Any Muslim group that has ties to terrorism in any way, shape, or form, must be universally condemned by both religious and secular Muslims.

Portrayal of Prophets
While portrayal of Prophets is not an acceptable practice in Islam could be personally offensive to some Muslims, other religions do not have such restrictions. Therefore, the portrayal of the Prophets must be treated as a manifestation of free expression.

The Crusades vs. The Inquisition
While the Inquisition was a repulsive practice by Christian Fundamentalists, the Crusades were not unprovoked acts of aggression, but rather attempts to recapture formerly Christian lands controlled by Muslims.

Brothers and Sisters!
Do not make the next generation of Muslims clean up your mess!
Fight Islamic Fascism now, so your children won’t have to!

Alas for Cao, history puts the lie to her clumsy attempt to proselytize for religious bigotry.

you are nothing but a certifiable nutcase…. since i absolutely don’t see the case you’re making for my being a bigot. On the other hand, I see you as one. And a Goebbels-type propagandist as well.

Update: This puts the lie to stinking feet’s proselytizing sick socialist bigotry and cheerleading for sharia and dhimmitude. Muslims Against Sharia came here in comments below on this post and said:

What exactly did she say that qualifies as “religious bigotry”? That Muslims are responsible for most terrorist attacks? That’s not religious bigotry, that’s a fact. Those terrorist attacks qualify as religious bigotry or rather self-genocide, because the victims are mostly Muslim.

but you’ll just ignore that, too, won’t you meaty? you would never stop to admit that i’m defending all of the terrorists’ victims and not just the “little eichmanns” when i take a stand against islamic terrorism. the problem with meaty is he’s long on slogans but short on thought process. Stupid libtard.

As a sidenote to MASH: I offer you my humble heartfelt thanks and gratitude for the important work you are doing. Thanks for taking the time to stop by and leave a comment.

1. Pearce, J. (March 26, 2003) Code Pinko, Frontpage Magazine[back]