1/27/2008
Barack Obama, Kenya, his cousin Odinga and Islamic jihad
I work with a young leftist who is on some committee or something raising funds for Obama. I didn’t get the chance to ask him what he thinks of Obama’s muslim past…but he came over to me and was showing me his personally-signed copy of ‘audacity of hope’ - and I asked him what he thought of Obama’s ‘liberation theology church’. He started backing up with his book, saying he doesn’t like to get involved with ‘religion’ - or ‘peoples’ religions’. And I said, well maybe you should look into it, because it’s marxist. That’s when he started walking really fast away from me. I left it right there, although Obama’s church recently gave Louis Farrakhan the Dr. A Wright Jr. Trumpet award. Maybe I should have mentioned that, too. What I’d really like to get around to talking about with this kid is - Odinga, Kenya and Obama.
Because it’s what’s going on in Kenya that we should be watching.
It turns out that Raila Odinga, the communist, who has the support of the muslims who are killing people in Kenya- is Obama’s cousin.
Obama and his paternal 1st cousin Odinga, wanted to bring the whole of Kenya under Sharia law. Obama campaigned for Odinga in August of 2006,just before he filed with the US Federal Elections Commission for his presidential candidacy.
The idea was simply to have the Luo tribe, mostly Muslims, to take over Kenya from the inheritors of colonial power, the Kikuyu, and bring the country under Sharia law, kick out the Western investors in the nation that had made it one of the most stable nations in Africa, and supplant those Western investors with wealthy Arab oil money.It all failed.Then Odinga yelled election fraud, and put his Luo Islamofascists into the streets of Nairobi to “protest” by murdering, raping and maiming Kikuyu people, including the recent burning alive of a church full of Christians.
If Obama and Odinga had succeeded, the next step in the plan would be for president Obama to help Odinga consolidate his power over Kenya by international recognition and trade. That will NOT happen. Obama wanted to expand Islamofascism, and annex Kenya to Somalia and the Sudan in an Islamofascist axis.
This puts both Obama and Odinga right up there in a pantheon with Idi Amin.Obama hates America, and the basis for America’s wealth. His actions show this.
Ask yourself why black America generally has been ambivalent about Obama’s candidacy. They know the nature of this creature. Whitey is simply catching up, but will whitey do so in time?
See: How Obama and 1st paternal cousin Odinga Tried to Bring Kenya Under Sharia Law and Failed, The Dose
Obama, the Muslim thing and why it matters
Kenya, Islam and Obama Hussein
Raila Odinga has, in his own words, a ‘close personal friendship’ with Barrack Hussein Obama Junior.When Obama went to Kenya in August of 2006, he was hosted by Raila and spoke in praise of him at rallies in Nairobi: Obama’s bias for his fellow Luo was so blatant that a Kenya government spokesman denounced Obama during his visit as Raila’s ‘stooge.’
Atlas has some important questions in her ‘why it matters’ piece. Obama went to the madrassas in Jakarta and was a practicing muslim. His father was a muslim. His stepfather was a muslim. In Islam, no matter what your mother is, if your father is a muslim, so are you. Obama understands and knows what is in the koran. Did he leave Islam, and if so, why the silence? If he left Islam, that would qualify him as an apostate, but I haven’t seen calls for his death-which we most certainly would have seen in his very public candidacy for the presidency. Is Obama practicing kitman or takeyya?
Melanie Phillips thinks this is worrying; and perhaps an indication of what he means when he talks about being the ‘candidate for change’.
His cousin Odinga is partnering with Islamic jihadists who are behind the violence in Kenya over his loss at the polls. Odinga is connected with Al Qaeda, for crying out loud. We should be asking question after question of Obama and his campaign, because the next president - like it or not-will be a war president. And we should not have someone in the highest office in our land who would not only be the first muslim president, but who would aggressively enable our jihadist enemies; as their ally.
Who’s to say Obama wouldn’t aggressively work to install sharia and fulfill CAIR’s dream for the US, just like his cousin is attempting to do in Kenya? All indications are…that’s exactly the ‘change’ that he’s looking for.
Odinga, Obama and the lack of courage
In this video, an Arab political science professor in Gaza says Arabs in the Middle East favor Obama for president. From Pamela.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, The Pet Haven Blog, Shadowscope, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Adeline and Hazel, Pursuing Holiness, A Newt One- The Truth Surge, Pet’s Garden Blog, Woman Honor Thyself, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Right Voices, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, A Blog For All, 123beta, Big Dog’s Weblog, Conservative Cat, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Nuke Gingrich, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Wolf Pangloss, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and OTB Sports, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
X posted at STACLU
Right Voices linked with They Don’t Call Him Barack Hussein Obama For Nothing...
February 17th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Wow…this is ****. Are you serious or is this just your job because you need money? What kind of life do you live man. I feel sad for you.
February 18th, 2008 at 6:21 am
You know, I make no money from this blog…and that kind of talk will get you banned.
I feel sorry for nitwits and their insulting comments.
I feel sorry for people who can’t see past the manufactured Obama hype…and who blindly defend him despite the red flags.
February 18th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Cao,
Can you please remove me from this wasteland? I don’t know how to remove myself from getting updates.
Thanks!
February 18th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
You know, you could manage your own subscriptions….in your cluelessness, you must have signed up for updates to comments!
bwahahaha!
February 18th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
comingawakening is our local muslim in support of Obama…apparently his dark middle-eastern looks with his shirt off on youtube have been quite the rage.
Does he mean like the Obama Awakening…as in the Odinga Awakening in Kenya?
And what’s with the no shirt thing?
February 20th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
I just wanted to thank you for all the information you’ve provided on Obama. It helps more than I can tell you. He’s just one more in a long line of smarmy liars.
February 24th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
They Don’t Call Him Barack Hussein Obama For Nothing…
[Geeska Afrika caption:] U.S. Senator Barack Obama, right, is dressed as a Somali Elder by Sheikh Mahmed Hassan, left, during his visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya, near the borders with Somalia and Ethiopia. The area is at the epicen…
February 26th, 2008 at 9:01 am
I am glad people are finally bringing this out. The liberal media is just pushing him forward.
I am very familiar with the Somalis and that is a clerics garb. I also heard from European media that his first cousin is a muslim cleric. Given the tribal nature of African muslim society that makes Barak…regardless of what he says…a muslim iman. It is very similar to how being a rabbi is passed down in family lines. His cousin in the European media was quoted as saying that once Barak Obama is a muslim he always will be a muslim and that barak Obama can pretend to be Christian but he will always be muslim.
Given how the African muslim groups have attacked the US Embassys in Africa and committed acts of piracy. If Barack was a real American he would quit the race, rather he is an Islamic fascist in American garb.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
I am a LUO….Everything you have posted on this blog is so far from the truth…even though i don’t support Obama, truth is majority of Luos are actually christian…most of the Muslims in Kenya live in Mombasa which is so far from where Luos live…The conflict in Kenya was maily btwn Luos and Kikuyus…Kikuyus and Luos make the majority of christians in Kenya…stop these lies my friend…do your home work before you post these things on line.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
FYI, Most Luos are famous for being seven day adventists…c’mon man, a Jihad??? You can not be serious.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
The question is …is Odinga supporting the Christians, or having them killed? Is Odinga supporting sharia? So says the agreement he signed with them.
See here
whereas the candidate - who recognizes Islam as the only true religion - is seeking to become the next President of Kenya…
I also like the part about his making sharia the ruling law of the land.
I’m sorry, but it’s hard for me to believe you’re Luo…Obama’s own family members - his sister, for example, have said that everyone they know is muslim. His grandmother is muslim, his father was a muslim, his stepfather was a muslim, etc.
Obama’s Man in Kenya
Nice try, but instead of acting like a Luo you’re acting like someone out of Obama’s camp - and you’re not even convincing about your charade.
If you are a Christian Luo, where is your outrage over the Christians burned to death in the church by muslims?
THE KENYA CONNECTION; LINK.
Even more sinister has been Mr. Odinga’s electoral pact with the National Muslim Leaders’ Forum — a hardline Islamist organization that represents Kenya’s Muslim minority. According to this document, dated August 29, 2007, Mr. Odinga promised the Muslim leaders that, if elected, he would establish Sharia courts, not only in the northern and coastal regions where Kenyan Muslims are concentrated, but throughout the country.
He also promised to impose Muslim dress codes on women, ban alcohol and pork, indoctrinate children, ban Christian preaching, and dismiss the Commissioner of Police “who has allowed himself to be used by heathens and Zionists.”
In short, Mr. Odinga in effect offered to Islamize Kenya in return for Muslim votes, despite the fact that Muslims make up only 10% of the population, compared to the 80% who are Christian. Mr. Odinga himself is nominally an Anglican, yet he signed a document that refers to Islam throughout as “the one true religion” and denigrates Christians as “worshippers of the cross.”
March 4th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
you obviously do not understand Kenyan Politics…Odinga is not having christians killed…this was a power struggle between Kikuyus and Luos.This is a geneational thing that has happened since independence..The Muslim community always felt left out.No one wanted to create Sharia law…the christian community in Kenya is so large that even the muslims know this is not possible …..this memorandum of agreement had nothing to do with Sharia law..Odinga is a christian…My dad works for the Kenya government.So i know what i am talking about..If you have time read THE DAILY NATION…OR EAST AFRICAN STANDARD sometime
March 4th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
you obviously do not understand Kenyan Politics…Odinga is not having christians killed…this was a power struggle between Kikuyus and Luos.This is a generational thing that has happened since independence..The Muslim community always felt left out.No one wanted to create Sharia law…the christian community in Kenya is so large that even the muslims know this is not possible …..this memorandum of agreement had nothing to do with Sharia law..Odinga is a christian…My dad works for the Kenya government.So i know what i am talking about..If you have time read THE DAILY NATION…OR EAST AFRICAN STANDARD sometime
March 4th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
The Standard Online
Raila’s secret MoU with Muslims revealed
Published on November 28, 2007, 12:00 am
By Ben Agina
The lid has finally been lifted on the controversial Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Muslim leaders and the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) presidential candidate, Mr Raila Odinga.
With its secrets unveiled at an international press conference in Nairobi on Tuesday, the ghost of the six-point document — which has been a subject of intense propaganda, cyber wars and a source of concern for sections of the Christian community — was, hopefully, finally exorcised.
Its chief signatories are Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi, the chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum (Namlef) and Raila, while Mr Mohammed Farouk Adam, Mr Said Athman Mtwana and Mr Najib Balala have signed as witnesses. The pact was quietly signed on August 29.
After captivating the country for several weeks, it was an anti-climax of sorts when the much talked about MoU turned out to be merely a timid piece of quid pro quo paper agreement between someone seeking votes for a top political office and a group that believes they have been treated as third-rate citizens by successive governments.
It said nothing about the Sharia law.
Instead, the MoU — which has been widely circulated on the Internet as the ultimate dangerous piece of accord — turned out to be an agreement aimed at safeguarding the interest of the Muslims.
“This MoU is made to secure and cement solidarity and partnership between Hon Raila Odinga and Namlef constituency based on values of mutual trust, honesty, integrity, transparency and good governance,” the pact reads in part.
It further states: “This MoU is made in utmost good faith and trust between Hon Raila Odinga and Namlef with the common objective of transforming our country Kenya into a proud, prosperous and just nation, where all Kenyans live in harmony realising their full potential without discrimination, subjugation or fear.”
Kibaki and Kalonzo non-committal
On Tuesday, Namlef — who originated the idea — further revealed that it held consultative meetings with President Kibaki and ODM-Kenya Presidential candidate Mr Kalonzo Musyoka with a view to entering into a similar pact.
Both were non-committal, Sheikh Abdullahi, told journalists.
“We met Kibaki once and then met Kalonzo and Raila three times. It’s only Raila who made a commitment,” Abdullahi, who said Namlef finally entered into the pact with Raila and decided to support him for the presidency because of his “consistency, valour and statesmanship”.
Abdullahi was speaking at the Namlef offices in Hurlingham, Nairobi.
And on Tuesday, Raila said: “Not all leaders are so opportunistic as to disown solemn memorandums in the interest of political expediency, as Kibaki so brazenly did after becoming president”.
The outgoing Lang’ata MP said he never kept the pact secret and that he publicly spoke about it on September 1, after securing the ODM presidential nomination.
He added in a statement e-mailed to newsrooms on Tuesday night by the Orange party secretariat: “I subsequently mentioned this memorandum at other public events as well, since I have every intention of honouring what I have formally committed myself to.”
Raila reiterated that the agreement with the Muslims was not the first such memorandum to be signed.
He said just before the 2002 elections, at the Nyali Beach Hotel, Mombasa, President Kibaki along with the late former Vice-President Mr Michael Wamalwa, Mr Kalonzo Musyoka, Mrs Charity Ngilu, Mr Najib Balala, the late Mr Karisa Maitha and himself signed a similar one with the Muslims.
The 2002 memorandum, Raila said, was necessary because all the then Narc Summit members recognised Muslims as having been historically marginalised, sometimes victimised and viewed as a national minority to be discriminated against.
“In 2002, President Kibaki as a Christian did not feel the need to sign a memorandum with the Christians. Nor did I. Like him, I am a Christian, baptised as an Anglican,” said Raila, who together with Pentagon members Ngilu and Balala had earlier yesterday addressed a press conference at Wilson Airport, Nairobi, before embarking on a campaign tour of the Coast, touched on the pact.
Hatred between Muslims and Christians
He added: “Our opponents simple aim was to create hatred between Muslims and Christians, in a bid to promote the re-election of the President.”
Raila said those behind the propaganda included Party of National Unity (PNU) leaders and some religious figures, who were trying to portray themselves as defending Christian rights.
In the pact, copies of which were provided to the media, Raila promised to initiate within the first year of his presidency deliberate policies and programmes to redress historical, current and structural marginalisation and injustices on Muslims in Kenya.
These will include the entrenchment in the Constitution of provisions that will outlaw the targeting and profiling of any member of the Kenyan community (including Muslims) and subjecting them to human rights abuses, violations and discrimination under any guise whatsoever.
Raila and Namlef agreed to the setting up of a commission of inquiry on deliberate schemes and actions of Government, its agencies or officers to target or interfere with welfare and social wellbeing of Muslims in Kenya.
According to the MoU, Raila is to accord northern Kenya and the Coast Province and other neglected areas budgetary priority in infrastructural development in the sectors of road telecommunications, water, housing, education and health.
Namlef and Raila agreed to embark on the radical transformation of Kenya to a “just harmonious, peaceful and prosperous nation based on good governance, constitutionalism and the rule of law and a genuinely devolved government”.
Yesterday, Abdullahi observed that the Government had meted out calculated, deliberate, unprecedented discrimination intimidation and harassment of sections of Kenyans, including Muslims.
“Namlef and the Muslim community in Kenya desire to see an end to this,” said Abdullahi, who was flanked by the forum’s National Executive Committee.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
I am so much of a LUO..i come from Nyanza province..which is a large Luo population and my middle name is Achieng…sorry cao, you are wrong on this one….
March 4th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
I’m sorry but I don’t swallow that propaganda; it of course relieves Odinga of any responsibility for his actions…
All papers seem to be in support of the communist Odinga. But not all online sources mask the problems that Africans have with him:
Here’s another:
And I’m sorry that you’re so determined to discredit it as false. I repeat:
Even more sinister has been Mr. Odinga’s electoral pact with the National Muslim Leaders’ Forum — a hardline Islamist organization that represents Kenya’s Muslim minority. According to this document, dated August 29, 2007, Mr. Odinga promised the Muslim leaders that, if elected, he would establish Sharia courts, not only in the northern and coastal regions where Kenyan Muslims are concentrated, but throughout the country.
He also promised to impose Muslim dress codes on women, ban alcohol and pork, indoctrinate children, ban Christian preaching, and dismiss the Commissioner of Police “who has allowed himself to be used by heathens and Zionists.”
In short, Mr. Odinga in effect offered to Islamize Kenya in return for Muslim votes, despite the fact that Muslims make up only 10% of the population, compared to the 80% who are Christian. Mr. Odinga himself is nominally an Anglican, yet he signed a document that refers to Islam throughout as “the one true religion” and denigrates Christians as “worshippers of the cross.”
March 4th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
Odinga’s official website (/www.raila07.com) bills him (no kidding!) as “the People’s President” and “your Agent for Change” and has links to “Register for Change” and “Vote for Change.”
Odinga ran unsuccessfully for president of Kenya in 2007, claiming that “[w]ith [his] candidacy, Kenyans finally have the opportunity to reject ‘politics as usual’…and vote for positive change” and he “is the only candidate that represents the kind of change that Kenyans have been yearning for.”
Do those lines seem familiar?
These fierce defenses and attempts to discredit the sources…are just getting plain funny to me.
And you wouldn’t happen to be Ms. BEATRICE KAKAHIWAMAMOULI -an Election Worker for the ODM Party and Odinga, would you? You couldn’t possibly be - considering that IP address in Herndon, Virginia…Nice try; your hysteria and numerous postings stink of pathetic desperation.
March 4th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
This idea by Raila that Kibaki is trying to kill his way to a majority in parliament is crazy and it is where Raila’s evil treachery comes into play. He is using these deaths to score political points and to spur continued violence (he knows these deaths are not connected to Kibaki!!).
Look at his speech right after Were’s death:
**Raila’s Hyperbole: “An emotional Raila eulogised the slain MP, saying his life and blood would not go in vain. “His blood will water the tree of liberation… we will walk tall and stronger, we shall plant a flag on top of the mountain to remember him … Were shall be remembered … we will remember you brother.” Please Negroe , please.
Raila and Ruto have decided that if they don’t get power, they are going to plunge the country into chaos (but of course, they will not do the fighting; they’ll get others to do it for them). I believe Kibaki is being told to forget about negotiating with these two thugs. They must fight them to the end and bring them down (with the ultimate knockdown reserved for William Ruto).
March 4th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
Kenyans are tired of the hooliganism and violence. When all is said and done, Raila Odinga should look back on history and connect his falling political fortunes to one fatal strategic mistake: His reckless alliance with people like William Ruto and those Kalenjin militia’s.
Even if you believe in your heart that Kibaki rigged this election, the violence that erupted ended up working in Kibaki’s favor because it depicted ODM as a party of division and destruction. It is clear that the planned violence was only meant to target Kikuyu’s, but it spun out of control! and I think people have looked at Raila and come to the conclusion that this man is not stable.
Kibaki is a dictator, but he is a competent dictator and prior to the outbreak of this violence, the country was beginning to make strides economically and it looks like people want to get back to that order and stability.
All the pundits who said that Kenya would descend into war like Rwanda were just wrong. In Rwanda, the government itself was behind the violence and ethnic cleansing. This is not the case in Kenya and it’s a very important difference.
This whole crisis would make a great case study for any young person who has dreams of becoming Kenya’s future president. So many lessons, so many.
For me, the fundamental lesson is that Africa was pushed into western style democracy too quickly and we never had a chance to think about whether it would fit into our culture. We just copied and pasted and it’s not working. Some may argue that had Kibaki not rigged this election, democracy would have worked in Kenya, but I don’t think so. Why? because Raila’s entire campaign was filled with ethnic undertones meant to rail the other tribes against the Kikuyu and that too, was not good. And I will maintain to this day, that the inflammatory ethnic language that defined Raila’s campaign fanned the flames of brutal violence that was meted out against innocent Kikuyu’s right after the election results were announced. It was not spontaneous. Those attacks manifested themselves after months and months of poisonous language being delivered to these young men at ODM election rallies.
Those 18 and 19 year old Kalenjin men were indoctrinated in the same way that the genocidal killers in Rwanda were indoctrinated and in the same way that Osama bin Laden indoctrinated those 19 hijackers who carried out the attacks of 9/11. You don’t just wake up in the morning and decide to cut your neighbor up with a panga! The sad thing here is that an indoctrinator like Jackson Kibor will probably wind up living while many of those poor 19 year old Kalenjin “warriors” are going to wind up dead.
They were no angels on either side of this political crisis.
March 5th, 2008 at 3:28 am
Love the post on Coming Awakening, this is the same idiot who was lucky if any of hs video had 500 hits on youtube until he started posting his videos attacking me with pure outright lies and claiming he had done his research. This i the same person who posted all over the web Obama was in the senate sessions on 11-4 and 11-5-99.
Oh, and he thinks he can call someone FAT, his shirtless a– needs to hit the stair master himself.
March 14th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Its good the truth comes out.
April 16th, 2008 at 12:48 am
Cao, it looks like Kikuyus and Luos finally agreed to power sharing deal and they have agreed on a multi-tribal government. with this coalition, and the Kibaki government will be held accountable and so we hope to fix the ocrrtuption problem in Kenya but i am still waiting for the jihad you were talking about in this article…when do you think it will occur? do you have any information on it?
April 16th, 2008 at 4:57 am
Well Beatrice,
The jihad is apparent to those who are keeping themselves updated on these matters. It’s unfortunate that you’re sitting here baiting me, refusing to acknowledge it:
Read the whole article here.
More recently (January 2008, NYT):
1. Kenyan Christians could be subjected to Sharia law
2. Raila Odinga, the current frontrunner the poor sport in the presidential election in Kenya, promised that he will implement strict Islamic Sharia law if he receives the Muslim vote in the country and is elected president.
3. 30 Muslims arrested in Kenya for arms smuggling
4. Muslim supporters want Muslim politician to counter Christian evangelism in northern Kenya.
5. Islamic charities in Kenya are providing Al-Qaeda with operating funds. “Al Qaeda Skimming Charity Money: U.S., Saudi Crackdown Has Largely Failed To Stop Money Flow,” from CBS News, June 7, 2004.
If this combination of events does not point you in the direction of concluding there is a jihad in Kenya that Obama’s cousin Raila Odinga BACKS- similar to what’s going on now in Indonesia– you simply have your head in the sand.
And as I mentioned before, Beatrice, you are hardly an objective observer…as I suspect you are Ms. BEATRICE KAKAHIWAMAMOULI -a propagandist and Election Worker for the ODM Party and Odinga.
June 6th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Cao, I am not the Beatrice you claim I am..my name is Beatrice oreta…I am a 30 year old Kenyan Citizen…you insist on lying and act like you are being attacked by someone you suspect? How many other people have said you are wrong? Stop spreading lies about my country…I am not the Beatrice you say i am..maybe if you were smart enough you would know that in KENYA, the name Beatrice is very common. **** you Cao
June 6th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Leslie and Beatrice have the same IP address….But I am the liar???? bwahahahaha!!!
Look, I’m just one of many who are reporting it, so get bit…and if you can’t get your names straight I’m going to put a name in there for you that is fitting.
Whatever. Obama is a descendent of Arab slave traders; the Kenyan government shows his father as African Arab, this is why he has three muslim names and why his family have tried so hard to differentiate themselves from the Christians in the area.
And whatever your name is …I don’t particularly care since most of the people sticking up for Obama are practicing takeyya or just flat out lying about it.
Take a look at others who are pointing out the Kenya/terror connection:
Obama Wore Muslim Garb During Kenya Trip
Kenya’s killing fields
Sharia in Kenya?
Who is this man with Obama?
Obama’s cousin charged with ethnic cleansing
Kenya Erupts– 270 Dead Following Vote- 50 Burned Alive in Church
The Kenya Connection
Barack Obama’s Cousin Leads Opposition In Violent Kenya
Naturally Karl Marx’s ideology evidences itself where Obama is concerned ….he has a lot of that floating around him.
June 6th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
of course Leslie and I are going to have the same IP address..as we type this message we are right here in Texas watching the travel channel..Your comments reflect a level of ignorance that even my friend had to post a comment on your blog..is there something wrong with that? Just leave Kenya alone..you can say anything you wnat about Obama because he is American but i am very passionate about my beloved country and I am so sure if there was Jihad in Kenya, CNN and all other major news channels would be all over the story because America has a lot of interest in Kenya…get an education about Kenya Cao…this is my last comment on this blog because it is not worth my time….
June 6th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Yeah right. Can’t take the heat there in Texas, I see…LOL
You know what the problem is with people like you …you troll other peoples’ blogs and think everyone is going to be absolutely rivoted about what you have to say. heh
Even when it’s bunches of people posting from the same IP address…it’s so funny how you try to cover your asses.
We’ll see if you can resist coming back…say hi to the piano guy for me
“beatrice”
June 24th, 2008 at 4:57 am
You must be either plain stupid or high one something, you just waste time here writing stuff aboyut Kenya you dont know. I bet you have never been to Kenya. Well. I am Kenyan. Raila Odinga is not communist, and what you are presenting here is just heresay. You should learn to respect people who are not like you, and get over your racist s#$t. Racism is a product of inferiority complex. Go to a psychologist and get treatment. Anyway I think u live in some american cave and know nothing about the real world. Go to hell
June 24th, 2008 at 5:08 am
I’ve been thinking that when marxists and Islamists are calling you in sane without anything to back up that particular stupid insult (which is idiotic even on its face),it only demonstrates that you are the one who deserves to be in a strait jacket…LOL!!!
Top psychiatrist concludes liberals clinically nuts
Eminent psychiatrist makes case ideology is mental disorder
Pot meet kettle! Looked in the mirror lately? Attacking people who have plenty of resources with mere insults doesn’t really say much about the validity of your statements…although it’s fun to publish those comments as an example of how stupid the other side’s argument is. It reminds me of the ‘peace’ protester who was asked what his sign meant and he had to look up and read it and think. Even then, he couldn’t explain what it meant. You people can’t back up your position so the only thing left is to call people in sane or find some other means to personally attack the messenger since you don’t like the message.
I’m sorry, but there’s plenty of information out there that says Raila Odinga is a marxist. And why the surprise? Barack Obama Senior wrote a paper called ‘the problems facing our socialism’ - it’s obvious what politics Obama comes from - on both sides.
To use the communist racist argument *which is also Reverend Wright’s Liberation Theology argument - this is Obama’s religion* when this isn’t a matter of race is also painting you as the marxist - and that shouldn’t surprise anyone since quite a few communist & socialist dictators have come out publicly in support of Obama…not to mention black nationalists (or black nazis) like Louis Farrakhan.
It is Obama who is the racist (Marxism is racist) - he’s the one that continually brings up race in this campaign - as you have here.
“–Also, Raila Odinga was educated in communist E. Germany, and his father Oginga Odinga led the communist opposition during the Cold War.
Pipeline News.
The Castro brothers aren’t the only Marxists in the Americas rooting for Barack.
Barack has stated his support for Luo Opposition Leader in Kenya RaRaila Odinga (who signed a Shariah pact with Muslims and claims to be Obama’s cousin) and is married to Ida Odinga. They have four children - two sons and two daughters. His oldest son, Fidel, is named after Fidel Castro.
And he named his daughter after Winnie Mandella. -Daniel Johnson, New York Sun
And why does Raila Odinga use Obama’s exact same campaign slogan: CHANGE….Vote for CHANGE: Look at his website.
Free Republic
Odinga is a Marxist who reportedly has made a pact with a hardline Islamic group in Kenya to establish Shariah courts throughout the country. He has also vowed to ban booze and pork and impose Muslim dress codes on women — moves favored by Obama’s brother.
Assyrian News Agency
June 24th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Conservatives are so afraid that the capitalist systems that favor the rich will be lessened, that they will not even stop to think about those who have been suppressed for hundreds of years. Like in Kenya, where the Muslim minority is suppressed, and the government was ruled by, as you said yourself, a “dictator”. The pact signed seems to be an attempt to help those who are not having a voice be heard, and who are we to judge which morals are correct for all humankind! there are countless minority groups around the world that have been exploited and used for the benefit of those in power. It’s definitely not okay for groups to use violence to regain control, against anyone, even if they have been treated unfairly, but as far as judging other countries goes, we have no right. How can we possibly read all of the literature and understand it ALL, moreso, what about all of the undocumented information about history in countries around the world. All I’m saying is this, we all need to find a way to overcome violence, because it only perpetuates more violence, as seen by the chain reactions of generations of fighting in the name of religion. The US is very much at fault for it’s own share of unjust violence, just as much as the revolutionary groups fighting for equality. Maybe if people would stop to take a look from the other side they might be able to see things more clearly, and unemotionally. A president who can take pieces of Marxism to change our country to look towards the betterment of those who have been suppressed is not a bad thing. Marxism theories are about equality and the struggles of classes, not just communism. And lastly, just because those are his family members, it doesn’t mean that he will secretly fund them and provide terrorists with aid. But maybe conservatives think he will be able to accomplish all of this without Americans knowing, and against our Christian majority in America because Bush has been very successful at exactly this type of thing. What’s scarier than Obama using marxist methods to help the poor is the thought of MacCain inheriting the presidency and causing our nation’s ruin with his bullheaded tactless techniques. We will never be able to bomb people into submission, because there is too large of a Muslim population, and terrorist network. It’s silly to think that we will succeed without cooperating with EVERYONE in the global society. Oh, and are Oprah and her viewers and all the voters who chose Obama practicing takeyya also?
June 24th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Wow that comment right there deserves a good fisking. I’m going to make it into a post. (I did, it’s here.)
You people are always providing comic relief…about how dumb leftists are and how little they grasp history and the millions who’ve been murdered in communist regimes.
I suppose the most amazing fact is the fact that communists only oppose violence when it comes to freedom loving capitalists.
I will once again post something that I posted from a website that went down…but I saved the sentiments because they ring loud and clear.
When is Commnism Godly?
Here’s what one person emailed to us that shows how liberals get deceived into embracing communism:
Capitalism is not ungodly, of course. It is the economic system that results from following God’s commandments not to steal or to lie. If I cannot steal, than the only way I can acquire goods or money is if I produce something that somebody else wants and is willing to trade with me for voluntarily. If I cannot lie, then I cannot defraud my trading partner about the quality or quantity of the goods or services I am offering to trade.
Self-interest is not sinful, of course, which is why God commands us to love others as we love ourselves. It is capitalism’s tendency to make men provide for their neighbors in order to advance their own self-interest that led Adam Smith, considered the father of economics, to remark that capitalism leads men to promote the welfare of society “as if led by and invisible hand”:
God’s commandments against stealing and lying - which create capitalism - limit but do not eliminate greed. This is why God gave us the 10th commandment against covetousness. But capitalism does limit greed in two ways:
First, capitalism prevents a greedy person from taking more from somebody else than he can acquire by peaceful, honest, voluntary trade.
Second, capitalism may actually induce a greedy person to give something away, not because he loves or cares about the person he gives to but to acquire a good reputation which will make future trades more likely. We even have a word for this idea in the language of capitalism, it is called “goodwill”.
A greedy person always struggles with Proverbs 11:24, which says “There is that scattereth, and yet increaseth; and there is that withholdeth more than is meet, but it tendeth to poverty.” Capitalism provides incentives to give, but it does not compel giving. That still requires a loving heart.
To overcome greed, one requires a self-interest enlightened by Biblical truth. God tells us that we are made in His image. This means that we are made to love others as well as ourselves. And this in turn means that we cannot be truly happy unless we give some of what God has given us to those less fortunate than ourselves. Even non-Christians understand this because God has written the law on the hearts of all men.
Now lets turn to communism. There are many ways to prove that communism does not work as a national economic system - besides just reading the newspaper - but let’s use the problem of greed that seemed to worry our liberal friend so much.
There is one situation in which the Bible tells us that communism works, it occurs in Acts 4:32-35:
32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
35 And laid them down at the apostles feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
The key to understanding when communism works is to recognize that those who have the power to distribute goods must love the others for whom they act sacrificially. This is the type of love that Christ commanded Christians to have both within their church families and their natural families. See John 13:34-35; Ephesians 5:24-25.
A second requirement is that property donated to the common store not be taken by force, but rather be donated voluntarily. This requirement appears in Acts 5:1-13, in the story of Ananias and Sapphira.
We are all communists within our families. The father, as the spiritual head, has the authority to distribute property as the family members have need, and the responsibility to teach his family to give of what they have in love for the benefit of other family members. But even within a family, the father does not have an absolute right to expropriate a child, and what right he does have is extinguished completely once the child reaches his majority and undertakes his own support. The duty of loving sacrificially within a family, however, remains in effect for life.
The two requirements for communism to work are never met when communism is implemented as the economic system for a nation. First, communist governments never rely on their citizens to donate property voluntarily - they take it at the point of a gun. Second, they never distribute property according to the needs of their citizens.
Two problems prevent communist governments from distributing property to meet the needs of their citizens. The first is greed. In a communist system, there is no incentive to give anything you have or control away. Just the opposite, the way you acquire control over goods or services is not by inducing others to trade with you voluntarily but by pleasing those in power, so you can acquire more power yourself. Communism actually provides an incentive for people to be greedy - so that they have more power. It is possible to demonstrate that communist economic sytems are based on covetousness by modeling a communist system with game theory and abstract calculus.
The second problem is just as important. Communist governments have no practical way to determine what the needs of their citizens are. The real problem of economics is a problem of distributed information. Each individual knows best what he can produce and what he wants to consume. Under capitalism, this distributed information is captured in the price system, by which people auction their labor and capital and bid on resources, goods, and services. But under communism there is no price system, because there are no markets. As a result, the knowledge that each individual possesses never makes it into the central committee’s five-year plan.
It is interesting to note that once the Soviet Union disintegrated we were able to find out what the distribution of wealth was across their society. To everybody’s surprise, it was no different than under capitalism. The top few percent had most of the wealth. The difference was the size of the pie - the amount of economic production or what we call GDP, gross domestic product.
Because capitalism gives incentives for people to produce and captures the distributed information that each individual possesses, capitalism produces a much larger quantity of goods and services for people to consume. Even though the poor still have a small relative share of the total production, because production is much greater under capitalism the absolute share the poor acquire would make them the equal of the middle classes under commuism.
The fact that the poor receive less under a communist national economic system confirms its sinfulness. Not only does national communism begin with sin - because it begins with stealing and provides no means to ensure that those who wield the power to distribute goods love sacrificially those for whom they act - but also it ends with sin, by oppressing the poor and giving greedy men an incentive to aggrandize arbitrary power to themselves.
To sum up, the difference between capitalism and communism as national economic systems is the size of the pie and how you get a bigger piece of it. In capitalism the pie is much bigger, and you make your piece bigger by producing something that others want to trade for. In communism, the pie is much smaller, and you make your piece bigger by pleasing those who have a bigger piece than you do, whether or not you produce anything that truly benefits anybody else.
One last thing we should say about communism within church families. Neither Paul nor the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15) taught or required communism within churches. It seemed to arise spontaneously in Jersusalen as a result of the unique time and circumstances within that church.
In Jerusalem, communism was adopted during a time of great upheaval, change, and persecution. Thousands were coming to the church, and the Gospel was being confirmed with signs and wonders. People were leaving homes and jobs, sometimes coming from foreign lands as with those who joined the church at Pentecost. Nevertheless, it was the church at Jerusalem that always found itself without a surplus, dependent on the churches in which communism was not practiced. The Pilgrims learned the importance of the incentives provided by the free market system when, after their first year in the New World, they threw out the communist model and adopted private property.
Perhaps the reason that liberals stumble at communism is that, because they don’t know Christ, they do not have the Holy Spirit to teach them how to rightly divide scripture. They see a system that arises from the rules God has commanded for families and make the mistake of thinking it can be transplanted to government. They discount man’s sinful nature. After all, if man was sinful, he really would need a Savior! This liberals can never admit.
June 24th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
What a comment. So violence is not the answer to getting out from under the thumb of oppressors?
Tell that to George Washington and the Continental Army.
And who are we to judge other systems as to whether they are moral or not? That question is a straw man that is going up in flames with this;
Freedom and equality under the law for all persons is vastly superior to the system of islam, where women are equal to half a man and non muslims are second class citizens, the proof is in the pudding baby, and we re to judge it because we are correct, and by not judging it, calling it for what it is and fighting against it we are shirking our moral duty towards our fellow man.
As for the comment that we can’t bomb them into submission because their are too many of them may I suggest regarding that untrue statement that you ask;
The Japanese;
The Germans (twice);
The Italians;
Whoever it was that tried to take back the Falkland Islands;
Grenada;
Manuel Noriega;
Need I continue?
June 24th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
Bravo Cao and Kender!
Kender did forget that the Mexicans “tried to take Texas back’, and got their butts kicked! We also kicked butt in Viet Nam to the point the NV leaders had to use our liberal press and American libtards to create the propoganda campaign that ended with our withdrawl and the deaths of thousands of South Vietnamese. Good job libtards! I say, pull out the stops and send in the Marines every time!
June 25th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Yeah, but we knew where they all were in previous wars, this is a widespread hatred of America based on the attitudes that people like you guys have, just bomb the sh** out of them! If you keep beating your child over and over again because he won’t learn the rules, eventually something bad is going to happen, one way or another. Instead, if you are having to beat him over and over again, maybe you should re-examine your methods of discipline, because they are NOT WORKING!!!! We have been fighting this stupid war with Muslims for thousand of years! It’s about time to find another solution! It’s basic ethics, a threat is only as good as the actions it prevents and the reaction it gets.
June 25th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
Communism is a far cry from using some ” Marxist” as you put it, ideas. To help balance out our economic system, there must be more regulations put in place. Our government lacks the infrastructure needed, and it’s by CHOICE, because those in power would not want the status quo to be changed. As far as our morality being so much better than others’ we only abolished slavery about 150 years ago, and our black citizens still are discriminated against. I wouldn’t believe it as true, but I have seen it first hand myself time and again! Obamas ties to Arab countries should be seen as a positive thing, because he may be our only hope of global cooperation. As far as his supposed “cousin” Odinga, the dictator that he revolted agianst was a ver corrupt official, elected by our “free election system” that we put into place in developing nations. Our system is so flawed, but yet we still try to get others to follow it. The previous dictator was never charged though, sound familiar? Oh yeah, like Bush and Gore, and Cheney and Haliburton, and the fact that we are borrowing money from China, and then helping them keep their oil sources in the Middle East by bleeding our citizens dry of all the money generated in the internet boom in America. This war is about so mush more than just “protecting us from terrorists”. We have so much money invested in this tangled web that if we pull out, it means disaster for our already broken economy!
June 25th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
As far as Odinga putting sharia law in place in Kenya, ha said it would only be in the Muslim majority areas, and why is that so bad? If they are Muslim areas, they are entitled to their own laws. And also, not all Muslims believe that women are worth half that of men, have you ever even met a Muslim person? That sounds as absurd as saying that all Christians believe that being *** is wrong, or are you one of those people who dispute scientific proof and thinks that people choose to be ***? I bet you also think that all interracial families are dysfunctional too, that women should not have the right to choose how to operate their bodies, and that anyone who is not like you is wrong! How does your Christian beliefs allow you to think that violence towards others is okay, oh yeah, because they are not as moral as us, because we just marry our wives and passive aggressively abuse them and have mistresses. The upper class society is every bit as corrupt and immoral as the Muslims who believe that women are inferior, because they think that by going to church and vowing to help others in community service they are actually helping. The only people they are really helping are themselves, by easing their guilty consciences about the way our government treats the less fortunate and those who are troubled, and the fact that they allow it to happen! That is the most immoral thing to do, and by saying that it must be given by a willing heart you are creating another excuse why it’s not “your fault” that our own citizens are poverty stricken while we fight a war for “those poor people who are in bondage because of their Muslim theocracies”. Even in the church we teach that you should help those closest to you first! Come on, are those your best arguments?
June 25th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Sorry, didn’t realize that stating someone’s sexual orientation is considering obscene!
June 26th, 2008 at 9:20 am
In observing Larry Sinclair– the nemesis of Barack Obama– concerning drug and ***** use in the back of a limo, one can listen to a laid back Sinclair tell his tale like one discusses the latest fashion trends.
For the Obamaniacs, Sinclair sounds like a dufe and a liar which they dismiss in their infatuation over Barack Obama. For those who really listen to Larry Sinclair though, he has allot more going on with him in intelligence and planning than his Minnesota smile reveals.
I sincerely believe that when Larry Sinclair was arrested after his National Press Club appearance that he honestly had calculated this would occur. He knew that the Obamaniacs were going crazy. He knew that Obama had shut him down in spending a fortune. He knew that Obama’s people were ticked at being reigned in the last time Mr. Sinclair waded through the muck of Democratic politics and he knew he had outstanding warrants which would lead to his arrest.
Now ask yourself, if you are Larry Sinclair and there is no legal way you can get your hands on Barack Obama’s phone records which Obama is hiding in connection with murdered Don Young and the vanishing limo driver who brought Sinclair and Obama together, what is one of the easiest ways to gain access to that information than a court order?
What court order could this be? Well, Larry Sinclair knows that 3 Obama operatives are online bragging they got Mr. Sinclair arrested. They phoned the DC police and literally stalked Mr. Sinclair and provided a visual identification that Mr. Sinclair just “happened” to put on his blog before the press club meeting.
Next, instead of the DC police, the Feds swooped in and took custody of Mr. Sinclair……all an apparent violation of the 10th Amendment of the Constitution as Delaware or Colorado were not even bothering with seeking extradition for Mr. Sinclair where his warrants were outstanding.
So this means someone in the Federal government violated protocols as they have no business in getting involved in a state matter for petty matters. The best part of this is for Mr. Sinclair is they then moved him from the District of Columbia, into Maryland which has nothing to do with this case which is supposed to be a Delaware warrant.
Liberals when this is going on with terrorists call it kidnapping. The reader can decide as a judge will if Mr. Sinclair’s attorneys start filing subpoenas in this for the following counts of what is shaping up as a criminal conspiracy of the Obama operatives and Federal officials to stalk and imprison with kidnapping one Lawrence Sinclair.
Questions now are raised in who in the Federal government was monitoring this to send in officers to take into custody Mr. Sinclair who has not broken federal laws.
Delaware and Colorado both knew of Mr. Sinclair and could have cared less about his petty offenses.
Attorneys now can subpoena phone and email records of the federal government.
Attorneys now can subpoena records of the 3 Obamanaics who were stalking Larry Sinclair to see what contact they have with the Obama camp.
When any of the above shows a link as in WhiteHouse at the same press conference Mr. Sinclair was conducting to what Mr. Sinclair states is a Mr. Axelrod working for Barack Obama funded the WhiteHouse lie detector fraud, well that channels directly to Mr. Obama and all of his campaign records in a criminal conspiracy to silence Lawrence Sinclair.
Once that door is open and it is, then Larry Sinclair via the court can obtain Barack Obama’s entire phone records which Mr. Sinclair states will prove his meeting with Barack Obama in a limo and the dealings Mr. Obama had with a dead sodomite choir director in Don Young.
Whether the Obamaniacs know it or not, they are the plumbers in an Obamagate who just landed this entire fiasco back onto Barack Obama with the courts opening up everything he has just like in Watergate.
Payoffs, faked lie detector tests, murdered choir directors and now a literal Federal conspiracy involving what is termed French bloggers and an American blogger to stalk and imprison Mr. Sinclair.
If the Federal zealot who grabbed Mr. Sinclair is found without merit as this was not a federal matter, then there is a fact of kidnapping.
All of that adds up to a horrendous catastrophe and as stated if Mr. Sinclair knew his being dragged into the courts would gain him access as his past maneuvers have shown, then it will be Barack Obama’s own people who bring him down as they have just opened all avenues of defense to Mr. Sinclair and his attorneys to all of these records as one apprehension links all of the parts together.
Now who looks like the bright boy? Yes Larry Sinclair does look quite intelligent now and if his attorneys are one bit the savvy they appear to be, the Obamaniacs walked right into this in one of the best chess moves ever carried out.
Barack Obama in his public directions has stated he had hundreds of operatives doing such work and they have been attacking Mr. Sinclair. The chickens have come home to roost and there is no way Senator Obama is going to cover this up when the courts get involved as if he starts violating court orders that is contempt and if he starts legal maneuvers the voting public will really start focusing on this in what he is really hiding.
Perhaps Larry Sinclair should have been the Democratic nominee as he is so far ahead of the most brilliant operatives in getting them to walk right into this.
June 26th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Marxist Communism has been the one of the most influential ideological developments of the past 200 years, yet very few Americans actually know anything about Communist ideology. Americans do have many misconceptions about Communism however, which have been intentionally promoted by American leadership.
I say influential for a reason, because the 20th century was largely defined by the struggle between capitalism and communism. Communism is so influential because even capitalist countries like America were defined in the 20th century by their anti-Communist policies, and because communism was a critical factor in the development of the climate that led to World War II, as fascism itself developed in opposition to communism.
There are three basic major socialist ideologies: Socialism, Anarchism, and Communism. These are all regarded as forms of socialism.
Rational Revolution
June 26th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
So…looks like we’re screwed no matter who ends up our president, now I feel even better!
June 26th, 2008 at 12:06 pm
Pick your poison!
June 27th, 2008 at 5:55 am
Unfortunately, that’s absolutely spot-on.
July 17th, 2008 at 10:05 am
This site is so full of **** it stinks to high heaven! It is dumb-*** rhetoric such as is posted on this site that feeds the minds and fantasies of your uneducated, brain-dead readers that would believe this hog-wash and anything negative that they hear that disrupts the ordinary and incites racism, bigotry, and feeds into hate! What you would rather have us do is continue to wallow in the political pig-sty that Bush and Cheney have been hovering over for the past 8 years! Well, your right wing, brain-dead president now has the honor of wearing the crown for being the “Worst President in American History”. Congratulations guys…you finally made it!
July 20th, 2008 at 8:30 am
Heh. One more reason I should close comments..so idiots don’t put diatribes up against me simply because they don’t agree with what I put up.
I guess it’s one of the reasons that Kender thinks I’m so talented, LOL…!
The louder they scream, the more you know you’re onto something.
What are you going to do about your Bush Derangement Syndrome when he’s no longer in office?
Your person to blame everything in the world on will be gone.
Talk about brain dead! bwahahahahaha!