1/27/2008
the Obama challenge: Larry Sinclair
I could hardly believe this when I saw it.
Larry Sinclair comes forward about a couple of incidents that took place in 1999, while Obama was a State Representative. Sinclair says he met Obama in a lounge - and they left in his limo, Obama got crack for his use, and coke for this guy…and oral sex in the back of the limo - and in a hotel room in Gurnee, two days later.
This is rather serious…I’m wondering if it’s another Hillary plant. I mean look at what Sandy Berger did for the Clintons…Either way, this is disgusting.
Now when I was clubbing in the 70’s, I witnessed Jessie Jackson, Jr., take chicks into his van - several over the course of a night - and rock their world…so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised at what politicians do in Chicago and what they think they can get away with.
What am I talking about…they DO get away with it, and nobody seems to care!
What will Soros do about THIS?
Rense has an interview with him:
February 1st, 2008 at 2:19 am
http://dearmurray.com/why-are-ron-paul-supporters-working-so-hard-to-defame-obama/
February 1st, 2008 at 6:06 am
Jeff Rense has a radio program, is a former television news reporter, dabbled in pet business, and his favorite singer is Mario Lanza.
I happened to share a lot of those interests–although UFOs are not one of them.
Who cares if he’s a Ron Paul supporter? He also believes in a zionist conspiracy - which I don’t. And I’m not a Ron Paulbot. But I DO work with a bunch of Ron Paul supporters.
I doubt if Sinclair is a Ron Paul supporter, he just wants Obama to tell the truth about his drug use….since democrats are claiming the Bush whitehouse LIED.
You’re just using that discrediting attack the messenger technique because you don’t like this message.
February 1st, 2008 at 8:21 pm
It’s relevant because 100% of the sites claiming this is credible are run by self-declared ron paul supporters.
There are two distinct Ron Paul camps. The Ron Paul campaign, and the Ron Paulbot “campaign”. The latter has been documented as the driving force behind the viral spread of this disinformation campaign.
There is absolutely no evidence that any such thing occured. Only further spamming attempts to attempt to create facts.
Such as “Obama said he remember the man, but not those events.” False. No such statement occurred = spam attempt.
Such as “sinclair has provided documentation.” false. he has repeatedly ignored such requests.
Frankly, he has offered absolutely no evidence to support any of his claims. He’s clinging simply to an offer to take a lie detector test, which really means nothing.
February 1st, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Well you can decrease that 100% to something less because THIS is not one of them. That first broadbrushing overgeneralizing statement is false, LOL
The next few statements don’t apply to this blog, either. And Freerepublic -to my knowledge - is not a paulbot site.
Nice try, though.
I think it’s interesting that you’re so rabid about shooting the messenger…….
When I think this story should be getting much wider coverage than it’s getting, and apparently there are others who think the same thing.
Hey. I have an idea. Why doesn’t Obama just come out and tell the truth?
That would prove the audacity of hope, LOL
February 2nd, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Why? Because they’re unfounded allegations from an uncredible man, with absolutely zero proof of his claims.
That post on freerepublic is a message board post posted by Mr. Sircy, who is a Ron Paul supporter. A message board post, not a news report. Another Ron Paul supporter, NewsGuy2005, the spokesperson for internet radio show “the right perspective” posted an announcement about sinclair appearing on the show, and free republic deleted the post.
This will never be taken seriously, and this will not hurt Obama’s chances one bit.
Good luck with that.
February 2nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm
You’re right, Soros and Axelrod will never let this see the light of day.
February 2nd, 2008 at 5:14 pm
Drug use or not, Obama is scary enough without having a “stoner past”. And everything you claim about this man being “uncredible” can be said for all the allegations made by the left about the Bush administration. If there was any solid proof that he was responsible for everything the leftist claim, he would be drummed out of office like Nixon was! What Nixon did for Americans was demonstrate that when “solid evidence” was there, proper action on behalf of the American people would follow.
February 2nd, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Unlike Clinton, who threw a party on the Whitehouse lawn when he was impeached.
February 2nd, 2008 at 7:08 pm
You’ll hear no defending of Clinton from me.
Didn’t he start bombing Iraq on the eve of his impeachment?
February 7th, 2008 at 8:24 am
I understand why the liberal media hasn’t picked up on this. I am very diappointed that Fox News hasn’t at least mentioned this scandal.
If seeing the video leaves any doubt as to the credibility of Larry SinClair, the mp3 interview with Jeff Rense will erase it.
February 8th, 2008 at 1:48 am
I realize it’s a stretch and all, but uh, could it be because there was absolutely no proof of any of this?
Just some guy with a webcam on YouTube.
February 8th, 2008 at 7:07 am
Well, the proof would have to be there or it would be liable. It is pretty pathetic that the MSM is so inept at producing truth that isn’t slanted that we don’t know if the story is being buried or ignored for political reasons or if it went ignored because of no real basis in fact.
February 8th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
What? The MSM what?
Larry hasn’t produced a single shred of truth.
Seriously, this is getting really annoying. It’s been three weeks since he started this, and he’s saying the exact same things he did, and has produced no evidence. He’s just saying “oh, you will see. just you wait.”
How long do we have to wait?
He said three weeks ago that three major newspapers had verified the “facts.”
And nothing.
Continuing to believe this is complete and utter nonsense.
February 8th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
There IS one way to know if Sinclair is lying
he can describe Omama’s private part!
February 8th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
Well if you listen to the interview with Jeff Rense, it sounds like he wasn’t about to leave any STONE unturned, if you get my drift.
Sounds to me like Jeff didn’t let him go into that much detail about the deed itself.
And if he had, I mighta puked.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
Interesting that this guy/gal would show up right at the time when Obama’s campaign picks up steam. Actually he “came out” one week before South Carolina when things started getting hot for the Clintons. I wonder it Mr. Larry is from Arkansas or Texas. That would tell us a lot.
And how would someone know who Obama was in 1999? I mean it looks to me that this guy was pretty “busy doing his business.” Wouldn’t he have been with hundreds if not thousands of people. Why remember Obama?
Politics in the US is beginning to stink. I wish we were nicer and just argued about policy and positions. I guess this is the downside of YouTube and the net. It’s east to slander someone.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:45 pm
Interesting that this guy/gal would show up right at the time when Obama’s campaign picks up steam. Actually he “came out” one week before South Carolina when things started getting hot for the Clintons. I wonder it Mr. Larry is from Arkansas or Texas. That would tell us a lot.
February 8th, 2008 at 11:30 pm
Cmon - he has been trying to get attention since at least last October.
February 9th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
If he’s been “trying to get the word out since October” why does it not appear anywhere on the internet before January 18?
You’d think he would have at least posted a blog, a YouTube video, on a message board, or something before then.
But there’s nothing. Absolutely nothing. January 18 is the earliest mention of any of this on the whole internet.
February 9th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Who cares if it didn’t appear until January?
The guy wasn’t trying to get attention - he was trying to get a response from Obama.
Since he didn’t get it, eventually he had to resort to other measures.
Please put all of your questions here, I’m going to try and do a phone interview with him - either over phoneblogz or on talkshoe. If I do it on talkshoe, people can call in to ask him questions.
February 10th, 2008 at 2:07 am
riiiiiiiight.
And I know a guy in Nigeria who wants you to help him with a bank transfer.
Hell, I just tried to listen to loopy Larry’s interview on the Right Perspective, and I only made it about 2 minutes in before I had to turn it off. Racist quacks. “Obama the jungle boy”? Yeah, real unbiased and legitimate news source, there. Mmmhmmm.
10 years from now, Larry will be sitting in a straightjacket somewhere, without ever producing anything to prove he’s telling the truth, or even credible in the least bit, and you will still be convinced he’s telling the truth.
Look up bonsai kittens, while you’re at it. Maybe they’re real, too!
February 10th, 2008 at 2:26 am
I just listened to part of the radio interview, and Larry’s going on saying they’re “slandering him on the DNC website.”
Go to DNC.org yourself, and search for “sinclair.”
An article about hurricane Katrina, and an article about the economy. Nothing about loopy larry.
Mmmhhm.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:20 am
I have not ignored any request for facts supporting my claims about obama. I have refused to turn over information to the internet warriors who somehow feel I owe them something. In response to the attempt to call me a liar about the smears on the official DNC site I provide you the following link http://www.democrats.org/page/community/tag/Larry+Sinclair
I also would like to say that comingawakening is posting videos making claims that he know what day I met Obama, and what day the navy graduation took place only all of his claimed FACTS were totally made up by him and I had to correct him.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:22 am
I also would like to say that comingawakening is posting videos making claims that he know what day I met Obama, and what day the navy graduation took place only all of his claimed FACTS were totally made up by him and I had to correct him.
February 10th, 2008 at 3:34 am
Murray, I have produced a lot of evidence to actual reporters to support my claims. Everyone wants the driver, and he is not ( and I understand his reasons) coming out until this is out because to put him out without a safety net Axelrod and Obama will try to keep that man from talking. And if you think otherwise, you people do not realize just how rough and corrupt Chicago politics has always been and still is when it is putting millions in Axelrods pockets.
February 10th, 2008 at 4:00 am
Thank you for commenting, Larry. I look forward to doing a great interview with you when our schedules permit!
February 10th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
this is such ****. you have an admitted drug dealer showing care and concern for our people all of a sudden? right.
you’re right larry - if that’s your real name.
politics are dirty and you’re the prime example of your own words. you are such a liar. how do i know?
well - in your “interview” with the nobodies you keep talking to like this blog - you first say:
“If Obama would have made a statement earlier admitting drug use, I would have voted for him.”
literally two minutes later you go into a politically biased tirade where you say (paraphrasing):
- that no one knows his politics.
- he’s the establishment now.
- no one knows anything about him.
and many more comments that left the “drug use” concern you have and went into the political realm. you are full of it.
if you were so worried about the country and young people why did you peddle crack and other drugs into the neighborhoods of america? you’ve probably killed or led to the killing of many americans in the trade.
the sad thing is that even if it happened, you’re lack of credibility, drug use, prostitution, and the murder of young people due to their drug use will keep you from playing hero to america. isn’t life a biotch.
go away. you have credibility and there is no proof you can bring to bear that will be significant. only a picture with obama or dna evidence will stand up in court. everything else you could have done yourself.
i feel bad for you because i think you are in trouble and need help. i think someone has a gun to your head because one of your drug deals went bad and now you are in deep.
February 10th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Okay, that is quite enough. I will not tolerate people maligning and insulting Larry here, nor will I tolerate your directing insults at me.
The comments I’m referring to have not been approved, nor will they be. This is putting you Larry Sinclair stalkers on notice–
Either you decide you’re going to be civil, and I’ll let your comments through, or - keep up the name calling and your comments will sit in moderation until I see them, start laughing, and nuke them.
I think Sinclair deserves a lot better press on this story than he’s been given, and he deserves more respect than this, as do I.
I contacted Matt Drudge, and I’m going to do some promoting of my own.
Thanks to you guys who find it necessary to shoot the messenger, I think we have something here.
February 10th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
By the way, that’s not a ‘community messageboard’ and blog. You have to be registered to comment there. As opposed to here, which is up to my personal discretion.
February 10th, 2008 at 5:30 pm
To address Murray’s questions. First the Driver is not a random cab driver and second I have always made it a point to try and keep in touch with people whom I enjoyed knowing and/or meeting. I have friends that I have had for 15 to 20 years now that I met just as I did this driver. The statements I made about David Axelrod were relayed to me by reporters who spoke directly with Axelrod, I find it interesting that you can claim Mr. Axelrod has not made these statements when these reporters state other wise. Some even feel he has the right to conduct his investigation.
February 10th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
Country Drug Bumpkin please if you wish to make claims of what I sell ask me. In 1999 and 2000 I did not sell crack to our kids, I was selling about 1000 to 1500 pounds of weed and 3 to 5 kilos of cocaine to two buyers in SC per month. I can be forthright about my past. I cannot expect to come forward with this on Obama and not be willig to be open about my past as well. As for my comments about Obama’s politics, people such as you have thrown at me over and over how Obama is here to save us, well aren’t I entitled to respond to that which you and others throw at me?
February 10th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Uhh, yeah. You’re best buds with a random cab driver you met nine years ago in Chicago.
Mmmhmm.
And re: the post on democrats.org it’s on a free blog and message board that anyone can sign up for and post on. Anyone. It’s no different than someone posting something on youtube or myspace.
Where exactly are these reporters saying this? All we get, Larry, is you saying things. “This happened, this is happening, etc. etc.”
With absolutely nothing to back up any of these claims, let alone your original claims.
One more question, Larry. If you were “selling 1000 to 1500 lbs. of weed and 3 to 5 kilos of cocaine per month”, it sounds like you were quite the drug kingpin.
So why, pray tell, would you have to find someone to score you some blow???? You would have had enough dust leftover just in your front pocket to get you through.
None of this makes the least bit of sense.
February 10th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Is it up to you to decide what makes sense, murray?
I think the public has a right to this story!
Maybe the Obama campaign is afraid of what else might come out as a result of this revelation. Why doesn’t Obama respond - and why hasn’t he? And what is Axelrod covering up?
February 10th, 2008 at 9:34 pm
It’s a matter of common sense. A bunch of claims that don’t add up, combined with zero evidence to support any of them. It’s a pretty simple equation. There is no “media suppression,” just a bunch of baseless accusations.
If you guys are counting on Drudge to report this, you’re in for a disappointment.
Another question, Larry. You said something on the radio about Obama being “immune” to attacks, and that attacks on other candidates get reported.
And, uh, who exactly are you speaking about? Because the only “attack” was on Ron Paul, for some newsletters that he may or may not have written, but were linked back to a foundation that he set up. Written by him or not, they were paid for by Ron Paul. That part is documented.
So, just for the record, is that the “attack” you are referring to?
February 10th, 2008 at 10:59 pm
Murray: Because I am not stupid enough to get on a Delta Airlines flight carrying cocaine on me or in my luggage. But then again to you that will most likely sound stupid too.
You are entitled to believe what you want, you are not entitled to post untrue statements about me all over the web. That my friend is what you and your friends are yelling is slander, but yet you are the one slandering.
February 11th, 2008 at 6:09 am
It’s not up to murray and his pals on the internet to determine whether or not any of this makes sense.
What about the ‘public’s right to know?’
Sinclair has talked to the Chicago Trib, Fox News, the New York Post, MSNBC-given up his medical records, his financial records, etc. These are the actions of someone who is sincere.
On the other hand, Sinclair is not even able to even pose a question…(just like reporters aren’t allowed to ask Chelsea Clinton a question) and a story you’d think would be HUGE hasn’t even hit the radar. That’s because it’s not politically expedient. But the stories on Blair Hull and Jack Ryan were….and Axelrod was behind those, too.
This is highly suspicious!
What are they hiding and what are they afraid of?
February 11th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Because the media doesn’t have the right to publish accusations without any basis, whatsoever. You have to have real proof, not an offer to take an unreliable polygraph test, or whatever.
Otherwise, anyone could accuse anyone of anything, and get TV time for it. That does not warrant coverage. Otherwise, we might as well just start a whole TV network for nonstop accusations, because I’ve got a whole bunch of them.
The public has decided. The comments on the YouTube video were overwhelmingly unbelievers. Then, they were suddenly disabled.
Basically what this all boils down to is the only people who believe this are people who really want to believe it. Who are predispositioned to believe it.
Larry, you can do nothing about people making fun of you. It’s called parody, and it is protected by free speech. That has been determined by the Supreme Court.
February 11th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
It seems to me Larry has come out with an awful lot of details about his own life that most folks would hesitate to expose on themselves and on that count I salute him. I would give him the benefit of a doubt and like to hear what he has to say, because quite frankly, I think Murray’s attacks and rude comments (in leftest style) is telling me that they want to suppress Larry a lot!!! Why would anyone care if Larry were an isolated and documented “nutjob” with no credibility???? Where there is smoke, the is fire, and Murray seems to be stirring up a good deal of smoke!
February 11th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Yeah, uh, it’s “me and my pals”.
My “pals” like Conservative Radio host Todd Schnitt, who posted a link to the YouTube video on his website with the disclaimer “Schnitt doesn’t believe this.”
February 11th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Murray, believe what you wish, I have no intention of going back and forth with you over this especially when you hide behind screen names to numerous to mention them all.
And Bumpkin, Larry Sinclair is my real name, and that is FORMER dealer to you, who ever you may be
February 11th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
The media has plenty of “basis”. They’re just controlled by Axelrod.
…..the Tribune finally admitted that it was Axelrod and the Obama campaign that brought pressure on the press to demand the unsealing of M. Blair Hull divorce records…
Axelrod, in fact, was also once a columnist for the Tribune and an advisor to Mayor Daley….
Apparently he has perfected those ‘politics of personal destruction…
February 11th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
I have explained why I “care.” Because, in the end here, it will be you and I who lose out because of things like this. With YouTube becoming a source for incredible slander, the day will come when YouTube instills moderators who will remove all questionable content. It will become as bad as Wikipedia.
I’m also documenting all of this, because once this is all over, I intend to write an article about how easy it is to make up a smear campaign online, and spread it by spamming blogs and message boards.
I’m not worried about any of “Sinclair’s” charges. I am just curious to see how far it goes.
I mean, what exactly would convince you that Larry Sinclair is lying? He hasn’t stated an exact date that this supposedly occurred, because if he did, it could be instantly rebuked, and he knows it. So you play the open ended game.
“Sinclair” states that he stayed at the Comfort Suites in Gurnee, Illinois, but googling information about the hotel brings up a page saying that it was being renovated from 1999-2000. What would it take? A statement from the hotel verifying that the hotel was closed for renovations during that time would blow everything else Larry said out of the water. Still wouldn’t be enough for you folks, though.
There have been no specifics, only vague details. There is a reason for the vagueness. It’s simply to create an atmosphere of “don’t believe me? prove me wrong.” Meanwhile, you can’t prove a claim wrong when someone is making vague statements.
February 11th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Are you kidding me? Youtube is already just as bad if not worse than wikipedia.
It stinks of the political correctness prevalent at college universities - and allows terrorist jihadi videos and protects ‘groups’ from being ‘offended.’
You’re a nut and a flake in my opinion…posting under different pseudonyms in numerous places is not a new ‘trick’…
February 11th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
Murray, you and the likes of you are the ones who have been spamming blogs and message boards. I have comments saved frompeople like you on youtube bragging to me about how they had spammed my video on web sites of businesses. I have one idiot who donated a dollar to Ron Paul and thenposted the comment that he donated a dollar in my name to establish a connection between me and Paul.
You write what you want, but when you talk about slander, you are the one slandering people.
Google all you want, I have my statement fro Choice Hotels International verifying my stay there.
February 11th, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Someone told you on YouTube that he gave a dollar to Ron Paul in your name, you automatically believed him?
February 11th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
And wasn’t it you that said 100% of the people posting this stuff about Sinclair are connected with Ron Paul?
See comment #3
dingalingaling!
February 11th, 2008 at 11:12 pm
So, put your $ where your mouth is. I’ll throw you down a wager. In two weeks, if this still isn’t in the news, you get to post a blog entitled “Dear Murray is smarter than me.” If I’m wrong, I’ll post a “Cao is smarter than me” blog.
I mean, after all, Larry’s already talking to all of these reporters (heard that before) and he even filed a lawsuit (LOL).
Nothing to worry about, right?
February 12th, 2008 at 6:42 am
With Axelrod at the helm of Obama’s campaign, considering what happened to Blair Hull and Jack Ryan, what Sinclair’s been saying about the media totally believable. And your ridiculous claims aren’t.
From Blame Bush
But he IS Black and a muslim although he’s not Latino, but has Ted Kennedy’s endorsement helps, LOL.
All he’d have to do is make some outward display of repentance, such as penning a children’s book….
And all would be forgiven!
bwahahaha! It’s not like civil lawsuits are something new, particularly to democrats…so get over yourself.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Does that mean you’re not up for MY Larry Sinclair challenge? hahahaha. You’re all talk, Cao. All talk.
Good call. I wouldn’t stake my rep on some random internet dude, either.
February 12th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
Murray, I have a challenge for you. Identify your true identity, and come out of the Obama closet. You do that plus put your rep on the line that you are sure I am lying. When I win in Federal Court an am proven to be telling the truth, you go on youtube nd this blog and admit you didn’t know **** and you sign over anything you own to charity of my choice.
You willing to stake that on you being right?
February 12th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
His wager is “Cao is Smarter than me” or “Dear Murray is smarter than me.”
Not very serious, it seems to me.
I like your idea better, Larry.
After all, you’re putting everything on the line to tell this story, but it seems like ‘dear murray’ is too stupid to realize it.
why anyone would support Obama when his black separatist Marxist “church” recently gave Louis Farrakhan an award is beyond me.
Dear Murray…as Larry points out in his challenge, it is YOU who are ALL TALK…
February 12th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Larry Sinclair isn’t putting “everything on the line”. He’s making himself famous and trying to sabotage a legitimate contender for the presidency. He’s either:
A)power mad and narcissistic (think: the guy who shot John Lennon).
B)scared beyond reason by the possibility of an Obama presidency (racist? conspiracy theorist?).
C)secretly getting drastic compensation from someone (”I’ll make you rich and famous, Larry!”.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Sinclair sounds a lot more sane than you loons do, but thanks for the laugh, anyway.
Gitmo lawyers for Barack Hussein Obama
An Islamist on the DNC’s Convention Committee
surprise. Moveon.org endorses Obama
Radical Muslims for Obama
Barack Obama, Kenya, his cousin Odinga and Islamic jihad
Axelrod paved the way for Obama
February 12th, 2008 at 9:34 pm
I saw Larry’s videos on youtube and listened to his interview on the radio. Although he seemed quirky to me, I thought he came across as credible in the interview. I don’t think anyone wants to publish his claims because there would be a huge fallout and accusations of racism toward whomever made it public. The Obama campaign brought up racism earlier in the primaries with very dubious grounds. Imagine how they would respond to allegations like these. It will take a lot of ironclad evidence for anyone to publish this — no one wants to risk his career like Dan Rather did.
If Larry is indeed telling the truth, I hope he can find a way to make it public before all the votes are cast. Right now Obama looks to be the frontrunner for the presidency.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
I think that racist stuff is a bunch of baloney. I just pray that Larry doesn’t fall prey to something like ***-choir-director-a-saint/">the mysterious murder of the *** choir director at Obama’s marxist church.
Sinclair is being threatened online, and I think it takes a lot of courage for him to come out like this…and even more to file a suit - just for Obama to come ‘clean’ and admit it.
I don’t know what the big problem with admitting it would be. Kennedy had Mary Jo’s murder on his hands, and yet he still gets re-elected to the Senate…
And with Clinton’s track record, people have come to expect criminal behavior from candidates and presidents.
Whereas I still think that if you’re going to call Bush a liar, you shouldn’t be a liar yourself. And particularly if you’re a presidential candidate.
February 12th, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Obama was a sitting state senator for the 14 District (Hype Park) who was running for US Congress for the 1st Congressional District (which is the South Side of Chicago) in late 1999. This is public record - look it up. He announced in late September 1999. He was the underdog w/name recognition around 11%
His opponent’s, sitting Congressman Bobby Rush, son was shot in October 1999 - causing a huge outpouring of support for gun control. Look it up. Obama suspended his campaign in deference to this for a few weeks.
Around the same time then Illinois Gov. Ryan joined forces w/Chicago Mayor Daley tried to get some gun control legislation through a special session of the state legislator. Obama missed the vote, because he was in Hawaii for most of December. Look it up.
So - if Sinclair is to believed, about a month after Obama, sitting state senator from Hyde Park, announces as a candidate in, what was to that point, the biggest political race of his life and where he is a big underdog and desperately trying to get his name recognition up in the south side of Chicago and right before he flies out to Hawaii - where it’s documented makes a huge mistake in not being there in Springfield a for the gun control vote in December, Obama take the time to have *** sex and cocaine with Sinclair - not ONCE, but TWICE?
Since Obama was on the routinely on the FRONT PAGE of Chicago Papers in NOVEMBER OF 1999 as he was RUNNING FOR CONGRESS does it seem REMOTELY plausible that he would risk the biggest race of his career to have ANONYMOUS *** SEX and DO DRUGS in or near the VERY SAME CONGRESSIONAL district he was running for office in?
Come on.
February 12th, 2008 at 10:25 pm
Yes, Kennedy still is in the Senate, but Mary Jo’s death ended any chance he had for the presidency, which was his ultimate goal.
It’s unlikely that Obama would ever come clean on his own, as it would end his chances for the presidency, just as with his mentor Kennedy …. brings “birds of a feather” to a new level.
I agree that the racist talk isn’t right, but it has been successfully used as a weapon in this age of political correctness. And if Larry is right, Obama is not only a liar, but also an adulterer and an illegal drug user. (At least Bush was faithful.)
February 12th, 2008 at 10:58 pm
Alright, Larry.
You have two weeks.
If this is news in two weeks, you will find out who I am. I can tell you now that it’s not the registered Democrat dirt that you’re hoping for. I’m a registered non-partisan.
If two weeks go by, and this is still nothing but you ranting a bunch of bs on blogs, then I want you to make another video of your own, and admit that you are completely full of ****.
Two weeks, Larry. I’ll see you on February 26.
February 12th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
Way to dodge the challenge, Cao.
I’m not making some stupid money wager with random people over the internet, who will disappear and never pay up when the time comes.
Put up or shut up, Cao.
I’ll be back in two weeks.
February 13th, 2008 at 12:40 am
you are so stupid.
first of all, if larry cared so much about the young people of america, why are you killing them with drugs? im supposed to think all of a sudden you have heart?
cao you only support mr liar because you think you have a real web site. i bet sinclair makes up most of you low traffic. i mean, why do you trust him over obama? who is the drug dealer of the two?
you guys are sad…you are part of the problem. you are the extremist but very small an insignificant.
please remove me from this web site. i dont alerts any longer. this story is dead. look up “the clinton chronicles” on youtube if you guys want to learn how to mount a real smear campaign.
-coming awakening
February 13th, 2008 at 6:12 am
Wow what a brilliant way to start a commentary.
“You are so stupid”.
so that absolutely compels me to believe in your brilliance and to read the rest of your little diatribe!
“I am so stupid” - and “you are so brilliant”! BECAUSE YOU SAID SO!
Honestly, you people write comments as though you’re holding up a mirror and describing your own selves.
but as Charles Johnson says, “…attacking the messenger who points it out is standard political damage control.”
February 13th, 2008 at 10:28 am
i was checking out blogs and found yours. quite a cast you have here. i was amused at how the one poster wrote “at least bush was faithful”….
how doe’s she know?
and besides i’d rather have smart, witty, honest or capable anyday over faithful…my dog is faithful but he’s not ever going to be president.
thanks
grouchy
February 13th, 2008 at 11:48 am
Coming awakening seems to think his IQ makes him somehow more knowledgable than the rest of us, yet this is a person who continues to make videos based on mine. Funny before my videos posted on youtube this person has little to no exposure of his own. Gives new meaning to the phrase “riding my coat tails.”
February 13th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Optimus, the answer is NONE OF THE ABOVE. You forgot one option, D.) He is telling the TRUTH
February 13th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Steve Parker, I don’t know for sure that Bush was faithful - it’s just that I’ve heard him called almost everything EXCEPT unfaithful, LOL!
I’m glad it gave you a laugh - you gave me one too, with your “grouchy” signoff.
Larry, keep safe.
February 13th, 2008 at 10:28 pm
Mr. Murray, please do not put any more words in my mouth. I never said you were democratic dirt or anything else as to your politics. I simply stated and state you are making many claims against me that you represent as fact, when in fact you have never once met me, spoken with me, nor have you made a single truthful statement about me to date. The funny thing is is I am who I say I am, and have my name out in the open and you still sy I am not.
February 14th, 2008 at 12:41 am
Larry has a very convincing delivery. To bad he doesn’t have any DNA evidence. The media will not talk about anything bad about Obama even relating to discrepancies between his record and speeches, let alone anything this incendiary. Have you seen anyone talk about his house buying adventure with the Rezkos on network television? There is an MSNBC video by Lisa Meyers that is web only and hard to find.
Good luck, Larry.
February 14th, 2008 at 6:46 am
Obama’s Rezco deal under scrutiny
Jan. 29: Chicago real estate ’slumlord’ Tony Rezko’s criminal troubles are now bringing renewed scrutiny to Barack Obama’s 2005 real estate deal with him. NBC’s Senior Investigative Correspondent… Jan. 29: Chicago real estate ’slumlord’ Tony Rezko’s criminal troubles are now bringing renewed scrutiny to Barack Obama’s 2005 real estate deal with him. NBC’s Senior Investigative Correspondent Lisa Myers reports.
February 14th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Larry, I still have the YouTube messages where you said “identify yourself, and let’s see who you’re working for” and you have repeatedly accused me of “being paid” etc. Oh, and then you asked me how to upload a video.
Convincing delivery? He’s reading off of cue cards.
February 14th, 2008 at 2:36 pm
This has to be true, i read it on the internet
February 15th, 2008 at 9:50 am
Is Murray obsessed with stalking Larry? Murray, now really, grow up and get a life! Perhaps you are obsessed with Obama! I can’t figure you out!?! In case you don’t realize it, it isn’t normal for someone to stalk another on various sites and hide behind numerous screen names. I know you don’t want to hear this, but you seem to be the one who needs professional help!
Larry, I want to know the truth! I am following your story because I think that the American people deserve to know the truth! So far, Obama has not presented any evidence to defend himself against these allegations. Without a doubt, your evidence does support your claims. Anyone who is honestly seeking the truth can’t discredit this story at this point.
And Larry-there are always going to be those “Murray’s” out there! The nuts that become so obsessed that they will do just about anything to defend their man. Be careful! Some of those people are very dangerous! They don’t always stop at on-line posts!
February 15th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
Ummm Larry,
If you are still there I just want to let you know that I am researching everything about this alegation sooo if I find discrepencies will you then please stop?
I also saw your vids on youtube (ozgarthefighter if you don’t recall) And do say that while you could be right, not saying you are, I haven’t seen any evidence that backs up your crazy sounding claim. And I am surprised that you weren’t prepared for the backlash…. what did you excpect hugs and kisses? Anyway we will see what, or what doesn’t develope.
Stay safe Larry
February 15th, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Ozgar, you can do whatever you wish, everyone who has claimed to have discredited me including Murray ( and yes I have all his youtube user names saved) have made outright false claims and then when I call them on it they leave and sign up for a new user name.
I have had the best investigative reporters in this country interview with me over the course of days and one even a week. Everything has verified as I said it, the hold is that I cannot disrespect the drivers wish to wait to disclose his identiy until he tells me otherwise.
Backlash I do not care about. People thinking they have the right to put my address and phone number on the web and then others feeling they have the right to make threatening calls to my home is not anyones right to do.
February 15th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
People have signed up for new user names because when they question you about anything, you delete the comments and block them.
And uhh, the bus depot is always in the bad part of every town.
February 15th, 2008 at 10:20 pm
Whoa Larry, Larry I am tired of fighting and spamming and I agree. It isn’t right to post your information without your consent, I am not one of those. But now that I have your attention I want to get some questions answered.
1. You say 1999, ok you have the year but what was the date?
2. You are very vague when you say “best investigative reporters in the country. Please name some names.
3. When can we expect to hit the mainstream news. I saw that you posted the the vids on Youtube last week sooo how long until the —
hits the fan?
I have also put a message on the Obama website about about your accusations and have asked them to put out so counter video.
I still find it fishy, but even if it is true I am still voting Obama cause I believe only he can get us out of this stupid dead-end war. Couldn’t care less what he does in his free time personally so if you did this to try and disuade voters I am not budging at all.
February 15th, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Serious question here. Not that any of you will do anything but attack me for asking, but Larry:
why do you live in an “elderly and assisted care” facility?
February 16th, 2008 at 12:43 am
The Beatles smoked pot and I am pretty sure they have experimented with homosexuality at some point. But they are hailed as one of the greates rock and roll bands ever. So what if they did drugs they did fine.
And what are you going to do about the $10,000 reward for your Polygraph test. I really want to know.
February 16th, 2008 at 2:59 am
murray, you said you know where I live, yet you know nothing about what The Depot is? I see your latest youtube user name and I see you aking a complete idiot of yourself yet again claiming my address is a nursing home. Are you really that stupid or are you just a kid acting like an adult.
You truly are going to expose yourself to be the one trying to gain fame here with your blattantly misrepresentation of the facts.
I have no desire nor intention of answering your ridiculous repeated vile insults here or on youtube.
Who are you that I need to answer to you? Where do you get off demanding someone explain things to you? You do not even know how to correctly quote someone and you think people are going to answer to you.
I have answer every question you have asked, you just do not like the answer and fee that if you mis-quote me I will give you a different answer, but I won’t.
February 16th, 2008 at 3:50 am
Murray really IS that stupid, IMO.
Here it is again:
Why does Murray keep asking idiotic questions? Why does Murray live in a box under a bridge? Why does Murray know where the bus depot is? LOL
February 16th, 2008 at 7:11 am
The Depot is a Rail mueseum that holds various conventions and music and fim festivals. He has signed up for 5 more youtube user names last night alone. I am getting threaten calls locally now and I am accusing Murray for that, people attacks like these can be classified as crimes against a person at risk and a hate crime so continue at your own risk, I will file charges on every one that makes these calls.
February 16th, 2008 at 8:14 am
So Larry when are you taking the polygraph?
Have you even recieved the notice from Whitehouse.com yet?
February 16th, 2008 at 8:24 am
If I seem to be going after you everywhere it is because I am a staunch supporter of Obama. You said that you had contacted and asked that he reveal his drug use from 1999, What are you stupid? Do you realize that if he said something like that it could sink his campaign. Yes Obama is a politician, and he is human like anyone else. But to do what you ask would just ruin him entirely.
Every politician has something from thier past. Look at Hillary vs. Peter Paul, JFK and his fibbing on his involvment in WWII and the numerous affairs, or FDR and his affair that he pleaded with his wife to keep from the public. If they went out and told the truth to everything they have done then they wouldn’t be taken seriously, even less than they are now.
February 16th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
You can read the HUD report for the apartments yourself.
http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/mfh/hto/state/mn.pdf
page 12
Gateway Tower
Total Units: 154
Occupancy Eligibility: Elderly and Handicapped
February 16th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
You are absolutely obsessed…! I’m not interested in reading a hud report…I’m interested in knowing why you’re such a creep. What happened to you that made you so inconsiderate? What is the point you’re making with that report…that you know where he lives, or that he’s a cancer patient? Isn’t that a privacy violation? He is, after all, a private citizen. Is nothing sacred anymore?
You can’t see why the driver is intimidated and afraid? I think the picture that’s coming up so far is pretty incredible…and that doesn’t take into consideration the Daley Machine, or Chicago politics since my great-grandfather was running for Governor and Al Capone was offering favors.
The fact that you’re analyzing the building he lives in gives me the creeps! And the fact that he’s a cancer patient - makes me feel bad for him…in addition to the fact that you’re relentlessly hounding him!
How is either one of those revelations even relevant to his claims about Obama? You’re putting the focus on the wrong individual.
To me, this is a terribly bad reflection on YOU and your motives.
I think you’re digging too deep in order to find out something that is just as well left alone and has no bearing on this case.
You know something else; I think you should get a life instead of spend so much time and effort stalking this man.
Obama needs to stop hiding behind his stormtroopers and fess up.
Attacking Sinclair might make him go away, but I guess you don’t realize that you’re making a horrible impression…acting this way on Obama’s behalf.
That makes you either incredibly stupid - or breathtakingly cruel and ruthless.
February 16th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
Um, the man claims he was a high roller with fancy limos, and it turns out he lives in Section 236 HUD subsidized housing, by his own admission.
The point is dipshits like you have made this welfare queen your new messiah.
Frankly, though, you’ll believe any fairy tale you want to believe, though.
Now I see why you wussed out on my challenge, Cao. Good call.
February 16th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
You’re comparing apples to oranges.
You’re assuming it’s all the same.
This is 2008, that was 1999.
Get a freakin grip and get a life, will ya.
SHEESH
Talk about dipshits, you couldn’t find your way out of a paper bag, LOL…you’re focusing on the wrong stuff, which is why you’re coming up with these loony conclusions
What I’d like to know is why is everyone protecting Obama so fiercely? What is he hiding?
That’s what the public needs to know before election day.
For political reasons you’re attacking Sinclair when I think he deserves an answer - just like anyone bringing charges like this.
But we all saw what happened to Linda Tripp when she brought allegations against Clinton, and this is ringing very similar in my mind. VERY SIMILAR.
Obama is not the next messiah…LOL
You’re holding a mirror up to yourself and describing me as if I’m you.
Sorry, it doesn’t work that way.
Larry should have a right to speak…and a right to ask Obama to come out of the closet.
You’re protecting him and I think that points more to his guilt than innocence…
Let Obama answer the allegations and you all shut your pie holes.
the problem with Obama’s camp - including Michelle Obama - is the belief that somehow Barack Obama is here to save our souls.
See, it’s the believers in the omnipotent Barack Obama that don’t want to listen to Sinclair…because it would destroy the pipe dream and the **** illusion for women that Obama girl has created for Barack on youtube, LOL
February 16th, 2008 at 4:16 pm
I realize Obama isn’t some God brought to solve all of our problems… I not stupid. But some things are just not important enough to know. Obamas ideals of a untied America called to me. His ideas of removing the lobbyist power from the Government appealed to me. The thought of finally getting out of Iraq appealed to me.
Obama is being forced to reveal things about himself that he would rather not. Being *** or Bisexual shouldn’t matter, and in a perfect world it wouldn’t, but wake up!! This is a world where the media jackels are waiting everywhere to rip you apart. If you are in a position of power; secrets are your only defense.
February 16th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
Your blind faith in the innocence of Obama IS stupid. Your going after Sinclair without finding out what Obama’s side of it is stupid.
Your relentless cruelty is worse than stupid.
And I’m tiring of this.
Aren’t you? Yet?
Or are you a paid internet sleuth defending Obama’s honor all across the internet?
You should go and have your picture taken in front of the status of Superman in Metropolis, Illinois - the way Obama did, LOL
I’m beginning to understand the image of the man you’re defending.
It’s completely ficticious..and almost a cartoon character.
It’s no wonder the campaign is scared to address Sinclair’s allegations…particularly if they’re true, which by all appearances seems to be the case….
It is the Obama campaign and even Michelle Obama who portray him as a savior for America…
Oh dear, what will happen when he falls off that pedestal?
February 16th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
I suppose Larry needs a blue dress with a stain for evidence? He certainly isn’t going to win any awards for what he is stating. If he is lying, what does he gain? A spot on Jerry Springer? If he is telling the truth at least he can know that he did the right thing. I saw the video where the Dem candidates were listening to the pledge and Obama was the only candidate with his hands by his side. His loyalty is to Africa as his church website states.
February 16th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Ok Cao since you are so convinced of the evilness of Obama. Let me ask you who do you think could be the best president of the United States of America. I would love to hear your answer.
p.s. No I am not a paid internet sleuth, I am currently a 19 yr old college student who had looked at all the candidates and had found Obama to be the cleanest of the group. Not perfect, and he most likely had some skeletons in his closet.
February 16th, 2008 at 5:20 pm
No, I’ve just reviewed his record, his cousin Odinga and what he’s doing in Kenya, and I’m wondering if Obama will do something with those ideas…considering he’s backed by all kinds of radical muslims.
He’s very interesting, to say the least.
And people should be allowed to question him…he’s in competition to be the leader of the free world, aren’t we entitled to know if he shares American values or not?
And if he’s told the truth about his past?
Cmon.
You’re blowing the Sinclair thing out of proportion because…why?
Because of this silly cartoony image Obama’s got…and because I’m not gullible enough to go for that, I’m convinced he’s ‘evil’? Don’t make me laugh.
It’s pretty pathetic, actually…it’s interesting how Karl Marx’s ideas are being candy coated for public consumption by the likes of Odinga and Obama these days…
But…like Code Pink says, “What is wrong with communism?”
February 16th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
that was theeeen and this is noooooooow.
that’s the most retarded thing you’ve said yet, cao.
One fact that has been proven. That is that the man who claims to be hobnobbing with bigwigs and riding in limos really lives in government housing.
Just don’t come whining to me when you have to face the truth! OH, CONSPIRACY! CONSPIRACY! Bwahahahahaha.
Thanks for the laughs, nutjobs.
February 16th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
Why is that retarded, Murray?
Don’t you believe in CHANGE?
If you don’t, then you’re siding with the wrong candidate–his entire gig is “change”
You’re chasing your tail with these stupid arguments! bwahahahahaha!
Mr. 100% Ron Paul websites - , LOL…
You can’t even look at what you’re doing…you have to blame everyone else. Pointing the finger is such a compelling argument.
And since you have no response, you call me a conspiracy theorist.
I can’t wait to find out what you’ve cooked up next!~ All of this wasted imagination focused on destroying someone who might take down the Superman of Metropolis!
bwahahahaha! oh, my sides!
February 16th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
I only believe in CONSPIRACY! CONSPIRACY!
February 16th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
Yeah Murray, your arguments don’t need to make any sense as long as you pull out the catch phrases and slogans that get the high school kids to chime in.
Where did I mention a conspiracy? I don’t think I mentioned that anywhere…it’s the the truthers that like to use that.
Obama’s nothing but a cartoon for a presidential candidate-he can’t talk very well without his teleprompter–bwahahahaha!
February 16th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Right.
It makes perfect sense that a dude living in low-income housing is rolling high with limos and hobnobbing with bigwigs.
A homeless guy told me the other day that government spies are watching him. Maybe we should give him a polygraph, too?
February 16th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
The truth is out.
Larry is not a high roller. He lives in subsidized housing.
And you still claim CONSPIRACY.
Seriously, if you want to help the man, you’d help him pay for a lawyer. He can’t afford one, and he’s representing himself. Without a lawyer, he’s going to be completely raked through hot coals.
So if you care about the man, you’ll help hire him a lawyer, and help lessen the consequences.
February 16th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Who cares that he’s not a high roller?
I don’t.
I care about the allegations.
Take your meds so you can focus, will you?
Oh, I forgot. You want everyone to forget about the allegations and focus on the toothless redneck living by the bus depot.
Got it.
We’re all so scared that the next big threat is coming from the terrible court battle that will ensue!
And who is the conspiracy theorist now, Murray?
I’m absolutely quivering in my boots with fear over the prospect: The cartoon character’s campaign is going to make Sinclair’s life miserable just like the Clintons did with Linda Tripp…and now that you know where he lives and have cased the building and the area, it’s going to be all that much easier.
You can all heave a sigh of relief!~Obama is protected!
Look - up in the sky - it’s a bird - it’s a plane - no…it’s MURRAY!
You can take your cape off now.
February 16th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
The toothless redneck living in welfare housing!
The man who says he has “bank statements bigger than any of us ever make”.
The man who rolls around in limos, and deals “1500 a week” in drugs.
He actually lives in the real, bonafide poorhouse.
BRILLIANT!
February 16th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
The bigger you build your wall of ignorance, Cao, the harder you will fall in the end.
The phrase is ‘the bigger they are, the harder they fall’
February 16th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Right. Tell that to the guy you put on the pedestal.
The phrase is ‘the bigger they are, the harder they fall’
And I think that’s what you’re afraid of…you little dickens, you..and I would say the ignorant ones are those that refuse to look at the big picture - instead focusing on little details that are inconsequential.
One of the biggest telltale signs of ignorance is someone who refuses to see everything. You’re a typical demagogue. You discount that which tells a story different than the one you want to tell…
Or is that Obama?
February 16th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
Meanwhile the guy you put on a pedestal is a guy who lives in welfare housing.
Lucky for him, he doesn’t have too much farther to fall, so what’s a little slander going to hurt him? Maybe make a little much needed money?
February 16th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Obama’s the one with the picture of him in front of Superman posing like the statue…
I think you’ve got that mirror in front of you again…
February 16th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Haha. Unlike Larry, I don’t live in subsidized housing. My taxes actually help pay Larry’s welfare.
You don’t need a microscope to examine Larry.
His lack of credibility is the size of the MOON.
February 16th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Who cares? There you are stroking yourself again, Murray.
You’re so stuck on yourself - that explains that mirror thing.
I bet every time you pass your reflection you’re admiring yourself.
Your narcissistic personality disorder fits right in with all of this. It makes you feel like a big man to pick on people less fortunate than you are, doesn’t it?
Do you steal candy from children and beat women, too?
February 16th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Wow. I’ve really gotten under your skin!
There are different kinds of places for people who get “seriously ill.”
This particular place is for “elderly and handicapped.” It’s the requirement of living there. If you’re not old, you have to be handicapped.
He sure isn’t in a wheelchair. Which only leaves ONE kind of handicap.
February 16th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
You’re the one that’s obsessed with Larry, Murray. I’m not interested in that. You’re stalking him, you’ve figured out whwere he lives, you can’t seem to let go. I think you have a serious problem! Instead of letting the courts figure it out, you’re trying to crawl up Larry’s ***. You want to know what color is **** is, too?
You’re all about discrediting him so he can’t hurt your cartoon character that is making girls faint.
You’d think he was a rockstar…not a political candidate, LOL…I wonder if the women would calm down if they knew about Larry.
but who cares? The cartoon character candidate sure does seem to have the hype built up!
The only thing that bothers me about you is…you never shut up. It’s probably a throwback from when you were a kid…and that’s why you’re so hung up on yourself. Your mama probably neglected you, and that’s why THINGS and MONEY are so important to you. And because you think that way, you assume everyone else is motivated by the same things.
February 16th, 2008 at 7:35 pm
Cao, I don’t see Larry as being like Linda Tripp. She exposed the extramarital affair of a sitting president whom she was no fan of, which led to his sham impeachment. No one was concerned that Clinton’s judgment and decisions were compromised by this affair in a way that they could be with drug usage. The impeachment debacle was driven by the republicans solely for their own political gain, nothing more.
Larry’s situation is different. He said that he actually likes Obama, but he believes the public has a right to know about Obama’s illegal drug use - something which very well may affect his judgment. Larry appears to have no political motives for doing this.
February 16th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
Clinton’s extramarital affair with Monica was the tip of the iceberg. Tripp exposed their theft of over $400,000 from the whitehouse, not doing an inventory of gifts, including their swiping furniture and other items - and theirs was the most horrible reign of terror in the Whitehouse that’s ever been documented.
What they did together and separately had nothing to do with the vast rightwing conspiracy - it goes all the way back to Hillary Clinton’s thesis when she was at Wellesley appreciating the Alinsky model, her days at Yale, when she orchestrated students overseeing the trial of the New Haven 9, when she was mentored by Tommy the commie…and Hillary’s sham of a marriage through numerous infidelities going all the way back to Arkansas and Paula Jones. Hillary made a pact with Bill -theirs is not a love relationship - it’s a powerlust they share.
In this way they’re similar to Barack and Michelle. The Obamas haven’t had the time to rack up all the offenses - like the illegal campaign contributions from the Chinese, Peter Paul’s civil suit for over a million dollars of illegal unclaimed campaign contributions, Whitewater and over 100 criminals Bill gave pardons to during his last hours as president…I would hate to see another couple like that in the Whitehouse–EVER.
Some have said that Michelle could very well be a presidential candidate herself; she can stand on her own. President Clinton is the first President that I know of that was ever accused of rape; not to mention the first president that was impeached that threw an impeachment party on the whitehouse lawn. So much for decency!
The correlation between Sinclair and Tripp is simply the fact that the Clintonistas destroyed her for exposing them, and it appears the same thing is happening to Sinclair from the Obamamaniacs.
That’s the only similarity I’m drawing between the two. Excuse me for not making a perfect match; but when you’re making comparisons - other than in Murray’s world, there are usually similarities and things that are not similar. The ability to discern between things, and make judgments seems to be beyond Murray’s limited grasp. He is so blinded by the starpower of Obama that he’s unable to see that he’s just a man.
Of COURSE Larry likes Obama, otherwise there never would have been an attraction there! And I agree, I don’t think it’s politically motivated, and I don’t think he’s motivated by money, either.
February 16th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
The only similarities are between Larry and your average corner crackhead.
Cao laughed when I said Larry lived in an assisted living home, now he’s resigned to just try to attack me, now that it’s been proven that Larry lives in HUD subsidized housing.
It’s all Cao’s got.
February 16th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
I’m still not convinced, Murray. Nor do I have to be.
bwahahaha!
What does Duluth today in 2008 have to do with Gurnee in 1999? What is the correlation and why is it important?
Because you need to make sure people can dismiss the allegations…even if they’re true…because of what you’ve uncovered, right?
I get the feeling you think Obama is guilty…and shouldn’t have to answer these allegations.
Yet, he’s a presidential candidate and I think it’s very important that this is cleared up before election day.
I can’t wait until he has to pull his pants down!
Isn’t that what they had Michael Jackson do when the kid made those allegations?
February 16th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
Only a dipshit would expect anyone to answer these allegations.
I love how you and Larry are convinced that I’m working for Obama and Axelrod. You’d be really disappointed to learn that the only connection I have to any candidate is Mike Huckabee of the GEE OH PEE.
February 16th, 2008 at 9:48 pm
See? Murray thinks he’s guilty!
they thought the same thing about the kid that accused Michael Jackson…but eventually Jackson had to pull his pants down.
Too bad for you, Murray. Your God’s **** will be exposed…and so will all the little details about it.
I could give a **** about the polygraph test - it’s a trap to make it look like Sinclair is after money.
Sinclair certainly doesn’t seem like the type …otherwise…if he was materialistic he’d be like you, Murray…a selfish self-absorbed sumbitch who can’t pass his reflection without preening like a peacock!
pea-****
Save us God, Save us!
February 16th, 2008 at 10:01 pm
Actually, everyone knew Michael Jackson was guilty from the start, and it still took like three tries to convict him.
Meanwhile, the only people who believe this is a group of kooks, racists, and Ron Paul nutjobs.
February 16th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
So which one am I?
oooh I think I’m getting a woody…you’re back to calling me names! Anyone who disagrees with you is some type of bigot!
Love, love, love that ‘tolerance’ you ‘new age’ liberals have!
I must really be getting under your skin with the number and frequency of comments you’re leaving here…LOL
February 16th, 2008 at 10:30 pm
Oh, I don’t know. The story has received a lot of attention…and the truth has a way of getting out no matter how the oppressors suppress it…
Waddya know, Daniel Parisi Multi millionaire Porn peddler and liberal Democrat Supporter
So…I think Sinclair ought to watch his step …this polygraph thing stinks of a trap.
Yeah, I think he should refrain from doing what the stormtroopers say and wait until Obama pulls his pants down. I saw on Free Republic there are a couple of people who’d be willing to help out with the legal stuff.
Interesting point…
Yeah, there are supporters out there, even though Murray has tunnel vision and ignores what’s right in front of him if it doesn’t fit his ideological template.
He has records from the hotel, he has a lot of documentation that proves he was where he said he was…and I just hope that limo driver doesn’t chicken out…with the pressure people are putting on …
I’m sure that’s exactly what this is all about.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
I am not sure if CAO is a person or the name of the website but I have a question for “CAO.”
It seems that you believe this person’s story. Is that a fair statement? If so, tell us what proof sold you on it?
You do know that this person is an admitted drug pusher with a checkered past but you are willing to trust him over a family man who has run and won three campaigns for office and that is under the scrutiny of being both a Senator and a Presidential candidate?
I look forward to your response. Thanks.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
Are you a lawyer? What gives you the right to question what it is I’m saying?
Am I allowed my opinions or not.?
Is Obama lily white? Is he pure? Was he vetted by the democrats or not?
Obama used and sold coke…some have even said it ‘helped the Africans’. So tell me what the difference is between these two…aside from the fact that one is from Hyde Park and the Gold Coast, claims to be a constitutional lawyer but does everything he can do change it?
Is that what has you so worried, or is it this?
Axelrod made sure a Clinton staffer resigned over this…
It appears as though there is some ambiguity there…
The oppressors will look to continue suppressing this, LOL…although stalking someone and interfering in their private life is a close second to forcing someone to resign- in my book.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
What kind of question is that? Man - relax. My question was fair - what makes you believe this guy?
Is that a hard question to answer? I didn’t tell you who to back - I am just asking what makes you believe this person.
You response shows a lack of credibility for you and your “blog.”
February 16th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
I’ve spelled it out in this thread…I don’t think I can answer it in a slogan or a sound byte…which is what you people always seem to be looking for.
It needs to be simple for you to understand it - and anything that requires you to think -you have a hard time with.
For me, it wasn’t one thing…..it was a combination of things…ideologically speaking I think democrats have a real problem with credibility, honesty, and criminal behavior.
It’s kind of funny that you would bring up my credibility as if this is now reflecting on ME. This is reflecting on the mentality and lack of intelligence of the Obama girl voters…and the people who are swooning in his audiences…when he’s short on substance and big on hype.
You’re just like Murray in my opinion, asking dumb questions.
Why don’t you read through the comments and THEN if you don’t get it - ask an informed question?
I have little tolerance for stupidity here.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:57 pm
Just what I thought. You are not in search of the truth. You just HOPE this is true.
Funny - who’s in the HOPE business now? Maybe you should follow Obama. You two have a lot in common.
You think you are smarted than you are. It’s a weakness.
February 17th, 2008 at 12:01 am
What do you mean? How is the big picture view - and taking it all in - and not in sound bytes - not searching for the ‘truth’?
Unless the truth means a preconceived notion - before taking in the facts.
The ‘truth’ is what Obama wrote about in his book. We should be allowed to question it.
Especially when this story comes up - which - if it was a lie - wouldn’t be so public. Axelrod’s suppression of anyone bringing up the subject strikes me as paranoia that the truth will emerge somehow.
February 17th, 2008 at 12:28 am
Cao, I share some of your concern about Larry taking up Parisi’s offer. Maybe it’s a trap, maybe not, but I think it would be more judicious if he sought out a polygraph expert through an agency with a sterling reputation with no “strings” attached. So far Larry has gone to legitimate newspapers and avoided the tabloids. This current arrangement does not appear to me to be a “high road” approach, with its business demands and financial lure.
February 17th, 2008 at 12:39 am
“I have little tolerance for stupidity here.”
Time to ban yourself, then.
February 17th, 2008 at 12:49 am
BTW, Cao, to elaborate further, it wasn’t the Clintons who made Linda Tripp the “most hated woman in America.” She pretty much did that by herself. She got Monica to confide in her about the affair under the guise of friendship, and then happily passed all the juicy details onto the Kenneth Starr crew without Monica’s knowledge. When Monica found out she’d been used, she was livid and immediately broke off the friendship. The betrayal of friendship by Tripp struck a nerve with most Americans — it was a behavior they understood and despised. She was a backstabber, plain and simple, and very few people have tolerance for that.
This is another reason why I don’t see a real similarity between her and Larry. He says he had given Obama plenty of time and opportunity to “come clean” about the drugs. He hasn’t been sneaking around behind anyone’s back.
February 17th, 2008 at 2:03 am
Murray I have to agree with Cao here. Knock it off!
And Cao, you have evaded my question so I will ask it simply so you can’t fudge it up.
Who do you want to be president of the United States?
I won’t flame, I won’t argue, I am going to just watch and wait. I am sick of the arguements.
everyone have a good night. And God Bless!
February 17th, 2008 at 5:36 am
This is like the spanish inquisition, which makes it look worse and worse for Obama’s side.
Sadly, Ozgar, there is no candidate that could even partially represent me - I think the politicians have gone too far to the left - and that means all of them. We have a RINO who considered becoming a democrat - and then the two marxists. And they call this a ‘choice’?
“Time to ban yourself,then.”
Another immature comment from Murray, which we’ve come to expect now…because he knows everything about everything and people who don’t agree are either stupid or a bigot. And by all appearances Murray has crossed th line over to unhinged stalker!
What an interesting prison of a world to live in…and how that kind of thinking limits the possibilities!
If we really are interested in ‘change’, then we should start with how we look at our candidates. We should be allowed to ask questions, we should be allowed healthy skepticism.
You’d think Sinclair was running for some office the way you people are focusing on hi