12/22/2004
Come And Get Some, Pip Squeak
this man is so utterly repulsive, i was surprised to find out he’s married. what kind of idiot would put up with an insufferable pr**k like this? ahem, 
excuse me. language alert on this post! i was looking through technorati and ended up at his website, reading this:
“Usually, I mean to do it, as I think the little feuds will drive traffic and keep things interesting. One of those is my close personal friend, the Eva Braun of Blogging, The Cow. (The current lead story: “Today’s Baby Jesus picture.” Says it all, doesn’t it?) Now in a battle of wits — well as she’s in public relations, what we magazine editors call “muffins,” — it’s not much really a battle as farm animal abuse. Still, it can be diverting — in the same way that it’s fun to see the school’s most popular girl, usually a nasty, vain bitch, fall into a vat of pig guts.”
Charming. Since he brags about how much traffic I send him, I take much pleasure in announcing this will be my last post about “the liberal pansy with no b**ls” (incidentally, that’s a direct quote from my husband). “We magazine editors”, as IF! Get a dictionary, Agg Pro, and take a writing course. ‘Close personal friend’? And what’s this reference to Eva Braun? Is that some reference to my being a nazi, or a whore? Nevermind. It’s apparent you’re going for the record on how many people can you possibly p**s off and/or offend, just remember: after the smoke clears, you’ll still be a lonely loser, blogging with no readership, who doesn’t know how to spell. I particularly was chafed at the comment he made in passing, about ‘insipid mommy blogs’. It’s offensive to me that someone would call a blogger who is a mother, ‘insipid’. It’s just about as bad as a comment I saw somewhere about ‘breeder blogs’. Same type of disrespectful crap towards women. He defines himself as ‘liberal’, but the definition of ‘liberal’ is certainly not what he is revealing himself to be. (respecting and allowing many different types of beliefs or behaviour)
Here’s the background, in case you’re interested: Click here and here. In his previous post dedicated to me, he talked about “Holiday Fun” -Chainsaw A Cow Today To Make America Safer.
Is it any wonder this guy can’t get hits on his blog?
BTW, I ran across another blogger in the AP’s crosshairs: Let me introduce you to Sigmund Carl and Alfred. I ran across this blog through BE, and the reason it caught my attention was because of the title of the lead post.
Here is some delicious, well-constructed, and might I add, wonderfully illuminated, funny and intelligent writing (which has undoubtedly gone unnoticed and unappreciated as far as the mentally- and might I say intellectually-challenged Agg Pro is concerned):
The aggressive progressive- Low wattage mind, otherwise known as ‘dimwit’
In our business, as you can imagine, we meet all types, from the benign and mildly afflicted, to the assinine and overly stupid self-important whack jobs.
The Aggressive Progressive (AP) is one such blogging dimwit. With the illuminating brilliance of a 25 watt bulb, he is a self absorbed and fairly irrelevant political pundit. This self proclaimed master of mediocrity isn’t happy with Sigmund Carl and Alfred and says so in a recent post.
Of course, SC&A do not really care what morons think, nor would we respond to such mindless drivel.
We have chosen to respond to the hack in question for a few reasons. Firstly, we’d like to highlight the utter stupidity of the AP. Secondly, and most importantly, by looking at and responding to the AP, we believe that we highlight the current state of his political punditry. The AP is not only a moron hack, he also a lying moron hack and he seems to have no problem with that. Momma, nor the public school system it seems, didn’t equip the AP with any kind of reasoning skill or even a moral compass. ‘I want what I want and I want it now.’ I suppose the good news is that the ‘untermensch’ doesn’t seem to be suffering from any self esteem problems.
We’d also like to remind our faithful readers that we at SC&A are not commenting on the politics of the AP. Indeed, the likes of the AP can be found on all sides of the political spectrum. Truly, they all deserve each other.
In this post, the AP comments and questions the SC&A’s qualifications to talk about other bloggers. Of the course, standing in his tippy toes (Napoleon Complex, maybe?) he makes sure to mention that his (pedestrian) qualifications are impeccable (as he would like to have you believe).
Not satisfied with his few words of self absorbed mediocrity, the AP cannot restrain himself (Sigmund would start with toilet issues and in this case, I’m not sure he’s off the mark) and comes back to further comment on this piece (scroll down a bit to find his pebbles of wisdom). It is interesting to note that most of the commentators ‘get it’ but the AP seems to have a bit of a disconnect with reality, leaving us all to wonder about his ‘analysis’ skills (real or imagined). He goes off the deep end and expresses himself rather crudely, blissfully unaware of his own rather obvious shortcomings.
Of course, the idiot takes exception at our reply to his stupidity by referring to us as ‘assclowns.’ Deep, indeed. The immediate connection to all things anal is indeed telling.
Of course, this intellectual lightweight (flyweight, bantamweight?) seems rather surprised that I would make reference to drug therapy (as well as much needed analysis) after he did so. Poor little man is offended! He implies that we first insulted him. Imagine that! The little pipsqueak ought to be grateful I didn’t mention his obvious origins from the bottom of the DNA barrel (Alfred remarks that we may have found the ‘missing link’). Maybe he won’t be happy at the reference to his family, but we don’t care.
Finally, the dimwit feels compelled to remind his readers (all 5 of them) that he has published ‘millions of words’- to which we reiterate our previous remarks:
“The fact that you have been a hack for extended period of time only serves to highlight that even mediocre minds can generate millions of words of irrelevancy. America is indeed, a great country and the land of equal opportunity.”
By the way, prior to this response to his piece, (and it seems, the majority of all his self absorbed drivel) the dimwit’s devoted readership had only contributed one comment in response: Ours.
cao’s note: i discovered, much to my amusement, that sc&a was targeted by the agg pro in the very same post as i was. sc&a is a very intelligent and well-written blog, so i am in good company. still, 6 comments on ap’s website for that post–from sc&a, as compared to around 30 on sc&a’s on the same subject.
AP, nice looking outfit. Now, run along, I think it’s time for your medication. I am, dear readers, referring to this: So, (donning my nun’s outfit and bursting into song) how do you solve a problem like Dr. Assclown? A lame reference to the Sound of Music, but I suppose it should come as no surprise that dressing in women’s clothing and broadway musicals are right up his alley. There are even more ridiculous spelling errors in that post, Mr. “Magazine Editor”. With guys like this running around, SC&A is guaranteed a full schedule and never an empty couch.
Agg Pro is starving for hits and readers in a serious way. I would call his trolling other blogs to start ‘blood feuds’ “negative attention seeking”. This behavior will, as he seems unable to grasp, generate hits–but from people who are going over there to gawk, as they would watch a masturbating monkey at the zoo. Not a very good method to develop a long-lasting readership or following, at least IMHO.
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
December 22nd, 2004 at 9:21 am
Well done- and really humorous to boot!
December 22nd, 2004 at 9:27 am
Thanks, C, I’m glad I scored points for humor; it’s difficult to tell when I’m P**SED OFF,
Your responses to his idiotic remarks have been priceless; I’ve been following them. Thanks for dropping by. In a battle of wits, AP is unarmed.~Cao.
December 22nd, 2004 at 9:32 am
Linked to you, of course.
You know, you really may be too well adjusted. Scary!
December 22nd, 2004 at 9:45 am
Well, C, you’re the expert, after all,
Thanks for the linky love~Cao.
December 22nd, 2004 at 11:03 am
Like the “Sound of Music” analogy…How about “Here are a few of my LEAST favorite things…”
December 22nd, 2004 at 11:10 am
hehehe to be fair it was AP’s reference, not mine–He’s so disconnected from reality he doesn’t know (or care) how stupid he looks, which is ok (and maybe should be even expected) for an immature hack picking fights in the blogosphere like a kid on the playground.
December 22nd, 2004 at 11:40 am
I didn’t read the whole post. I usually don’t read these kinds of things. So, you may wonder why I’m commenting. Hmm I scrolled down to see what other nice bits you were blogging on and see you make reference to Christianity a lot. I look at your sidebar and see a Bible. I’m a Socialist. I’ve also been a Christian since I was a very young girl. I’m not the best Christian out there no doubt but I do know the basics of what Christ taught us. I somehow don’t see him speaking to another person as you have. In fact, I think he would have turned the other cheek. It’s ok for us to be angry. I get that way often. But, if we’re going to advertise our Christianity and therefore say we represent Christ we should be careful about what comes out of our mouths. If we would rather let it all hang out, it would perhaps be better if we kept our light in the closet.
December 22nd, 2004 at 11:46 am
Is that so? Oh I think you read every word of it. That’s the kind of **** people say to Christians to neutralize their message. I doubt if what you say is true; very few Christians turn around and become socialists. The two ideologies don’t mix. Socialism is Godless.
It is easy enough to clear up common misconceptions like “turning the other cheek” if it is understood that this practice is reserved for brothers and sisters, for FAMILY, and NOT for enemies.
December 22nd, 2004 at 12:07 pm
If you are truly a socialist, what is the point in even voicing an opinion? In your ideal world, you will not have one that matters. That will be done for you.
If what you said is true about being a socialist, I am curious to know what swayed you down that path. Please share that with us.
December 22nd, 2004 at 12:20 pm
Dianne Maire is a witch–a wiccan. Go take a look at her website. She’s one of the ones who complains about Christians.
Look at this post of hers: Conservative Christian Weblogs and what they say to me
She was, of course, lying about being a Christian socialist. There is no such thing. She’s probably telling the truth about being a socialist, though…probably sent here by her boyfriend, the Agg Pro.
Boy, they’re really coming out of the darkest placest, aren’t they?
December 22nd, 2004 at 1:20 pm
Villager: We have found a witch, may we burn her?
Crowd: BURN!! BUUUURN HER!
Bedevere: But how do you *know* she is a witch?
Villager: She looks like one!
Other Villagers: Yeah! She looks like one!!!
Bedevere: Bring her forward.
(a young woman is pushed through the crowd of villagers to the platform. She
is dressed all in black, has a carrot tied around her face on top of her nose,
and a black paper hat on her head. She talks funny because her nose is
closed by the carrot.)
Witch: I’m not a witch, I’m not a witch!
Bedevere: Er,…but you are dressed as one.
Witch: THEY dressed me up like this.
Villagers: No! nooo! We didn’t! We didn’t!
Witch: And this isn’t my nose, it’s a false one!
(Bedevere lifts up the carrot to reveal the woman’s real nose, which is in
fact rather small.)
Bedevere: Well?
One Villager: Well, we did do the nose.
Bedevere: The nose?
Villager: And the Hat. But she’s a witch!
Villagers: Yeah! Burn her! Burn! Burn her!
Bedevere: Did you dress her up like this?
Villagers: NO! No, no, no, no, no, no…
One Villager: yes.
Villagers: yes. yes. yes. A bit. yes. a bit. a bit.
Another Villager: (hopefully) She has got a wart…
Bedevere: What makes you think she is a witch?
Villager: Well, She turned me into a newt!!
(pause)
Bedevere: a newt?
(long pause)
Villager: I got better…
Villagers: BURN HER anyway! BURN! BURN! BURN HER!
December 22nd, 2004 at 1:53 pm
Interesting, I also know her from tblog. She is one of the professional activists on the Kerry side who were spamming the airwaves trying to keep the message from the other side (meaning the ‘pro Bush’ or ‘pro Iraq’ or ‘pro Military’ message) from appearing and attacking the conservatives with nasty comments. This is really a very mild comment compared to what I’ve seen. It’s because of people like her that I shut off comments on my other blog. There was even some speculation over there that these were professional hacks paid by George Soros (or one of the 527’s).
This wicca thing is very serious, take a look here. Doesn’t that scare the piss out of anybody besides me?
You may poke fun, TS, but there were 3 wiccans over there who were blogging against Bush.
I think this was all aimed at shutting down our fun, anyway. And the fun we were having was at her boyfriend’s expense, she must have been ticked, poorbaby….well maybe if she has another smoke it’ll calm her down,
December 22nd, 2004 at 2:27 pm
I couldn’t pass up the python sketch when you mentioned witch.
That link doesn’t surprise me Cao. I am not sure what the wiccans are about, but maybe we should take it easy before we become newts
December 22nd, 2004 at 2:45 pm
hehe I was just thinking…I tested out to be a ‘geek liaison’ (click here). I just translated your geek reference there…and I bet some people where freaked out by it. But then…that would make YOU the GEEK
Oh, and while we’re on the subject, and I know we’re way off topic but what the hell, the wiccans have an alternative to the boyscouts–click here.
December 22nd, 2004 at 2:59 pm
According to the SpiralScouts’ interpretation of the pagan philosophy, children participating in the program will learn to honor “both the maleness and femaleness we all harbor within us,” as the handbook put it. “Perhaps, if we are lucky, even a few parents who may need some brushing up on these same skills may reap benefits just from being there with the children while the kids learn these things.”
What a total load of ****
More left wing agenda garbage.
I am afraid to ask how they honor the maleness and femaleness of themselves.
They have to make things so difficult. When a kid is born, you count digits right? If you count 10, you have a girl, if you count 11, you have a boy. What is so hard about that? I yi yi
December 22nd, 2004 at 3:07 pm
That’s why the AP dresses up in a nun outfit and sings songs from the Sound of Music, he’s embracing his female side!
December 22nd, 2004 at 3:37 pm
December 22nd, 2004 at 6:23 pm
Oh, you’re just jealous I look better in a dress than you do, which ain’t saying much, sweetie.
Ciao, baby.
December 22nd, 2004 at 7:00 pm
Yeah, TS, a whole bunch of friends. That’s why he finds it necessary to pick fights in the blogosphere to get hits on his pathetic blog.
You really should stick to football, you manly man, you–but then–how many guys who like football appreciate a man in a dress?
December 22nd, 2004 at 7:20 pm
I really need to stop by more often.
Any guy who says he looks better in a dress than a woman…more pearls of wisdom from the author of ‘millions of words’ as editor of the Fartown Gulch Gazette.
In any case, he’s a lightweight.
He hasn’t had this much attention showered on him since kindergarten.
December 22nd, 2004 at 8:14 pm
Ahh the typical liberal response when they are threatened: “I look better than you”…The Agressive Pro is really just an ANNOYING Pro who seeks attention and wants to be liked. Typical liberal who has no confidence in him(her?)self.:roll:
December 22nd, 2004 at 8:49 pm
That response of his was REALLY LAME, wasn’t it? Sheesh.
December 23rd, 2004 at 7:26 am
I see that pesty fly has been buzzing around again.
December 23rd, 2004 at 7:52 am
Yes, I’ve concluded he has narcissistic personality disorder. The need for attention is paramount to the person with narcissistic personality disorder, and he or she will do anything to obtain that attention. SC&A was right.
December 23rd, 2004 at 12:10 pm
We’re always right.
Yes, you read that right.
December 23rd, 2004 at 12:24 pm
No, I’m not always right. Well on the political spectrum other people say that I’m always right, lol…but as far as other things are concerned, that’s not always the case. But thanks for saying it, anyway.
December 23rd, 2004 at 1:34 pm
I’ve noticed something… it seems that only Leftist scumbags are up to starting these “blogwars” because they have nothing else to talk about and no one wants to read it. I mean, how much does it suck to be a lib? To be unhappy ALL the time? To wake up everyday loathing your own country? To blame your misery on the president? It’s pathetic. No wonder there’s noone listening to Dead Air America and why the liberal media is getting crushed by talk radio and Fox News! Same goess with bloggers. The only people that read left-wing bloggers are either A. Those who hold the same doom-and-gloom opinion, or B. By those of us who like a good laugh once in a while when nothing’s good on TV.
December 23rd, 2004 at 2:14 pm
Very good, TS–very well said. I was laughing when I read this by Michael Moore: 17 Reasons Not to Slit Your Wrists It has to be depressing, you’re right. I’m so mean.
December 24th, 2004 at 3:53 am
Mommy-blogs are insipid!
December 24th, 2004 at 8:03 am
Certain individuals are destined to fade into total obscurity; that doesn’t include the millions of “mommy’s” out there. “Mommys” still have an important role in our society, despite the fact that the family is in trouble across America today.
Right Magazine is a very good read, btw.
December 28th, 2004 at 7:13 pm
“This man is so utterly repulsive, I was surprised to find out he’s MARRIED. What kind of idiot would put up with an insufferable pr**k like this?”
Lots of women, unfortunately. I hope his wife has a hefty life insurance policy on him.
December 28th, 2004 at 7:15 pm
hehehe thanks, Deb.