2/16/2008
whitehouse.com $100,000 challenge to Larry Sinclair
Norman Y. Lono for The New York Times
Dan Parisi said back in 2004-that bidding for the domain name, Whitehouse.com, had reached $2 million.
The Web site WhiteHouse.com is offering Larry Sinclair a whopping $100,000. Apparently they think the man is desperate! Sinclair is the man who accused Barack Obama on you tube of homosexual sex and cocaine use in Chicago back in 1999; asking him to tell the truth about his drug use. Then, when there was no response, Sinclair filed a lawsuit against David Axelrod, Barack Obama, and the DNC. Since then, Obama supporters have gone after Sinclair instead of looking to their golden boy for an explanation. (Which would be the rational thing to do.)
I’d like to see them ask Obama to take a polygraph….all of this political posturing, attacking and threatening Sinclair- while protecting Obama from merely answering a simple question is incredibly suspicious.
Supposedly the owner of Whitehouse.com is Daniel Parisi, a porn king. Whitehouse.com came online in 1997 and started out as an adult and political entertainment website. According to a statement on the web, it was originally created by Dan Parisi as a place where uncensored discussion of government policies could occur before adult content was added to make it more profitable.
He’s reportedly been offered large sums of money for the domain or website, because he’s stated that he wants to get out of that game and concentrate on ‘parenthood’ and ‘real estate’.
Daniel Parisi owns Jennifer Lopez sucks dot com, Microsoft sucks dot com and about 600 similar domains and has been named ‘the master of all things sucky’.
Whitehouse.com is also offering $10,000 plus the cost of airfare and hotel bills to Sinclair up front for taking the test — with the promise of 10 times that amount as a larger reward, if he passes. An offer letter has already been mailed to Sinclair.
Since Sinclair’s private information was published on the web, and he’s been receiving telephone calls and death threats, I would hesitate if I were him.
It sounds to me like a setup; they pick where and who gives him the test, and all Sinclair has to do is show up and take the money?
Something stinks…!
Does Parisi still own the site? It seems unclear:
In 2004 Parisi decided to sell the domain, mainly because of his son who would be in kindergarten the next year. At this point he was making US$1 million annually from the site alone. Parisi had said he did not want to sell the domain name to anyone in the adult entertainment industry, and even claimed to have turned down what was essentially a blank check from a buyer hiding his identity behind his broker.
In November 2005, the domain appeared to be used for a real estate site. In December 2005 it contained only Google ads, with a notice that a site for investigating people by checking their public records would be coming.
In March 2006, whitehouse.com called itself “America’s Free Speech Forum”. It advertised a cartoon contest and presented links to Associated Press political news stories.
In July 2006, the site was a real estate site again, and forwarded to www.house.com.
As of November 2006, was a search engine for people, which searched over 90 million White Pages listings and 14 million Yellow Pages listings.
As of June-October 2007, the site once again changed and now claims to be “your source for up-to-date information to help you keep track of the major party candidates for President.”
It appears as though the contact information is for a Parisi - in New York.
Obama’s Rezco deal under scrutiny
Obama votes to punish companies that cooperated with US after 9/11 (WSJ)
Larry Sinclair filed a civil suit today against Obama *Cao’s blog exclusive*
surprise. Moveon.org endorses Obama
An Islamist on the DNC’s Convention Committee
Gitmo lawyers for Barack Hussein Obama
the Obama challenge: Larry Sinclair
Rezko is Obama’s problem
Barack Obama, Kenya, his cousin Odinga and Islamic jihad
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, Adeline and Hazel, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, A Newt One, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, 123beta, Oblogatory Anecdotes, Big Dog’s Weblog, Conservative Cat, , Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, , The World According to Carl, Wolf Pangloss, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:35 am
It may seem fishy to Larry but if he wants he can still do an independant polygraph not sponsered by whitehouse.com. But unless Larry finally sets a date for a polygraph it seems that his talk about “truth” is all a pipe dream.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:46 am
It’s hugely fishy.
They’ll use his passing this as proof that he’s in this for the money.
He’d be smart to turn it down and do his own polygraph.
February 16th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Oh I agree with you there something does stink with the situation. But Larry still hasn’t, as for as I know and I am probably wrong, tried to set up an independant polygraph. What’s the hold-up? is it the driver? What does he have to hide?
I just wish Larry would answer my questions instead of ignoring me and going after Murray, who obviously doesn’t know what he is saying half the time.
February 16th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
One other thing Larry hasn’t adequately answered is why now? Why not bring the story up early last year when Obama was debating with hillary and Edwards? I mean, think of the timing: Articles that question wether Hillary is done for and suddenly BOOM out comes something that could save her. Not saying that you support Hillary Larry, just pointing it out.
Why couldn’t Larry have brought this to the American attention when Obama was a senator? It could have saved many people the trouble of supporting Obama. Larry has had 8 years to get his story straight.
My question after all the ranting boils down to: Why now Larry?
only Larry can answer this so Cao and Murray please don’t respond to this inquiry.
February 16th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
Ok, sorry just read that Larry is going to take the polygraph. Now all we can do is wait.
February 16th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
It’s not Sinclair that is hiding, LOL…
February 16th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Cao please,
When I asked what does he have to hide? I was reffering to the as of right now unknown driver. Where is the supposed driver?
February 16th, 2008 at 10:21 pm
“I’d like to see them ask Obama to take a polygraph…”
But don’tcha know, most of the political class (like other sociopaths) can lie w/o a twitch on a polygraph?
*heh*
February 17th, 2008 at 1:03 am
The Sinclair story would seem to be something that Larry Flynt would be interested in exploring, unless even he is an Obama supporter. I wonder if Flynt is aware of him?
February 17th, 2008 at 1:41 am
Ozgar, this is the problem with people not listening, I have answered your question over and over again, I made evry attempt since last fall as far back as September to let Obama correct his claim about the last time he used drugs to avoid this very thing from coming out like this.
When he ran for US Senate I was living in Mexico and in all honesty him represeting his district of IL did not strike me as any different than the others who sit in the senate web surfing for sex or doing drugs.
Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod are the only ones to blame for this coming out this way.
I do not even like youtube and really am not that good at making web videos, but it got to the point that it had to come out.
Now, any questions as to the driver, listen, I do not have the right to disclose the name and info on the driver to anyone without his permission. I have received repeated calls of threats that I am going to say right now I know to have been the direct result of and from Murray.
I have law enforcement looking into Murray as since his statements here and on youtube under many names I have received threats coming directly from here.
Now Murray ca get on here and claim to know this or that, but I am telling all of you now, do not fall into his game because his threats are felonies and the are but state and federal crimes and I will not tolerate them.
February 17th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Thank you Larry I now understand.
Sorry for all the crazy remarks. I hope others will be able tp apologize for thier remarks as well. Stay safe.
February 17th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
I geuss I am back to square one on who to vote for…. oh well. I really can’t vote for Hillary because she has as much to hide as Obama. And the thought of Bill returning is giving me nightmares as well as all other republicans. But I also can’t feel safe voting for McCain because his Iraq plan is going to fail. Has history taught us nothing? Geuss I will just have to look at all the other issues before I make my final decision…. again.
February 23rd, 2008 at 7:16 am
I think Larry’s claim that Obama has been misleading, I would add downright fraudulent, is very credible.
Have you seen this video compilation clip of Obama’s words which show quite clearly Obama is NOT a messiah, is NOT special, but rather just a sad, pathetic, mass marketed politician created by Axelrod.
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/02/obamboozled_did.html
February 23rd, 2008 at 10:58 am
Very good, thanks!!!!
February 24th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Larry was proven to be a liar by two polygraph machines. Where is Cao today?
Cao has no credibility. Cao supported a lying drug dealer over Obama that has been proven to be a liar via two independent Polygraphs. With blog sites like this, the MSM seems more trustworthy every day. Stay away, she now credibility unless you are willing to defend crackheads over the Constitution and the truth.
Hahaha!
February 24th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
I was on my radio show, you ignoramus.
I’m sorry, but the people who have no credibility are Parisi who played a lot of duck and whisper games the whole time.
The results of this were predetermined; that seems obvious to me.
February 24th, 2008 at 5:14 pm
By the way, they told Larry that the results weren’t going to be in until Monday.
Who are the liars again? I already know who they are…
And I still stand with Sinclair…
Nobody is going to touch Obama…no matter what the truth is…they don’t want his ‘record tarnished’…and Whitehouse.com has taken care of that very conveniently.
February 24th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
No fair they cheated! It’s been the favorite phrase of children and right wing extremists, alike!
February 24th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
“I would like them to ask Obama to take a test”
You have illusions of grandeur.
Look, what about this. Bush and Cheney take a test and then Obama does it afterwards. Are you open to that?
February 24th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
Speak for yourself, Islamonazi…and the correct phrase is ‘delusions of grandeur’. Is English not your first language?
You and your buddies are all banned. I don’t take well to being harrassed on my own blog.
You aren’t interested in the truth; you’re interesting in furthering the career of your fellow muslim…who will try do here what his cousin Odinga is trying to do in Kenya.
Just like Dahr and Baghdad Bob, LOL
June 13th, 2008 at 11:20 am
So do you still stand by Larry? After failing not one but 2 polygraph tests?
June 13th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
He didn’t “fail” the polygraph tests…the (unbiased) computer passed Sinclair. It was the human examiner (Gelb) who considered SOME of Sinclair’s responses untruthful… the human examiner who a) hooked the machine up incorrectly; and b) got his supposed doctorate from an online diploma mill. What’s your problem, you have a problem with reading comprehension?
You haven’t been reading my front page, apparently, because it’s full of stuff about Sinclair.
Maybe you should take a reading comprehension test….I think you may have some serious issues.