2/17/2008
Reverse Speech of Barack Obama sex and drug allegations
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Reverse Speech Analysis confirms sensational gay sex and drug allegations against Barack Obama
Adelaide, South Australia
February 17th 2008
On January 23rd 2008 on the Jeff Rense radio program, a man named Larry Sinclair made stunning claims about Senator Barack Obama. Sinclair claimed that in 1999 he met Barack Obama and Obama purchased and supplied him with cocaine. Sinclair also claims that he performed a sex act on the Senator and the Senator smoked crack cocaine during the evening.
Sinclair’s claims have been analysed by the controversial forensic technique known as Reverse Speech, the practice of playing speech in reverse to reveal unconscious thoughts of the speaker.
In some stunningly clear reversed statements, Sinclair confirms his claims by saying, “The man buys dope,” and “Seen his thing, you know.” These and other speech reversals verify that Sinclair is telling a true story. He did indeed share drugs with Obama and performed a sex act on him in 1999.
Sinclair’s claims have circulated widely on the YouTube internet site and Senator Obama has yet to comment on these claims.
The sensational findings of the Reverse Speech analysis of Larry Sinclair’s allegations will be presented on the Jeff Rense Program, Monday, beginning at 8pm Pacific on GCN at www.rense.com. Startling Reversals of Barack Obama himself will also be heard for the first time ever.
Reverse Speech is the brainchild of Australian researcher, David John Oates, whose controversial technique has been used in the past by law enforcement officials. Oates pioneered the Reverse Speech technique in 1984 and devotes most of his time working in the therapeutic arena and training students in the Reverse Speech techniques.
For further information contact Reverse Speech Technologies in America on 1 866 978-5910, or in Australia on 618 8382-4372.
————-
[link to www.reversespeech.com]
redwolfe@adam.com.au
~~~~~~~~~~
You can see the youtube video here. Sinclair was interviewed on the Jeff Rense show on January 23rd 2008 about these charges. You can listen to the interview by clicking here. The reverse speech analysis was done on sound bytes from the Rense interview.
This man’s reversals are all congruent with his story and they reinforce what he is saying. The man is telling the truth.
I think this is much better than a known democrat, Dan Parisi, offering Larry $10,000 to take a trip, all expenses paid, to show up for a polygraph which appears to be a complete setup orchestrated by the democrats. If Sinclair does that polygraph, he should cover himself and have at least one independent polygraph test done. If there is a discrepancy between the two findings, that would be telling…as I predict that the Sinclair polygraph funded by Parisi and whitehouse.com will show Sinclair is lying. I believe the motivation behind that money offer is more about ’suppressing the truth’ than looking for it.
Previous:
Barackomania; the soulfixer has women fainting
whitehouse.com $100,000 challenge to Larry Sinclair
Obama’s Rezco deal under scrutiny
Obama votes to punish companies that cooperated with US after 9/11 (WSJ)
Larry Sinclair filed a civil suit today against Obama *Cao’s blog exclusive*
surprise. Moveon.org endorses Obama
An Islamist on the DNC’s Convention Committee
Gitmo lawyers for Barack Hussein Obama
the Obama challenge: Larry Sinclair
Rezko is Obama’s problem
Barack Obama, Kenya, his cousin Odinga and Islamic jihad
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Oblogatory Anecdotes, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog’s Weblog, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Pursuing Holiness, , Diary of the Mad Pigeon, third world county, Allie is Wired, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Celebrity Smack, Wolf Pangloss, Dumb Ox Daily News, A Newt One, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
February 17th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Reverse speech??? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
wait, wait. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
They used to do that with rock albums to find hidden messages like “I am satan’s servant.”
Bahahahahahahahaha.
You kooks have really topped yourselves this time!
February 17th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
To Murray and his liberal cry-baby *** buddies: just because a hero like Larry Sinclair is exposing Obama as the lying ****** he is is no reason to get your panties in a bunch
February 17th, 2008 at 5:17 pm
This just keeps getting better and better. The closer this runaway train gets to the cliff, the more I cannot look away from the complete wreck it is. I can’t believe there are people stupid enough to believe complete fabrications without any shred of proof… Wait a minute… they also probably believe that intelligent design is real.
February 17th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
Actually I go further than Intelligent Design…I believe in Creation. And I also believe that partial birth abortion is a sickening crime committed against the completely defenseless.
Not that marxists care about the ‘defenseless’…Obama voted for it. His record on abortion is the most extreme!
It’s the abortion ‘free choice’ people who treat babies like garbage - that has created a culture that no longer believes having children is a blessing - and has people throwing babies off bridges and newly born infants in garbage cans.
February 17th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
I agree totally Cao. The government has totally lost touch with reality. Back in my daddy’s day, good honest people could take control with a noose and a commitment to what’s right. Maybe its time we bring back citizen’s justice? A good hanging or three would put these ****** in their place.
February 17th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Wow. Will this hold up?
Cao, can you send me the link to the interview?
Best wishes,
D. Ox
February 17th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
Sure, DOx
February 18th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Gotta love the GOHP and its followers. They claim to be be anti-abortion, but yet fail to do support measures that will best reduce pregnancies- better birth control access and increased condom advocacy. People have a fundamental right to have sex, regardless of what your hypocritical tomes preach. Keep up the extremism; it really helps solidy your entire lot as wackos to the rest of America.
February 19th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
I personally think that the reverse speech thing is a load of hot, steaming, ****. It has been done to Lad Zeppelin, and the Beatles. Know what they found? Nothing! Reverse speech is not evidence at all! I would trust a polygraph over the reverse speech dohicky. Sorry guys, I have to side with Murray on this one point.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
I’ll be publishing the results of the polygraph as soon as they become available…but I think the real proof will be a description of Obama’s privates and for Obama to pull his pants down; like they did with Michael Jackson.
There are different methods to arrive at a conclusion, I’m not saying this is unequivicol proof…just pointing out that the results from this showed he was telling the truth.
And when all the different methods are investigated, it will give us all a bigger picture rather than the say-so of Murray, the ill-mannered, foul-mouthed cut-and-paste dude who claims his site is a parody site.
I see no original stuff there…it’s all cut-and-paste from other sites….which doesn’t fit the definition of parody.
If he was a parodist, he’d offer the type of original material that “The Nose on Your Face” does. Or that “Blame Bush” does.
Everyone’s entitled to Murray’s opinion…he makes sure we all know it…and he thinks everyone should believe as he does.
And that’s parody?
February 20th, 2008 at 9:45 am
When is Larry going to have the polygraph?? I hope it’s soon..This guy is gaining more and more “fans”..and the more days that go by, the more I’m getting skeptical…
February 20th, 2008 at 11:27 am
I just love it when the Marxist Libtards start the insults and name calling. Just when I was going to state that this “reverse speech thingy” is stated to be a “controversial” process, I read Franklin and Murray’s comments! I do sooo look forward to seeing the results of an independent polygraph exam that is NOT funded by that manipulating half-tard Soros!
February 20th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
In my book we are talking about a Negro who is well known for trolling the Depths of Depravity. Nothing he’s done surprises me, whether it is true or not.
-RPTH
February 21st, 2008 at 4:29 pm
People will just have to wait. I know it’s hard when mostly they’re the fascists supporting Obama who want to order everyone in their world around…but…
As Larry said on the interview, he’s not releasing details…and he asked that Whitehouse.com not reveal the details …because of the threats he’s been receiving.
As soon as we get the results, I’ll let everyone know with a post.
February 23rd, 2008 at 1:16 pm
David Oates is a professional and has no reason to lie. He has never been wrong with his analysis of reverse speech.
Don’t just ba ba something because you do not have knowledge of it. That’s a trolls game. Check the evidence.
February 26th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
hi
go to the website http://www.whitehouse.com/ and scroll down. You will see the results published from the polygraph. They were found to have strong indications of deception on the 2 important questions and the man would also not provide contact details at all of the limo driver he has quoted as being able to corraborate his story. They have dismissed the story. think what you like, but I believe he lied.
February 27th, 2008 at 6:55 am
click here. Or just read below.
Update: Polygraph Operator “Dr.” Edward I. Gelb Exposed as a Phony Ph.D.
The question should be - why is the leftist blogosphere spreading this rumor that Sinclair failed a polygraph test that was given to him by a fake doctor?
Is Whitehouse.com stupid enough to accept the credentials of a FRAUD to make a quick buck…? I gather the amount is somewhere around $750,000.
Even though Parisi is now telling Sinclair the checks are no good.
The polygraphs are meaningless…just as this guy explains in his video.
Did you know…
* The consensus view among scientists is that polygraph testing has no scientific basis?
* The FBI considered the creator of the lie detector test to be a phony and a crackpot?
* The man who started the CIA’s polygraph program thinks that plants can read human thoughts?
* The foremost polygraph advocate in academia was discredited by a federal judge?
* A prominent past-president of the American Polygraph Association is a phony Ph.D., and this premier polygraph organization doesn’t consider it an ethics problem?
* The longest polygraph school produces newly minted polygraphers in just 14 weeks — less than half the time it takes to graduate from a typical barber college?
* The Defense Academy for Credibility Assessment (the erstwhile DoD Polygraph Institute) suppressed a study suggesting that innocent blacks are more likely to fail the polygraph than innocent whites?
* The researcher who developed the U.S. Government’s polygraph Test for Espionage and Sabotage “thought the whole security screening program should be shut down?”
* The National Academy of Sciences concluded that “[polygraph testing’s] accuracy in distinguishing actual or potential security violators from innocent test takers is insufficient to justify reliance on its use in employee security screening in federal agencies?”
* Spies Ignatz Theodor Griebl, Karel Frantisek Koecher, Jiri Pasovsky, Larry Wu-tai Chin, Aldrich Hazen Ames, Ana Belen Montes, and Leandro Aragoncillo all passed the polygraph?
* One of the most prolific serial killers in U.S. history passed the polygraph and killed again?
* Al-Qaeda and Iraqi insurgents know full well that the lie detector is bogus?
* You don’t have to be a psychopath, go to spy school, or somehow believe your own lies to fool the polygraph? (We’ll reveal how it’s done.)
August 22nd, 2008 at 8:08 am
You ****ing idiot!
April 7th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Is the performed a “sex act” claim supposed to support his credibility? Oh yeah, I get it. Next time I want to appear credible I will add “and I performed a sex act on the guy.” Right. Whatever you people are smoking must have been soaked in Clorox.
April 7th, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Actually he didn’t want to make the charge of doing cocaine in 1999 by itself because he knew the sex part of it might come out later.
We’ve all made mistakes in our lives, at least Sinclair owns up to them.
Obama, however, is the teflon politician…despite Rezko and Blago and the rest of the criminal gang he associates with and has associated with for the past 10+ years…or even before.
Get a life, RG. This post is now closed to comments since you can’t let go of it.
Find somewhere else to insult Sinclair. I’ve met the man, and he’s straightened his life out. Too bad we can’t say the same for Obama.