2/24/2008
hysteria put to rest by Whitehouse.com-Sinclair was set up
It seems pretty obvious to me that Sinclair was set up, considering they weren’t going to tell him what the results were until Monday and broke the story before that…before even telling Sinclair.
They were playing duck and whisper games the whole time…I knew it would be a mistake for Larry to go through with this.
And now the results are just as I predicted they would be: that he’s a liar.
But is he really?
I think this is an orchestrated campaign just like the one against Blair Hull and Jack Ryan…to take someone out that would ‘taint’ the Messiah Obama.
Actually considering the hype and virtual hysteria around Larry’s allegations and given the results that I predicted - this is really giving me the creeps.
Update: Polygraph Operator “Dr.” Edward I. Gelb Exposed as a Phony Ph.D.
Gelb has publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least 1996. In 1997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court in the land — the United States Supreme Court — as a co-signer of the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists’ amicus brief in U.S. v. Scheffer, where he is listed as “Ed Gelb, Ph.D.”
*snip*
No, the “LaSalle University” that awarded Gelb his “doctorate” turns out to be a defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson. In 1996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and in 1997 Kirk pled guilty to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle University, see “The swim ‘doctor’: Credentials of nutrition adviser to U.S. women’s team questioned,” by Danny Robbins and Margaret Jamison, Houston Chronicle, 7 September 2000 and “Chiropractors with False credentials and diplomas” on ChiroWatch.com.)
Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop masquerading as such.
The question should be - why is the leftist blogosphere spreading this rumor that Sinclair failed a polygraph test that was given to him by a fake doctor?
Do they really think we should accept this nonsense?
Is Whitehouse.com stupid enough to accept the credentials of a FRAUD to make a quick buck…?
Or that greedy that Parisi doesn’t care?
Cao’s note: Was there- in fact- a $750,000 agreement between Axelrod and Whitehouse.com to set up Larry Sinclair?
February 24th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
CAO I’m Baaacckkk!!
So Larry failed not one but TWO!!! tests. You claim to just want to report the facts but evrything on your site about Obama is in a negative light. You are just like any other reporter…. FULL OF ****!!!
February 24th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
Oh and one more thing. People don’t see Obama as a Messiah so qui posting that ****!! People want Obama because they believe that he will bring the troops home. Hillary won’t, and McCain definitly won’t.
February 24th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Conspiracy!
Make up your mind Cao. I thought you said that you were happy that WH.scum was doing a great service. Were you wrong about this as well based on your comment? Now you say they are evil conspirators.
You were wrong about Sinclair and now this mistake. How can anyone trust your judgement or your postings?
You display bad judgemnt like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld - all your heros that kill innocent people for money - your money - while prostituting your family.
http://www.youtube.com/user/comingawakening/
February 24th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
No, I predicted he was being set up and the results were predetermined.
And whaddya know, it turned out just as I predicted.
February 24th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Of course you “predicted” Whitehouse.com was setting up Larry you are rooting for Larry after all and you have a distrust for the MSM. What else could you say?! But I have some details that you are going to be hard pressed to respond to. Here you go: …continued from below…The Post has learned that presiding Judge
Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on
Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of
mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound
credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this
suit. Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of “fraud” two times and
investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money
for “black male” charges. Two of the defendants were political
figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive
record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned.”
How do you like dem apples?
February 24th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
I predict that the second result will conflict, leaving the whole thing “inconclusive” and leaving people to argue it out and google it to death into infinity.
February 24th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
I’d like to know what this record of misconduct is, and the names and dates involved so I can fact check it.
Send me a link to the Washington Post blog - and let’s find out who “truthbetold” is…since the Washington Post doesn’t seem to know how that got there. They say that someone has posted it on their blog.
Anonymous sources don’t wash.
By the way, I just talked with the Washington Post - they don’t have a story in print, let alone a story that says that (unless they were lying). So you’ll have to provide more information…unless you just expect me to believe you, LOL
February 24th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
These are completely outragous and untrue statements
Any claim that I have been involved in any “Black mail” attempts against anyone in the world, much less in the areas claimed here are completely false and I will contact the post immediately to respond to their claims.
February 24th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
If I had a candidate I believed in and this sort of thing came up, I would have a little more faith in the system to sort it out. Ya’ll go on the attack instead of lending real support to your candidate and that makes me suspicious of your motives! I haven’t been attacking liberal/Dem blogs over the McCain story because he did what I would expect an innocent man to do… he addressed it publically and put his legal people in place.
Why hasn’t Obama done the same here? If it’s not true, it seems to me he would be the best one to debunk it. I went out on Google, and sure enough the Democrat/liberal blogs and forums have been posting terrible stuff about Larry and when you click on the link, the comment has been “withdrawn”. Ya’ll are behaving pretty pathetic. I think I’ll stay registered Democrat so I can vote for Hillary in the primary. At least with her one knows what they are getting.
February 24th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Well, one of the problems is that in the age of the internet, you can’t believe anything, either way. Anyone can pretend to be anything. Yes, there have been attacks, and there have also been fake attacks. I can sign up on a Republican website and pretend to be a Republican and post attacking comments, if I want. So you never know what is what, and how much or how little of it is staged or sincere.
February 24th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
The info stated as “fact” by Ozgar is from a scam mail and appears to be more unsubstantiated pratter.
February 24th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
I know you and I both are, lol…but then we have common sense.
Again, truth wins….in a world where there are no anonymous sources, and people aren’t allowed to just make things up - or pay doctors to do polygraph tests with a desired end in mind.
There are few people as honest as Larry Sinclair. Unfortunately, this whole band of brothers we find ourselves harassed by wouldn’t know honesty if it bit them in the butt.
February 24th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
People don’t see Obama as a Messiah?
Then why does Michelle say he’s going to ’save our souls’?
Michelle sure does, and so do all the blind moonbats who are drooling over him and the “Obama girl” videos on youtube.
It’s not called Obamamania for nothing.
February 24th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
He’s the “Soul Fixin Man”…. LOL!!!!
February 24th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Haha. But that blog took the bait and ran with it. That feeling seems vaguely familiar!
February 24th, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Cao, I had shared with you my concerns last week about going this route for his polygraph instead of enlisting an agency with a sterling reputation. However, I am unclear as to what exactly is meant by “deception indicated” on the whitehouse.com website. There is no real report there, no context, nothing about where the deception occured - and I don’t see anything that actually says Larry failed the overall test. Am I missing something here?
February 24th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
Update: Polygraph Operator “Dr.” Edward I. Gelb Exposed as a Phony Ph.D.
I think the deception was indicated on the part of Parisi and the phony Ph.D. he spent over an hour with in the good fake doctor’s office while Sinclair was waiting to have the polygraph done.
February 24th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
You guys know my brother Ed?
February 24th, 2008 at 10:28 pm
Good one, Murray. Good one.
That would explain a lot.
I also know your two brothers named “Darrell”.
February 25th, 2008 at 12:44 am
A fake Ph.D? It looks like Dr. Gelb has engaged in “deception” of his own.
February 25th, 2008 at 12:47 am
Cao - What would all of you Obama haters do after he is elected? I know you don’t want him in but what if? Would you move to another country or would you give him a chance to see if he can be a good President?
Larry - I can’t believe you are here making claims about your “honesty.” I am glad we’ve all made you feel like you are still part of this world. I hope you feel better and healthier because of this minor hype. But seriously, you have to stop with the lies. Just post your opinion and more videos about why you want candidate A or B but stop the claims to be a savior. It’s is sad.
February 25th, 2008 at 1:17 am
If Mr. Sinclair has anything concrete to substantiate his claims, now would be the time to put everything on the table. This polygraph information will otherwise bury him.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:32 am
coming awakening - he will probably be elected because so much of this process has been rigged. I have no choice - in spite of the problems, I still love my country, unlike Mr. and Mrs. Obama -who want to change it to some other country.
Talk about “Bamboozled”, LOL…I don’t like Louis Farrakhan (given an award by Obama’s church) - or Malcolm X (whose lines from Spike Lee movies he plagiarizes in his speeches) - or what that tells us about what he really stands for.
I doubt if any sensible American would want Louis Farrakhan in the Whitehouse….unless, of course, you’re a muslim who wants sharia here yourself.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:33 am
I am making this statement regarding the claims recently made against me and attributted to the WASHINGTON POST.
FIRST
The claims that I have an “extensive record of drug convictions” is in fact completely false and according to both the national new desk and city desk at the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.
SECOND
The claims made that I “have been investigated eight times over the past 25 years for trying to secure money through “black male” and two of those involving politicians in IL and IN” also is in fact false and according to the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.
THIRD
Dan Parisi of Whitehouse dot com has decided to ignore the conditions and agreement we entered into regarding the polygraph examination. Mr. Parisis has failed to provide the identity and contact information on the second Expert and in doing so has never obtained any agreement from me for using this individual.
Mr. Parisi failed to provide information that I recently received from emails from people I do not even know, which shows Dr. Edward Ira Gelb has in fact misrepresented his own credentials before a case filed in front of the US Supreme Court. (attached below)
fyi
Polygraph Operator “Dr.” Edward I. Gelb Exposed as a Phony Ph.D.
In addition Mr. Parisi and his assistant refused to inform or allow me to be present during their meetings with Dr. Gelb in his office before, during and after the exams. Mr. Parisi and his assistant spent approximately two hours behind closed doors with Dr. Gelb before I was even introduced to him. During the examination process Dr. Gelb printed something off his computer and left the room telling me he would be back in five, only to return some 30 to 45 minutes later with Parisi’s assistant and an associate of Dr. Gelbs and then asked me to step out side for another 20 minutes before calling me back in to proceed with the exam.
FOURTH
Tonight (2-24-08) after Mr. Parisi refused to respond to my emails I posted on Whitehouse dot com the fact that Parisi this afternoon claimed he had not sent me copy of the results because he had not received them. Shortly after making that statement this afternoon Parisi’s assistant called saying they would fax the results in 15 minute, needless to say that never happened. Later Parisi claimed he had only then received a handwritten report faxed this date to him from Dr. Gelb and that he would wait to fax me the typed report.
If Mr. Parisi fails to comply with our agreement by Monday 2-25-08 I will post all email communications with him concerning this matter and which clearly state the conditions for this arrangement. These emails will clearly show Mr. Parisi did not follow our agreement and I will consider at that time what course of action should be taken. It is only natural that I would become suspicious of Mr. Parisi after finding out he has misrepresented this expert, he has claimed I was examined by two (2) experts of which I agreed and yet I only met one and still have not been given the contact information to this date on the second.
It needs to be made perfectly clear that I have from the very beginning demand all of this be done openly and with credible, unbiased, and apolitical individuals. These facts about Dr. Gelb make it hard for me to believe that Mr. Parisi can claim this person is unbiased and credible when he has misrepresented himself before the highest court in this Country.
Mr. Parisi’s claims that I approved both experts is untrue because I was never given this person whole name or any contact information on him/her. I was simply told Gordo something in Salt Lake City.
Thank you,
Larry Sinclair
2-24-08
February 25th, 2008 at 5:56 am
I have receive a tip informing me that some communications between David Axelrod and Whitehouse dot com was obtained and was some wrangling over the fact that WH has not posted everything that Obama’s camp wanted posted as fast as they wanted and about half of the $750,000 paid to WH to set me up has yet to be paid because of this delay. Mr. Parisi is not happy at all.
This may also explain why Parisi went out of his way to keep his face down and not looking up at me the entire time.
Well, I guess now we will just have to follow the money trial.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:58 am
I wonder how much money the fake doctor got.
February 25th, 2008 at 9:46 am
As far as Obama getting in the White House goes, since I will probably become a criminal, since I will refuse to “play along” with socialized healthcare and government trying to take over control of my life… I will stock up on notebooks and pens so I can write my memoirs from the concentration camp they will probably ship me off to. I would give Obama a chance, but I would fight tooth and nail anything that is in opposition to the Constitution and contray to liberty and freedom of the people… period. I have heard some state that a rebellion of citizens refusing to pay taxes when out representitives constantly ignore us might be in order.
February 25th, 2008 at 11:29 am
I suggest you keep running and investigating every anonymous internet tip you get for the rest of your life. That will serve you well.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:43 pm
People on the internet are trying him and demanding evidence.
It doesn’t belong on the internet; and if I were Larry I would ignore the cretins who are calling for it.
This belongs in court - for a Judge to sort out. That’s where the evidence he has should be presented…not to wise *** anonymous trolls on the internet…or to Axelrod sympathizing journalists who, like Hillary, believe in the Alinsky model.
February 26th, 2008 at 12:54 am
Well, he said himself that it’s going to be thrown out (I said that last week), so then he’d have to appeal to a higher court, which leaves the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court, and those courts would have to first decide whether or not to hear it, just based on the claims, and those courts would require sufficient evidence of all the claims up front to even hear it. Can’t just a stamp at the clerk’s window in those courts.
February 29th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
WE DONT LIVE IN SOME COMMUNIST REGIME!..ITS ABOUT WE THE PEOPLE!…AND WE THE PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHO IN THE HELL WE R VOTING FOR!…LEAVE SINCLAIR ALONE DAM IT!…LET HIM PROVE HIS CASE!RUDE COMMENTS MAKE U LOOK LIKE U DONT HAVE A BRAIN ****!..IF U R ANY KIND OF AN AMERICAN..U WILL STAND BACK AND LET LARRY TAKE ON THE OBAMA ISSUE..AND LARRY!..GET THAT LIMO DRIVER TO STAND UP AND BE A MAN!!…SINCLAIR IS A PATRIOT!!