2/25/2008
Statement from Larry Sinclair
I am making this statement regarding the claims recently made against me and attributted to the WASHINGTON POST.
FIRST
The claims that I have an “extensive record of drug convictions” is in fact completely false and according to both the national new desk and city desk at the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.
SECOND
The claims made that I “have been investigated eight times over the past 25 years for trying to secure money through “black male” and two of those involving politicians in IL and IN” also is in fact false and according to the Washington Post has never been reported by anyone employed at this newspaper.
THIRD
Dan Parisi of Whitehouse dot com has decided to ignore the conditions and agreement we entered into regarding the polygraph examination. Mr. Parisis has failed to provide the identity and contact information on the second Expert and in doing so has never obtained any agreement from me for using this individual.
Mr. Parisi failed to provide information that I recently received from emails from people I do not even know, which shows Dr. Edward Ira Gelb has in fact misrepresented his own credentials before a case filed in front of the US Supreme Court. (attached below)
fyi
Polygraph Operator “Dr.” Edward I. Gelb Exposed as a Phony Ph.D.
Gelb has publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least 1996. In 1997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court in the land — the United States Supreme Court — as a co-signer of the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists’ amicus brief in U.S. v. Scheffer, where he is listed as “Ed Gelb, Ph.D.”
*snip*
No, the “LaSalle University” that awarded Gelb his “doctorate” turns out to be a defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson. In 1996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and in 1997 Kirk pled guilty to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle University, see “The swim ‘doctor’: Credentials of nutrition adviser to U.S. women’s team questioned,” by Danny Robbins and Margaret Jamison, Houston Chronicle, 7 September 2000 and “Chiropractors with False credentials and diplomas” on ChiroWatch.com.)
Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop masquerading as such.
In addition Mr. Parisi and his assistant refused to inform or allow me to be present during their meetings with Dr. Gelb in his office before, during and after the exams. Mr. Parisi and his assistant spent approximately two hours behind closed doors with Dr. Gelb before I was even introduced to him. During the examination process Dr. Gelb printed something off his computer and left the room telling me he would be back in five, only to return some 30 to 45 minutes later with Parisi’s assistant and an associate of Dr. Gelbs and then asked me to step out side for another 20 minutes before calling me back in to proceed with the exam.
FOURTH
Tonight (2-24-08) after Mr. Parisi refused to respond to my emails I posted on Whitehouse dot com the fact that Parisi this afternoon claimed he had not sent me copy of the results because he had not received them. Shortly after making that statement this afternoon Parisi’s assistant called saying they would fax the results in 15 minute, needless to say that never happened. Later Parisi claimed he had only then received a handwritten report faxed this date to him from Dr. Gelb and that he would wait to fax me the typed report.
If Mr. Parisi fails to comply with our agreement by Monday 2-25-08 I will post all email communications with him concerning this matter and which clearly state the conditions for this arrangement. These emails will clearly show Mr. Parisi did not follow our agreement and I will consider at that time what course of action should be taken. It is only natural that I would become suspicious of Mr. Parisi after finding out he has misrepresented this expert, he has claimed I was examined by two (2) experts of which I agreed and yet I only met one and still have not been given the contact information to this date on the second.
It needs to be made perfectly clear that I have from the very beginning demand all of this be done openly and with credible, unbiased, and apolitical individuals. These facts about Dr. Gelb make it hard for me to believe that Mr. Parisi can claim this person is unbiased and credible when he has misrepresented himself before the highest court in this Country.
Mr. Parisi’s claims that I approved both experts is untrue because I was never given this person whole name or any contact information on him/her. I was simply told Gordo something in Salt Lake City.
Thank you,
Larry Sinclair
2-24-08
Cao’s note: Was there- in fact- a $750,000 agreement between Axelrod and Whitehouse.com to set up Larry Sinclair?
February 25th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Oh, come on. More conspiracy?
February 25th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
The only way Mr. Sinclair can restore his credibility is to provide all the concrete information he has to substantiate his claims. If Mr. Sinclair cannot, there is nothing else to advance his story. I had found Mr. Sinclair’s accounting to be credible, but I am not interested in accusations any more that cannot be backed up by evidence.
February 25th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
Hahahaha…
First of all, I am sure Larry wrote that letter. Cao probably “assisted” him. Just my opinion.
Second point, Larry, you need help. (-15) and (-7) - hahahaha. Not even close. Maybe Obama was logged in to the machine via the internet and sent ping packets when those questions were asked.
Larry - so what’s next? If I were you, I would work on McCain. It would be much more believable considering his history of cheating on his wife and his wife’s drug abuse and addiction.
Maybe you can say that you had a threesome on a lobbyist’s airplane. Right?
February 25th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
WHERE IS THE LIMO DRIVER LARRY?
Why are you hanging on Parisi? Produce the limo driver you lying fraud.
February 25th, 2008 at 7:36 pm
He doesn’t have to produce anything on the internet for you vultures to pick at.
February 25th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Cao said: He doesn’t have to produce anything on the internet for you vultures to pick at.
Ummm - the burden of proof is on the accuser. This is America, right?
February 25th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
Actually, Journalism 101 teaches that someone accused should refute the claims immediately.
Axelrod knows that…but he’s playing out of the Alinsky playbook.
February 25th, 2008 at 9:12 pm
Cao wished she had taken that JRL101 class in the community college annex. She’s happy the interwebs were created and she can google tings and learn fast to catch up with smart peoples of the world like coming awakening. That is spell check.
February 25th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Cao wished she had taken that JRL101 class in the community college annex. She’s happy the interwebs were created and she can google tings and learn fast to catch up with smart peoples of the world like coming awakening. That is spell check.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pF5MhzFdBsU
February 25th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Cao wished she had taken that JRL101 class in the community college annex. She’s happy the interwebs were created and she can google tings and learn fast to catch up with smart peoples of the world like coming awakening. That is spell check.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pF5MhzFdBsU
February 26th, 2008 at 6:43 am
coming awakening can’t even write coherent sentences but puts down my level of education?
And deez interweb tings was created by Al Gore, right?
bwahahahahah! This is getting more and more amusing!!!!
coming awakening should take some English classes and get over his typical muslim air of superiority.
Here in America that kind of thing doesn’t go over well…unlike Saudi Arabia where it’s okay to treat infidels like dhimmis.
February 26th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
“Larry - so what’s next? If I were you, I would work on McCain. It would be much more believable considering his history of cheating on his wife and his wife’s drug abuse and addiction.”
Coming Awakening seems to have a problem here. He claims Larry is lying and can’t substantiate his claims, but… looky here… he states McCain has a HISTORY OF CHEATING ON HIS WIFE???? You think that is a fact because you read it in the NY Times???
Let’s see your evidence that he “has a HISTORY (that means many times!)of cheating”… geez, and I can’t stand McCain, but I hate the pot calling the kettle black, while making assumptions.
February 26th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
who said anything about McCain? LOL another diversion tactic…Coming Awakening is pulling them all out…!!!
You are making devastatingly stupid assumptions, CA.
I have no dog in this fight…they’re all losers - and they’re all supported by George Soros, as far as I can see.
I’ve blogged about McCain and the numerous things that bother me about him over and over again…all three of these main candidates have thin records - and are not qualified to be Commander-in-Chief.
Hillary has that Saudi woman - who makes a scant salary but lives in a $500,000+ place. Who’s paying for that, I wonder???
What coming awakening is talking about - as if it’s news - is here on youtube…going through my archives you can see I don’t support ANY RINOs.
February 26th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
I don’t support Clinton. I am not a Democrat. I voted for Bush in 2000, Dole before that, and Bush Sr. in 88 and 92. I am an independent so stop assuming I am a Left wing nut or what ever you call them.
If Ron Paul would garner enough support, I would vote for him but it didn’t happen.
February 26th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Are you allowing me to post now? I have kept it clean (except for the one time). I apologize for making personal comments like that. I will continue to argue with you about policy and left/right issues though.
February 26th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Cao - I was responding to HoosierArmyMom not you. I know you’ve posted about McCain before. So who do you support then? RP?