4/21/2008
expelled: no intelligence allowed
The intolerance of Big Science in academia shows the Darwin paradigm as a secular religion. No intelligence allowed!
Ben Stein’s film is about the evolutionists and their thought police tactics regarding the antiquated theory of evolution.
Dinesh D’Souza wrote a piece about it at Townhall.com entitled “Ben Stein Exposes Richard Dawkins”:
In Ben Stein’s new film “Expelled,” there is a great scene where Richard Dawkins is going on about how evolution explains everything. This is part of Dawkins’ grand claim, which echoes through several of his books, that evolution by itself has refuted the argument from design. The argument from design hold that the design of the universe and of life are most likely the product of an intelligent designer. Dawkins thinks that Darwin has disproven this argument.
So Stein puts to Dawkins a simple question, “How did life begin?” One would think that this is a question that could be easily answered. Dawkins, however, frankly admits that he has no idea.
Read the entire article. The complexities of life and how we came into existence-simply cannot be explained by that out dated Victorian “theory” that is being taught in our schools without any other alternative.
What is even more entertaining beyond the infinitesimal impossibility of this all coming together ‘by chance’ - is the fact that Dawkins then proposes the “ET Theory”; that life evolved, but was set into motion by intelligent beings from outer space.
So now that Dawkins has admitted that evolution provides no explanation for the origins of life, and we are left with the notion that it has to be either ET or God.
It isn’t as big a leap of faith to believe in God as the creator of all things when you put it into that context.
Chuck Norris has a piece up on Worldnet Daily about this entitled “Win Ben Stein’s Monkey”
What’s surprising to me is that this debate is framed by atheists (who have their own religion that they’re trying to push on everyone else) in terms that are incredibly odd–that it’s science against religion. Where Evolution is consider science (when there is no hard evidence that supports it) - and Intelligent Design is considered “religion”. ID is by no means a religious concept…it only supports the notion that it’s highly unlikely that-in the words of Ben Stein-when lightening strikes a muddle puddle, what emerges from that is a fully equipped 747.
