5/7/2008
Philly cop murdered by bank robbers wearing Muslim garb
Michelle Malkin by way of Tel-Chai Nation
Philly Daily News:
The mastermind of the Port Richmond bank robbery was Howard Cain, who was fatally shot by police Saturday while fleeing in a minivan minutes after he fired a once-banned high-powered Chinese assault rifle, killing Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski, police say.
Cain apparently realized he couldn’t hold up a bank where he was known, so he and Floyd donned Muslim women’s clothes - a hijab covering their heads; long dresses, called an abaya; and face veils, called nik-ab - to prevent detection, the source said.
Warner, of Westminster Street near 54th, wore a dreadlock wig and dust mask, the source added. Then, the trio marched into the bank, and Sgt. Liczbinski responded to the bank robbery alarm at 11:26 a.m.
The trio hopped in a blue Jeep Liberty. Hearing flash information about the Jeep, Liczbinski chased the vehicle, which stopped twice before hitting a pole. Cain jumped out and fired the high-powered SKS assault rifle five times at the officer, hitting his left trunk and leaving him in a pool of blood, at Schiller and Almond streets, police said.
Liczbinski’s car had one bullet hole on the driver’s side door.
I’ll be commenting on this later, but Fareed NuMan, an “Islamic researcher” claimed “They couldn’t be practicing Muslims, no way. The Quran forbids a man to imitate a woman.” More apologetics from a liar, since there are many documented cases of muslims dressing up as women in order to escape.
Men disguised as Muslim women rob bank from 2007 (Reuters)
Red Mosque leader captured while trying to escape … in a burqa from 2007 (Hot Air)
The Niqab and Burqa as Security Threats, November, 2006 (Daniel Pipes)
Attacking a church: Two assailants in burqas threw a grenade among worshippers at a Christmas Day service on in the village of Chianwala, northwest of Lahore, killing three and wounding thirteen. (December 25, 2002)
Burqa’ed commandos capture burqa’ed Al-Qaeda fugitive: On the plus side, a group of Pakistani commandoes disguised itself as women to wait out a ranking Al-Qaeda operative, Abu Faraj al-Libbi. And why were they in burqas? Tim McGirk of Time explains: “U.S. and Pakistani intelligence had received a tip that a suspected al-Qaeda operative would be traveling to [the town of] Mardan disguised as a burqa-clad woman. Because any plainclothesmen seen grabbing a woman would attract a hostile mob, the commandos had donned female garb and accosted the suspect as his motorcycle crossed a graveyard.” (May. 8, 2005)
Afghan suicide bombers hides under burqa: Five Afghan soldiers were killed and four wounded when a suicide bomber, whom the police think was a Taliban member, disguised himself as a woman and sat in the backseat of a car, then set off a bomb hidden under his burqa at an army checkpoint in Khost province of eastern Afghanistan. According to Mohammed Ayub, the regional police chief, “The bomber probably wanted to go into Khost city for a suicide attack there, but panicked and blew himself up when the soldiers started checking.” (February 2, 2006)
Al-Qaeda leadership in Iraq: Abu Mousab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, eluded Western forces over a three-year period through wiliness. In the description of Bill Powell and Scott MacLeod of Time, “al-Zarqawi was a maddeningly elusive target—a master of disguise who could pass as a woman in a burqa one day, an Iraqi policeman the next.” (June 11, 2006)
Palestinian gunmen escape Israeli forces in Gaza: The IDF suspected that Palestinian gunmen dressed up as women to escape a 19-hour standoff with the IDF that tried to dislodge them from a mosque where they were hiding.
Etcetera, Etcetera.
May 7th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Hi,
I dont know if I should agree or not. I used to be a Muslim for 4/5th of my life, then I quit. I am an Atheist now, but I cant tell anyone at home about it. But what You said in that statistics is not true in whole, but it in part yes. You got to write objectively - that is what journalists go four years for in college, otherwise we wouldnt need New York Times, everyone could write for oneself. Paris Car Burnings was not an Islamic act, but a social injustice retaliation. And many more examples cant be just what you see on Fox News or the CNN, there are always a motivation and unless you understand that, you will not be able to be objective. Of course I agree with you that Muslim officials act cruel- like Saudi Arabia, is there any Human Rights there you think? Of course not, but why the UN Security Council doesnt pass resolutions to force them to obey human rights? Well the answer is that they have oil and USA wants oil. Why Israel is not stopped from killing Palestinian children - children are not muslims or jew- well because USA want Israel to be the power of the middle east, like a watchdog - remember Israel air raid of Iraq. And why Iranian Mujahidin Khalq, that is a wanted terrorist network by the Iranian government is not blacklisted in Europe? Well because Iran is the enemy and the enemy of the an enemy is a friend not a terrorist. So finally those networks are terrorists that harms the west, but if they harm someone else, they are not terrorists. What about Abu Gharib and Guantanamo and Bagram prisons? Those torturers and abusers were your fellow Americans, werent they? Another good example, what about virginia Tech shooting? What about Northern Illinois Shootings? Were they called terrorists? No- because they were Americans, and Americans will not become terrorist, even if they atom-bomb Japan 100 more times. It is American Patriotism and if someone else wanted to defend his counrty, he is a terrorist.
May 7th, 2008 at 6:15 pm
The beauty of it is you don’t HAVE to agree. But…You are in sane if you think the New York Times is objective. Have you ever seen the website Times Watch?
Here’s a mini selection:
Still Calling it the Haditha “Massacre”
On Crucial Primary Day, the Times Definitely Tilts Toward Obama
It’s Still All Reagan’s Fault
Has Obama Really Overcome His Wright Problem? NYT Says Sure
Etcetera, etcetera.
On the other hand, I don’t claim to be “objective”; I tell it like it is, without the socialist spin- like it or lump it. I have never claimed to be the New York Times or its equivalent. In addition, I think I made it rather clear as to the source of the material in the post; so don’t blame desenex. I updated the post to show what it is I’m talking about - about terrorists dressing up as women in order to escape. And Daniel Pipes’ list is much longer than the short list I cited.
Bottom line: The New York Times tells glowing stories about terrorists and likes to depict our military in the worst possible light. That’s not “objectivity”. The New York Times and the rest of the print media are having a hard time because their readership is down; people don’t trust the people in our secular newsrooms today - to tell the truth. And isn’t the “truth” what they’re supposed to be reporting? Their version of the truth is manufactured stories that fit a predetermined storyline that fits a political template; that’s not “objective”.
It’s no wonder when you consider quite a few of them are graduates from Columbia University - one of the most horrible examples of leftist moonbattery at a University on the planet!!!