I’m sorry, but these two things really pissed me off.

First you have Obama saying that Hezbollah and Hamas have “legitimate claims”, then you have Matthis Chiroux who was so emotionally swayed by the testimony in front of the socialist progressive congressional caucus that he refuses to participate in an “illegal” “unconstitutional” war, and then you have a quran shooting soldier ‘removed’ from his deployment in Iraq.

Does anyone see a big picture here?

Can anyone say dhimmitude?

One should remember that Chiroux played journalist while serving 5 years in the army. (Jonn’s MOS was 46Q, and points out that a 46Q journalist MOS doesn’t require Chiroux to do any of the heavylifting - no fighting, no patrolling.) And while he was there *shocka!* he experienced hostile environments “fighting” against Islamic insurgents.

booohooooooohoooo!

Bend over. Here it comes.

While leftists are encouraging conscientious objection (at least they’re not publicly tell Chiroux to frag his officers like Ward Churchill has done)-Obama is saying Hamas and Hezbollah has legitimate claims, and our own military is telling our guys to stop using the koran for target practice and instead, bend over and kiss it.

Meanwhile, George Bush says the appeasers are the Neville Chamberlains of our time.

Completely true, of course. Terrorist appeasing isn’t only going on in the media.