6/19/2008
Larry Sinclair led away in handcuffs; THIS IS WHAT THEY DO
A dark cloud is forming in the sky…history has shown us the way of the Marxists…and Obama and his cousin Raila Odinga are Marxists. Obama has lent support to Raila Odinga, and the “us-against=them” rhetoric is also marxist.
Larry Sinclair had his press conference yesterday. And standing before the podium in terrible pain, he did a great job of pointing the press to the facts. He opened it up with “I’m Larry Sinclair, and I AM a US Citizen” or something to that effect. LOL…!
The smears are aimed at Larry Sinclair, not from Larry Sinclair toward Barack Obama. Larry’s press conference was loaded with facts; not character assassination. And Whitehouse.com wasted the cost of renting a room and only were there for 5 minutes. They tried to derail Sinclair’s event, but in the end, only looked foolish in the process.
Just as Obama has promised to “investigate” his predecessors in the Bush Administration on War Crimes charges, the campaign must view Sinclair as a serious threat and he’s become big enough now, and public awareness is far beyond what they can control…so they need to make sure he’s removed, and they did that yesterday. It is SO 1930’s Germany…and 1930’s Soviet Union.
And the Obamanots at an Obama rally in Eugene Oregon featured a band that opens with the Soviet Union’s National Anthem - paying homage to the communists. Their colors are showing and they are red with a hammer and sickle. In fact, the Obama campaign blogger, Sam Graham-Felsen is a self-described marxist who has had the communist flag posted on his office wall.
Obama had Sinclair removed - Just like paranoid Joe Stalin did his opponents, which was his motivation behind the “purge”. Just like Hitler did, when he also got rid of his political opponents with many vicious acts like arresting people in the middle of the night - and the book burning of Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science. That particular book burning covered up the Institute’s carefully documented details of the sexual perversions of the Nazi party.
Sinclair isn’t plotting to get rid of Obama, I don’t know why his campaign is so threatened by him. When Monica Lewinsky came up, President Clinton came out and responded, although he did it dishonestly. Perhaps Obama is afraid people would sense that with him, too, or eventually find out what the truth is, so the strategy is to let others handle it.
But this approach hasn’t been very successful, either.
Where there was Monica, there was a pattern of behavior going back for many years, which people knew about. My feeling is Donald Young and Sinclair are the tip of the iceberg; just as there was a hidden story about the Nazi persecution of homosexuals, so there is a hidden story behind Obama’s avoidance of answering Larry Sinclair’s allegations.
Whether or not Hitler was personally involved in homosexual relationships, the evidence is clear that he knowingly and intentionally surrounded himself with practicing homosexuals from his youth. Like Roehm, Hitler seemed to prefer homosexual companions and co-workers. In addition to Roehm and Hess, two of his closest friends, Hitler filled key positions with known or suspected homosexuals. Rector, himself a “gay Holocaust” revisionist, attempts to dismiss sources that attribute homosexuality to leading Nazis, but nevertheless writes that…
Reportedly, Hitler Youth leader, Baldur von Schirach was bisexual; Hitler’s private attorney, Reich Legal Director, Minister of Justice, butcher Governor- General of Poland, and public gay-hater Hans Frank was said to be a homosexual; Hitler’s adjutant Wilhelm Bruckner was said to be bisexual;…Walter Funk, Reich Minister of Economics [and Hitler’s personal financial advisor] has frequently been called a “notorious” homosexual …or as a jealous predecessor in Funk’s post, Hjalmar Schacht, contemptuously claimed, Funk was a “harmless homosexual and alcoholic;” …[Hitler’s second in command] Hermann Goering liked to dress up in drag and wear campy make-up; and so on and so forth (Rector:57). - Scott Lively
It is SO interesting, and seems to me to be so similar! The only thing I hope is that Sinclair is safe and all right.
…the attack against the Institute was not motivated solely by the Nazi enmity against effeminate homosexuals. It was an attempt to cover up the truth about rampant homosexuality and other perversions in the Nazi Party. - Scott Lively
I see the what’s happened with Sinclair in relationship to the Obama campaign as very similar. The attack on Sinclair is not only damage control on the homosexual/bisexual/whatever sexual he is-but an attempt to cover up the truth about his drug use, too. Both about his connection to things that are outside of acceptable sexual norms for most Americans, - but other truths, as Citizen Wells has pointed out.
Wells quotes a commenter on his blog:
“I came late to this rodeo just recently but have been (naively) stunned by the lack of MSM coverage. And I must say, whatever the outcome, I am very glad there are people in this political circus like Larry. He made up his mind to do the Right Thing and won’t back down. I don’t know if I could have withstood the onslaught like he has.
With virtually no media reporting before or after the PC today I could only find the flood of nasty, hypocritical O’borg bloggers slamming Larry (and the staunch defenders doing their best) and several UK and Aussie articles. I had googled earlier today and found an article in a Biloxi paper but one hour later it was gone. Poof! Gone, as if it never existed. It was a very small article, not slanted in either direction, and was very neutral. I guess just reporting even the basic information was not allowed. So much for free press.”
I completely echo those sentiments; the Obamanazis have an iron grip on the media, yet they are absolutely hysterical and they need to stomp out any dissent. Communism is communism, this has happened in communist countries all over the world. Under Castro, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, –and millions die.
The Roehm Purge was driven by political, not moral concerns. Hitler feigned disgust and outrage about the homosexuality of the murdered SA leaders to justify himself to the German people; it was a tactic he had used previously to allay public suspicions about the sexual deviancy of his inner circle. The importance of this fact is asserted in many leading works by both mainstream and homosexualist historians. - Scott Lively
Leftist doublespeak…
Obama doesn’t even have the balls to confront this head on - what kind of a president would he be if he’s not willing to take on the rumors that are out there? When instead his minions set up a site that is supposed to ‘counter the rightwing smears’? It’s ridiculous. Nobody has come up with evidence that Larry is lying, despite the fact that they’ve manufactured more warrants.
Stalin did this in his Show Trials…
None of this political theatre proves a thing except what we have to look forward to under an Obama “presidency”. When a marxist takes over with his marxist followers, you can expect plenty of “change” afterward. This is what Obama’s agitators are working toward for our once-free once-Capitalist America…and you can bet a lot of people will end up in prison, regardless as to whether or not their white guilt is sufficient.
Sinclair just wanted to get the whole story out so nobody would call him a liar later on when this part of the story came up. But it is important for Obama to hold onto his appeal with the ladies, just as Hitler did. This is all merely for appearance’s sake, for power and control.
Igra addresses Hitler’s justification for the purge:
In his defense before the Reichstag a week later Hitler talked of “traitors.” That was his alibi…In his speech to the Reichstag he admitted that one of the motives for ordering the massacre was to get rid of the moral perverts in his party and that they were traitors because they practiced homosexualism. But under the dictatorship it was not possible for anyone to put Hitler at question. Nobody asked him to explain how it was that, if his purpose was to get rid of homosexuals, he really didn’t rid himself of them but used them as the instruments of his own murder lust and still retained most of them as members of his personal entourage, as well as in key positions of the party organization and the government. Otto Strasser, in his book, The German St. Bartholemew’s Night (which has not been published in English), mentions sixteen of these highly placed homosexualist officials who survived the massacres of June 30 and retained their posts (Igra:82). - Scott Lively
This video is the first part of a series on the Night of the Long Knives. Although what Obama is doing is on a lesser scale, you just have to wonder who else has been framed by the Obama campaign…or died. Why aren’t more people asking why there is only $1,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Donald Young’s murderer, when Wright’s retirement mansion is being paid for by TUCC and is worth and has cost them over $1 million? Donald Young was the gay choir director of the United Church of Christ, who contact Larry Sinclair before his death.
People are being sent a message…and it isn’t a ‘peaceful one’….
And so the attack on Sinclair is to cover up the truth about Obama. We are to accept only that which has been filtered through the Obama-adoring media and presumably Axelrod, and whoever all else is controlling the Obama spin machine. But this is what all of Larry’s supporters have been saying for some time as they withstand the attacks from the Obamabots. The fact that Obama’s minions have reported Larry’s lawyer to the bar is similar to what happened to lawyers in support of the Pendleton 8, and others. This is how they do it…’with smears’, as the Obama website says…take away everything that helps a person to perservere…his support system, his lawyer, his sense of safety, etc.
So in an incredible act of nazi stormtrooper type totalitarianism reminiscent of other times in socialist/communist history, federal marshalls showed up and led Sinclair away in handcuffs. This is similar to the way Putin is treating his political opponents today; they simply vanish. Some even die of poisoning in another country.
Did they take him to an Obama-style gulag? Or just turn him over to his terrorist friends?
As far as I can tell, they are revealing far more about the truth than if Obama came out and said “I did not have sex with that man”.
I guess it depends on your definition of “sex”?
Perhaps the American public wouldn’t fall for it again; because they might remember Clinton saying straight into the camera: “I didn’t have sex with that woman!”
June 19th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Have been now rallying to try and spread the truth about Obama before its to late and gets into office. Sure hope Larry is ok.
June 19th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
I personally believe Obama’s run is pretty much over now that it was let out that he refused Muslim women from sitting behind him. He just tipped his hand towards his hidden rascism and hate!!
June 19th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
So Sinclair was arrested on a warrent from a state that would not extradite him until he appeared against the Messiah. All of a sudden he is arrested and will be extradited for ‘punishment’. He is truly a political prisoner, someone notify the U.N., maybe they can combine this investigation with the ‘racism’ investigation of the Democrat party.
June 19th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
does he qualify as a terrorist?
In this day and age I wouldn’t be surprised if they held him and denied him habeas corpus, like they did for three years with Jack Idema in Afghanistan.
Let’s face it, Larry didn’t exactly murder an entire family, molest any children, or gun down some Federal agents - so his crimes are totally inexcusable. He isn’t Black, Latino, or a Kennedy, and therefore not above the law. Most of all, he hasn’t made any outward displays of repentance, such as penning a children’s book or contributing to the
Clinton campaignObama campaign.June 21st, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Soooo…it’s ok for YOU to silence speech but not others, I guess.
June 21st, 2008 at 8:29 pm
I don’t send people to jail, nincompoop - although I’ve been known to - if I’m harassed by people who are breaking the law.
Harassment isn’t a matter of ‘free speech’. There is no ‘free speech’ to taunt, insult, intimidate and threaten people - despite what you stormtroopers think.
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:45 am
You STILL haven’t released the original questions that I asked -
I want to know how this so-called “silencing” of Sinclair by the left stacks up against the right-wing silencing of the Dixie Chicks.
I’d also like to know why you believe that a career criminal like Sinclair should not be held accountable for his actions.
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Well let’s see.
#1) you are demanding to know something that is so incredibly stupid I don’t think it warranted wasting my time with a response. Let it be known I am not here to do your bidding.
Did the right wing have the Dixie Chicks EVER taken away in handcuffs?
Were the Dixie Chicks - any one of them murdered execution-style like Donald Young was?
The Dixie chicks said that they have a broad enough listening audience that they don’t care about the dumb hick repugnitards - they have a lot of listeners from Europe.
The problem is, their listeners - a lot of them - are the old-time southern type listeners - the ones who ‘cling to guns and religion’. So she can spout her elitism all she wants, the southerners are the ones who switched from slave-owning democrats to freedom-living republicans - they’re just too young to remember all of that…and also the reasons to love their country, which I attribute to their leftist indoctrination in college.
Regardless, leftists are using their clout in terms of ‘buying blue’ - there’s even a leftist website that encourage leftists to only patronize businesses that are leftist.
So why doesn’t it work both ways, or are you a fascist that just complains about the opposing side?
And how does that justify the stupefying claim that we are - or I am- stifling the free speech of the Dixie Chicks in any way shape or form? Puhleez. Get a reality check, will you?
2) Next, is the criminal activity of Sinclair.
He has owned up to everything he’s ever done (he said it all in his press release including the aliases he has used) - and all the receipts and details that people like you have been complaining he hasn’t revealed. It’s all out there on the larrysinclair.org website.
On the other hand, Obama hasn’t answered any of the allegations (or come clean about exactly how much money he got from Rezko/Auchi)- and the Sinclair allegations are only the tip of the iceberg as far as Chicago corruption, crime, etc. - which has been touching the Obama campaign…including that of known unrepetent terrorists.
He talks about “change” but I see politics as usual and connections to Saddam’s old Iraq….and if that’s not frightening to the general public, then we will deserve what we get with this guy who’s probably not even an American citizen.
Now. As to your future demands…
I’m sorry but you’ve made your quota for the rest of eternity - and I’m not going to waste my time answering any more of them, so don’t expect me to foul my comments section with the publication of anymore of your retarded comments or attacks.
Off with you! And take your stupidity, your hatred for conservatives, your sweeping generalizations and personal attacks with you
PS: I pay for this space - I own it, I reserve the right to publish or not to publish comments as I see fit. If you don’t like it, that’s tough.
This isn’t a public park - or a street corner - and even for those you have to get a permit.
People who can’t conduct themselves in a civil manner and have an intelligent conversation or make points that are relevant - wear out the welcome mat here really quick.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Well said Cao. “wow” demonstrates that liberalism is a mental disorder. The full moniker must be “Wow…isn’t it amazing I have enough active brain cells to allow me to walk and talk at the same time and keep my heart beating”. Thanks for all you do Cao to get the truth out.
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm
And a special shout out to Billy Bobneck from Watertown, Massachusetts.
June 25th, 2008 at 11:29 am
How have I not conducted myself on your blog in a civil manner?
As to your assertion that you’re allowed to stifle my free speech because you control this media, well, that just goes to prove my point. You will not allow debate, just as Stalin (and in your view) Obama will not allow debate.
If you really believe that calling liberalism a mental disorder is “intelligent debate” then there is something seriously wrong.
Did the Dixie Chicks kill anybody? No. Did Obama kill anybody? No. Larry said no one from the Obama campaign contacted him. Yet the person Obama theoretically killed identified himself as being from the Obama campaign in 9/07. By his own words, Larrry lied. But this isn’t really about the truth anyway, is it.
June 26th, 2008 at 6:03 am
My blog is not a street corner.
You are a nuisance and making idiotic points while thinking my comments section is your soapbox.
I don’t have time for it, and it is I who makes the rules here - just like I make the rules for who is a guest in my own house.
If a dog craps on the carpet, you put him outside. So don’t let the door hitcha where the good lord splitcha.
I have never said that the purpose of my blog is to debate moonbats.
Liberalism IS a mental disorder - several psychiatrists have said so, and in fact, there are a couple of books on the subject.
Did Obama kill anybody? Ask the Chicago PD about what’s up with their investigation, or Don Young’s family, or stop and ponder for a moment the fact that there’s only $1,000 reward for information on the killer…while Reverend Wright’s $1 million + mansion for his retirement is being paid for by TUCC.
As I’ve said - the Dixie Chicks comparison is really dumb. If leftists are entitled to ‘buy blue’, then the other side is entitled to boycot for political reasons, too. The Dixie Chicks are not politicians - they should just shut up and sing.
I’ve provided ample explanation and if you can’t accept it - that just proves your totalitarian ideology - that says you’re entitled to order people around.
You’re not. Debate as you define it - is about insulting people you don’t agree with - and demanding them to print your comments so they shut up to listen to YOU and provide you a soapbox. Get your own radio show or blog if that’s what you’re looking for; that isn’t the purpose of CB.
June 26th, 2008 at 8:54 am
In observing Larry Sinclair– the nemesis of Barack Obama– concerning drug and ***** use in the back of a limo, one can listen to a laid back Sinclair tell his tale like one discusses the latest fashion trends.
For the Obamaniacs, Sinclair sounds like a dufe and a liar which they dismiss in their infatuation over Barack Obama. For those who really listen to Larry Sinclair though, he has allot more going on with him in intelligence and planning than his Minnesota smile reveals.
I sincerely believe that when Larry Sinclair was arrested after his National Press Club appearance that he honestly had calculated this would occur. He knew that the Obamaniacs were going crazy. He knew that Obama had shut him down in spending a fortune. He knew that Obama’s people were ticked at being reigned in the last time Mr. Sinclair waded through the muck of Democratic politics and he knew he had outstanding warrants which would lead to his arrest.
Now ask yourself, if you are Larry Sinclair and there is no legal way you can get your hands on Barack Obama’s phone records which Obama is hiding in connection with murdered Don Young and the vanishing limo driver who brought Sinclair and Obama together, what is one of the easiest ways to gain access to that information than a court order?
What court order could this be? Well, Larry Sinclair knows that 3 Obama operatives are online bragging they got Mr. Sinclair arrested. They phoned the DC police and literally stalked Mr. Sinclair and provided a visual identification that Mr. Sinclair just “happened” to put on his blog before the press club meeting.
Next, instead of the DC police, the Feds swooped in and took custody of Mr. Sinclair……all an apparent violation of the 10th Amendment of the Constitution as Delaware or Colorado were not even bothering with seeking extradition for Mr. Sinclair where his warrants were outstanding.
So this means someone in the Federal government violated protocols as they have no business in getting involved in a state matter for petty matters. The best part of this is for Mr. Sinclair is they then moved him from the District of Columbia, into Maryland which has nothing to do with this case which is supposed to be a Delaware warrant.
Liberals when this is going on with terrorists call it kidnapping. The reader can decide as a judge will if Mr. Sinclair’s attorneys start filing subpoenas in this for the following counts of what is shaping up as a criminal conspiracy of the Obama operatives and Federal officials to stalk and imprison with kidnapping one Lawrence Sinclair.
Questions now are raised in who in the Federal government was monitoring this to send in officers to take into custody Mr. Sinclair who has not broken federal laws.
Delaware and Colorado both knew of Mr. Sinclair and could have cared less about his petty offenses.
Attorneys now can subpoena phone and email records of the federal government.
Attorneys now can subpoena records of the 3 Obamanaics who were stalking Larry Sinclair to see what contact they have with the Obama camp.
When any of the above shows a link as in WhiteHouse at the same press conference Mr. Sinclair was conducting to what Mr. Sinclair states is a Mr. Axelrod working for Barack Obama funded the WhiteHouse lie detector fraud, well that channels directly to Mr. Obama and all of his campaign records in a criminal conspiracy to silence Lawrence Sinclair.
Once that door is open and it is, then Larry Sinclair via the court can obtain Barack Obama’s entire phone records which Mr. Sinclair states will prove his meeting with Barack Obama in a limo and the dealings Mr. Obama had with a dead sodomite choir director in Don Young.
Whether the Obamaniacs know it or not, they are the plumbers in an Obamagate who just landed this entire fiasco back onto Barack Obama with the courts opening up everything he has just like in Watergate.
Payoffs, faked lie detector tests, murdered choir directors and now a literal Federal conspiracy involving what is termed French bloggers and an American blogger to stalk and imprison Mr. Sinclair.
If the Federal zealot who grabbed Mr. Sinclair is found without merit as this was not a federal matter, then there is a fact of kidnapping.
All of that adds up to a horrendous catastrophe and as stated if Mr. Sinclair knew his being dragged into the courts would gain him access as his past maneuvers have shown, then it will be Barack Obama’s own people who bring him down as they have just opened all avenues of defense to Mr. Sinclair and his attorneys to all of these records as one apprehension links all of the parts together.
Now who looks like the bright boy? Yes Larry Sinclair does look quite intelligent now and if his attorneys are one bit the savvy they appear to be, the Obamaniacs walked right into this in one of the best chess moves ever carried out.
Barack Obama in his public directions has stated he had hundreds of operatives doing such work and they have been attacking Mr. Sinclair. The chickens have come home to roost and there is no way Senator Obama is going to cover this up when the courts get involved as if he starts violating court orders that is contempt and if he starts legal maneuvers the voting public will really start focusing on this in what he is really hiding.
Perhaps Larry Sinclair should have been the Democratic nominee as he is so far ahead of the most brilliant operatives in getting them to walk right into this.