7/20/2008
Dear Bongoman
Respect for Donald Young? Sinclair is now dragging a dead man into his scam and you talk about “respect”? Wow.
Yes, I know you don’t know what respect is, and neither do the Obamablognazis…but…yes. Sinclair wants to find Young’s killer - as do his family and everyone who loves him.
The Obamablognazis have posted Donald Young’s familys’ names and information as well as the phone number of the spokesperson for the family in the hopes that they could harrass them into coming out against Larry Sinclair. And you call that respect?
You say ‘Sinclair is now dragging a dead man into his scam’…?
This is the third Globe story about it, from back in May.
I would think that everyone would applaud the efforts of those who are interested in apprehending Young’s killer-except, of course, those who are covering for the murderer and those who might have ordered it. It appeared to be a ‘hit’…so someone could have been paid to do it.
I think it’s disrespectful to someone who is murdered NOT to want to investigate, but I know you’re too thick to understand that reasoning; particularly because the ObaMessiah might have had something to do with it…along with Reverend Wright, who hightailed it to his $1.2 million mansion, paid for by TUCC, while a paltry $1,000 reward is being offered for information leading to the arrest of Young’s killer.
It’s obvious that despite Young’s contribution to the church, his death meant nothing to them, otherwise the reward would be much more than that.
As far as I can tell, bongoman, - and maybe you haven’t been paying attention - the Donald Young name has been in this story from the very beginning.
You can see it on the flyers that are being distributed about Obama’s crack cocaine use, homosexual sex in the back of limo in 1999, and the murder of Donald Young.
The phone calls that Donald Young made to Sinclair in order to pump information from Sinclair for Barack Obama are what led Sinclair to the conclusion that there was a connection. Not long after he admitted to Sinclair in a text message that he was milking Sinclair for information and that Obama had no intention of admitting he smoked crack in 1999, –that’s when things turned. And it was not long after that - that Sinclair heard or read that Young had been found dead, an apparent victim of homocide.
I hope that answers your questions. Donald Young has very much been a part of this whole thing - since the very beginning.
I’m not sure why you’re not glad that someone wants to unravel the mystery behind who might have done the deed –unless, of course, you’re trying to protect someone.
July 20th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
Cao,
I received following for your blog:
“Someone has asked to reset the password for the following site and username.”
And they say we’re obsessed!
– Dumber Than A Bag of Hammers
July 20th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
The Definition of Irony
Young, *** and Murdered
http://www.newsweek.com/id/147790>1=43002
Teenage Tragedy
A 15-year-old boy told family and friends he was ***. He dressed flamboyantly; he hit on a classmate. His murder made clear that issues of sexuality, at such a young age, can have heartbreaking consequences.
July 20th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Yes, take a look at the link, here.
It seems as though they’ve given their little list of email addresses to a Microsoft employee who has been playing a few games.
I have shut off that entry portal where he gained access.
July 20th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
“a Microsoft employee”
son-of-a-******
or would that be
son-of-a-miatch
July 20th, 2008 at 6:00 pm
(July 20, 2008) “Techdude: Obama COLB is a (Horrible) Forgery”
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/july-20-2008-%e2%80%9ctechdude-obama-colb-is-a-horrible-forgery%e2%80%9d/
July 20th, 2008 at 10:22 pm
here’s the law:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1573&ChapAct=410%20ILCS%20535/&ChapterID=35&ChapterName=PUBLIC+HEALTH&ActName=Vital+Records+Act.
you can pick through it and figure out the answers to any questions you might have.
July 21st, 2008 at 4:17 am
The State Registrar of Vital Records, may disclose, or authorize the disclosure of, data contained in the vital records when deemed essential for bona fide research purposes
The State Registrar of Vital Records shall search the files of birth, death, and fetal death records, upon receipt of a written request and a fee of $10 from any applicant entitled to such search. A search fee shall not be required for commemorative birth certificates issued by the State Registrar. If, upon search, the record requested is found, the State Registrar shall furnish the applicant one certification of such record, under the seal of such office.
The local registrar or county clerk must charge a $2 fee for each certified copy of a death certificate.
———-
So it’s not ‘illegal’ to order a death certificate; I don’t see a thing in there about making one public, or your 20-year rule.
How interesting. According to this, anyone could request Donald Young’s birth certificate, as well, if he was born in Cook County.
July 21st, 2008 at 4:34 am
I am at the point now where I may just disable comments for all future posts.
By the way, the next time you allege that Sinclair is doing something untoward, identify yourself and explain why you’re qualified to make such a statement. And if you’re going to allege that he did something illegal, cite the specific act or crime he committed and the law that was broken - don’t throw the lawbook at me with a vague allegation from an anonymous troll and then tell me to parse through it; the burden of proof is on YOU, not ME.
If you’re such an expert, PROVE IT and cite, cite, cite; otherwise you’re just another crackpot with another distraction.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In addition I’d like to see the law that allows people to indiscriminately post other peoples’ personal and private information - like that of Donald Young’s surviving family.
Did the Mitch and Nan Show have Donald Young’s family’s permission to post their information?
And what about the list of Larry Sinclair’s supporters?
More and more evidence is coming to the fore that proves that Mitch and Nan are nothing but a bunch of internet stalkers.
What’s amusing is their screaming about how THEIR privacy should be considered; after all they’ve done. Being that they have no respect for anyone else’s privacy, or the law, I think it’s all the more reason we should pursue identifying exactly who they are.