7/30/2008
there are not two sets of rules
We don’t have one set of rules for Obamamaniacs and another for everyone else. There is one law; one set of rules, and if you break them, you break them. Period.
So what is this dichotomey we have between Larry Sinclair who brings up allegations about days in November 1999 and a sexual and drug encounter with Barack Obama, and Obama’s acolytes? Let’s review.
Sinclair comes out on youtube in January of 08 after having attempted to get through to Obama’s campaign since September of 07. After that there has been a virtual onslaught of attack on Sinclair, and Sinclair’s growing support base. Sinclair sounds like a lawyer when he’s questioning people such as Neon aka James Barry, who is hiding behind a psuedonym like the rest of the Obama lemming legions. What is different about their approach is - going to the trouble of hacking onto websites in order to find the email addresses of supporters, then posting that list in order to encourage people to go out on the web and dig up information on those people.
Sinclair brought on a DC court case in federal court against three of the bloggers who had been spreading malicious lies about him; and Public Citizen came to the rescue. Interesting, isn’t it, how Public Citizen is a Ralph Nader litigation group designed to protect citizens against corporations. Yet in this scenario, John Levy is representing three bloggers (who had already put their information out there on the web) and is protecting their identities from being revealed in court-from Larry Sinclair, a single dying gay man living in Minnesota.
They claim they have a right to anonymity, but again we have our two Americas. The attackers; the hackers; the malicious internet warriors have the right to THEIR anonymity, but those who are under attack by these malicious assailants need to stand still and take their punishment!
Larry Sinclair’s supporters have done nothing but position Sinclair so he is able to fight the battles that have cropped up in response to his bringing allegations of homosexual sex and drug use in the back of a limo in 1999 with Barack Obama to the public.
After not having heard from the Obama campaign, but receiving phone calls instead from Donald Young - Sinclair eventually came to the conclusion that Young had also been involved to some degree sexually with Obama. Gay people talk. And it’s been long known in gay circles that Obama is on the down low, that’s not a new revelation. What was new was in December of 2007, when Young sent Sinclair a text message, saying that he was only milking Sinclair for information, and that Obama never intended to admit to his drug use or anything else. And then Sinclair learned of Donald Young’s murder.
So it is little wonder that Sinclair came out in January of 2008. A lot had transpired between January 2008 and the months previous that magnified his desire to get this in front of the American people; particularly because Obama and Axelrod refused to even return a phone call.
It’s also not new that the media would go to great lengths to ignore this story, even now, as it develops into a freight train crashing down the tracks on its way to ripping away some of Obama’s god-like mystique as the lightgiver; allowing people to see him as he truly is.
“A light will shine down on you and you will suddenly realize…”
Turkeys! You’ve been had.
There is only a $1,000 reward for information leading to the apprehension of Donald Young’s killer. You might conclude from that that nobody is interested in finding out what happened there, despite the fact that he was shot execution style and died of multiple gunshot wounds. That $1,000 is in stark contrast to the lavish homes that both Wright and Obama live in, and the lifestyle to which they’ve become accustomed. You would think that Donald Young’s contribution to the church would have meant more than that. You would think that they would both be out there clamoring for an investigation, and for the killer to be brought to justice.
Although…maybe not. Maybe Obama is one of the leftists who’s been clamoring for lighter sentences for drug dealers and criminals of other stripes.
I think it’s great that Sinclair has a new site up. I think it’s great that he’s getting it ironclad so the Obamanazis can’t find a hole to steal information about commenters, etc. Rock on, Larry, and in the words of Citizen Wells: Stay safe.
July 30th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
Thank you, Cao, for posting this.
July 30th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
(July 30, 2008) “Will Obama be indicted next? Sign the petition and followup with a hand-signed letter. Yes you can!”
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=21798
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/july-30-2008-%e2%80%9cwill-obama-be-indicted-next-sign-the-petition-and-followup-with-a-hand-signed-letter-yes-you-can%e2%80%9d/
_______________________________
http://www.myspace.com/koostapo
July 31st, 2008 at 12:41 am
Poor Larry…and still not a shred of evidence in support of his claims.
July 31st, 2008 at 1:33 am
Isn’t it a little hypocritical to accuse people of hiding behind pseudonyms when you don’t reveal your own name?
July 31st, 2008 at 4:10 am
My identity was revealed
quite a long time ago; you’re not all that bright, are you? It’s the reason that some people have made a connection between Joe Cafasso and Scott Covington. (Two con artists cut from the same cloth, LOL)
But as this post says…there are not two different sets of rules. One set of rules should apply to all. Break the law, go to jail.
What’s hypocritical are people who dig to reveal the email addresses, social security numbers, medical information and other personal information - of people who are merely expressing an opinion that differs from theirs. That’s pretty militant for people who call themselves “tolerant liberals”. That is an invasion of privacy and a crime. Hiding behind anonymity to protect themselves from prosecution is not only hypocritical, it’s downright cowardice.
The evidence that his claims are true is the hysterical manner in which the Obamabloggers and lawyers have tried to malign Sinclair. Sinclair is smelling like a rose, while Obama is looking worse and worse. It’s no wonder his polls are sucking so bad, LOL…the guy can’t tell the truth about his background, where he was born, or even produce a real birth certificate!
Sinclair has provided all of that, and more.
Now it’s up to someone to investigate Obama’s phone records to see who it was he called to score the cocaine in November, 1999. And who it was that he was calling during the month or two preceeding and following Donald Young’s death.
The longer Obama ignores it, the worse this is going to get for his candidacy and the bloggers who are so hysterical trying to ’shoot the messenger’.
bongoman, you are really starting to crack me up!
Okay, back to moderation with you!
July 31st, 2008 at 6:09 am
“the worse this is going to get for his candidacy”
This is a total non-event for Obama’s candidacy. Sinclair has been around for months now and nothing has come of his ridiculous claims. And nothing will come of them. Anyone with a shred of common sense can see through Sinclair.
July 31st, 2008 at 11:20 am
“My identity was revealed
quite a long time ago; you’re not all that bright, are you?”
I’ve been saying this for a long time now. If they can’t even get this right…?!
July 31st, 2008 at 11:22 am
”Amos and Andy in black responsibility” (the spurned homosexual lover, Larry Sinclair)
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/%e2%80%9damos-and-andy-in-black-responsibility%e2%80%9d-the-spurned-homosexual-lover-larry-sinclair/
EXCERPT
“The Presidential campaign of 2008 has had more theatrics than Broadway could ever hope to produce.
The invidious candor of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright;
the spurned homosexual lover, Larry Sinclair, holding press conferences with accusations of Obama’s cocaine use;
the crocodile tears of Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, and her downing shot glasses of whisky at the local saloon in Indiana. Clint Eastward, eat you heart out!
July 31st, 2008 at 12:59 pm
“Nothing But The Truth — Larry Sinclair Agrees With Polarik And TexasDarlin”
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/nothing-but-the-truth-larry-sinclair-agrees-with-polarik-and-texasdarlin/
July 31st, 2008 at 6:25 pm
If it were a non event, bongoman, you people wouldn’t be paying attention. You wouldn’t be hysterically commenting on pro Sinclair blogs. You wouldn’t be attacking, and then whining and complaining when someone holds you accountable. The M&N Show would never have gone up; Murray wouldn’t have been posting hysterical “satire” slander comments, the M&N Show wouldn’t have posted the email addresses and personal information of Sinclair’s supporters!
What I find funny is how serious and desperate you are in your efforts to shut Sinclair down!
This is far from a non event, as the 2 million plus hits to his blog in just a few months and the tons of people voting in his polls attests.
Non event my ***!
Keep wishing and hoping that tubesoscktedD, owningliars and mzmolly don’t find themselves with their identities plastered all over the front pages of the Globe or some such magazine -as more of Obama’s sacrificial lambs. It’s not like he hasn’t thrown people under the bus before, LOL