7/26/2008
I have Obama fatigue
This cover puts it all in perspective. A picture sure is worth a thousand words!
I am more than sick and tired of Barack Obama and his wife and his campaign, and Axelrod’s handling of the campaign and issues swirling around the campaign.
I’m sick of Obama because his wife flapped her trap once too often, and now he wants everyone to ‘lay off’. Maybe she should get back in the kitchen! I understand even after she got her $300,000 increase - she ended up leaving her job, anyway, and supposedly she’s going to ‘raise their daughters’. I noticed that their daughters can’t get enough of Harry Potter; the witchcraft books and movies.
I’m sick of Obama claiming to be a Christian when in actuality he ridicules, mocks and pokes fun at passages in the Bible, and takes them out of context like a muslim.
I’m sick of Chris Matthews and his mancrush on Obama–particularly made we want to throw up when he talked about getting a ‘tingle up his leg’ when listening to the ‘hope and change’ garbage.
I’m sick of people blaming Bush for everything; which is a complete oversimplification of the state of the nation and the democrat-ruled congress, which has an incredibly low approval rating; a disapproval rating of an astonishing 75%.
I’m sick of them complaining about McCain being “old” and depicting Obama as a swinging cool ‘dude’.
I’m sick that none of the Senators running for the presidency have done their jobs or attended congressional sessions since they began running; yet none of them have stepped down from their positions.
I’m sick of his campaign doing things so transparent about the PR value and squeezing every possible drip of PR advantage out of photo ops with the troops - that they CANCEL events when they figure out that the press won’t be allowed to cover it.
I’m sick of Barack Obama’s silence over the Larry Sinclair issue, and the media’s silence over Obama’s involvement with Donald Young.
I’m sick that the Rezko indictment didn’t touch Obama at all.
I’m sick of Obama and the lies that he told in his autobiography. So many lies, in fact, that Andy Martin is suing him for it.
I’m sick of Obama claiming other people are focusing on race when he was a member of a black separatist “church” for 20 years that preaches black liberation theology.
I’m sick of Obama’s communist mentors such as Davis and Ayers.
I’m sick of knowing of his connections to Rezko and Naom Auchi - and Saddam’s Iraq.
I’m sick of the fundraising that breaks the rules; in effect giving people a raffle.
I’m sick of the Obama campaign treating like he’s a rock star instead of a presidential candidate.
I’m sick of hearing people say that they “like” Obama when they can’t come up with a single accomplishment he’s made as a junior senator.
I’m sick of Obama’s lack of experience which leads to numerous gaffes that are merely covered up.
I’m sick of Barack Obama’s communist bloggers, and all the rest of the individuals who are helping him cover up all the skeletons in his closet, such as the fact that it’s well known on the gay scene that Obama has had sexual relationships with men for a very long time.
I’m sick of Obama claiming he is not, and has never been - a muslim…when he was registered in Indonesia as a muslim in a catholic school, his father was a muslim, his step-father was a muslim and has three muslim names.
I am sick of Obama because he has covered up the fact that he is literally a bastard and was born to an unwed mother of a muslim man who never divorced his wife in Kenya.
I’m sick of Obama flip flopping over so many issues I’ve now lost count.
I’m sick of Obama supporters’ belief that Obama is somehow going to change the economy FOR THE BETTER - WITH SOCIALISM.
I’m sick that people don’t know about Obama’s Global Poverty Act. And when you look at that, you can see Ovama’s goal isn’t simply socialism, it’s WORLD COMMUNISM, a complete redistribution of wealth program to the WORLD. And that, folks, doesn’t help the poverty-stricken of the world to fend for themselves or manage their own destiny…it just gives them money they didn’t earn.
I’m sick that people don’t take it seriously that Hezbollah and Hamas have endorsed him.
I’m sick of black people attracted to the democratic party when it was the democratic party that the KKK came from.
I’m sick that Obama is being touted the ‘first black president’ when he is in fact Arab; and is the descendent of Arab slave traders on his father’s side, and democrat slave holders on his mother’s side.
I’m sick of the Obama bloggers attacking with ad hominem and exposing the identities of those they disagree with rather than debating the facts.
I’m sick of the Obama bloggers who use the 1st amendment to protect their anonymity when they have no respect for the identities and personal information of other people.
I’m sick of the spectre of women fainting in the aisles when Obama speaks.
I’m sick of the thought of Obama’s audacity when he said A LIGHT WILL SHINE THROUGH THAT WINDOW, A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL COME DOWN UPON YOU, YOU WILL EXPERIENCE AN EPIPHANY … AND YOU WILL SUDDENLY REALIZE THAT YOU MUST GO TO THE POLLS AND VOTE FOR OBAMA” - BARACK OBAMA LEBANON, NEW HAMPSHIRE.JANUARY 7, 2008.
Perhaps, just perhaps, we’ve all arrived at the same conclusion: his persona, the hype - is completely fabricated.
Obama attention good for McCain?
As Messiah Tours with Disciples, Obama Fatigue Sweeps America
Lefties add a little to the theme:
Fatigue and racism threaten to knock Obama bandwagon off the road (guardian)
Fatigue Hinders Obama Camp’s Ground Game (In March, they said the campaign crew was fatigued. How that could be when there are hundreds of them - 300 foreign policy advisors alone, is beyond me.)
Campfire: Will Tolerance Fatigue Affect Barack Obama’s Campaign to be President of the U.S.?
Sure, do a google search and the term “Fatigue” comes up a lot where Obama is concerned. But not everyone is completely on the same page where those terms are concerned.
Cohen, Clinton, Obama And Election Fatigue Syndrome
One thing is consistent: where Obama is concerned, people - whether they are “for” him or “against” him, are tired of him for one reason or another. But this fatigue of mine isn’t about other people - it’s just about my own observations regarding the hysteria of his disciples and the complete Goebbels style propaganda campaign that has catapulted him into the spotlight with no respite.
Reportedly, even Obama himself is fatigued, LOL
ThinkingMeat linked with Shorter Cao...
July 26th, 2008 at 2:11 pm
You be preaching to the choir!!
The only thing I must point out is that Harry Potter and other fantasy books aren’t inherintly evil/satanic.
July 26th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Is Harry Potter Harmless?
July 26th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Shorter Cao…
I have Obama fatigue:
I’m sick…
Yes, dear… we know.
‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard, and shamelessly pilfered from Sadly, No.
……
July 26th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Perhaps, just perhaps, we’ve all arrived at the same conclusion: his persona, the hype - is completely fabricated.
Obama Fatigue
Obama Fatigue Sets In
Stu’s Views: Obama fatigue
Obama Fatigue? Already?
Obama attention good for McCain?
Fatigue (Eye on Obama)
As Messiah Tours with Disciples, Obama Fatigue Sweeps America
Lefties add a little to the theme:
Fatigue and racism threaten to knock Obama bandwagon off the road (guardian)
Fatigue Hinders Obama Camp’s Ground Game (In March, they said the campaign crew was fatigued. How that could be when there are hundreds of them - 300 foreign policy advisors alone, is beyond me.)
Campfire: Will Tolerance Fatigue Affect Barack Obama’s Campaign to be President of the U.S.?
Sure, do a google search and the term “Fatigue” comes up a lot where Obama is concerned. But not everyone is completely on the same page where those terms are concerned.
Cohen, Clinton, Obama And Election Fatigue Syndrome
July 27th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
“EXCLUSIVE! OBAMA’S FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE: How the forgery was made.”
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/%e2%80%9cexclusive-obamas-fake-birth-certificate-how-the-forgery-was-made%e2%80%9d/
Please see Polarik’s latest at above link. And also see Polarik’s comments at Free Republic in comments section.
July 27th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Yep, that’s another thing that makes me sick about Obama -he always appears to give the doubletalk, doesn’t give straight answers, and is hiding something about that birth certificate - for example, the fact that his birth was registered in Mombasa. What possible reason could Barack Obama Sr. have had to do that other than - he intended for Barack Jr. to be a citizen of Kenya?
there are a lot of twists and turns on the birth certificate story; I hope some people smarter than me can unravel it, because it gives me a headache thinking about the different countries and the rules that conflict.
July 27th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Hopefully, Cao, this won’t worsen your headache or your fatigue!
“OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY: The SMOKING GUN has been found!”
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/%e2%80%9cobamas-birth-certificate-forgery-the-smoking-gun-has-been-found%e2%80%9d/
“Sometimes, you don’t always find what it is that you’re seeking on the Internet. At least, not when you could have really used it.
I decided today to search through the web archives to locate other COLB images that have not been seen since their original posting. What I found was downright shocking!”
July 28th, 2008 at 1:41 am
yawn. What semi-literate rubbish.
Your take on Harry Potter makes you sound like you’re superstitious & living in the 18th century. Next thing we know, you’ll be clamoring to burn the author at the stake.
July 28th, 2008 at 5:16 am
yawn. What sanctimonious leftist trash.
You’re plagiarizing from some of the most well-known communists of this century with that ’superstitious’ ****.
You forgot that religion is also the opium of the people.
Being ’superstitious’ is more about black cats and spells.
It’s odd that you have nothing to say about the rest of what was written there, LOL..instead, you swoop in with a weak justification for Harry Potter’s existence in childhood literature.
Sad.
July 28th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
What else is there to say? Your post was a tour-de-force of conservative whining.
Pick yourself up off the floor and stand up for your candidate, John McCain. He knows how to ‘win’ the occupation in Iraq and he has a plan (secret, of course) for finally capturing bin Laden.
You know that Islamic Terrorist incident counter on your website? It’s not very informative without displaying the # of attacks before 9/11 and then the # between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq as separate numbers. If the # of attacks has escalated since the invasion of Iraq, then the invasion was a failure by definition, don’t you think?
July 29th, 2008 at 3:46 am
The number of terrorist attacks didn’t happen in Iraq. The point of tracking that is to show that this is an ongoing war.
A lot of stupidity goes with the leftist idealogy; one of them is to break things down to a devastatingly over simplistic level.
Like Blame Bush.
The invasion of Iraq is not a failure; Saddam Hussein is gone; Al Qaeda itself has complained they’re losing there.
Iraq no longer has Uday Hussein, so their soccer team and other atheletes have come back with some amazing successes.
So as far as Iraq is concerned, there is victory.
As far as the overall WoT - terrorism still exists.
It’s stupid to think that Iraq is the only front in the WoT!
You may consider it a whine, but I don’t think so. Many, many others have complained that Obama is being marketed as a rock star rather than a politician.
That could be because he has no experience, and he doesn’t really take a stand on issues.
Rockstar status, no experience and no stand - not really the profile of someone who should be leading the country.
I’m not a fan of any of George Soros’ candidates, McCain included.
I think it’s funny that every time I put up a post about Obama or Sinclair, that the posts attract Obama supporting losers like flies, who have nothing valuable to add to the conversation.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:52 pm
I think Billy Joe needs to go back home and break some light bulbs, because he doesn’t make a very good argument. yawn!! Moonbats are soooo boring!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Uday Hussein? Is that why we invaded Iraq? And the Iraqi soccer team? You convinced me… I feel like it’s 2003 all over again and bush just declared Mission Accomplished. The $1 Trillion+ we have spent in Iraq was not wasted (or stolen) at all!
And your explanation about your ridiculously meaningless terrorist incident counter proved my point. It tells us nothing aside from the fact that, as you so eloquently put it, ‘terrorism still exists’. Duh. I guess we should keep fighting terrorism with the US military until terrorism no longer exists in the world forever and ever. Your strategic thinking is about as compelling as Hoosier Army Mom’s.
And speaking of experience… Does Obama have more experience than conservative favorite George bush had when he became President? Arguably, yes.
McCain a ‘Soros candidate’? Do you have any evidence whatsoever to support that assertion or did you just pull it out of thin air?
July 30th, 2008 at 5:15 am
Why We Went to War in Iraq
Not that you’d be able to follow that since slogans are all that you have to carry you forward in political debate!
Ridicule terrorist incidents all you want; scarey things don’t exist and I’ll bet you go to bed with a baby blanket. That kind of thinking is dangerous and will invite more terrorist attacks on our soil, while armies of corporate lawyers (the Gitmo bar) fight for the rights of Gitmo detainees pro buono (but paid for by the Saudis and our tax dollars, courtesy of the ACLU). And as many have surmised, that’s what it’s going to take for many to wake up from their post 9/11 slumber and apathy toward terrorism, brought on by that very sentiment! Meanwhile, honor killings have moved to America, as well as radical clerics preaching hatred of America in their mosques. Amina and Sarah Said’s father has Al Qaeda connections, and people wonder how he disappeared? bwahahahahaha
Come to think of it, critical thinking, strategic thinking and being able to examine the facts - are a specialty of mine and hoosier army mom’s, thank you for putting me in the same category with her!
As you opened up your comment with “feelings”, we reference, provide links, etc. I notice you don’t have any of those.
That’s right, we SNOULD fight the state sponsors of terrorism wherever they are; and that includes here at home, where ‘humanitarian’ organizatons are funding terrorist organizations; which are also facts which people like you ridicule.
McCain’s Soros Ties
Are you completely stupid or what.
JOHN MCCAIN: GEORGE SOROS’ BEST FRIEND
Who is funding McCain’s Reform Institute?
And of course McCain-Feingold was for the benefit of Soros…
And there’s more:
Leftists only care about “feelings” and not about “facts”, but your ridiculous comment proved it in spades.
July 30th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
You’re happy to give your freedom away to our government in return for phantom security from terrorism. I already knew that, but thank you for confirming it. Have more people died as a result of ‘terrorism’ since we invaded Iraq? Actually, yes, if we’re to believe the President when he says we’re in Iraq fighting terrorists. We’ve lost 4,000+ and had 30,000+ injured in Iraq alone. That’s more than were killed or wounded on 9/11.
if that’s success to you, then you and bin Laden have a lot in common. Looking at the #’s, the conclusion is inescapable: the ‘war on terror’ is a failure by definition. An increase in American deaths is a failure in the minds of most Americans I know. You clearly don’t think so, nor does the intellectual giant, HoosierArmyMom.
Link #2 btw, doesn’t really address McCain’s Soros connection. Do you have any links, say, from non-partisan, good government groups (citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington, for example) that might give more support to your claims of a Soros/McCain connection or am I just supposed to accept this mindlessly like conservatives do because you have also linked to the oh-so-authoritative Front Page Magazine & pundit Michelle Malkin?
McCain is such a boring & flawed candidate… I wish the Republicans would have nominated Mitt Romney or the ridiculous Hollyweird hero of low-IQ, teevee worshipping conservatives, Fred Thompson. Even Huckabee, who I think believes humans lived with dinosaurs (as you probably do), would have been better…
July 30th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Your strategic thinking is about as compelling as Hoosier Army Mom’s.
Billy Joe, THAT was not strategic thinking, it was OBSERVATION. When Cao makes her points, she includes the sources of the information she uses. That is why what she writes is thought provoking for a former, liberal Democrat (33 years) like myself.
You make “comments”, criticisms and assertions, but give no reference to sources… not very compelling for someone who seems capable of thinking.
July 31st, 2008 at 3:28 am
Thanks, HAM. They should talk about “strategic thinking”. Their ability to parse through and weight facts is nonexistent, but that points more to the absence of CRITICAL THINKING than “STRATEGIC THINKING”. They can’t even use the correct terms to describe what it is they’re trying to say.
Strategic thinking is used in a business scenario, critical thinking is using discernment, analysis and evaluation to arrive at a conclusion. I see no critical thinking on the liberal side, when their positions are diametrically opposed to capitalism, limited government, protecting the American people from terrorist attacks - including going after them for funding terrorism on our soil (such as the Holy Land Foundation, Kindhearts, Hamas, Hezbollah, etc.) They seem to do everything within their power to make excuses for - instead of confront - the enemy. And it’s that ‘peace and conflict’ approach that will have us all living under sharia law within the next few decades.
You’re happy to go through life deluding yourself into thinking there’s no threat. I have never said I’m happy about the size of government; but none of the candidates in front of us are talking about limited government; they all talk about growing it even bigger. Right now, government is 40% bigger than it was under the Reagan administration, and that’s the fault of both parties. With a democrat-controlled congress with a disapproval rating of 75%, I hardly think that’s something to crow about.
You’re wrong about that; apparently you’re just focusing on a few things and discounting all the rest. Cherrypicking!
So….let me get this straight. There is phantom terrorism, but more people have died because of terrorism? Which is it? Does it exist, or not? You seem rather confused. The people that have SIGNED UP to go to Iraq and have VOLUNTEERED to go back haven’t been bamboozled; they know what it is they’re facing and they understand the risk. They give their all while you sit there like an armchair quarterback saying their sacrifice is for nothing. You are an idiot.
The Arabs understand this war - because they’ve committed to win this over generations. They are betting on the mentality of Americans who can’t stand to do something or be committed to something for any length of time. This is a war that’s being fought on many fronts. Oversimplifying it does nobody any good. There is a big picture here that you’re obviously missing.
Do you have any links from non partisan sources to back up your position? Again, I see no links to source documents in your comment, so with that in mind, I think I’m completely wasting my time responding to your blind demagoguery.
I wish the demonrats would just shove a sock in it. They have no strategy except to tear down their opponents. They go back on what they said earlier; even Clinton has claimed he opposed the war from the beginning, which is not the case.
Discounting what it is I’ve linked to as ‘partisan’ while not providing source documents to what you’re talking about really makes your position very weak. The democrats all voted on invading Iraq, the resolution to Invade Iraq was about Saddam’s violating the Gulf Truce, and I don’t see this person debating any of that.
Here’s a non partisan document for you: The Authorization for Use of Military Force Bill (statement by the president) Pub.L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224, enacted 2001-09-18), one of two resolutions commonly known as “AUMF” (the other being “Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002″), was a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress on September 18, 2001, authorizing the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001.
It’s funny that although they discount the sources as “partisan” the facts contained therein are easily verified…if you bother to do it. This person is lazy, is not providing source documents, is using ridicule as his method of debate, and can’t even get it straight about whether or not there are terrorist acts are not. On the one hand, we are fooling ourselves because of ‘phantom terorism’ and on the other hand, people have died because of terrorism. It’s a hoot!
And I’ll bet the reason there are not citations is because the sources are KOS, the Smirking Chimp, the ACLU, Media Matters, Huffington Post, et al.
I made my points, and all you can do is tear down the sources? Well prove to me that the facts are wrong instead of just sitting there on your high horse pontificating.
August 1st, 2008 at 2:16 am
You asserted a McCain/Soros connection. It is therefore YOUR responsibility to back it up and you didn’t do a very good job of it. One of your links wasn’t even relevant.
If you need me to document something in particular, I’ll try. but at least let me know what you’re disputing.
The President claims we’re fighting terrorists/terrorism in Iraq. If that’s the case, then more people have died from terrorism in his war than all of the other terrorist incidents targeting Americans under the first 42 Presidents (previous incidents of course include: the cole bombing, Embassy bombings, including the beirut bombing that killed 240+ marines and which promptly caused Reagan to ‘cut-and-run’, miscellaneous other incidents, none of which even came close to killing the #’s of people that were killed on 9/11. Please feel free to add any I’m forgetting and you should also keep in mind that not only did 9/11 happen on bush’s watch, he didn’t do anything in the 8 months before to avenge the Cole bombing, either. AND he took a 5 week vacation before 9/11, in spite of receiving a warning that bin Laden was planning an attack. Most people would consider that incompetent.
We’ve lost more people in Iraq and will have spent more than $2 Trillion by the time this war is done. How then, would Iraq, a war against ‘terrorists’, be considered a ’success’? You sound just like bin Laden, who probably also views our rudderless occupation of Iraq as a success. He successfully turned much of the world against us, including those who we’re ostensibly there to help, as evidenced by the Iraqis saying that a timetable for withdrawal suits them fine.
Regarding the impending take over of America by ‘Islamo-fascists’…
How exactly are Muslims going to take over a largely Christian country that is separated from them by the Atlantic (and Pacific) oceans? No Muslim country has an Air Force, Navy or Army even remotely capable of taking the so-called American ‘homeland’. They would have to somehow get around all of our military bases between us & them and then invade the most heavily armed country on earth - and subjugate us. That is pure fantasy.
The mormons, another minority religion in America have a 100+ year headstart on Muslims in America and they have only succeeded in dominating Utah.
You’re delusional and paranoid. If you can explain exactly how Sharia law will somehow be widely implemented in America & we’ll all be subjugated though, I’m all ears. I need a good laugh. It sounds like the plot of a fantastical made-for-teevee movie, starring Fred ‘Glamour Grandpa’ Thompson, no doubt.
August 1st, 2008 at 4:58 am
I have backed it up. And I don’t have any responsibility for your disconnect with reality.
Which link wasn’t relevant? Interesting how you’re entitled to post irrelevant garbage in your comments, but still haven’t posted a single link or fact to back up your generalizations. You can go to any number of sources to verify my claims; it’s not up to me to convince you (even though I’ve cited my sources - you don’t!); if you’re going to call me a liar; prove it. If you say something isn’t relevant simply because of the source, I find that amusing.
Don’t make a sweeping generalization like that without citing facts - otherwise I’ll consider your entire comment irrelevant. Not to mention STUPID.
See the rest of my answers to you here.