7/31/2008
Sinclair’s site is incredibly WILDLY popular
This cartoon should have Larry Sinclair on there -on the end.
2, 129, 273 hits on Sinclair’s site (that was this morning)
You can’t even vote in the polls twice.
Statcounter logs unique visitors, returning visitors, first time visitors, etc.-and guess what those 2 million plus visitors are?
Sure, he’s kept a running total from the sites that the Obamablognuts have been able to shut down. So what? The bottom line is-the Obamablognuts are objecting to the fact that he’s still online!
Despite the fact that google only brings up the old wordpress blog that was deleted….people are typing in the actual address to get to his site.
I think one of the reasons why it’s so popular is people know there is no bull over there; unlike the MSM…
DC Court Asked to Act Upon Obama Supporter Threats
U S District Court for the District of Columbia asked to issue ORDER in compliance with Federal Crime Victims Act sought.
Barack Obama internet warriors upset that their acts of threats and intimidation are subject to U S Law and are now screaming to be excused from accountability.
Well isn’t that typical of them.
Prison time for email threats
By Courtney Macavinta
That’s what Oswaldo and the rest of the people who are issuing death threats should get. No allowances, no excuses, and no comments like ‘you’re still alive, so…I didn’t mean it’ BS.
Anything happens to Larry Sinclair, these people should be held responsible; even if he dies from natural causes, as Oswaldo himself said.
July 31st, 2008 at 11:39 pm
Oh, come on now… You are now resorting to outright obvious fabrication? We all know that Larry’s new site has not had two-million-plus unique visitors, and you trying to sell that story just looks extremely desperate.
August 1st, 2008 at 1:00 am
Owen is partially correct.
Larry has carried over the hits from both old sites. And his counter is obviously not unique visitors, it is page views. This was proven a long time ago by refreshing and taking screenshots on a systematic basis.
Larry has never disclosed the actual number of unique visitors to his site(s) but I would estimate somewhere around 75,000 based on how much people on both sides refresh to see comments and updates.
August 1st, 2008 at 4:52 am
bwahahahaha!~
Tell a lie often enough and it becomes truth.
That is the motto that belongs to both of you.
Sounds like the defense of the three bloggers! The internet is not a safe haven from federal law - and that includes where the Obamablognuts are concerned!!!
Larry Sinclair’s current site is a carryover from the others; but you can’t argue that whatever site he’s been on has been incredibly popular…you people can’t stop looking and complaining about it…! and yes, those numbers are indicative of UNIQUE PAGE VIEWS!!! Sinclair isn’t blowing up those numbers, they’re being recorded by his statcounter program.
I mentioned that those are the numbers that he’s had over just a few months. That is correct. And sure, he’s had several websites - due to the hysteria coming from the M&N camp and those working from John Levy’s playbook. So what?
Just the polls alone on the new site shows that it is infinitely more popular than M&N!!!! bwahahahahahahaha
You poor losers. So determined. So nasty. So intolerant. So obsessive compulsive. Pete and Owen, why don’t you take your comments somewhere where someone gives a ****.
From Larry: Aug 1, 2008 @ 12:13 AM CDT
August 1st, 2008 at 7:46 am
I just got off the phone with the Obama Senate offices in DC. I asked for a calendar and itinerary regarding Mr. Obama’s where-bout’s on the nights in question.
As it turns out they claim that no history of his travels at that time are available.
BS
I can promise you that every politician and elected official at the State or Federal level in this country has a calendar of events and require staff to keep accurate history logs of their activities. Almost without exception.
I asked if they could provide other dates and there does appear to be a record of those????
C’mon .. Obviously if the Obama folks won’t account for the dates in question, that alone, more than supports Larry’s claim and therefore as the only sane person in the debate .. I am ruling on this here and now by the powers invested in be by the international assembly of Talk Show Host Gods..
” I find Obama GUILTY as charged in the “Open Court of Common Sense”.
His drunken druggie escapades with *** men in the back of Limo’s will probably continue because his sopporters don’t care if he exploits or even murders ****, I find the Mitch and Nan crowd to be anti-*** (which I am also). They have a violent bias and lack the needed sensitivity in this desperate reaching out for closure by this tormented soul Larry Sinclair.
You all Owe Larry an apology, a hug and a kiss and an atta-Boy for outing Barrack Obama for the dope-addicted pervert Larry Describes. My
Israeli made voice detection truth machine software shows Larry is telling the truth and they are lying.
It’s Clear they (The Obama Staff) were lying .. I could hear it in her voice .. and I am an expert at detecting the lie .. And this software
of mine is always right.
That should settle the matter once and for all …
God Bless
Roger Fredinburg
August 1st, 2008 at 11:51 am
I’ll let you in on a little secret Cao. If you disable cookies on your browser, you can vote as many times as you want.
You really believe Larry had that many people vote? Did you even look at the results?
It’s obvious people were fudging the results.
August 1st, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Roger is posting here. That’s cool!
August 1st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
“Listen to Larry Sinclair – Decide for Yourself (Barack Obama – Donald Young)”
http://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/listen-to-larry-sinclair-%e2%80%93-decide-for-yourself-barack-obama-%e2%80%93-donald-young/
August 1st, 2008 at 4:44 pm
I don’t think it’s obvious that peole are fudging the results.
You’re desperate to do whatever it is you possibly can to discredit Larry Sinclair so that gives me every reason NOT to believe you.
Sinclair has been so honest that he’s given his detractors more ammunition to use against him. That takes balls. Whereas …I don’t think Obama has any balls even though he has enough balls to be married, father children and have bisexual affairs–and even be stupid enough to have homosexual sex and do crack cocaine back in 1999 when he was in the Senate; he flip flops worse than John Kerry did - and Kerry is and was a laughing stock.
I guess that’s what that would be defined as, right? A married man has sex on the down low with other men. That is bisexual.
Right?
The whole thing is so convoluted and the Obama bloggers have made fools of themselves trying to shut Sinclair down - complete with hollywood-style death threats and phone calls…even an arrest by Federal Marshals delivering a warrant outside of the jurisdiction, backed up by the Dc police –and that Delaware warrant was also outside of their jurisdiction if I understnad it correctly.
Joe Biden and a number of prominent lawyers representing the very telecommunications company that Larry is trying to get records from -are involved. Larry was told he couldn’t get those records, when the Chicago PD got them.
Sounds really fishy the more there is that comes out.
And it gets worse and worse for my opinion of Obama as a person, not to mention as a potential leader of the free world.
Obama should never ever be allowed to become POTUS, considering what we know, and what he is hiding that we suspect. What is there that he’s hiding that we don’t know? I shudder to think.
August 1st, 2008 at 6:22 pm
“I don’t think it’s obvious that people are fudging the results.”
Didn’t you notice that every poll’s result was exactly opposite of what Larry intended?
Should I do as the Obama Blogoidiots and begin “outing” their names, addresses, phone nubers, childrens names, schools, photos, etc…? I already know the answer to this, but I am interested in seeing your votes. Bet SB would love to see her grandchilds and daughters recent photo on the internet!
This voting was closed on 07/31/2008
25573 votes
Yes
0.6%
No
99.3%
Only in PDF Flyer Form
0%
Should Barack Obama have to respond to the Threats, Intimidation, attacks on Citizens and Hate mail/phone calls of his supporters/surrogates?
14022 votes
Yes
1.4%
No
98.5%
Depends on Who they Threaten, Intimidate and Attack
0%
How do you feel about the recent statement by Barack Obama “People of the world, this is OUR moment”
13029 votes
Fine, I am comfortable with it
46.1%
It doesn’t bother me
51.9%
Scared, I am uncomfortable with it.
1.1%
All the votes cast for “Fine” are Obamablogoidiots
0.6%
Are you tired of the Obama Bloggers using your names to post threatening and disguting comments on the web?
12022 votes
Yes
1.4%
No
51.6%
Doesn’t Bother me in the least
46.9%
August 2nd, 2008 at 4:28 am
Of course I noticed that it’s the opposite of what Larry intended; therefore, I’ve concluded that the Obamablognazis like you are cheating. And I think you’ve proven the point by letting me know that all you have to do is re-set your cookies in order to vote multiple times.
Now how many people do you suppose think Sionclair’s polls are so infinitely important that they would take the trouble to do that?
Only the Obamablognazis who are trying to screw with him at every turn.
But thanks for going out of your way to explain it to me as if I’m a 2-year-old.
August 2nd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Here’s something that you still need to have explained to you:
Larry’s site is not “wildly popular.” Rather, every vote in a poll there has advanced the site counter.
Now look at the vote totals again. Thousands of votes = thousands of hits registered on the site counter. Of course, the vote totals for the three open polls have since increased.
Try looking up the site’s “wild popularity” at Alexa.com.
August 2nd, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Excuse the misquote. You didn’t say that Larry’s site was “wildly” popular; you said that it was “incredibly” popular.
Oh, as for the ORDER that Mr. Sibley sought, it will be interesting to see how the DC Court responds to seeing such a motion from a lawyer who is now suspended from the DC Bar.
August 2nd, 2008 at 5:40 pm
Larry’s site is wildly popular. You said it! I think I’ll pick up on that misquote. I like it.
WILDLY POPULAR!
WILDLY POPULAR!
It has a ring to it, don’t you think?
You are confusing the polls with the sitemeter count.
Site Meter Can Provide the Answers!
Site Meter’s comprehensive real time website tracking and counter tools give you instant access to vital information and data about your sites audience. With our detailed reporting you’ll have a clear picture of who is visiting your site, how they found you, where they came from, what interests them and much more.
Site Meter is a free, fast, and easy way to add a web counter to your web page. Not only can it display the number of visitors to your web site, it also keeps statistics on the number of visits each hour and every day. It also provides detailed information about these visitors. These statistics are provided in real time so they are always up-to-date.
Site Meter tracks page views and visits. You may also have heard the term “hits”. When someone comes to your site, they generate a “hit” for every piece of content that is sent to their computer. Viewing a single web site page would generate one hit for the page and one hit for every individual graphics file that was on the page. A single page could easily generate a dozen or more hits. When you are browsing a site, every time you follow a link, it is treated as a single “page view”. Site Meter defines a “visit” as a series of page views by one person with no more than 30 minutes in between page views.
Etc. etc. etc.
You can’t do what you’re saying was done in the polls with sitemeter.
Statcounter and sitemeter are two different tracking systems; but to my knowledge, sitemeter is more discriminating. Some people think that sitemeter isn’t accurate and recommend statcounter, instead. Regardless, it’s sitemeter that is recording his hits - not the polls.
I just brought up the polls because the numbers are incredible.
But as I said before, it’s the obamanazis who are cheating; and you can expect them to WANT TO THROW THE RESULTS OFF.
But that has nothing to do with hits on his site. They’re two separate things.
So I appreciate your ‘explaining things’ to me, but really, maybe you need to have some things explained to YOU…
You’re WRONG WRONG WRONG and Sinclair’s site is WILDLY WILDLY POPULAR
bwahahahahaha
the other point that should be made is…you people have been collecting the personal information, IP addresses and email addresses of the supporters because it GALLS YOU that Sinclair’s site is WILDLY POPULAR!
But you should know by the information that you’ve illegally collected that - Sinclair has more than the handful of people that M&N has - who have different pseudonyms and are talking to themselves in comments.
bwahahahahaha
This just gets better by the minute.
PS: I’m assuming he’s using sitemeter. Maybe you should ask him what he’s using! bwahahahahaha
I don’t know why you care. Why do you care? Why is this so important to you? Why do you have to nitpick on every single Sinclair post? Why are you so obsessed with Larry Sinclair? What are you going to do when he falls off the scene? You seem to NEED HIM in some sick kind of a way…
August 2nd, 2008 at 7:05 pm
Never mind which software is being used. A counter is displayed on each page of Larry’s site. Go to one of the three pages that contain open polls. Observe the total that the counter shows. Vote in the poll. Now observe the total that the counter shows again.
And for a widely accepted, standard set of metrics, look up the traffic stats for Larry’s site at alexa.com.
(Obsessed? IIRC, today is only the second time I’ve ever commented here. I’m not Pete, who commented above.)
August 3rd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
I don’t care who you are. And I don’t care about your metrics analysis. You people care an awful lot about Sinclair when you claim his allegations are ridiculous.
You are spending an awful lot of time looking at his site and his statistics, and trying to throw the polls off.
I have no idea why you’re so obsessed with it - except that you must have very empty lives. Either that, or you think that what you’re doing to him is going to discourage him in some way.
You haven’t figured out yet that it’s very motivating for him…maybe you’ll find that out when you hear what happened in Delaware.