8/2/2008

The Case Against Barack Obama

By: Cao, Filed under: Larry Sinclair , Music, Books, Film , Obama @ 9:30 am

thecaseagainstbarackobama.pngAmerica faces an even scarier and more liberal threat than John Kerry posed. Today’s liberal threat is the most liberal senator in the Senate, Barack Obama.

Fortunately we don’t have to put up with the liberal media spin on the Obamessiah because, investigative journalist and National Review Online political reporter David Freddoso wrote THE book every voter needs to read: The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate.

Uncovering stories the mainstream media has neglected, Freddoso reveals Obama for who he really is: the U.S. senator with the #1 most liberal voting record in the Senate. And a politician whose rhetoric of “change” does not match the reality of his corrupt, “Chicago-machine politics” background.

Moving past Obama’s inspiring speeches and say-anything-to-win campaign tactics, Freddoso outlines Obama’s extreme, far-left legislative record and his questionable associations with both criminals and radicals. From Obama’s repeated support for the Chicago patronage system, to his hard-line position of no restrictions on abortion, The Case Against Barack Obama offers the cold, hard facts about this man who would be our next president.

As American citizens, it is our right and duty to question the background, character, and proposals of any candidate who could be our next commander in chief. Democrats and the media are not holding Obama accountable, so conservatives must. I’m grateful to David Freddoso and my publisher, Regnery, for finally revealing the man behind the myth.-John O’Neill

When I get my copy, I will be looking for any reference to Sinclair and Sinclair’s allegations of homosexual sex and crack cocaine use when Obama was a Senator in 1999.

So far, the “smears” website and Obama himself have not responded to those very public accusations. No one has had the nerve to try to uncover Obama’s phone records from November 1999 when he is alleged to have scored cocaine for Larry and Barry’s use. No one has attempted to unravel the connection between Obama and Donald Young, the gay choir director of Trinity United Church of Christ, who was found murdered on December 23, 2007 of multiple bullet wounds.

But even if the author of this new book doesn’t get into any of that; the story should still be very interesting.

11 Responses to “The Case Against Barack Obama”

  1. sisterrosetta Says:

    Saturday, August 02, 2008 5 PM EST Clintons4McCain Radio — “Obama’s Psych OPS, Mind Control…Who is the Man Behind the Mask?”

    :twisted:

  2. sisterrosetta Says:

    “The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate” by David Freddoso (Larry Sinclair – Donald Young)

    :twisted:

  3. sisterrosetta Says:

    “Obama: A Disaster Waiting to Happen, Legal Challenges Imminent?” (Obama’s House Of Cards)

    :twisted:

  4. sisterrosetta Says:

    “New Birth-Certificate Report, Exclusive”

    :twisted:

  5. Bunny Colvin Idiot Says:

    “When I get my copy, I will be looking for any reference to Sinclair and Sinclair’s allegations of homosexual sex and crack cocaine use when Obama was a Senator in 1999.”

    Oh, please do. And give us a brief synopsis of these claims, as they seem so legitimate. *** sex and coke use, you say? Sounds more like a republican shindig to me. Were W. and Larry Craig in attendance? How bout Ted Haggard?

    And Obama is behind a murder too? Wow! Did he kill Vince Foster as well?

  6. Cao Says:

    Give you a synopsis of the claims?

    Are you an idiot, or what?

    LarrySinclair.org

    Read the press statement.

    And stop complaining to me about Sinclair.

    I’m sorry you have such a problem with him, but what I have a problem with - is people like you protecting Obama from answering the allegations.

    You must believe them to be true.!!!

  7. Bunny Colvin Idiot Says:

    Mao,

    I’ve never considered myself an “idiot”. If not granting much credibility to an ex-con crackhead who claims a sitting U.S. Senator scored $250 worth of drugs for him and then accepted fellatio from him makes me idiotic, then I am guilty as charged.

    If the homeless guy down the block told me he shot H with GW Bush and then performed fellatio on him, do you think I’d want an investigation? Should W be required to “answer the allegations” in this instance? I think not, but then again I’m the “idiot”.

    Gotta go- W’s coming over to service me and get high. I swear it’s true!

  8. Cao Says:

    Well of course you don’t consider yourself an idiot, because you’re so superior to everyone else.
    :razz:

    Idiot.

  9. Fuzzi Andrea Says:

    McCain should remain an outsider into Obamabus,that almost everybody agrees being adulated and exagerated.
    That a good starting point for McCain to fingerpoint and compassionate His rival.

  10. Cao Says:

    Andrea, I could barely understand what you said there.

  11. Bunny Colvin verified Imbecile Says:

    Mao,

    Why was my comment not posted?

    Because I am not here for you, not that I have to give you a reason. I am not here to take abuse on my own blog. You have violated all of my cardinal rules. Contrary to what you believe, my purpose in this world is not to fulfill the wishes or do the bidding of pompous asses such as yourself.

    I guess you have no qualms about pushing blasphemous garbage which attempts to smear Obama, but you censor anyone questioning Cheney and Rummie.

    There you have it wrong again, which again proves that you’re not all that bright. “Blasphemous”? Is Obama your GOD? Blasphemy is the disrespectful use of the name of one or more gods.

    blas·phe·my (blsf-m)
    n. pl. blas·phe·mies
    1.
    a. A contemptuous or profane act, utterance, or writing concerning God or a sacred entity.
    b. The act of claiming for oneself the attributes and rights of God.
    2. An irreverent or impious act, attitude, or utterance in regard to something considered inviolable or sacrosanct.

    Even if you pick “2″, you’d still be admitting that you think I’m being irreverent or impious toward the Obamessiah who is inviolable or sacrosanct. That’s still a stretch - quite a big stretch - from reality. Facts never bother leftists, obviously, perhaps I should introduce you to something obviously foreign to you: a dictionary. Anything that goes against your religion is blasephemy, but I’m the idiot. :wink: I don’t believe he’s “the one” we’ve been waiting for. A light will never shine on me where I will realize I must vote for him.

    Where have I even mentioned Cheney and Rummy here? That’s your pat answer for anybody you consider to be a repugnitard, isn’t it? Do you see anything from me here on the GOP or McCain? Truth of the matter, I can’t stand McCain and I’m an Independent. As a matter of fact, I have a section up here called “GOP and RINOS” So shove that where the sun don’t shine along with the rest of your dumb stereotypes.

    Typical (r)epuke hypocrisy and censorship. Chairman Mao (your namesake) would be proud of you.

    You’re being redundant; hypocrisy is YOUR specialty, not mine. You’re here to censor information about/from Larry Sinclair and his allegations about homosexual sex and drug/crack use in 1999 with Obama; something Obama has never answered. Although he used donald Young to get to Sinclair - and interestingly enough, Donald Young is dead.

    So don’t lecture me about censorship. (Look up the definition of “liberal” as an example of the hypocrisy I’m talking about.) You people are quite militant toward people who disagree with you. And that is in the proud tradition of communists like Mao. And Obama has surrounded himself with communists like his star punk wet behind the ears blogger Sam Graham-Felsen, Shepard Fairey who designs his creepy posters (OBEY) and was weaned on radicals like Frank Marshall Davis- and is protected by commies. So don’t give me that BS either; I’m an ANTI-COMMUNIST.

    PEACE

    Up yours.

    From My About Page

    Comments Policy: If you engage in using language that offends, insults, humiliates, intimidates, threatens, disparages or vilifies me or another person, those comments will be either deleted or edited, and you could find yourself banned. It could happen to you without warning, so be careful of what you put in comments and think about it before you publish.

    dingalingdalingdaling! Idiot.

    So guess where you stack up with me right now? This is not your soapbox. You can sit there and holler and complain about your entitlement mentality, how you’re superior to me, etc.- on the blog space that I pay for, call me “Mao” and whatever other names you want to use, but the bottom line is–I don’t give two ***** about what you think right now.

    BE GONE!

    Have a nice day. :twisted:

    Update: You have been banned. Have you no brain at all?

Leave a Reply