I couldn’t believe the headline, but when I clicked on the link, the article didn’t say that as the headline. (It would have made more sense had it been the headline!)

So was this merely a slip of the wrist, a mistake, a gaffe, or was it originally titled that and then changed?

Either way, when you put it in these terms - McCain’s steady hand versus Obama’s trustworthiness, there isn’t much of a choice there.

I mean…that in itself is admitting that Obama hasn’t proven himself trustworthy in the eyes of the American people, and his hysterical supporters haven’t help that perception along. In fact, most of the behavior on that side of the aisle has actually - HELPED McCain’s case for steady leadership and experience.