We are all Sauad: honor in Islam

The ridiculous assumption that we are instigating the violence coming out of this people aimed toward us is ridiculous. They aim violence at EACH OTHER. They aim violence at their WOMEN AND CHILDREN. In this case, it’s the women–a sick cultural heritage of “killing women for honor” in the most horrifying manner you can imagine.

We are all Sauad.

I suddenly felt a cold liquid running over my head and instantly I was on fire. . .I start to run in the garden, barefoot. I slap my hair, I scream. . . .I smell the gasoline and I run, the hem of my long dress getting in the way. My terror leads me instinctively away from the courtyard. I run toward the garden as the only way out. . .How did I get away? Did he run after me? Was he waiting for me to fall so he could watch me go up in flames?

I’d like to talk about what seems like hatred to me. This is not love. A society that treats women with respect and allows them freedom to roam

Killing women for “honor” is just one of the myriad regressive and violent pathologies inherent in Arab tribal culture, where institutionalized misogyny and sexual repression intersect to spawn yearnings for violence, terror, death and suicide.

The prerequisite for being a victim of an “honor” killing in the Arab Middle East is that you need only be a female. And you don’t have to engage in consensual sex before marriage to get your death sentence. That you die for this is a given. But you could also be punished by death for being raped or for people saying you were raped. In many cases, you also need only to look in the eyes of a male or be seen talking to one — or to have someone say that you talked to one. Then you are a charmuta – a whore. And you must die because your blood is the only substance that can wash your family’s – and community’s — shame away.

And there will be no lawyer, no hearing, no defense for you. The male with whom you associated — in the real or imagined world — will always be exonerated, no matter what. And the family member who kills or maims you will never be punished. To the contrary, he will be seen as a hero and receive great rewards and respect for his gruesome deed.

And so Souad made the horrendous mistake in her culture to be born a female. Females are seen as being equivalent to dirt. They are less worthy than cows and sheep — a fact that Souad’s father drilled into his daughters’ heads throughout their lives.

In the Arab Middle East, baby girls are simply not wanted — and, as Souad recalls, “Every birth of a girl was like a burial in the family.” The mother is always blamed for bringing a non-child (a girl) into the world — even though we all know that it’s the father that determines the child’s gender.

In any case, baby girls are often just killed and disposed of in many parts of the Arab world. That is why Souad recalls her mother suffocating nine of her own baby daughters, twice right in front of her eyes.

If you are a baby girl and are exonerated from death, you will confront vicious violence. The abusive and neglectful care of baby girls is rampant throughout the Arab Middle East. Purposeful injury to them is all too common, including burns and the injection of kerosene and medicines to the point of poisoning and death.

God am I glad I live in the United States where we don’t live under sharia law.

58 responses to “We are all Sauad: honor in Islam”

  1. Jay

    Pure evil is what we face, and nothing less. This is as much a spiritual war as a physical one.

  2. john

    yes killing for honor is a fundamentalist type thing to do. But killing for money is the amerikkkan thing to do. You’ve been doing it since the amerikkkan indian genocide and the whole world knows it but you.

    Now those in the U.K are made to suffer for going along with the u$a’s crusade against islam for oil and power. The only difference is, they know it; they didn’t even want the war in the first place.

    The chicken comes home to roost!

  3. Kender

    John, killing for “honor” is a muslim tenet. Or have you not heard of the increase of honor killings, evene here in the US?

    As for a war for oil and power….what was the war waged by mohammed aginst the christians all about?

    Money?

    Nah.

    Resources?

    Nah.

    Land and power?

    Nah.

    Mo was just a great guy that wanted to spread the Freedom and Love of Islam.

    As for the “amerikkan indian genocide”…first, they prefer “native Americans”, and second, I suppose the europeans were the only people in history to go conquer another land by subjugating those that were their first weren’t they?

    Come back again moonbat…I still have some sauce left.

  4. RottyPup

    “Now those in the U.K are made to suffer for going along with the u$a’s crusade against islam for oil and power. The only difference is, they know it; they didn’t even want the war in the first place.”

    You little ****. Don’t you *dare* try to use what we’re going through to prop up your pathetic anti-war agenda. Let me tell you, there are *plenty* of us in Britain who fully support the liberation of Iraq, and who are proud to stand with America in the War on Terror. It’ll take more than a bunch of Islamonazi crazies, and more than thier friends on the left, to turn us into victims. What do you think we are — Spanish?

  5. Mustang

    John, selective history is an interesting way to have a discussion. What do you think (new word?) the entire colonial experience was about? And now that we have that out of the way, you need to do some serious reading to catch up on current events. Fundamental Islamic terrorists have declared a jihad against western civilization, you idiot. It isn’t just about the US or Great Britain.

    But, tell you what . . . after you have had a few years to become educated, why not stop back by and we can discuss geo-politics at the advanced level.

  6. jcrue

    John,

    If this war was about oil, why haven’t we invaded Mexico yet? It would have been a hell of a lot easier than what we are doing.

    Gee, I know you are convinced that the “indian genocide” is some historical blemish on the American mythos, but I challenge you to show me a single civilization, past or present, that does not have the same blemishes in their history. Just try it.

    I would respect little thinkers like you if you would just come out and say, “I am jealous of you and I dislike you.” At least then, you are being intellectually and emotionally honest.

    The idea that we are causing anyone to suffer because of their alliance with us is laughable. Again, I point to history as proof. The so-called “religion of peace” in it’s fundamnetalist form resembles the 14th century in culture, government, and society and is why they are now attacking us from their moderate to extreme fringes – they are jealous and they dislike us. They want to take what is ours – they even say so in their mosques. They want to profit from our labors while convincing poor souls to blow themselves up for a mythologic promise of martyrdom (which really means post-mortem popularity really). What easier way to enter someone’s history book than to die?

    Nevermind, the fact the fight between Muslim and Christian society goes further back than the origins of the United States, and most importantly before Ford, before Carter, before Reagan, before Bush Sr., before Clinton, and before President Bush today.

    If what happened in London, Madrid or on 9/11 was really about, to use your Ward Churchill-ism, our “chickens coming home to roost” – you will have to concede the exact same argument can be made for our removal of the Taliban, Saddam and our military’s continuing slaughter of Islam’s “holy warriors.” Their “chickens” have come home to roost too. Of course, much of this depends on your perspective and who you actually support – those who are islamo-fascist murderers or those who are not islamo-fascist murderers.

    The only way I would only concede your “roosting chickens” point is after realizing that you might understand what being a chicken is better than I do.

  7. Mustang

    Oh by the way John, here’s what the BBC posted at their website: a statement by those ******** who are taking responsibility for the London Bombing:

    “In the name of God, the merciful, the compassionate, may peace be upon the cheerful one and undaunted fighter, Prophet Muhammad, God’s peace be upon him.

    “Nation of Islam and Arab nation: Rejoice for it is time to take revenge against the British Zionist Crusader government in retaliation for the massacres Britain is committing in Iraq and Afghanistan. The heroic mujahideen have carried out a blessed raid in London. Britain is now burning with fear, terror and panic in its northern, southern, eastern, and western quarters.

    “We have repeatedly warned the British Government and people. We have fulfilled our promise and carried out our blessed military raid in Britain after our mujahideen exerted strenuous efforts over a long period of time to ensure the success of the raid.

    “We continue to warn the governments of Denmark and Italy and all the Crusader governments that they will be punished in the same way if they do not withdraw their troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. He who warns is excused.

    “God says: “You who believe: If ye will aid (the cause of) Allah, He will aid you, and plant your feet firmly.”

    Again, John, the jihad confronts western civilization. Please take your head out of your ***. Your own life may depend on it.

  8. jcrue

    OT: two bets

    one: Johnny doesn’t come back to reply

    two: Johnny has nothing to do with the linked web site in his name

    hit and run.

  9. The Boss Man

    I guess by now I should know that there are as many different opinions as there are ********

    It just bothers me when something seems to be as clear cut as this:

    The evil has decided to descend upon the good and fight their way of live to the teeth.

    Sad fact is that the evil ones think they are the good ones and they are being attacked by the evil ones!

    What really bothers me is that these fanatics manage to all be on the same page in one form or another, but us Westerners who are under attack for our very way of life just can’t get our act togher and stand united to fight these barbarians!

    And let me tell you this: There is no peaceful solution to this!

    Sometimes I think it all started when Osama Bin Laden was turned down for his McDonald franchise…

  10. Mustang

    Boss, you’ve hit it squarely on the head. Now, if I was born into a family that had skillions of dollars, I’d be driving fancy cars, fooling around with fantastic looking females, spending a lot of time on my yacht, playing lots of golf on quality golf courses, eating at the finest restaurants, and smoking cuban cigars. So what is Osama doing? He’s living in a cave. What a dumb ***.

  11. SSgt Yatahey

    John-Boy … are you still letting your ignorant mouth overload your obvious dumbass again?:roll:

    FYI, Sweetheart – I am a Native American Indian and proudly served our beloved country with the Marine Corps; and all of my ancestors have also fought for this nation in every damn war we’ve had so far.

    You wouldn’t understand that apparently, as the Native Americans have never been involved with genocide … we’re just a bunch of dumbass Injuns sittin’ on top of a horse shootin’ bows and arrows at those hateful English.

  12. corruption exposer

    I agree with John. This war’s about a weak country’s oil; it’s not about terrorism. All the 9-11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, but we remain strange bedfellows with their leaders.

    And where’s Osama? (remember Osama?). “The greatest military in the world”; give me a f—in’ break! OOOooooooosama has been laughing at the bungling US military for 5 years now, come September. Yes, he’s been running around free for five years after “allegedly” masterminding the toppling of New York’s tallest buildings–those symbols of American power.

    Are you humiliated yet? You should be, because you’re part of the dumb American club. That’s the club of folks who ignorantly regurgitate their dumb leader’s buzz words, like “evildoers” and “freedom haters.” You don’t know why you say it; you just know what you’re supposed to say.

    I just flipped on the light switch, so be sure to salivate.

    Osama’s laughing at us, and your bungling Bush ****** says that invading Iraq is the answer; and you blindly follow like sheep into the slaughterhouse.

    Well, I think I’ll just stay out here; maybe I’ll have lamb chops for dinner.

  13. SSgt Yatahey

    “Well, I think I’ll just stay out here; maybe I’ll have lamb chops for dinner.”

    Since you’re one of those California Fish-eyed Faggots who really likes “John” — it might be a very good idea for you to stay out; maybe you and “Lil’ Johnny” can play with each others’ lamb choppies…

  14. GBlagg

    What he represents is stupidity, plain and simple. We did not lose on D-Day because we did not capture Hitler or Rommel. We are not fighting one man we are fight an ideal. ,The moonbat pacifist ostriches just don’t get this. And never will. They are to logic what a black hole is to light. It is pulled in, stretched, skewed, twisted, and then finally destroyed. You see, they would have to actually, objectively study history. And what they would find would not easily fit into their West hating paranoid conspiratorial world.
    Let them babble on like frightened spoiled children, and leave the real world to the adults.

  15. SSgt Yatahey

    Cao sez — “but then you guys have no moral compass.”

    Bwahahahaha … I love that!:mrgreen::lol:

  16. Kender

    what is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter?

    Terrorists target the populace while freedom fighters target the people in charge.

    Learn that, memorize that and spread that…it is the TRUTH.

  17. corruption exposer

    I wonder if Cao’s pervasive fixation on little girl molestation issues stem from her personal experiences. If so, she ought to get psychological help, rather than falsely imputing such behavior to others. Was daddy bad to you, little Cao?

  18. SSgt Yatahey

    Corrupt Exposure — Stephan; you’re full of **** by claiming to be a CA Attorney, and writing ignorant statements like that about Cao!:evil:

    BTW – your “lovely wife” Virginia?

    Damn; that is one ugly, homely creature — but then too, you’re no prize either; no wonder you have her living in a treehouse surrounded by a bunch of pine trees.

    She’s so damn ugly, you take her camping in the wildnerness just so your alleged friends won’t make fun of you — guess that comes from you having a really ugly, fat Mother, huh?

  19. corruption exposer

    Cao, the only 12 year-old girls I ever lived with were my sisters.

    You’d better ask your attorney about the laws concerning defamation, because you’re violating them left and right. I can only guess that you have no assets; otherwise, you wouldn’t continue to irrationally subject yourself to liability.

    Defamatory statements about others–i.e., untrue statements harmful to another’s reputation–are actionable. Maybe you read someone else’s FALSE remarks and accepted them as the God’s-given truth (like conservatives do when Bush speaks).

    As your attorney will explain, “replublication” of defamation is as actionable as the original remark.

    If you want to attack members of the left, you should stick to the facts and not place yourself in financial jeapordy by making false statements.

    To defame two attorneys repeatedly (we’re documenting each instance) is a risky financial venture.

    You’re not the only blogger who’s done this, but your separate instances of defamation exceed all others.

    Libel (written defamation) alleging criminal conduct as you have against me is “libel per se.” Damages are presumed and need not be proven in such cases. Again. your attorney will clarify this distinction.

    My wife works for San Francisco’s most reputable law firm, a firm with over 700 attorneys. She also serves as a pro tem judge. Your false statements about us are significant in light of her employment circumstances. Thus, the amount of potential liability you create for yourself, just regarding her, is also significant.

    You’d better stand down soon unless you want to learn about 1st Amendment law the hard way. This is your polite warning. The 1st Amendment doesn’t protect your defamatory speech.

    Freedom of defamation is not free!

  20. Kender

    There is such a thing as a “reputable law firm”?

  21. Mustang

    I understand that the original source was published in the Sacramento Bee; what would the courts think about “selective” prosecution?

  22. SSgt Yatahey

    “My wife works for San Francisco’s most reputable law firm, a firm with over 700 attorneys. She also serves as a pro tem judge.”

    ROTFLMFAO – :mrgreen::lol:

    Sounds just like a typical “Sea Lawyer” — “BOY WONDER”, I’m a former Sheriff’s Officer and know far more about Internet Law than you … YOU are the Moronic Idiot who has created all of the Libel and Slander here … it wouldn’t be difficult to prove in a court of law.

    So, tell those HOMELY 700 FEMALES (you allegedly married one of them) in the “Fish-eyed ****** City” to bring it on … otherwise; go play with your little 12-yr old girl and shut the hell up.

  23. The MaryHunter

    There’s something wonderful happening here in the name of exposing corruption. I’m grabbing some peanuts and a beer.

    Oh, BTW, “Corrupt Exposer”: there are laws against doing just that in most US cities, even if not in the City by the Bay. (I pity those poor 12-year-old girls.)

    Um, whoops, kinda got off track of the post here: sharia law was it, and the evil which we face? Oh, and LAWYERS? Thank God indeed we’re not under the laws of Islam, for then, there’d be no need for lawyers to speak of:

    And there will be no lawyer, no hearing, no defense for you.

    :shock:

    What then would Corrupt Exposer do without his 700 Legal Virgins? :lol:

  24. corruption exposer

    Yatahey you sound like a true idiot. I can see why you’re a “former” anything!

  25. SSgt Yatahey

    Well, “Stephen” — at least I’m not a former or current Pedophile who likes little 12-yr old girls like you.

    I’m willing to bet you have unnatural *** with your Mommy every Friday night before going out to prey on little girls, don’t you?:grin:

    Let’s see … what else have I found out about you so far without digging too deep?

    1. You don’t live in Berkley, CA — but you allegedly live in Sacramento

    2. Interesting About The “Real” Stephen Pearcy

    3. You apparently like Cao’s Blog; Kender’s Musings; and more as your other Blog clearly shows here

  26. SSgt Yatahey

    ROTFLMAO — WOOF…WOOF :mrgreen:

  27. Gribbit

    Well Stephen… you and your wife like hanging soldiers in effigy huh? How about we all hang little Stephen and Virginias in effigy? How offended would you be. As a former soldier, I take that as that you would be willing to kill me. I take that as a threat. Perhaps I should sue you? Do you want me dead? Do you want my friends that are still in the military dead? Your symbolism seems to lead one to believe so.

    Facts are facts, you are a certifiable MORON. Typical left coast liberal who don’t know anything about anything outside of their dope influence haze. So you and your wife in HOMO ville, as far as I’m concerned had better keep an eye out for any soldiers who know of your stunt. Because if I were still in, I’d hunt you down. Just to ask you why you want me dead. Then I’d invite you to try.

    You are a coward. Just like all the lefties in the blogsphere. Hiding behind the legal system just like your mentors at the ACLU. Get a life.

  28. Gribbit

    SSgt Yatahey, my dog is offended at your calling that homely thing a dog. I’ve seen better looking piles in barn yards that thing he calls his wife.

  29. SSgt Yatahey

    Gribbit — even my dog sat up and howled when she saw the ugly-*** pic of “Who’s Afraid Of Virginia Woof-Woof”?

    Yeah; he threatens alot of Bloggers and I’m not done with him yet; wait until certain Authorities find out what else I’ve found on him … he’ll need to tie a pork chop around her scrawny neck just to get her to come home.:lol:

  30. SSgt Yatahey

    No self-respecting Attorney would be doing this stupid **** … read on…

    Well; well; well — seems like Virginia Pearcy is NOT MARRIED TO ANYONE … however, you can call and/or email this bonafide Berkley Attorney and ask her why this clown is using her name and picture without her written permission on numerous Blogs by viewing her Law Website

    They are now calling Bloggers and threatening them with lawsuits

    They also made the headlines on WorldNetDaily

    Apparently, many Californians refer to them as Slumlords

    Even further — The Happy Couple of Scumbags

    According to “MoveAmericaForward”, these ******** de-graded a fellow U.S. Marine who just returned from Iraq, and one of their neighbors said, “Although the Pearcys re-entered their home stiff-lipped, a neighbor said the couple is worried about their safety and possible vandalism to their property.”Here’s the story

    Stephen Pearcy began the talk by introducing his wife as having been California’s youngest attorney when she graduated.

    “We began to put out some signs soon after 9/11,” Stephen Pearcy said. “At that time we were still getting along with our conservative neighbors.”

    He said they noticed a problem after they put up a sign that said, “Boycott SUVs.” Their neighbor across the street put up a sign that said, “Boycott liberals.”

    “For *** Pride Week, we put up a rainbow flag,” Virginia Pearcy said. “The police came by and said it didn’t comply with a city ordinance.”

    Stephen Pearcy said the police told them if they didn’t take the flag down they would be investigated.

    “It was meant to send up a chilling message,” Stephen Pearcy said.

    After the Pearcys put up the soldier’s uniform, they were called about the ordinance again. But the Pearcys said the city couldn’t make them take the display down because it would be “selective enforcement,” since other people put up Christmas decorations and Halloween displays.

    Now, remember — her EMPLOYER’S WEBSITE STATES SHE IS “SINGLE” … yet; these two Circus Clowns are scared of people, as they had to hire Bodyguards as the “Controversial lawyers Stephen and Virginia Pearcy” came to Sacramento State on March 30

  31. Kender

    Is there any public info on Stephens law schooling?

  32. SSgt Yatahey

    I told the Jack-Off not to mess with me, nor anyone here, as I would dig deeper!:mrgreen:

    Now, all we have to do is contact her Employer with all of this evidence; along with the California State Bar Association; and the California Attorney General and advise all Agencies of their LIBEL – SLANDER – AND THREATS and let the LAW work for us!

    It’s not nice to piss me off…:lol:

  33. SSgt Yatahey

    Kinda like terrorists in Iraq? Wait’ll you see what else I dug up on these TWINKLE-TOED COMMUNIST LOVERS…

    “In the past two years, the Pearcys have hung an Iraqi flag from their Sacramento home and chosen the day after a terrorist attack in Israel to unfurl the Palestinian flag in the front window, at least two neighbors have said.”

    Send Their Asses To Iraq!

    He may not be an Attorney — do a search for both Berkley and San Francisco on this site

    Well — we now have their home address and home telephone –

    Stephen and Virginia Pearcy have made a public display on their at their Sacramento home. Their phone number is also publicly listed as:per my attorney this has been deleted (but you can find it easily enough, it’s public information.

    They have used their home to make a public comment. Therefore, it is legal to post their address, which has been clearly identified by television news reports.

    It may be legal, but as per my attorneys, we don’t want to encourage stalkers or crazy people like he’s doing by publishing my information at his site. My information is not public and I have gone to great lengths to keep it that way for my personal safety in view of bomb threats, death threats, etc.. There is a lunatic fringe on the left who will stop at nothing and think threatening phone calls are cool. There is a smaller percentage who will follow through on what they’re threatening. This guy is looking for someone in that 1% to pay me a visit.

    This public info came from SlagleRock

  34. Jay

    Corrupted Exposer, you just go ahead and call your ACLU lawyer. Don’t worry about this yahoo Cao. Send him on over to my place if he feels like discussing law. Tell him to bring it on…our “dumb America club” is just as much grounds to sue such a frivolous law suit as any truth you said that might have hurt his fragile feelings.

  35. SSgt Yatahey

    In the words of the famous “Charlie Daniels” …

    “I done told you Son-Of-A-*****, I’m the best there’s ever been…”
    :mrgreen: :grin::lol:

  36. The Mad Tech

    Jackass and his wife will be on a local Sacramento tv show Monday night so I guess he will dump all over us since we have no way to respond. That is the lefty way. Kick your oppenents when possible and stifle their free speech while claiming they are oppressing you.

    If you were actually a lawyer Jackass you might know about this: Section 230 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 protects Internet publishers from being held liable for allegedly harmful comments written by others. If you did you might not want to shoot your mouth off about suing people. Have fun on your little tv appearance and be careful what you say, since your appearance will be part of the public record.

  37. The MaryHunter

    This.is.just.awesome. I feel history being made here… the comeuppance of a Corrupt Exposer?

Leave a Reply