What motivated Malik Nidal Hasan to open fire on his fellow soldiers at Ft. Hood? (poll)

10 responses to “What motivated Malik Nidal Hasan to open fire on his fellow soldiers at Ft. Hood? (poll)”

1. 
   Carolyn Hileman

   11/10/2009 at 8:28 am | Permalink

   I don’t think we can call the ones he killed and wounded his fellow soldiers. They were his enemy and he was just waiting for the right time to strike

2. 
   Cao

   11/10/2009 at 8:31 am | Permalink

   He took an oath to serve in the military; and part of that oath is to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic. The military paid for his education; they were his fellow soldiers. He had the option to resign his military commission and he didn’t.

   There are lots of muslims who serve our country honorably; take the guy who interrogated Sadam, as an example - he was an FBI field agent of Lebanese descent.

   If the Fort Hood shooter were a mere jihadist that snuck onto the base somehow that would be one thing – but he was a Major in the Army, took an oath and had that duty to perform.

   Yet, he called himself a muslim first and an American second. Clearly, he was fleecing the army for what he could get for nothing; while serving the hateful radical Islamic wahhabi masters.

   If he was conflicted about all of this, he should have resigned his commission.

   Bottom line is – he was trying to contact Al Qaeda operatives and should have been kicked out of the army and billed for what the army spent on him.

3. 
   Ogre

   11/10/2009 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

   Ron Paul.

4. 
   Ogre

   11/10/2009 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

   Personally, I blame the religion of political correctness.

5. 
   Cao

   11/10/2009 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

   Darnit, I should have made Ron Paul one of the choices!

6. 
   Steve Rowland

   11/12/2009 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

   I asked this question on several other blogs:

   “How can a “radical Islamist”, without permission from his Iman, enter into a pact with the ‘infidel’ unless some future act be deemed proper by the Iman to attain approval in the eyes of Allah as a penance for contaminating themselves?”

   I think he was a plant, a mole, or at the very least, a turncoat.

7. 
   Cao

   11/13/2009 at 7:34 am | Permalink

   It’s called al-takeyya and it is sanctioned in the Qu’ran; that’s how. Al-takeyya is lying for the sake of Islam and is perfectly acceptable. It doesn’t matter what you say, what matters is what’s in your heart.

   “War is deception”

8. 
   DanFromMo

   2/13/2010 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

   He was given the order. They green TV shows. They manipulate the News Cycle. Answer the question, what would have been the front page news that day had this event not happened? I will give you a hint. Same thing as the Christmas Undie Bomber.

9. 
   Cao

   2/14/2010 at 11:52 am | Permalink

   Which was…? What?

10. 
    thomas paine

    2/25/2010 at 7:53 am | Permalink

    Steve and others, he was no plant or tunrcoat.

    He was a devote muslim who prayed 5 times a day and read teh quran and abided by its writings.

    Steve, any muslim can act as malik did under the pretense of Al Taqiyah.
    Google it and you will understand why it is ok for muslims to lie, cheat and steal and still be in alignment with the quran and islam.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.