The New Blog Of The Leftist Attack Squad

Thought I’d break it to you, these brainless nincompoops have their own blog, Click here.

They call themselves the “united americans”. They opened it up with an attack on me and the Wide Awakes, so I suppose you could say I’ve arrived!!! I do have to thank them for the linky love but honestly, isn’t there a better subject to blog on than me and TWA? Guess there’s nothing more important going on in their small minds than to get back at me and TWA’s 20+ writers and 30+ something defenders.

Hey–look. On the bright side, I know that I’ve finally arrived!! Libs are calling me names. On my own website, and they built a whole website dedicated to ripping me and TWA! They’re sending me emails, calling me names. They’re asking me questions, calling me names. Curiously, the proponents of “tolerance” always chose to call people names, like dumb, stupid, sexist, fascist, Nazi, fag, homophobe, racist, rightwing extremist, even comparisons have been made between Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson!~!!

Way to go, lefties! Why should anyone expect them to act differently on a group blog than they do in their personal lives??? Throw accusations out and point their little accusatory fingers at people rather than talk about issues or take responsibility for their own actions.

I take Cao seriously because she’s one of the two percent. The two percent that put Bush over the top and consider that a mandate. Perhaps it was because politicos pander to them as if they’re wretched royalty.

What? Politicos pander to us? What are you talking about? That’s a leftist assumption or presumption that isn’t based upon fact. Give me factual data and show me your source. I always do. But seriously, all of the stuff that’s posted there is slanderous accusations and nothing based on fact or reason.

My grandparents would have killed her with verbal acuity. My father’s family were Socialists; my maternal grandmother a Communist. Now I admit that the differences can be hard to distinguish, and that there were many branches of both movements. But when you make a blanket statement, you better be able to back it up. Cao can’t.

Try me.

It’s so nice that whynot’s able to influence this little group of stepford wives to set up a whole blog dedicated to attacking me and TWA. I guess the frogblog isn’t enough, we need one dedicated solely to TWA and Cao.

Today we’re going to concentrate on one aspect of Cao: her insistance that Hitler was a Socialist.

Now I can’t help but be totally mystified as to why someone would call a Christian a nazi. Nazis aren’t Christians, they’re National Socialists. After all, was it was called Nationalsozialismus aka “National Socialism.

That’s interesting, here is one of the articles that I quote from on the subject, and there’s a lot more to it than those few sentences, but then I realize these people are challenged in the IQ department and need chants and cheers like high schoolers to deliver their points because they’re incapable of debating. Any more than a few words, and thought processes are lost on them. You can see that at ProtestWarriors.com -they don’t want to debate, they run away from debate. Here’s is the piece on Cao’s Blog and some of the comments left regarding it. They can’t stand the idea that Hitler was a socialist…I guess because they can’t rightfully draw swastikas on the sides of our houses.

What was Marx most famous for? The writing of The Communist Manifesto, co-written with Engel. So he couldn’t have been a Socialist.. I grew up hearing about the differences between the movements, and while they might sound minor to us–evolution vs revolution, they were very big to my Russian Jewish grandparents

That’s right. And communists support socialists because socialism is the predecessor to communism. Are you just totally clueless? Nevermind, I already have my answer. Among students of the Nazi period it is well-known that Hitler’s most central concern after getting rid of the Jews was Lebensraum for Germany — i.e. taking over the lands of Eastern Europe for Germans. But WHY did Hitler want Lebensraum (literally, “life-space”) for Germans? It was because, like the Greenies of today, he was concerned about overpopulation.

Greenie Paul Ehrlich wrote in his 1968 book The population bomb:

“The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate…”

Hitler shared Ehrlich’s pessimism:

“Germany has an annual increase in population of nearly nine hundred thousand souls. The difficulty of feeding this army of new citizens must grow greater from year to year and ultimately end in catastrophe, unless ways and means are found to forestall the danger of starvation and misery in time… Without doubt the productivity of the soil can be increased up to a certain limit. But only up to a certain limit, and not continuously without end….. But even with the greatest limitation on the one hand and the utmost industry on other, here again a limit will one day be reached, created by the soil itself. With the utmost toil it will not be possible to obtain any more from it, and then, though postponed for a certain time, catastrophe again manifests itself”. (Mein Kampf pp. 121 & 122).

And how about another direct quote from Hitler himself?

“We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions”

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

And here:

It was and still is common in academia to identify the Communists as the Left and the Nazis as the extreme Right, as if they stood on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. This definitions were first coined by Stalin himself at the 7th Congress of the Communist International in 1935. To put these regimes in their true perspective we should admit that they are as various versions of the same socialist ideology. The economic policies of Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s Germany resembled the “state socialism” which Lenin wanted to institute in Soviet Russia upon coming to power, under which private enterprise would work for the government — an idea Lenin was forced to abandon under the pressure of the “Left Communists”. Under both fascist and communist regimes government bureaucracy completely controls the production. It decides what shall be produced, how much, for whom and how.

The difference between the systems is that the German and Italian patterns did indeed allow — or, more accurately, tolerated — private property. However, it was “property” in a peculiar and very restricted sense — not the virtually untrammeled private ownership of Roman law and nineteen-century Europe, but rather conditional possession, under which the state, the owner of last resort, reserved to itself the right to interfere with and even confiscate assets which, in its judgment, were unsatisfactorily used. But in fact the governments of fascist Italy and Nazi Germany directed production decisions, curbed entrepreneurship and the labor market, and determined wages and interest rates by centralized authority similar to that in the communist states.

I just love this subject, I could go on and on about it. To Marxists only is nationalism considered ‘rightwing’…on the communism/socialism scale. Since I’m not a Marxist, it isn’t a relevant scale because nationalist socialism is still way far to the left of capitalism.

That slam about Christians is another interesting thing and demonstrates exactly how close to this socialist ideal these people really are, at least to those who have access to a few brain cells.

Good luck, lefties! You’re making such a great impression and case for the cause of socialism everywhere!