hacked emails prove Global Warming is junk science

E-Mails Of Climate Researchers Buttress Case Of Warming Fraud

It’s the hysterical climate change fanatics who’ve been caught with their pants down this time.

In a day and age when hackers break into email accounts and wave their findings in the air with sarcastic aplomb, isn’t it ironic that what was exposed was by someone using the same technique the leftists use.

It’s all too familiar… The people who oppose Obamacare are supported by the Insurance companies because of PROFIT…

Those openly skeptical of global warming are in it for the money (what money? just see what writing “global warming” or “climate change” does for your grant application!), or are funded by Big Oil and other fossil-fuel interests.

The content in the Britain’s Climate Research Unit’s hacked emails is downright hilarious.

Climate Emails Stoke Debate

In the emails, which date to 1996, researchers in the U.S. and the U.K. repeatedly take issue with climate research at odds with their own findings. In some cases, they discuss ways to rebut what they call “disinformation” using new articles in scientific journals or popular Web sites.

The emails include discussions of apparent efforts to make sure that reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations group that monitors climate science, include their own views and exclude others. In addition, emails show that climate scientists declined to make their data available to scientists whose views they disagreed with.

The IPCC couldn’t be reached for comment Sunday.

bwahahahaha!

About Cao

I'm a kind old soul-until you cross me.
This entry was posted in Environmentalism, Science: Real, Weird & JUNK, bwahahahaha!, moonbat hysteria and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>