ACLU and Religion: Only If It Feels Good

This week’s STOP THE ACLU Blogburst is a free-for-all on what we dislike most about the ACLU. I thought I’d take a second glance at some rather interesting news I saw recently about that organization famous for practicing selective civil rights with impunity. Apparently the Florida branch of the ACLU is assembling a diverse collection of religious leaders in the hopes of getting some friendly advice on improving their image, as reported in this 20 May 2005 article in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. The ACLU, which by all accounts has a pretty clear message of abject hatred for public expressions of religion in general and Christianity in particular, hopes that their panel of religious (including but not limited to a rabbi, a United Methodist elder, a Baptist minister, and religious studies faculty) will help to “soften the image” of the ACLU and assist in crafting positions on issues ranging from school vouchers to religious practices in public schools and gay marriage.

According to the Sun-Sentinel, things seem to be off to an interesting start:

In their first, wide-ranging meeting in Miami on Thursday [19 May 2005], Howard [Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida] and other state ACLU officials spoke to religious leaders on the teaching of creationism in classes and on right-to-die issues, highlighting the varying opinions each person had on the subjects.

Florida ACLU President Jeanne Baker said creationism should not be taught in science in public schools. The Rev. James R. Summers of Northwest Baptist Church in Miami said creationism should not be excluded from the curriculum solely because of its religious foundation.

“I reject the notion that there’s more evidence for evolution than for creationism,” Summers said. “I have no problem with teaching evolution, but I do have a problem with expunging creationism from the curriculum.”

In fairness, I should point out that Mr. Simon also was quoted in the Sun-Sentinel story thus: “The ACLU is hostile to government’s mingling with religion. We are opposed to the view that religion should be marginalized. The church has got to be the watchdog of government.”

!

Given that the ACLU is wont to violate people’s rights of religious expression in the public square, it just seems a little odd (even hypocritical?) for them to seek advice from those that they would just as soon silence. But that just might be me. I’m sure that my acquaintances who work for Americans United for the Separation of Church and State have no qualms.

If you have qualms, then know that there is hope. A bill, The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005, has been introduced to the house.

H. R. 2679
To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that potential litigants may seek damages and attorney’s fees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 26, 2005
Mr. HOSTETTLER (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. JENKINS, Mr. PAUL, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. SODREL, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. OTTER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. POE, and Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

In the words of Jay at STOP THE ACLU (who interviewed a legislative aid of one of the bill’s co-sponsors), this is basically what the bill would do:

This bill is specifically designed towards “establishment clause” cases, and would not apply to “free exercise clause” cases. In other words, it would help curb groups like the ACLU from violating people’s right to express their religion in the public sphere. It does not stop their ability to do so, but takes your [taxpayer] money out of their hands if they do so. Furthermore, it could not be used in a case against an individual expressing their religion.

In other words, it’s a step in the right direction. Support the passage of HR 2679. Write, call, and email your Congressman and Senators urging passage of this important legislation.



Join the Stop The ACLU Blogburst, every Thursday at a right-minded blog near you.

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst! If you would like to join, it is very simple.
Go to our new portal at Protest The ACLU , click where it says “sign up now”, and fill out a simple form. This will enable us to send you a weekly newsletter with information, and keep your email private. Current members who have not registered, please do so. There are additional advantages and features that will be available for you there…You can opt to use them, or not. Thank you!

Sites Already on Board:

Stop The ACLU
Freedom Of Thought
Mad Tech
Respublica
The Wide Awakes
Angry Republican Mom
Kender’s Musings
American Patriots
What Attitude Problem?
Life Trek
Gribbit’s Word
Def Conservative
An American Housewife
A Tic In The Mind’s Eye
Cao’s Blog
Regular Ron
Freedom Of
Is This Life?
Patriots For Bush
California Conservative 4 Truth
NIF
Obiter Dictum
PBS Watch
Xtreme Right Wing
Daily Inklings
Miss Patriot
Jack Lewis.net
Conservative Dialysis
Conservative Angst
Kill Righty
American Warmonger
Birth Of A Neo-Con
The Nose On Your Face
The View From Firehouse
Ogre’s View
Fundamentally right
Conservative Rant
My Political Soap Box
Common Sense Runs Wild
Redstate Rant
Time Hath Found Us
American Dinosaur
Merri Musings
And Rightly So
Sweet Spirits of Ammonia
Smithereen’s Files
Pulpit Pounder
Ravings of J.C.B.
Is It Just Me?
Blogtalker
Parrot Check
Stuff You Should Know
Rancher Blog
Christmas Ghost
Vista On Current Events
Musing Minds
Pirate’s Cove
Mr . Minority
The Lesser Of Two Evils
TMH’s Bacon Bits
RAGE
The Life And Times

We are trying to raise money for full page ads and eventually commercials exposing the ACLU’s radical agenda. Help us out! Buy a bumper sticker!
Click Below To See Our Store!

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

One response to “ACLU and Religion: Only If It Feels Good”

  1. Jay

    Excellent job Cao! I hope enough people can convince their reps to get this passed in the house, cause then the real pressure of getting it through the senate comes.

Leave a Reply