<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;I cannot feel for you because I believe you are an infidel&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caosblog.com/archives/1850/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/1850</link>
	<description>Righteous Politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:20:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SSgt Yatahey</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25442</link>
		<dc:creator>SSgt Yatahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25442</guid>
		<description>Stimulating - LOL - I knew you&#039;d catch that!:mrgreen: </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stimulating &#8211; LOL &#8211; I knew you&#8217;d catch that!:mrgreen:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25429</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25429</guid>
		<description>&quot;He deserves to be another dead terrorist. I don’t think we can ever have enough dead terrorists.&quot;

Well, if one of two conditions obtained, I could say, &quot;enough.&quot;

1.) Every single terrorist had finally been introduced to Final Judgement: that&#039;d be enough.
2.) Enough terrorists had been introduced to Final Judgement to convince the rest to convert from jackals into sweet lil lambs: that&#039;d... no that&#039;d not be enough.  Until those jackals-turnedambs had been sheared (of every piece of information possible), butchered and the resultant excrecence fed to pigs, the pigs slaughtered and cremated and the ashes scattered over Mecca and Medina, their &quot;cnversion&quot; would be worthless...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He deserves to be another dead terrorist. I don’t think we can ever have enough dead terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, if one of two conditions obtained, I could say, &#8220;enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>1.) Every single terrorist had finally been introduced to Final Judgement: that&#8217;d be enough.<br />
2.) Enough terrorists had been introduced to Final Judgement to convince the rest to convert from jackals into sweet lil lambs: that&#8217;d&#8230; no that&#8217;d not be enough.  Until those jackals-turnedambs had been sheared (of every piece of information possible), butchered and the resultant excrecence fed to pigs, the pigs slaughtered and cremated and the ashes scattered over Mecca and Medina, their &#8220;cnversion&#8221; would be worthless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cao</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25428</link>
		<dc:creator>Cao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25428</guid>
		<description>ooh Yat says I&#039;m &quot;stimulating&quot; hehehe :eek:

And BTW, the jihadis are saying that the anti-war movement is helping them to win on their message boards.  You just have to go back to what Bin Laden said before the election about the states that support them versus the states that don&#039;t.  On the jihadi message boards they say &quot;it appears that it&#039;s bearing fruit&quot;.

The jihadis themselves are saying the anti-war movement is helping their cause.  You have to be a total idiot not to see that, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooh Yat says I&#8217;m &#8220;stimulating&#8221; hehehe <img src='http://caosblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':eek:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And BTW, the jihadis are saying that the anti-war movement is helping them to win on their message boards.  You just have to go back to what Bin Laden said before the election about the states that support them versus the states that don&#8217;t.  On the jihadi message boards they say &#8220;it appears that it&#8217;s bearing fruit&#8221;.</p>
<p>The jihadis themselves are saying the anti-war movement is helping their cause.  You have to be a total idiot not to see that, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSgt Yatahey</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25424</link>
		<dc:creator>SSgt Yatahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25424</guid>
		<description>Marie b sez -- &lt;i&gt;&quot;people either agree with you or not. if they do but not to the degree you want, you lump them into the same category and as having the same ideals as terrorists and fantatics.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re not only way out in left field, but you&#039;re really reaching with a stupid summation like that.

I&#039;ve known Cao for a few yrs now; you need to follow along with her to get a better understanding of how she thinks, which more often than not, can be very deep for many people -- it&#039;s an admirable quality I, and many others, find stimulating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marie b sez &#8212; <i>&#8220;people either agree with you or not. if they do but not to the degree you want, you lump them into the same category and as having the same ideals as terrorists and fantatics.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re not only way out in left field, but you&#8217;re really reaching with a stupid summation like that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve known Cao for a few yrs now; you need to follow along with her to get a better understanding of how she thinks, which more often than not, can be very deep for many people &#8212; it&#8217;s an admirable quality I, and many others, find stimulating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cao</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25284</link>
		<dc:creator>Cao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/1850#comment-25284</guid>
		<description>How is &quot;opposing the war&quot; &quot;supporting our troops&quot;?  It&#039;s like two parents fighting over how they&#039;re going to raise their children.  The woman criticizes her husband in front of the children, about how he&#039;s disciplining the children.  Do you think that encourages the children to mis-behave and undermines his authority?

You bet it does.  And how is that any different than the situation in Iraq?  Do you think opposing the war emboldens or discourages the terrorists?

It has nothing to do with how I treat people who &quot;disagree&quot; with me.  It has to do with what your attitude is accomplishing, bottom line.

Do you think &quot;opposing the war&quot; &quot;supports our troops&quot; in any way, shape or form?  How does &quot;opposing the war&quot; do that, exactly?  Or do you think our fighting forces are discouraged when they hear people say that?

Captain David Rozelle, on a plane home after he lost his foot from a roadside IED, was sitting next to John Kerry, who said &quot;I don&#039;t support the war&quot;.  What do you think that did for his morale at that point, after having just risked his life and sacrificed his foot for the cause?

What I think is hilarious is the twisted rhetoric that you come up with and the fact that you actually BELIEVE what you&#039;re saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is &#8220;opposing the war&#8221; &#8220;supporting our troops&#8221;?  It&#8217;s like two parents fighting over how they&#8217;re going to raise their children.  The woman criticizes her husband in front of the children, about how he&#8217;s disciplining the children.  Do you think that encourages the children to mis-behave and undermines his authority?</p>
<p>You bet it does.  And how is that any different than the situation in Iraq?  Do you think opposing the war emboldens or discourages the terrorists?</p>
<p>It has nothing to do with how I treat people who &#8220;disagree&#8221; with me.  It has to do with what your attitude is accomplishing, bottom line.</p>
<p>Do you think &#8220;opposing the war&#8221; &#8220;supports our troops&#8221; in any way, shape or form?  How does &#8220;opposing the war&#8221; do that, exactly?  Or do you think our fighting forces are discouraged when they hear people say that?</p>
<p>Captain David Rozelle, on a plane home after he lost his foot from a roadside IED, was sitting next to John Kerry, who said &#8220;I don&#8217;t support the war&#8221;.  What do you think that did for his morale at that point, after having just risked his life and sacrificed his foot for the cause?</p>
<p>What I think is hilarious is the twisted rhetoric that you come up with and the fact that you actually BELIEVE what you&#8217;re saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
