To be perfectly honest, I’m getting absolutely sick and tired of idiots who regurgitate this kind of rhetoric in my comments section. This comment was stopped in my moderation queue and I’m beginning to think that I should set up a section for “idiotic comments” for me to create a post about and shred each one for its supreme moonbattery, because it’s a favorite pastime of mine besides absorbing as much information as I can.
Nice work Caos
Take this womens suffering and anguish and spin it to draw traffic to your blog and support the misguided sense of patriotism you and your readers have.
A decent christian would have left this one alone. This poor womans life has been ruined. Her son is dead, her husband is divorcing her, and her children are distancing themselves.
Why not stick it to her a little more. I mean she is a democrat so I suppose she deserves it.
First, it’s not “Caos” it’s “Cao”. What’s so hard about that? It’s three letters. Second, you’d think I was the only one writing about this. I have a shocker for ya: do a google search on Cindy Sheehan. I’m sure it won’t surprise you to note that as of this writing, 2,290,000 results pop up. Technorati has 8,995 posts about Cindy Sheehan. You think the reason I’m outraged is because she’s not “a republican”? Think again.
Michelle Malkin here and here, Rightwing Nuthouse, Chrenkoff, Iraq the Model, Frontpage Magazine and other posts at frontpage, Ann Coulter, Moonbat Central, GM Roper’s Corner, TMH’s Bacon Bits have all written about it. If I missed your post, add it here in comments or trackback to this post. There are a lot of people writing about Cindy, I’m sorry the leftists object to it and think we should remain silent while they take over the world, but it’s not going to happen.
Maybe you should go over and lecture and/or admonish Mohammed about how he’s not a good muslim for posting about Cindy and how he should mind his own business since he’s not an American. But you can’t honestly say that he’s posting about Cindy Sheehan because she’s not a “republican”. Mohammed is one of those millions of Iraqis who is glad about what’s happening in his country as a result of the war. His message to Cindy, in part, is this:
I know how you feel Cindy, I lived among the same pains for 35 years but worse than that was the fear from losing our loved ones at any moment. Even while I’m writing these words to you there are feelings of fear, stress, and sadness that interrupt our lives all the time but in spite of all that I’m sticking hard to hope which if I didn’t have I would have died years ago.
Ma’am, we asked for your nation’s help and we asked you to stand with us in our war and your nation’s act was (and still is) an act of ultimate courage and unmatched sense of humanity.
Our request is justified, death was our daily bread and a million Iraqi mothers were expecting death to knock on their doors at any second to claim someone from their families.
Your face doesn’t look strange to me at all; I see it everyday on endless numbers of Iraqi women who were struck by losses like yours.Our fellow country men and women were buried alive, cut to pieces and thrown in acid pools and some were fed to the wild dogs while those who were lucky enough ran away to live like strangers and the Iraqi mother was left to grieve one son buried in an unfound grave and another one living far away who she might not get to see again.
We did nothing to deserve all that suffering, well except for a dream we had; a dream of living like normal people do.
We cried out of joy the day your son and his comrades freed us from the hands of the devil and we went to the streets not believing that the nightmare is over.
We practiced our freedom first by kicking and burning the statues and portraits of the hateful idol who stole 35 years from the life of a nation.
For the first time air smelled that beautiful, that was the smell of freedom.The mothers went to break the bars of cells looking for the ones they lost 5, 12 or 20 years ago and other women went to dig the land with their bare hand searching for a few bones they can hold in their arms after they couldn’t hold them when they belonged to a living person.
I recall seeing a woman on TV two years ago, she was digging through the dirt with her hands. There was no definite grave in there as the whole place was one large grave but she seemed willing to dig the whole place looking for her two brothers who disappeared from earth 24 years ago when they were dragged from their colleges to a chamber of hell.
But I suppose the feelings of millions of Iraqis who Mohammed speaks for mean little to a woman with a Bush-bashing agenda, or other leftists who feel the same way.
Gosh, am I amazed at how little common sense leftists apply to issues and the real world.
Here’s an excerpt from Rocco DiPippo at Moonbat Central:
Now the pro-terrorist Code Pink crew that’s orchestrating the Crawford circus is trying to milk what’s left of the Sheehan situation by publicly floating the idea of a Cindy Sheehan martyr scenario in order to gauge what the public’s reaction would be to such an event.
Trapped within the confines of their ’60s-era funhouse-mirror thought-model, the deluded leftists at Crawford seriously think that the arrest of Sheehan and her radical friends will cause a Vietnam-era-type outcry in America.
Leftists are generally a dishonorable lot and Cindy Sheehan is their perfect poster-girl. What we’re witnessing in Crawford Texas is the true face of the American far- Left: hate-filled, unpatriotic and treasonous.
Sheehan has tried to dishonor her brave son. She has tried to dishonor her son’s Commander-in-Chief. She has tried to dishonor the U.S.
She has managed to dishonor only herself.
That’s priceless. My leftard commenter calls my sense of duty, my sense of honor, my sense of God and Country-”Misguided patriotism.” So who exactly has the “misguided patriotism” again? Here’s a woman who is standing on her son’s flag-draped coffin alongside people who celebrate the deaths of American soldiers and give money to the enemy forces who are killing them and this guy calls what I have–a true love of country and support for the military and the idea–OMG-that we should WIN the war on terror instead of concentrate on jobs and social programs instead–”misguided patriotism”. You know, the extremist leftist socialist/commie view of things that has historically rooted for the enemy and is called sedition and treason isn’t exactly “patriotism”, that’s why so many democrats have bailed from the democratic party. I think YOU have a misguided sense of what patriotism is, you sorry leftard. How is rooting for the enemy and blaming Bush “patriotism”?
Cindy Sheehan’s behavior is of her own choosing, let’s not forget that.
Perhaps Cindy Sheehan should stand in front of Congress and demand to know why they killed her son for this “immoral war” that CONGRESS sent her son into? Or get on television and demand it from the American people? C’mon. Bush isn’t the only one involved in this thing, he’s not a dictator.
I love that. So I’m not a “decent Christian”. A “decent Christian” would have left this alone. Why is that, my dear boy? When I have a son of my own in Iraq right now and her rhetoric is putting his life and all the lives of his brother at arms further at risk?
It’s interesting that people come here spouting that kind of stuff actually think that’s a point. Is that supposed to hurt my feelings? So is Michelle Malkin not a “decent Christian”? She’s posting about this, too. And what about the moral views of anyone else who believe what Cindy’s doing is a despicable grandstanding act after she’s already had a moment with the president back in 2004?
Pardon My English says it very well:
So I went to MichaelMoore.com and found that the majority of the home page was dedicated to Cindy Sheehan so I figure there must be a hell of a connection.
“When I say “dedicated to Cindy Sheehan” I mean just that. There is not a mention of her brave son Casey anywhere on the page. There isn’t a mention of ANY of the brave soldiers who have fought and died in Iraq and Afghanistan except for the liberal boast that one died used as anti-war propaganda. This whole protest and the shameless media engorgement with it has nothing at all to do with our brave soldiers and their sacrifice. It’s all about Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore and the media and Moore’s exploitation of Sheehan and her cause for their own selfish political interests: Get us out of the war at all costs and if possible, get George W. Bush run out of Washington on a rail.”
So I guess because her son died in Iraq the leftard thinks that she should be able to say and do whatever she wants, even if it means emboldening the enemy and more soldiers’ deaths in Iraq. What about all the wives, sisters, mothers of the soldiers who are still over there fighting? Aren’t we allowed any outrage over what this woman is doing? Apparently not, because that wouldn’t be “Christian” in this person’s eyes. What exactly defines that, I’m not sure, and I doubt that many leftists truly understand what being a “decent Christian” really means. But it certainly doesn’t mean allowing someone like this to get away with what she’s saying without challenging her motives and those of the people who are encouraging her to say these terrible things –not only about the war, but about the President. It’s also very telling that she’s pinned this on Bush alone, as if he’s some kind of commie dictator instead of a duly elected official, elected by a majority of Americans.
And here’s a bulletin for you, lefty: I can and will do and write whatever the hell I like here, I pay for the bandwidth. Contrary to the liberals who come here telling me what to do and ordering me around and judging the content of my posts like this, that’s a fact.
What I’m doing is pointing out the extreme rhetoric of her newfound pals at the expense of her family, and trashing her son’s memory for the sake of her political views. This isn’t about Casey, this is about Cindy; let’s make that clear.
And certainly I’m not doing this, Cindy Sheehan herself is doing this. She’s a grownup. I realize that leftists have this problem with shifting blame and entitlement. She’s a commie tool of Michael Moore, Medea Benjamin and all the rest. If you can’t see that, lefty, I feel sorry for you.



Well Cao… AMEN to THAT! There’s this “personal responsibility” thing that many — mostly the leftist elite — simply don’t get. Thanks for shining a light onto them, I love to watch them scurry away so.
WOOHOO – that’s our Cao!
:lol:
John “HANOI FONDA” Skerry is guilty of war crimes and lying to the people – he should be strung up in a tree; shot at sunrise; kicked in the balls; get married to Cindy Sheehan and ran out of America along with:
* Michael Moore
* Stephen Pearcy
* Ted Rall
* Theodore Kennedy
* Frank Church
* Tommy Hayden
* Tommy Harkin
Git-R-Done With New Rope!
: How is rooting for the enemy and blaming Bush
: “patriotism”?
Do you believe that “blaming Bush” and “rooting for the enemy” are one and the same thing?
: Perhaps Cindy Sheehan should stand in front of
: Congress and demand to know why they killed her
: son for this “immoral war” that CONGRESS sent
: her son into?
As Commander in Chief of US armed forces, does George W. Bush have sole authority to order the military to invade another country? Or is there some Congressional authority to issue orders to the military that has somehow been overlooked all these years?
: When I have a son of my own in Iraq right now
: and her rhetoric is putting his life and all
: the lives of his brother at arms further at risk?
Explain exactly how anything Cindy Sheehan has said to this point has increased your son’s chances of dying in Iraq.
: And what about the moral views of anyone else who
: believe what Cindy’s doing is a despicable grandstanding
: act after she’s already had a moment with the president
: back in 2004?
When exactly did Mrs. Sheehan meet with President Bush?
When exactly did she help found Gold Star Mothers for Peace?
And what happened in between?
: So I guess because her son died in Iraq the leftard
: thinks that she should be able to say and do whatever
: she wants
As an American citizen, she has exactly that right. Is this what bothers you most?
: But it certainly doesn’t mean allowing someone like
: this to get away with what she’s saying without
: challenging her motives and those of the people
: who are encouraging her to say these terrible
: things –not only about the war, but about the
: President.
It is, of course, far far easier to impugn Mrs. Sheehan’s motives than it is to engage in a civilized debate about the causes of the war, and who is responsible for it.
: And certainly I’m not doing this, Cindy Sheehan
: herself is doing this. She’s a grownup. I
: realize that leftists have this problem with
: shifting blame and entitlement. She’s a
: commie tool of Michael Moore, Medea Benjamin
: and all the rest.
You need to decide on one story and stick to it. Eitehr Cindy Sheehan is responsible for her actions, or she is a “tool”.
You can’t have it both ways.
Moonbats return…
“Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots.”
Rachelle – you have to be another Leftie with their head in the sand your entire life … if you don’t know who has the express authority to send the military to another country, you’re not the brightest crayon in the box, are you?
No matter how you slice it and dice it, EVERYONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS and this includes that Moronic Left-Of-Center Idiot, Cindy Sheehan.
Marine SSgt Yatahey
John “HANOI FONDA” Skerry is guilty of war crimes and lying to the people – he should be strung up in a tree; shot at sunrise; kicked in the balls; get married to Cindy Sheehan and ran out of America along with:
* Mister Carlos
* Michael Moore
* Stephen Pearcy
* Ted Rall
* Theodore Kennedy
* Frank Church
Git-R-Done!
:: Rachelle – you have to be another
:: Leftie with their head in the
:: sand your entire life … if you
:: don’t know who has the express
:: authority to send the military
:: to another country, you’re not
:: the brightest crayon in the
:: box, are you?
I am quite clear on who has the authority to send the military to another country. Cao claims that Congress sent Casey Sheehan into Iraq. Perhaps you should be educating Cao.
“Second, you’d think I was the only one writing about this”
The herd is all mooing so I moo.
“I am quite clear on who has the authority to send the military to another country. Cao claims that Congress sent Casey Sheehan into Iraq. Perhaps you should be educating Cao.”
You’re not clear on anything about the subject, Dumbass — and i don’t need to educate Cao on any subject, as she has more brains in the toenail of her smallest toe, compared to you.
Listen up, you slant-eyed stupid **** — it does require Congress to approve any type of military action, in regards to sending troops to war in a foreign country … I can’t believe anybody can possibly be that ******* ignorant, other than a typical Moonbat Leftie!:roll:
John “HANOI FONDA” Skerry is guilty of war crimes and lying to the people – he should be strung up in a tree; shot at sunrise; kicked in the balls; get married to Cindy Sheehan and ran out of America along with:
* Rachelle Warren
* Mister Carlos
* Michael Moore
* Stephen Pearcy
* Ted Rall
* Theodore Kennedy
* Frank Church
Git-R-Done!
:: it does require Congress to
:: approve any type of military
:: action
Cao’s original claim was that “CONGRESS sent [Casey Sheehan]” into Iraq. Was it, in fact, Congress who ordered the military to invade that country?
Ms. Warren:
If Congress didn’t send this young man exactly who did? Congress funds the war? If it doesn’t fund it there would be no forces. Try and think a bit.
Cao great article. I am sick of those “AMericans” who are ready to consign others to the gulags and torture cells. My wife recently had surgery. The nurse was an ex-ARVN capt who spent seven years in an re-education camp. I can only guess what he suffered but he was so cheerful and happy. My parents told me of what the Russians did in Eastern Europe before they escaped. I can only say such trolls have a special place in hell reserved for them, no doubt run by the same gulag team leaders.
“Cao’s original claim was that “CONGRESS sent [Casey Sheehan]” into Iraq. Was it, in fact, Congress who ordered the military to invade that country?”
Rachet-Brains — were you the after-birth of your Mother, “Susie Rottencrotch”; were you born naturally ******* stupid, or do you have to work at it everyday?
I can’t believe anyone is so damn ignorant, to keep asking the same question over and over — so, pay close attention Numbnuts, and READ!
Congress APPROVED THE WAR (which, just happened to involve both Republicans and your DEMOSHITTERS in case you’re that damn brain-dead) and the President only signed the AUTHORIZATION — did you go to any sort of School at all; or did you sleep all the way thru?
What the hell does the Constitution say?
“As commander-in- chief, he is authorized to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed by law at his command, and to employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy. He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States. But his conquests do not enlarge the boundaries of this Union, nor extend the operation of our institutions and laws beyond the limits before assigned to them by the legislative power.”
You’re too damn stupid to own a computer – sell the damn thing; go to a Library and READ BOOKS!
So – to answer your DEMOSHITTER LEFTIE question —
HELL YES – CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT SENT HIS *** TO IRAQ … RIGHT ALONG WITH THOUSANDS MORE!!!
What part of that do you not understand???
Thank you, Mr. Jackson. I appreciate your thoughts on that. It’s amazing how many lefties come here spewing their rhetoric as if I’m the only person in the world saying this stuff…or believing in God, or whatever. They’re WAY outnumbered, so the only thing I can imagine is they live in a leftist enclave like Berkley where moonbats run free and Stephen Pearcy gets a discount on the materials he uses for his anti-american yard displays.
Agreed, Cao.
Congress did authorize President Bush to use military force against Iraq.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-2.html
Cindy Sheehan, unfortunately, is turning ever more insane live and on camera. And by denouncing the President and the war, she’s minimizing her son’s achievements, deflating his honor and her justifiable pride, thus augmenting her loss.
http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2005/08/to-cindy.html