Comments on: Support them

By: NIF

NIF — Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:33:50 +0000

Another Today

Today’s dose of NIF – News, Interesting & Funny … It’s Stop the ACLU Thursday

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:09:08 +0000

Yes! Yes! Right on brother!

By: Cao

Cao — Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:39:48 +0000

Also…our men and women fighting don’t care about the reasons they were sent there. They are there now and it means the world to them to know they have support from the people back home and it makes them sick to hear people talking about ’support the troops’ but ‘don’t support the president’.

Intent doesn’t matter. It’s the final result that counts.

If you ‘care’…and you talk about ‘not supporting the president’ -which means you don’t support the ‘WOT’–which means you don’t support our men and women in Uniform…how are you any different than the people who say ‘we support our troops when they shoot their officers’?

By: Cao

Cao — Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:27:35 +0000

Look…you said you listened to it, but when you continued to ask the same questions, it seemed as though you hadn’t. And now you admit it. So now it’s clear you lied.

Why should I continue to carry on a conversation with someone who’s not honest and lies–and who’s not willing to put any effort forward? Why should I do all the work?

Your almost argumentative position has me heading off arguments that are very familiar and that’s why I’ve answered them in advance.

Now I know how important the answers to your questions are–’archived’–’out of sight out of mind’.

Actually, I have people commenting on archived posts all the time because they google up the subject matter. So that’s kind of a ridiculous point. You can keep track of the recent comments in the sidebar that says “your words”. People are looking up articles in my archives constantly, so that reasoning doesn’t make sense; it sounds like an excuse.

Those clips aren’t that long–there about 20 minutes a piece, so there’s another excuse. We all find time for what’s important to us. 20 minutes is short…easy….about the time it would take for you to take a walk around the block. Or a shower. Or a phone conversation. Less than the time it takes to watch a television program. This conversation has been going on for more than 2 days. What is 20 minutes once a day for 3 days going to cost you? Absolutely nothing. But you’re not even willing to do that.

And getting the answers to your questions is also relative. Rather than write down what Michael Graham said–as you suggest–for me to transcribe it–would take too much of MY VALUABLE TIME. You haven’t proven to me that you’re worth that.

I challenged you to take the initiative to find the answers you seek.

You failed the challenge.

Next.

By: jcrue

jcrue — Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:52:54 +0000

sorry about the typos:

“In this case, there may be complaints about the plays being called in,…”