Nobody has mentioned the bright code-pink color of this outfit. Do you think it’s a coincidence? I don’t.
Hillary Wants To Protect Your Privacy
Yeah, right. One of her goals is to get us off the internet. She was invited but snubbed the Kosfest in Vegas because I don’t believe she wants to recognize the legitimacy of anyone including those of her own stripe on the internet.
From the DNC’s Associated Press:
This is another case of Rod’em giving us the shaft. This bill SOUNDS great; but the purpose is just the opposite of what it sounds. We should never forget the true personality of this woman…spelled out very intimately in Peggy Noonan’s book…and others. She is determined not to even acknowledge bloggers, because her goal for the internet is to shut down our free speech.
Ms. Rodham has yet to explain how she came to have 500 background files from the FBI on Republicans in her possession, but then again. She has stated in no uncertain terms-she’s going to take things away from us for our own good.
So that’s the first little tidbit about Rod’em that I find interesting, but now there’s a second issue -and that’s her appearance and speech mentioned at Hot Air and at Frontpage Magazine.
In her speech, she does some artful dodging about her position on things like Iraq; with Code Pinksters heckling her when she said ‘we must support our troops’. I have no doubt what she actually meant by that, knowing how she and her husband felt about our troops back when the two of them were sitting in the catbird seat in the Whitehouse.
What Hillary Actually Said by Ben Johnson is up at Frontpage magazine and well worth the read, with the links and references. He starts it out with this:
Media spinmeisters have claimed Hillary Clinton showed her mettle Tuesday during her keynote address to the “Take Back America†conference, daringly baiting her party’s leftist base with her “hawkish,†“centrist†Iraq policy. Norman Solomon called the speech “premature triangulation.†In fact, the fringe crowd repeatedly cheered her on, because Hillary slavishly followed leftist talking points from start to finish. It was the most servile “Sister Souljah moment†in history.
Hot Air has her Hate America speech here. And the moonbats have gone wild, in typical fashion, blaming Michelle for the post, when it was Bryan who posted it, and other ridiculous inaccurate accusations. It’s worth watching these videos for that alone.
I think it’s hilarious-and for a couple of days I think I might play some Paul Shanklin ditties devoted to Hillary and her husband the rapist.
Cao,I have a question,and I’m not trying be fecitious here,but,I keep hearing all these stories about Ms.Broaderick that many on the right jumped on early,I was supscious of her because I’ve seen and you have to a bunch of women cry wolf claiming they got raped only to find out,that they lied and ruined people’s lives,because I never heard of this woman having a rape kit test done on her and why did she take so long to speak out!Me, personally,Clinton doesn’t frighten me at all,any man that is henpecked as he is,what can he do,if Ms.Broaderick was threatened why didn’t she report this sooner and also,the cops can’t always be reliable in situations like this,she should’ve went the old school route and cracked his ribs or skull with a high heeled shoe or something,the women in my family had to do something like that,and the men wound up behaving themselves after that!:roll:
Read this from Newsmax.
Basically, Broaddrick was brutally raped by Clinton in an Arkansas hotel room…leaving her bruised and broken. And rape cases like this one that involve a powerful man who has been able to get away with that behavior for a very long time while his wife knew about it and who has also had accomplices who enable him to continue this behavior along the way, not the least of which is his wife, it is just a difficult thing. Rape cases are difficult when they play themselves out in court; and the person who suffers most is the victim, having to relive the incident over and over again on the stand and during cross examination.
Here’s a brief description from Carl Limbacher on the rape charge coverup from 1998:
There is more, but needless to say, the DNC’s media wasn’t overanxious to put this all over the front pages, which is where it should have been. But the other part of this is how it really affected this poor woman, and how his brutalizing her has haunted her. It is not an easy thing to do to step forward and relive these events when lawyers are trying to tear down your reputation…and paint you as a ***** or a ****.
Anyway, Clinton was exposed as a purjurer, but ‘rape’ is a word the democrats prefer not to use. But they also don’t want to use the word ‘adulterer’ or ‘purjurer’ where Clinton is concerned…even ‘impeached’ doesn’t appeal to them…Clinton threw a party on the Whitehouse lawn, considering it a badge of honor.
He is disgusting. Men like this who take advantage of women on a regular basis-use their strength and other means to overpower and keep their victims victimized. Who knows what the actual circumstances were–but if he left marks on her–which required ice to bruises that were visible–then this is no ‘date rape’ scenario. And how dare he use his power and influence over women like that! What a pig!
At least she didn’t end up in an oldsmobile at the bottom of a lake…there are several democrats who have skated (and distanced themselves) from some pretty awful deeds and affiliations…Robert Byrd is another.
Thanks for the information,I know with the press you have to skeptical,but,the last straw with him for me personally,was Monica Lewinsky,that was it for me and the beginning of seeing them for what they are.And now I’m even more convinced not to trust them,It is amazing how the feminazi’s defend him in his behavior,but,they will railroad our service Academies with all this good for nothing but destruction social engineering and they have said nothing about women in the muslim world being victimized by those evil men and murderous religion of theirs,typical of the left,they take the easy way and never try to attempt to take on anything difficult.Them left has no shame,and no brains,and I’m glad not be associated with such a bunch of losers.
What I find is amazing is–Islamofascists would kill those that stand with leftists–adulterers, ****, thieves, murderers, etc-yet it’s leftists who support them and defend them.
I’m convinced, liberalism is a mental disorder…