I’m convinced, liberalism is a mental disorder…

Basically, Broaddrick was brutally raped by Clinton in an Arkansas hotel room…leaving her bruised and broken. And rape cases like this one that involve a powerful man who has been able to get away with that behavior for a very long time while his wife knew about it and who has also had accomplices who enable him to continue this behavior along the way, not the least of which is his wife, it is just a difficult thing. Rape cases are difficult when they play themselves out in court; and the person who suffers most is the victim, having to relive the incident over and over again on the stand and during cross examination.

Here’s a brief description from Carl Limbacher on the rape charge coverup from 1998:

There were four witnesses who told NBC that Broaddrick had revealed to them years ago that Clinton had brutally raped her in 1978. One was a nurse who told NBC that she tended to Broaddrick after the assault, applying ice to the victim’s bruised face and badly swollen lips. It was right after the attack that Broaddrick first revealed the rape, telling the nurse that Clinton had *** with her “against her will,” NBC reported. ABC News released a statement from Broaddrick friend Phillip Yoakum, who identified the nurse as Norma Rogers.

On Monday, March 30, the London Telegraph reported that investigators working for Paula Jones had tape-recorded an interview with Broaddrick, where the alleged rape victim revealed that she had suffered “a traumatic encounter” with Bill Clinton that “turned her life upside down” — causing her to flee from Arkansas to California for a lengthy period. Broaddrick would not go into more detail, said the Telegraph, because she did not want to “relive her ordeal.”

The paper reported that Ken Starr had subpoenaed the Jones team’s Broaddrick audiotape, along with Broaddrick herself, as part of his Monica Lewinsky investigation.

But then two things happened that gave reporters an excuse to drop the story, which they did in a heartbeat. First, journalists acquiesced to White House arguments that Broaddrick’s sworn denial of the Clinton assault proved that the charge was baseless. And second, just days after the story broke, Judge Susan Webber Wright dismissed the Paula Jones case.

There is more, but needless to say, the DNC’s media wasn’t overanxious to put this all over the front pages, which is where it should have been. But the other part of this is how it really affected this poor woman, and how his brutalizing her has haunted her. It is not an easy thing to do to step forward and relive these events when lawyers are trying to tear down your reputation…and paint you as a ***** or a ****.

Anyway, Clinton was exposed as a purjurer, but ‘rape’ is a word the democrats prefer not to use. But they also don’t want to use the word ‘adulterer’ or ‘purjurer’ where Clinton is concerned…even ‘impeached’ doesn’t appeal to them…Clinton threw a party on the Whitehouse lawn, considering it a badge of honor.

He is disgusting. Men like this who take advantage of women on a regular basis-use their strength and other means to overpower and keep their victims victimized. Who knows what the actual circumstances were–but if he left marks on her–which required ice to bruises that were visible–then this is no ‘date rape’ scenario. And how dare he use his power and influence over women like that! What a pig!

At least she didn’t end up in an oldsmobile at the bottom of a lake…there are several democrats who have skated (and distanced themselves) from some pretty awful deeds and affiliations…Robert Byrd is another.