<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vulgar Kid Rock to Perform at Inauguration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caosblog.com/archives/859/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/859</link>
	<description>Righteous Politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cao</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/859#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Cao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/2005/01/13/vulgar-kid-rock-to-perform-at-inauguration/#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>Just a few words on the old WMD story...although as usual, a lib has changed the subject from the original post.  I know this is way off-topic for the comments on this post, but here is more information on the WMD story-

Click &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pardonmyenglish.com/archives/2005/01/13/oh-absolutely/#more-1373&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;

Wait a minute hereâ€¦ if you are going to say that President Bush was wrong, you should add at the bare minimum the following names: Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Tom Daschle, Robert Byrd, Carl Levin, Bob Graham, and of course Nancy Pelosi. All these aforementioned Democrats, and many others have at one time or another made statements saying that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction, or had them. (See Glenn Beckâ€™s â€œ&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml&quot;&gt;What Did The Democrats Say About Iraqâ€™s WMDs&lt;/a&gt;â€). As youâ€™ll see, many of these statements were made before George W. Bush was even elected President. The information these Democrats used to make these statements about Iraqi WMDs came the same place that gave them the information to say similar statements years later after President Bush came to office.

&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:78%;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few words on the old WMD story&#8230;although as usual, a lib has changed the subject from the original post.  I know this is way off-topic for the comments on this post, but here is more information on the WMD story-</p>
<p>Click <a href="http://www.pardonmyenglish.com/archives/2005/01/13/oh-absolutely/#more-1373">here</a> and <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml">here.</a></p>
<p>Wait a minute hereâ€¦ if you are going to say that President Bush was wrong, you should add at the bare minimum the following names: Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Tom Daschle, Robert Byrd, Carl Levin, Bob Graham, and of course Nancy Pelosi. All these aforementioned Democrats, and many others have at one time or another made statements saying that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction, or had them. (See Glenn Beckâ€™s â€œ<a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml">What Did The Democrats Say About Iraqâ€™s WMDs</a>â€). As youâ€™ll see, many of these statements were made before George W. Bush was even elected President. The information these Democrats used to make these statements about Iraqi WMDs came the same place that gave them the information to say similar statements years later after President Bush came to office.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:78%;"><em>NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.<br />
</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cao</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/859#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Cao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/2005/01/13/vulgar-kid-rock-to-perform-at-inauguration/#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>La Shawn Barber has a lot to say about that guy--&lt;a href=&quot;http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/08/armstrong/&quot;&gt;in this piece&lt;/a&gt;.

There are some real gems on both sides, I&#039;ll grant you.  Doesn&#039;t mean we all endorse every one of them across the board.  Read what LaShawn has to say.  She&#039;s not proud of that guy.   I am not a mindless moonbat, barking at the moon-I actually take a look at what people stand for, as I&#039;m sure a lot of &quot;values voters&quot; do.  I look at what they&#039;re doing and if they practice what they preach--or if they&#039;re a poor representation of the people.  And then I vote accordingly. 

For you to hold up that example after Clinton and what he perpetrated on the American public--must be embarrassing for you.  Democrats have spent at least 50 years of taking the wrong stand on every single conflict in memory &lt;a href=&quot;http://caosblog.com/archives/2004/12/27/the-progressive-left/&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;.  Without exception, they have sided with the enemy.   The release of that little-known revelation of truth (reference the Verona Project) further punctuates the point, so I can&#039;t see how the barking moonbats of Idiotaria can look any more ridiculous at any point.  We just watch and take note of it, laugh our arses off and add it to the ever growing list.  Even contrast what Rather tried to perpetrate against the president but he stuck to the story even when the story was exposed as plain out-and-out fraud, Rather didn&#039;t even lose his job immediately (as he should have) while Williams&#039; bad judgment cost him his column.  Seems like there&#039;s still quite a bit of bias here and it&#039;s bias in favor of left field.  But, of course, that&#039;s common knowlege now.

Here&#039;s an interesting little tidbit from history:  On the same day the Declaration of Independence was adopted, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson were the members of a committee to come up with a seal for the brand-new United States. They suggested an image of Israel crossing the Red Sea and Moses lit by the pillar of fire, with the motto: â€œRebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.â€ (The seal was never adopted, but a copy of the recommendation survives in the papers of the Continental Congress.)

&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:78%;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Shawn Barber has a lot to say about that guy&#8211;<a href="http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2005/01/08/armstrong/">in this piece</a>.</p>
<p>There are some real gems on both sides, I&#8217;ll grant you.  Doesn&#8217;t mean we all endorse every one of them across the board.  Read what LaShawn has to say.  She&#8217;s not proud of that guy.   I am not a mindless moonbat, barking at the moon-I actually take a look at what people stand for, as I&#8217;m sure a lot of &#8220;values voters&#8221; do.  I look at what they&#8217;re doing and if they practice what they preach&#8211;or if they&#8217;re a poor representation of the people.  And then I vote accordingly. </p>
<p>For you to hold up that example after Clinton and what he perpetrated on the American public&#8211;must be embarrassing for you.  Democrats have spent at least 50 years of taking the wrong stand on every single conflict in memory <a href="http://caosblog.com/archives/2004/12/27/the-progressive-left/">click here</a>.  Without exception, they have sided with the enemy.   The release of that little-known revelation of truth (reference the Verona Project) further punctuates the point, so I can&#8217;t see how the barking moonbats of Idiotaria can look any more ridiculous at any point.  We just watch and take note of it, laugh our arses off and add it to the ever growing list.  Even contrast what Rather tried to perpetrate against the president but he stuck to the story even when the story was exposed as plain out-and-out fraud, Rather didn&#8217;t even lose his job immediately (as he should have) while Williams&#8217; bad judgment cost him his column.  Seems like there&#8217;s still quite a bit of bias here and it&#8217;s bias in favor of left field.  But, of course, that&#8217;s common knowlege now.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting little tidbit from history:  On the same day the Declaration of Independence was adopted, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson were the members of a committee to come up with a seal for the brand-new United States. They suggested an image of Israel crossing the Red Sea and Moses lit by the pillar of fire, with the motto: â€œRebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.â€ (The seal was never adopted, but a copy of the recommendation survives in the papers of the Continental Congress.)</p>
<p><span style="font-size:78%;"><em>NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.<br />
</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben F</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/859#comment-2062</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/2005/01/13/vulgar-kid-rock-to-perform-at-inauguration/#comment-2062</guid>
		<description>Kid Rock Rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kid Rock Rocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas J</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/859#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/2005/01/13/vulgar-kid-rock-to-perform-at-inauguration/#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>Of course, Kid Rock is a staunch conservative who campaigned for W in the 2004 election and entertained the troops in Iraq.  That was why he was considered for this particular performance.  Folks may not like to admit it -- but Kid Rock is one of those &quot;values voters.&quot;  So you have to ask just what all values the GOP embraces these days.

After all, the GOP used $240,000 in taxpayer money to produce &quot;covert propaganda&quot; with Armstrong Williams, they threatened their own Ethics Chairman with firing for being so mean to Tom DeLay (who&#039;s about to be indicted), and the first act of the new Congress was to pass a rule change making it harder to investigate ethics violations of sitting Congressmen.  Sounds like Kid Rock&#039;s act would fit in perfectly with that attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Kid Rock is a staunch conservative who campaigned for W in the 2004 election and entertained the troops in Iraq.  That was why he was considered for this particular performance.  Folks may not like to admit it &#8212; but Kid Rock is one of those &#8220;values voters.&#8221;  So you have to ask just what all values the GOP embraces these days.</p>
<p>After all, the GOP used $240,000 in taxpayer money to produce &#8220;covert propaganda&#8221; with Armstrong Williams, they threatened their own Ethics Chairman with firing for being so mean to Tom DeLay (who&#8217;s about to be indicted), and the first act of the new Congress was to pass a rule change making it harder to investigate ethics violations of sitting Congressmen.  Sounds like Kid Rock&#8217;s act would fit in perfectly with that attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cao</title>
		<link>http://caosblog.com/archives/859#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Cao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caosblog.com/archives/2005/01/13/vulgar-kid-rock-to-perform-at-inauguration/#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>I am happy to hear that!  It&#039;s disgusting that kids like these gross idiotic smut generators...

&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:78%;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy to hear that!  It&#8217;s disgusting that kids like these gross idiotic smut generators&#8230;</p>
<p><span style="font-size:78%;"><em>NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.<br />
</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
