Ali Sina, an Iranian, and member of the ex-muslim movement at Faith Freedom.org, has been debating the Islamists.
Interestingly, the frightened and paranoid Islamists set up a website to counter what Ali Sina and his accomplished fellow ex-muslim apostates are writing at faithfreedom.org, and they set up faithfreedom.com
If you try to do a search (and I’m no longer going to refer to google), you’ll see they are saying that “Ali Sina is on the run”.
But in true Islamist cowardly fashion, they were full of hot air and not long after they started debating with him, they quit. They quit debating him and didn’t publish the debate on their site. So it would seem they’re on the run, not Ali Sina.
Cheers to Ali Sina and the rest of his writers at faithfreedom.org!! Why do I say this? Because the fate of an apostate is DEATH, according to sharia law. The ex-muslims at faithfreedom.org are literally defying the same death threats that the Iraqi people faced when millions of them marched to the polls in January.
Looks to me as though Zwahiri, Zarqawi and Bin Laden are going to have to figure out a different marketing technique other than beheading videos.
I discovered Ali Sina a few months ago and now I am addicted to his site and his writings. I think he is one of the greatest thinkers of our time. His courage is just one of his virtues. He is also compassionate and a true humanist. His writings are inspirational and uplifting. I hope he succeeds and I hope he is right when he says the days of Islam are numbered.
I agree with that, Observer. He and I are in personal contact. He is a good man. I also know a few of the other writers over there.
Ali Sina quit the debate with me, go and look at the website http://www.icssa.org. He capitulated and failed to put my responses.
Here is the URL in full.
This is to help people like Bar-bra Stock and the likes, she is a bit slow as she last visted the website she could not find the deabte. Her reamarks are there and you can go an see and have a laugh.
Mr. Zakaria, your responses are posted as one piece in your own column but of course they are not coherent and that is your problem. Your utterly incoherent responses are published twice, once as one piece and then paragraph by paragraph where I respond to them and a third time when you post them directly in the forum. In all fairness I do not have to publish them at all. You are not publishing mine, so why I should give you preferential treatment? You are assuming that I am a dhimmi and demanding compliance while you do not feel any obligation to return the favor. This is how you Muslims arrogantly have been treating your hosts, demanding especial privileges as if you are already their masters and they are your vassals. Had you not been so ridiculous in your ‘rebuttals’ I would not have posted them at all in retaliation or you not publishing my responses. But I can’t let go of this much gobbledygook that you have written and hence it does not matter if you don’t publish my rebuttals and are afraid to provide a link to this debate, I will publish yours with pleasure nonetheless.
The person who is dishonest is you because you not only do not post my responses in your site at all, you even do not give any reference to our debate when you post your diatribe against me in other Islamic sites. Are you afraid that people read our debate and see what an embarrassment you have been?
You say I should be ashamed for calling my relative stupid. I said I was obliged to perform the stupid prayer to show my deference for him. He is like an uncle to me and commands my respect. You are certainly a pathetic liar. The only person who must be ashamed is you who broke his word and divulged the content of an email that we both agreed would be off the record. You are a man that can’t be trusted. You lie and you break your promises. You are a true follower of Muhammad and you emulate him in every respect including treason.
Mr. Zakaria, I don’t see any reason why I should pursue this further. You are, as Ali says, an embarrassment to “free thinkers” everywhere, but I’m certain you are following the teachings of Mohammed because “truthfulness” is not a well-known trait of Islam, rather, making Islam dominant in America is, at whatever cost. I am sure that your writings at Al Jazeera are being cheered by the jihadis across the world, but those of us who want to keep our freedom do not think very well of Al Jazeera, its propaganda being well-known as simply the Voice Of Al Qaeda. Islam is no “religion of peace” since all you offer is people whose hatred for the west is bigger than their love for their own children, men who hide behind women and children and can’t face the enemy like men, and men who beat their wives and a culture who beats women if they show their arms in public. Sharia law and all that it brings with it is a despicable form of facism that should be extinguished. I will be fighting it as long as I’m alive, and I will be sharing what people like you really represent to the world and spreading the truth. Just like Ali Sina. Thank God for him and all the writers at faithfreedom.org
He has a point here, “I already clarified this point. I said people must be free to believe in any fairytale they like. However if their fairytale tells them they should kill othres, then that fairytale must be stopped.”
Does Islam or does Islam not condone murdering us infidels?
Mr. Zakaria, I hate to tell you but you loss the debate miserably. At the end you appear to be acting more in defense than in a spirited debate. A typical ploy of one without a leg to stand on.
Ali: “It is Islam that teaches moral relativism. Rape is bad but rape of the disbelievers is good. Murder is bad but Murder of kafirs is divine.”
I couldn’t keep going but this moral relativism is also demonstrated but the concpet that the Arabian Pennisula is thought inviolable and an area where only Islam can be practiced. But if any nation on earth prohibits Islam, it is subject to attack.
[...] );
5/26/2005
Our good buddy Cao
verses the al-Jazeera guy. Go weigh in. And if you have the stomach, check his website for how evil you are.
Sa [...]
How clever . . . “send us feedback in email” so that we can ignore, edit, distort, propagandize, or outright lie. Of course, lying is not a new strategy among jidhadis and, lets face it, among the least of their sins. I feel confident that these monsters will burn in hell for all the suffering they’ve forced on human kind, including the defenseless in their own families.
Mr. Zakaria,
You were defeated by Mr. Sina and lost the debate miserably. That match is over and you are the loser. Sina is not considering you anymore as his rival. You simply don’t measure up. Now you can shout as much as you want. In my opinion, he is doing the right thing by ignoring you. Frankly, you are not of his caliber. You proved to be a man incapable of understanding logics and making rational arguments. Instead of defending Islam you attacked the Golden Rule. This is enough for us. A man who dose not understand the Golden Rule, not only lacks ethical values but also commonsense.