A great book that GREEN EAGLE, who is obsessed and sexually excited by the thought of the Nazis being gay- ought to pick up.

It’s also a movie that was made in 2004 from the book.

A review at Amazon reads:

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars EXCELLENT DOCUMENTARY, December 17, 2007
By J. DeMeo “naturalenergyworks” (Ashland, OR USA)

Understandably nobody wants to “claim Hitler” as a part of their social construct or world view. But facts are facts, and what’s related here — taken also together with the info in the The Hidden Hitler, about which this documentary is focused — is powerful evidence. Not only evidence for “der fuhrer’s” youthful romps with other men, his later vainglory in the “men’s world” of the WW-I trench warfare, but later in the “muscular homoerotocism” of the Third Reich itself. Not to mention his SA units who were led by the openly homosexual Röhm, and whose units were known to commit pedophilic rapes and drunken homosexual street parties which was costing “der fuhrer” some of his popular support. Another work to consider is Pink Swastika which is hated by the gay movement, but also provides even more supporting detail. Hitler condemns the Jews, capitalists, Bolsheveks, Americans, British, etc., in his “Mein Kampf”, but says nothing about homosexuality. Homosexuals later in the Third Reich were interned into the concentration camps — but only the softer males. The leather-clad S&M phallic-aggressive macho sexual predators who also inhabited the German homosexual scene rose to high positions in the Third Reich, and occupied roles in the machinery of death and destruction. If I could fault this documentary, it is only that it spends too much time apologizing for the implications of Machtan’s findings, for the facts of Hitler’s and the Nazi movements homoerotic aspects. There are plenty of interviews with leading homosexual scholars and gay-rights advocates, denouncing Machtan and his findings but without giving clarity about why (other than they don’t want Hitler identified as homosexual), but not one interview with those who agree with Machtan. One important question raised in the documentary, and which remains unanswered, is “why out of over 100,000 books published about Hitler and the Third Reich is this aspect of his sexual life almost never mentioned?”

To the contrary; there are plenty of books and articles that reveal the Third Reich’s proclivity toward homosexuality; but my favorite is the Pink Swastika and articles written by Judith Reisman.

Socialists are willfully blind to the facts; but you can see the similarities and even the Nazi symbolism in the modern day gay culture. There is a reason for that.

“EPA SILENCES A CRITIC”-The professional penalty for offering a contrary view to elites like Al Gore is a smear campaign.

Read the whole thing at the link above; it explains a little bit about Hansen, who Climate Progress tends to put on some kind of a pedestal because Hansen has been a devoted toadie to the Church of Global warming. “Endangerment” where carbon is concerned allows the EPA to categorize CO2 as a pollutant, and gives the agency the power to regulate it, regardless of what happens with Cap & Trade in the Senate. Pesky and persistent, aren’t they?

And ridiculous! The EPA is making some ballsy moves with regard to CO2, but they’re also trying really hard to regulate WATER, says Heartland:

A watershed is usually thought of as a ridge of high land dividing two areas drained by different river systems. EPA, however, adopts a broader definition. A watershed, says the agency, is the “area of land that catches rain and snow and drains or seeps into a marsh, stream, river, lake, or groundwater.”

The water in an EPA “watershed” originates as rain or snow that subsequently melts, then enters the water table by one of several means. It may permeate soil or porous rock, percolate through other rocks, or, if it lands on igneous rock or concrete, flow across the impermeable surface until it finds an opportunity to enter the water table.

Now that part sounds maybe even sensible, although its a little bit odd that “watershed” starts with rain or snow. And then you get here and you realize just what the intent is:

“No matter where you live, you live in a watershed,” states EPA very matter-of-factly.

Everywhere except the interior of one’s home, and sometimes even that’s under water! Therefore, any water running over or under your land, carrying away rock, soil, sediment, nutrients, oil, grease, bacteria, anything off your property, is seen by EPA as a contribution to water pollution somewhere, an interpretation that could make everyone in the country a polluter.

Hmmm. What do you suppose the possible ramifications of that could be, HMM? Do you suppose we could be taxed according to the amount of waterfall we get in a year? It’s another power grab, and more hands in our pockets looking for coinage.

I would imagine like most of these loopy leftist laws, something like penalizing you for the rainfall your neighborhood gets will be selectively enforced. Regulating Water and CO2 is just plain nuts, but so was the feigned outrage aimed at Carlin, and moreso than I’d previously thought. Back to the WSJ article:

The Bush administration’s great sin, for the record, was daring to issue reports that laid out the administration’s official position on global warming. That the reports did not contain the most doomsday predictions led to howls that the Bush politicals were suppressing and ignoring career scientists.

The Carlin dustup falls into a murkier category. Unlike annual reports, the Obama EPA’s endangerment finding is a policy act. As such, EPA is required to make public those agency documents that pertain to the decision, to allow for public comment. Court rulings say rulemaking records must include both “the evidence relied upon and the evidence discarded.” In refusing to allow Mr. Carlin’s study to be circulated, the agency essentially hid it from the docket.

Unable to defend the EPA’s actions, the climate-change crew — , led by anonymous EPA officials — is doing what it does best: trashing Mr. Carlin as a “denier.” He is, we are told, “only” an economist (he in fact holds a degree in physics from CalTech). It wasn’t his “job” to look at this issue (he in fact works in an office tasked with “informing important policy decisions with sound economics and other sciences.”) His study was full of sham science. (The majority of it in fact references peer-reviewed studies.) Where’s Mr. Hansen and his defense of scientific freedom when you really need him?

Mr. Carlin is instead an explanation for why the science debate is little reported in this country. The professional penalty for offering a contrary view to elites like Al Gore is a smear campaign.

Yeah, where is Hansen now?

The blog “Climate Progress” is all over attacking Alan Carlin, the 25 year veteran with the EPA who has a BS in physics; not mentioning either of those as qualifications but attacking him for being ‘an economist’ and ‘plagiarist’ for lifting parts from what Climate Progress calls ‘deep climate’ but appears to be called ‘world climate report’. But - what is more curious is the complete omission of any mention of the man who co-authored the report with Carlin, John Davidson.

From page 81 of the 2009 Draft:

About the Comments

This report has been prepared by the National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE) to the EPA Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation, which is a part of the Office of the Administrator. It was authored by Alan Carlin and John Davidson of NCEE and in part builds on three previous reports Carlin (2007), Carlin (2007a), and Carlin (2008).

So we know now upon closer examination that Climate Progress’s claims have little bearing on the facts. First, there is no mention of Carlin’s previous reports; second, no mention of Carlin’s expertise beyond “economist”; and third, complete omission of the contributions of Davidson to the report.

Why is that?

When perusing Carlin and Davidson’s 98-page report I was wondering which one of these men inserted the ‘plagiarized’ sections from the “Deep Climate aka “World Climate Report” blog that Climate Progress is so upset about, despite the fact that leftists plagiarize and receive no consequences for it. In fact, I’ve seen bloggers writing in support of plagiarists such as the Huffpo Plagiarist, Obama himself, Joe Biden and others. Gee, one of my main critics is the writer of the “Thinking Meat” website who is also harping on the plagiarism meme and making fun of me for picking up on the suppression of the EPA report. How one is connected to the other I don’t know.

But it’s even more ironic when you realize that “Thinking Meat” is plagiarized from a short story by Terry Bisson, the socialist science fiction writer. But rules don’t apply to them; I’ve known that since Mary Jo Kopechne was found dead in the Oldsmobile but Ted Kennedy’s political life continued without a hiccup. They seem to take this in stride, as I recall Ted Kennedy’s Portugese Water Dog was named “Splash”.

So meatbrain the plagiarist is making fun of me for picking up on the EPA suppression story because it doesn’t fit within the Church of Global Warming’s agenda. Are you laughing yet? And yet meatbrain - who is as dumb as a rock - lifted from “Climate Progress” the part about plagiarism, and didn’t bother to read the report. Meatbrain in all his infinite leftyworld wisdom, neglected to notice that Davidson was left out of the smear against Carlin.

Why is that?

Davidson’s bio cites “Emerging environmental issues” as part of his Current Research Interests, in addition to “Environmental Innovation”. His Job Title is “Environmental Scientist”, the EPA Division/Office is “Innovation and Emerging Challenges Division”. Davidson is also a veteran of the EPA, having joined the progran in 1983.

And get this: Davidson has a Ph.D. in Physics, having received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1972.

This man is no slouch! Why no mention of him by Climate Progress? Did they not read the report, or are they cherry picking talking points?

Previous Experience:

• Staff Member for Energy Programs, Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C.
• Staff Member, Energy Policy Project, Ford Foundation, Washington, D.C.
• Postdoctoral Scholar, Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Selected Publications:

• Global Energy Futures and the Carbon Dioxide Problem, Council on Environmental Quality, 1981, staff coauthor.
• Energy chapters of Environmental Quality, Council on Environmental Quality, 1976-1980, staff coauthor.
• A Time to Choose: America’s Energy Future, Report of the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation, Ballinger Publishing Co., 1974, staff coauthor.

Now what drew my attention is that he wrote a Report of the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation.

The Ford Foundation has an extremely long resume of leftist causes, meticulously documented at Discover the Networks.

There is something very odd about the crafting of the plagiarism argument against only one of the two authors of the “Proposed NCEE Comments on Draft Technical Support Document for Endangerment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act” - the 98 page report that the EPA suppressed.

So what qualifies someone as an expert in the Church of Global Warming? That you accept the theory unquestioningly? That you apply the “new scientific method”? Is that what gets you in? It appears so.

Congress Votes for Bad Weather by Harry Jackson, Jr. at Townhall.com-

He starts off with how this will affect GNP and the economy in general and other concerns. The entire article is worth a read, but the part about how it will negatively affect the most vulnerable among us is the most disturbing to me:

…cap and trade will affect the poorest of the poor in America. In a manner of speaking it is a regressive tax. Let me explain. Because the poor spend more proportionally on energy than others, their disposable income will decrease because of energy costs. Our poorest citizens spend up to 50 percent of their limited income on energy, while the average American spends only 5-10 percent of their income. In comparison to their rich suburban counterparts, poor families are sometimes forced to make serious choices between food, medicine or fuel. As a result of this dilemma, 8 percent of households with incomes between $33,500 and $55,000 have had their electricity shut off this year due to non-payment. Those living in rural areas of the country are being squeezed even harder. They tend to have older vehicles that are less fuel-efficient. Pickup trucks are common because they work part or full time in agricultural jobs. It takes a larger percentage of a person’s income for transportation in rural areas because of longer rural commutes.

It’s not only the poor that will be hit hard, it’s EVERYONE - but then he spells out in poll numbers that black people are against this regressive taxation:

The third reason I am against cap and trade has to do with the felt needs of the average minority citizen. “An overwhelming majority of African-Americans want Congress to fix the economy before turning its attention to climate change,” said David Ridenour, Vice President of the National Center for Public Policy Research. A recent national poll which included 80% self-identified Democrats produced fascinating results: 76 percent of African-Americans want Congress to make economic recovery instead of climate change its top priority. The same study says that 56 percent of the respondents believe that policymakers have failed to consider “economic and quality of life concerns of the black community.” Finally, over 70 percent of the respondents don’t want to pay more for gasoline or electricity.

Does anyone? America is the only country in the world where the poorest people have air conditioning - but don’t worry, that’s about to change and we’ll be exactly like the rest of the socialist regimes in the world.

WorldNetDaily article entitled “EPA’s own research expert ’shut up’ on climate change-Government analyst silenced after he critiques CO2 findings”

And from the Competitive Enterprise Institute: “CEI Releases Global Warming Study Censored by EPA-The Public Shouldn’t Be Kept in the Dark by an Agency Supposedly Committed to Transparency”

Well of course they should! This is the age of the Marxist Comrade Obama the “lightworker” where “transparency” means the exact opposite of its dictionary meaning! Where liberal doublespeak is rampant! Where “just words” are “just words”-and “Stimulus” means its opposite! Occasionally the dhimmicrats makes devastating slips that are completely wiped away as if they never happened!

Just like Nazi Germany. And just like Nazi Germany, they are pro homosexual and cover it up - just like Nazi Germany, they are blind greens that promote failed energy sources like wind power that don’t exist in the private sector. As a matter of fact, for every government-generated green job, three jobs are lost in the private sector, and that is precisely the goal of these elitists; to destroy the fabric of our lives, and tell us how to live, what to say, and what to think.

Here is a pdf of the internal EPA document entitled “Proposed NCEE Comments on Draft Technical Support Document for Endangerment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Clean Air Act” that the EPA refused to allow into the light.

It starts out

“We have become increasingly concerned that EPA and many other agencies and countries have paid too little attention to the science of global warming. EPA and others have tended to accept the findings reached by outside groups, particularly the IPCC and the CCSP, as being correct without a careful and critical examination of their conclusions and documentation. If they should be found to be incorrect at a later date, however, and EPA is found not to have made a really careful review of them before reaching its decision on endangerment, it appears likely that it is EPA rather than these other groups that may be blamed for this error.

We do not maintain that we or anyone else have all the answers needed to take action now. Some of the conclusions reached in these comments may well be shown to be incorrect by future research. Our conclusions do represent the best science in the sense of most closely corresponding to available observations that we currently know of, however, and are sufficiently at variance with those of the IPCC, CCSP and the Draft TSD that we believe they support our increasing concern that EPA has not critically reviewd the findings by these other groups.”

Then it goes on to summarize what a lot of us have been saying for some time (each point is elaborated on in greater detail in the document):

• Global temperatures have declined.
• The consensus on current, past and future Atlantic hurricane behavior has changed.
• The idea that warming temperatures will cause Greenland to rapidly shed its ice has been greatly diminished by new results indicating little evidence for the operation of such processes.
• One of the worst economic recessions since World War II has greatly decreased GHG emissions compared to the assumptions made by the IPCC.
• A new 2009 paper finds that the crucial assumption in the GCM models used by the IPCC concerning strongly positive feedback from water vapor is not supported by empirical evidence and that the feedback is actually negative.

Read the whole thing; it’s an eye opener, but not anything new, really. What’s new is how overt the suppression of real science is, which is so very reminiscent of Lyzenko biology in the Soviet Union.

This is eerily famliar; he’s sending his kids to private - not public - schools, too.

From ABC comes a very revealing admission from Barack Hussein Obama:

Dr. Orrin Devinsky, a neurologist and researcher at the New York University Langone Medical Center, said that elites often propose health care solutions that limit options for the general public, secure in the knowledge that if they or their loves ones get sick, they will be able to afford the best care available, even if it’s not provided by insurance.

Devinsky asked the president pointedly if he would be willing to promise that he wouldn’t seek such extraordinary help for his wife or daughters if they became sick and the public plan he’s proposing limited the tests or treatment they can get.

The president refused to make such a pledge, though he allowed that if “it’s my family member, if it’s my wife, if it’s my children, if it’s my grandmother, I always want them to get the very best care.

Well of course he refused; he’s not an idiot! He just thinks the rest of us are idiots! And here’s the money quote:

The president said he understood the American people “know they’re living with the devil, but the devil they know instead of the devil they don’t.”

Yeah, Obama’s the devil, all right….and more people know what he is than the DNC’s Goebbels style propaganda dares to reveal.

This is just in sane, but you can expect it from someone like Axelrod; he’s the one that WRITES the speeches that promise the opposite of what we get.

Obama Aide: Second Stimulus Package Possible

So he says let’s wait until the fall to see where we are…LOL

Yeah let’s wait so that we can do more of the same to make sure it gets worse.

What a surprise. From the Washington Times: Conyers Abandons Acorn Probe

“The powers that be decided against it,” Mr. Conyers told The Washington Times.

The chairman declined to elaborate, shrugging off questions about who told him how to run his committee and give the Democrat-allied group a pass.

Of course, people are perfectly capable of filling in the blanks.

Why don’t the elitists send their children to public schools?

Why doesn’t Obama want to send his family to government doctors under Obamacare?

Why don’t the elitists collect social security like the rest of us and why don’t they pay into social security?

I’ll tell you why - because it’s all garbage if it’s run by the government. Just look at how the post office and the DMV are run…and the cuts in services while they keep ratcheting up prices.

This is totally bogus….!

It’s redistribution of wealth, all right…but I haven’t given them permis

Obama plays hardball with watchdogs.

Gerald Walpin has quickly become the most famous of the three inspector generals who’ve left their jobs in recent weeks, exposing what appears to be a pattern of pressure from the Obama administration.

In radio and television interviews, the silver-haired 77-year-old former AmeriCorps IG has certainly contradicted insinuations of senility that administration officials made in defending the quit-or-be-fired ultimatum that Walpin said he received on June 11. On Tuesday, Walpin released a letter signed by more than 140 allies — including a former White House counsel to President Clinton — attesting that they have never seen him “confused” or “disoriented,” as the administration claims he appeared to be at a May 20 meeting.

This was a famous tactic of the Nazi regime - relegating its political opponents to mental asylums.

We’ve seen his brand of poliics before; punishing political opponents and predecessors…in communist countries.

It’s only going to get worse if we don’t find some way to stop him…

Polls: Obama’s Disapproval Rate Growing

Rasmussen Presidential Poll for June 22, 2009.

You’d have to be dumb as a rock not to see what’s happening, but I’ve still heard that lame old mantra about how Obama inherited a disaster from Bush. Are these useful idiots or what?

Rasmussen poll findings:

# Only 46% of respondents think Obama is doing an excellent or good job with the economy.

# Just 30% say they trust Obama to handle the economic crisis.

# 60% of voters now trust their own judgment on economic issues more than the president’s.

# 51% of voters favor an across-the-board tax cut for all Americans to stimulate the economy.

# 45% of voters trust the Republicans more to handle the economy, while 39 percent trust the Democrats more.

# 50% those polled agree that the economy is getting worse, and only 25% think it is getting better.

# A majority of those polled, 56%, have an unfavorable view of Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and 34% have a favorable view. Just 27% have a favorable view of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Except for Fox, of course, which leftists in general hate because it presents another point of view.

Only one point of view is acceptable for leftists: theirs.

NBC is consantly pandering to the administration with fawning coverage because GE is its parent company, hoping for more government contracts from Obama.

Glenn Beck interviews Bill O’Reilly and discusses how the conflicts of interest between NBC and General Electric are affecting the way politics are reported on NBC news affiliates.

Links:
[1] Google Finance - General Electric Company http://www.google.com/finance?q=GE
[2] Business and Media - Liberals Complain, CNBC Caves In-Business network goes from inspiring anti-tax ‘tea parties’ to adding left-wingers like Dean, Huffington. http://businessandmedia.org/articles/200…
[3] Newsbusters: Garofalo: Tea Party Goers Are Racists Who Hate Black President http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=cu…
[4] Washington Examiner: Obama’s hidden bailout of General Electrichttp://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politi…
[5] “Green is Universal” http://www.greenisuniversal.com/

ABC is another propaganda machine for Obama-! Who needs the White House Press corps when ABC devotes hours of news coverage to the president’s health care ripoff plan, televises a primetime rigged “town hall” “discussion” that only includes Obama’s supporters on Health Care- called “Questions for the President: Prescription for America” and anchors its nightly “World News” program from inside the White House?
ABC says no to Republican ads during Obama Health Care Propaganda Special.

But we’re just supposed to ignore all this and admit that FOX NEWS is EVIL….because except for FOX, Obama doesn’t receive any criticism from those who worship him at the state run media.

Study: ABC, NBC, CBS strongly support Obama (August, 2008)

A comprehensive analysis of every evening news report by the NBC, ABC and CBS television networks on Barack Obama since he came to national prominence concludes coverage of the Illinois senator has “bordered on giddy celebration
of a political ‘rock star’ rather than objective newsgathering.”

The new study by the Media Research Center, which tracks bias in the media, is summarized on the organization’s website, where the full report also has been published. It reveals that positive stories about Obama over that time outnumbered negative stories 7-1, and significant controversies such as Obama’s relationship with a convicted Chicago man have been largely ignored.

Rich Noyes, the research director for the MRC, told WND Obama has “always received very positive press from the national media,” and that was a “huge boost to anyone seeking a national political career.”

It’s the same now as it was then, which is why their viewers are turning elsewhere. There’s just so much of this commie propaganda a person can take. But it’s the reason why the documentary came out entitled Media Malpractice: How Obama Got Elected.

This was referred to by the Anchoress and Stop the ACLU back in 2008 (but I can’t find the links right now)- and all around the internet, but it’s worthy of taking another look at it, in view of what’s been happening with “Lightworker” aka Chairman Zero and his Politboro lately. This was sent to me through email by my dad.

Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.. (originally appeared in the Orlando Sentinal.)

545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices, a total of 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.

If the Army and Marines are in IRAQ, it’s because they want them in IRAQ.

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people and they alone, are responsible. They and they alone, have the power. They and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

That is, provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees. We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

At Faultline, the explanation, by JD Longstreet.

In the bad ole days of the Soviet Union, it was ruled by the Politburo. The Politburo functioned as the central policymaking and governing body of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The body was made up of the top members of the Central Committee. In theory, it acted as the political bureau (hence Politburo) of the Central Committee, elected by them to direct the Party between the sessions of the committee and with a mandate that only covered the Party. The Politburo was responsible to, and its membership was subject to, the approval of the Central Committee.

We tell you this just in case you might be wondering where our socialist President, Comrade Obama, got the idea for all those Czars he has appointed who seem to answer to no one but Obama. Well, now you know!

Check this out. It is from the blog, “Facts not Fantasy”, of my friend Alan Caruba. It reads as follows: “I would argue that a President who appoints over twenty “czars” to supersede the powers of the secretaries of various federal departments; people who are apparently exempt from Congressional approval or oversight, and people who apparently do not feel the need to hold press conferences to explain what they are doing, is distinctly unconstitutional.It will be argued that there have been various such “czars” in the past, mostly particularly “drug czars” whose purpose was to oversee and coordinate efforts to address the nation’s problems with illegal drugs, but the imposition of people to virtually replace members of the President’s cabinet is unprecedented. Cabinet officers must receive the approval of Congress, but these “czars” have not. We recommend you read the entire article titled:” Time to Demand Obama’s Resignation”. You’ll find it HERE.

I happen to agree with Mr. Caruba that America cannot wait until 2012 to rid ourselves of Mr. Obama. I sincerely doubt the country will even have elections that year. I suspect that if something isn’t done, the country will be in such bad shape elections will be “postponed” until some later date. Your guess is as good as mind as to when that “later date” might occur.

It’s good to see that someone else recognizes the sorry fact that we might never even have another election…but even if there is one, it will be a rigged one (as if the last one wasn’t?) like the one in Iran. And I daresay he won’t be as accepting of “dissent” at that point as he’s been thus far–so much more of his Soviet-style government will be in place.

Read the rest-excellent.

One point that he made that I find intrigueing is - what is the Constitutionality of his appointing 20 something Czars that report only to the President and replace Cabinet and other positions? In effect, he’s created his own Politboro -which begs the question, then, who belongs to the “Central Committee”?

Nobody’s “guessing” when they say that the unemployment rate is at a 25-year high.

Nobody is “guessing” when they say that 6 million jobs have been lost; over 600,000 in January alone-that $1.2 trillion of Americans’ personal wealth has gone down the crapper - which interestingly enough parallels the stimulus package figure that they “sold” us under dishonest cirumcstances.

It’s not socialism it’s not socialism - just repeat that and it’ll be true.

What kind of jackass is this. The stimiulus is the biggest dumbest move made by the U.S. government that I can recall in the whole history of the United States; New Deal, Social Security, Amnesty for Illegals included.

And in the end, when those infrastructure type projects are done, those people who were employed on them-on our dime, mind you - not in the private sector where real wealth is built-will be unemployed AGAIN, and we’ll be further behind the 8-ball! Any numbskull can figure THAT out.

And I wonder…what private sector job have any of these government bureacrats had in their lives, or are they all idiots spending our money - who’ve made an entire career out of doing just that?

I’m starting to think that not only should government officials have a limit to how many years they can “serve”, they should also have some kind of requirement for having worked a real J.O.B. in the private sector in order to appreciate capitalism.

No economists (other than an idiot out of Berkeley or enthusiasts for Soviet style Central Planning)- have come out solidly behind this thing ; it’s diametrically opposed to capitalism and what has made this nation great for the past 233 years. It’s been government bureacrats who are having wet dreams while they stick their hands further into our pockets….as they piss it away. Bend over, and smile, good buddy.

Not on your life.

Economists Against the Stimulus - Cato Institute - from back in January-

Cato has just published a full-page ad in the New York Times with the names of some 200 economists, including some Nobel laureates and other highly respected scholars, who “do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance” — contrary to widespread claims that “Economists from across the political spectrum agree” on a massive fiscal stimulus package.

But like the thousands of scientists and engineers who signed off on the white paper opposing the IPCC report and the Global Warming freaks’ agenda, this has apparently had little effect.

And so the devastating example of moral relativism Goldberg displays in the conclusion of this article really doesn’t make a whole helluva lot of sense.

The attacks in Arkansas and Washington are both manifestations of a radical type of intolerance, and they are linked in very deep ways. The left, generally speaking, doesn’t want to acknowledge Muslim intolerance, and the right, generally speaking, doesn’t want to acknowledge white, Christian intolerance. But they both exist, and they should both be acknowledged.

Fact is, Muslim intolerance is propped in the Koran and preached here in America in mosques and in prisons; Christian intolerance isn’t propped the Bible…except for the ten commandments, which was the basis for our laws. Christians are about following the law, Muslims are about changing our laws to sharia law; which is why you had that Islamic jail convert kill that soldier in Arkansas. He is following the laws of his religion, that’s all.

But Goldberg’s problem is that not all religions are the same. You can go down a list of things muslims have rioted about and killed people over but when you look at the Christian side to find the same things, you will not find them. Have Christians rioted over the piss Christ “artwork”? Have Christians rioted or killed muslims when Jesus’ birthplace was pissed on by muslims? Have Christians rioted when Jesus appears in cartoons?

I mean come on.

Goldberg ought to screw his head on straight and do a little more investigating before he makes such devastatingly stupid statements.

Christians are VERY tolerant - and that’s the whole problem - nobody is standing up to the editorializing BS that’s being passed off as “news” today….they apologize when Tiller the baby killer is murdered by a nut…and say they’re not about murder. Immediately after the murder, pro life-ers were out there denouncing Scott Roeder’s actions, and it’s apparent that Roeder had some serious mental problems and had been caught in the past with bomb making materials in his trunk.

Is this commonplace for Christians in their spare time? No.

Obama is creating some timebombs with what’s happening with peoples’ savings. Unemployment is on the rise, peoples’ homes are worth less, Americans’ personal wealth plummeted by 1.3 trillion, and over 60 million jobs have gone up in smoke. Von Brunn had been cut off his social security and was acting more and more desperate.

Here’s what Von Brunn says about Christians and the Holocaust:

The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh’s Kingdom of Heaven. To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH’s children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus’ father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness. Omnipotent, omniscient YHWH promises Hebrews that they alone shall inherit the earth, that it is commendable to steal from Gentiles, better yet — kill them. Whereas Gentiles, if they fail to worship YHWH, are transported straight to Hell. And it is written, “A little child shall lead them.”

These dangerous, imbecilic, concepts, tenets, and teachings, often treasonous, DESTROYED the Roman Empire and drenched the soil of Europe with Aryan blood for almost 2000 years!

The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION … CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.

Goldberg, excuse me for saying so, but no Christian would say that Christianity is a hoax.

You need to do some research or get out of the writing business.

Seriously.

Suddenly people are starting to realize this? It’s shocking TO ME that it’s taken them so long.

Oh when will it ever end with the Urkel Corruptocrats?

Corruptocrat Chris Dodd Caught Lying Again (Michelle Malkin)

She excerpts a number of articles, but I like this one from Judicial Watch in April:

“This seems a straight-up quid pro quo. Dodd helped his apparently crooked friend and seems to have received a cut-rate real estate deal on a property in Ireland in exchange. Moreover, it appears Dodd attempted to cover up the gift by failing to disclose it on his financial disclosure forms.

Lying on financials? Say it ain’t so.

To put it mildly, this type of behavior clearly does not reflect well on the United States Senate. We hope the Senate Ethics Committee does a thorough and speedy investigation. Federal prosecutors also need to take a look at this, as knowingly filing false financial forms is a crime,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

In 2008, Senator Dodd came under fire for receiving preferential loan terms from Countrywide Financial as a member of the company’s “VIP Program.”

The Chicago Crime Syndicate Urkel dragged with him to Washington and the gang of other not-Chicago criminals that assist Obama in tearing America apart sure are making an impression….buddy up with Obama, and you get untold numbers of “perks”…and whether they’re legal or not doesn’t matter.

We learned that from the Larry Sinclair story…and it’s dangerous to cross Urkel and his army of knuckledragging idiots…you could end up in a body bag like Donald Young did.

A great article at NRO by Victor Davis Hansen

In the first six months of the Obama administration, we have witnessed an assault on the truth of a magnitude not seen since the Nixon Watergate years. The prevarication is ironic given the Obama campaign’s accusations that the Bush years were not transparent and that Hillary Clinton, like her husband, was a chronic fabricator. Remember Obama’s own assertions that he was a “student of history” and that “words mean something. You can’t just make stuff up.”

Yet Obama’s war against veracity is multifaceted.

And then he goes after examples of this, one by one. What an excellent article.

And as some have pointed out to me in comments, it has reached the point where one realizes you can’t believe a single word that comes out of his mouth because he’s the King of liberal doublespeak. He hasn’t put himself in a very good position, but then…it’s been as plain as the nose on your face exactly where he sits; the company he’s been keeping told us all we needed to know. He shared an office with Billy Ayers for three years or so, was mentored by the radical black marxist separatist Reverend Wright for over 20 years, his association along with Wright and Pfleger with ACORN and his throwing gobs of money their way, his relationship with Frank Marshall Davis as a youngster, etc.

Then there are all the despicable scandals- the implication of his questionable involvement and the nature of his relationship with Donald Young, the gay choir director of Trinity United Church of Christ who was murdered in December of 2007 execution-style…and the way he, his puppetmasters and his knuckle dragging followers have handled the Donald Young-connected Larry Sinclair debacle, fought tooth and nail to prevent the publication of Sinclair’s book, and spent over $900,000 in the courts to resist producing a real birth certificate to prove he meets the natural-born qualification for the presidency, and so on. The list just keeps getting longer.

This guy has so much garbage in his past, and is manufacturing more garbage to add to it in the present-it’s simply stupefying.

Clinton’s Monica Lewinsky disaster pales in comparison, but…Clinton never faced any repurcussions from that politically…he threw an impeachment party on the White House lawn and thought it was a big joke.

In kind, Obama laughs off these things that would be troubling to a normal person such as the natural-born question.

He obviously hates America, he obviously hates the Constitution, which is why he continues to violate it and re-shape it according to his marxist yearnings for “social justice”. That’s why Pravda, the Communist Soviet empire’s media arm- has happily acknowledged that America is marching toward marxism at an astonishing rate; yet - people don’t seem to realize what this means for us - even in the face of having lost millions of jobs - and the outright attack on the private sector which is responsible for not only our GDP, but for peoples’ ability to make choices. For crying out loud, in the first quarter, $1.3 trillion of Americans’ personal wealth was completely wiped out, and unemployment is at a 25-year high right now at over 9%!

And there is no end in sight! There is not going to be a “recovery”….so when are people going to wake up to that fact as he continues to take over businesses, dictate what salaries should be, punish his political opponents and continues his marching America toward Soviet-Style Central Planning–that our choices, our ability to earn a living, buy toys, and buy basic necessities like food are going to dry up?

It’s appalling!

What’s worse is that we’re still at war in Afghanistan and Iraq, but we have a radical sympathizer in the White House now. Muslims recognize him as a muslim-he was financed by foreign and domestic Islamic radical donors including Hamas-yet “fight the smears” said he was a Christian until he visited Cairo, and then he openly came out and talked about his muslim roots. Once a muslim, always a muslim - and if you convert to some other religion, you’re an apostate, marked for death. And that’s not my OPINION, that’s written in the Koran. Not all religions are the same, as much as the moral relativists turn around and try to claim that Christians are terrorists. No, we don’t believe if you murder an infidel you are guaranteed paradise….neither do we believe that “heaven” is the reward of an endless sex orgy with reconstituted virgins every day - or young boys - whichever you prefer- with rivers of wine at your disposal to keep you drunk whenever you feel like it.

So, since we have a radical sympathizer, we’ve witnessed such devastatingly stupid moves out of Urkel’s white house as dropping the charges against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the Al Qaeda USS Cole bomber who was responsible for the deaths of 17 sailors.

Radicals have been watching, and have been emboldened just as communist North Korea has - as evidenced by their missile launches and virtual taunts.

Within the first 6 months of Obama’s radical Islamic sympathizing administration, we had the murder of an Army Recruiter by an Islamic Convert who felt justified in doing so and had no remorse - so Obama can’t claim he’s kept America safe from Islamic radicals. What other disasters are we going to face because of Urkel’s stupidity?

He has signaled to the Muslim World time and again precisely where he sits on the muslim issue - you can read the signs - the words that fall out of his mouth don’t matter -what matters is what’s in his heart….and muslims have heard him loud and clear….after all, he speaks in their cultural language and says the shahada with a perfect Arabic accent.

When Urkel grabbed his ankles to bow to the Saudi King; when he promised to close Gitmo-when he dropped the charges against the USS Cole bomber and sent the Chinese terrorists off on a vacation to Bermuda along with millions of taxpayers dollars-when Moammar Khadafi said he was a muslim, how he waffled on the Somali Pirates situation until someone else took control and did something about it - it is all so evident I can’t believe some people are in such denial and refuse to see it.

He is a liar, and so much more…I am ashamed that this usurper is in the White House with his fake family to put on an endless dog and pony show in order to conceal his real intentions.

Our Founders are rolling over in their graves right now….I’m reminded of the “boy who cried wolf” story here…and the moral of that story was, nobody believes a liar–even when he’s telling the truth.

House Republicans Darrell Issa and James Sensenbrenner are calling for an investigation of whether Obama climate czar Carol Browner’s secrecy in developing Obama’s CAFE standards and EPA’s CO2 endangerment finding was a “deliberate and willful violation” of the Presidential Records Act.

Read the rest at the Green Hell Blog.

Ah who cares? We know that Obama is breaking all the rules now - punishing and silencing political opponents - etc. The laws don’t apply to him or his people…and they will do whatever it takes to bring their “change” upon us - no matter what the cost.

And it will cost dearly…we’ve already seen an inkling of it in these first short months…