So does he think that’s what he’s running for, or what? It’s just interesting that he would make such an interesting faux pas; considering he has three muslim names, his muslim background, the fact that he claims he’s a Christian and nobody is calling for his death as an apostate from Islam, etc.

Here’s the link to the article at the International Humanist and Ethical Union.

And here again is Obama with the freudian slip talking about the 57 Islamic United States.

My previous post: Obama wants to be president of 57 states. Jay had it had this at Stop the ACLU

President Apostate?
By EDWARD N. LUTTWAK
Published: May 12, 2008
New York Times

In Islam, however, there is no such thing as a half-Muslim. Like all monotheistic religions, Islam is an exclusive faith.

As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood. It makes no difference that, as Senator Obama has written, his father said he renounced his religion. Likewise, under Muslim law based on the Koran his mother’s Christian background is irrelevant.

Of course, as most Americans understand it, Senator Obama is not a Muslim. He chose to become a Christian, and indeed has written convincingly to explain how he arrived at his choice and how important his Christian faith is to him.

His conversion, however, was a crime in Muslim eyes; it is “irtidad” or “ridda,” usually translated from the Arabic as “apostasy,” but with connotations of rebellion and treason. Indeed, it is the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit, worse than murder (which the victim’s family may choose to forgive).

Actually, I don’t think he’s an apostate at all.

That an Obama presidency would cause such complications in our dealings with the Islamic world is not likely to be a major factor with American voters, and the implication is not that it should be. But of all the well-meaning desires projected on Senator Obama, the hope that he would decisively improve relations with the world’s Muslims is the least realistic.

I don’t think the Islamic world views it that way, otherwise there would have been a fatwa against him, like there was from the Islamic world against Salman Rushdie.

Obama’s “slips” have been very revealing in this respect. For example, when he said we would go after Israel (even with nukes) if Iran fell under attack- and his claim in the Audacity of Hope - that if it got ugly, he would side with the muslims - Hamas’ support, when he said the muslim call to prayer was the sweetest sound on earth, Hezbollah’s support ad infinitum from radical muslim organizations including even Calypso Louis Farrakhan’s endorsement- is all we need to know about what lies in his heart. And in the Islamic world, that is what is important.

I don’t think the situation for Obama can get any worse. Haven’t we listed just about every terrorist organization in history is in support of Barack Obama–marxist, socialist, Islamic, you name it - he has their endorsement.

In “Obama’s Church Printed Pro-Hezbollah Articles“, Steve Gilbert outlines the reason why the Trinity Church of Christ printed those Pro-Hezbollah Articles: Obama and Wright were on Hezbollah’s side during Israel’s limited incursion into Lebanon two summers ago.

It defies reason that “Christ” is in that church’s name. I could think of a lot of other names that would be more fitting.

Is Obama Caught up in Gay Murder Scandal? - Larry Sinclair

He starts out with Boycott Oprah Winfrey. And talks about “the trinity of Hell”…which he characterizes as Obama, Wright and Winfrey. This is amazing. He talks about how white folks lovingly promoted Winfrey when she was a struggling actress and radio talkshow host.

But he also talks about Soros funding Obama, and that Winfrey disavowed the white folks who supported her. He says Obama is “a long-legged pimp.”…and that Winfrey, Obama and Wright are homosexuals.

It can’t get much more rich than this…

Like we’ve been saying…dumbed down for socialism/marxism, etc.

From Stop the ACLU

Compare and contrast

Jennifer Locke, was on assignment with a camera crew to cover the entertainment angle of the event. When Sen. John McCain walked by, the assistant said, “I voted for you in the primary, you’re going to win.”

McCain was overheard saying to her, “You’re not supposed to reveal that.” Locke apparently continued to explain that she is the daughter of a Vietnam veteran.

Insiders who were at the event were surprised and shocked to hear the disclosure, which was recorded on videotape. A Fox News insider called it “journalistically unacceptable.” An FNC spokesperson would not comment on the personnel matter but did confirm Locke is no longer with the company, where she’d worked for a couple of years.

This is a quote from the link above, in case you didn’t notice.

From Cynics Party

A commenter at media bistro calls Fox “biased” for firing this young lady. How you can compare Chris Matthews KEEPING HIS JOB after talking about how he got hot in his nether regions over Obama and kept his job, and Fox firing the young lady for having a dad who’s a Vietnam Veteran, I’ll never know.

It’s about time this thing got some more coverage, this is the third globe story on the Sinclair/Obama debacle and it’s only gaining speed and momentum.

Apparently it mentions Donald Young, the murdered gay choir director of Obama’s Trinity Church of Christ. This is all getting incredibly interesting, considering the fact that Reverend Wright recently retired and the church is building him a mansion within a stone’s throw of Louis Farrakhan’s in Tinley Park.

I haven’t read the globe article yet, but I know that people are circulating the flyers that I posted earlier. This is a grassroots movement - someone called Hannity and Colms and Colms said he was aware of the story, and the caller was so surprised he got through, he was rendered speechless.

But that sort of thing won’t continue as this story gains more momentum.

I continue to believe that Obama and Axelrod have made a serious strategic mistake, along with their marxist bloggers, for trying to so hard to keep a lid on this, making a deal with Dan Parisi and Whitehouse dot com, etc. It seems to me that we still have a lot of freedom to get the word out, and a lot of resources at our disposal, like these flyers.

Good for Larry!!!

Go check out his blog, it has a new cleaner more elegant look to it.

Just One Guy? Wasn’t Gennifer Flowers Just One Gal At First?

At that link, he talks about Gennifer Flowers and how she was one of many. It’s not a stretch of the imagination to consider that where there’s a Larry Sinclair, there are more people with whom Obama has had ‘affairs’ or “liaisons” - and possibly more crack cocaine- we just have to continue to get the story out in order to encourage them to come forward.

Is was a long time before women started talking about Clinton, but when they did, and when it hit the airwaves, it showed a pattern of behavior that lead all the way to the Oval Office. Hopefully we can stop this chug-a-luggin’ train in its tracks before November.

If you don’t know about the Sinclair story, here is the original video he finally put out there on youtube after Obama and his minions refused to privately respond to him.

It really would have been wiser for them to handle this differently.

This is going to be a big mess for the Obama campaign.

FLYERS (Download for Printing & Distribution)

* Bad/Mad Magazine Flyer
* Hand-Held Placard
* HOPE YOU’VE CHANGED FLYER
* Limo Flyer B/W
* Limo Flyer Color
* LS Flyer
* Obama Come Clean about Larry Sinclair

Help bring Larry’s blog up in the search engines by searching for LarrySinclair0926.wordpress.com

You have your freedom says Uncle Sam
to do as you are told
From where to drive to where to park
and how you can grow old
We regulate the food you eat
how you can live and die
And go to school and congregate,
the waters and the sky
We have the best in mind for you
we know what’s best in life
The huddled masses have no clue
so let us end your strife
We’ll hand out things like free health care,
education and job training
We’ll even give out umber-ella’s
for days that it is raining
We know the things we legislate
aren’t in the constitution
But all our plans to keep you well
will soon come to fruition
When BHO is sitting in
the Not so White House Chair
He’ll mandate things that take away
those pesky little layers
Of freedom that you still possess
to do things as you please
And we will own your unwashed ass
from birth to death you see
We hate to do it that’s for sure
it’s lot of work for us
To ride in limo’s telling you
to just go ride the bus
But you must listen to our rules
our laws and edicts too
Our regulations and the drivel
that we always spew
We know what’s best so just shut up
and go with our big plan
To give you everything you need
from our abundant land
The taxes that you pay today
will feed you on the morrow
You’ll feel a great relief you see
and not one bit of sorrow
Freedom’s over rated now
so do us all a favor
Quit complaining that we steal
the fruits of all your labor
If we don’t take away the cash
you work so hard to get
How can we take care of all
the hordes of lazy shits
That vote for us and sit around
collecting welfare money
We think your stingy attitude
is not one damned bit funny
So vote for us at election time
we know just where it’s at
We are freedoms worst nightmare
we are the democrats

I couldn’t find a satisfactory commie picture of the IVAW alone, so this one will have to do. From The Two Malcontents.

The marxist IVAW plan is to bring their dog and pony show before the House Progressive Caucus, since their original efforts in Maryland didn’t go over so well. The next phase is to go over and sing to the choir in Washington; their dutiful fellow pink-o comrades in the Progressive Caucus. (Rep. Dennis Kucinich, co-chairman)

Take a look at the organizations that support the Congressional Progressive Caucus (Circus). It should give you an idea of the 70 or so Congressional members of this caucus(circus) and how they spend their time:

“An array of national progressive organizations will work to support the efforts of the caucus, including the Institute for Policy Studies, The Nation magazine, MoveOn.org, National Priorities Project, Jobs with Justice, Peace Action, Americans for Democratic Action, and Progressive Democrats of America. Also co-sponsoring the kickoff event were the NAACP, ACLU, Progressive Majority, League of United Latin American Citizens, Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, National Council of La Raza, Hip Hop Caucus, Human Rights Campaign, Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs, and the National Hip Hop Political Convention. The CPC has long maintained cordial ties with the Democratic Socialists of America, which hosted its website during the 1990s.”

Until 1999 the Progressive Caucus worked in open partnership with Democratic Socialists of America. After the press reported on this link, the connections suddenly vanished from both organizations’ websites. -Discover the Networks

The eyes and ears of thousands will be inspecting closely every word spoken by IVAW testifiers since, according to IVAW press release, the Congressional testimony is billed as being under “oath”. A few calls for “proof” (date, time, place, witnesses, leadership, and unit involved) would be appropriate…generalities may be satisfying to a gullible media or politically correct congress, but when our warriors and nation’s policies are potentially defamed and distorted, only facts and credible evidence will be acceptable.

There was nothing of substance reported at the WSII National Labor College event so we can expect the IVAW tilted crystal ball to fabricate additional fantasy, if this appearance actually occurs.

Information as to where and when of the testimony is listed below in a IVAW press release.

Media Advisory: May 5, 2008

Contact: Francesca Lo Basso, 215-498-3347, media@ivaw.org

Winter Soldier on the Hill: Iraq Veterans to Testify Before Congress on Failure of Troop Surge

WHAT: Winter Soldier on the Hill

WHO: Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) & The Congressional Progressive Caucus

WHEN: May 15, 2008, 9:30am-12:30pm

WHERE: 2261 Rayburn House Office Building

WHY: To present eyewitness accounts of the Iraq occupation to Congress.

Washington, DC - On May 15, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) will testify under oath before Congress about their eyewitness accounts of the military occupation of Iraq. Testifiers will include veterans who served during the surge.

This testimony represents a shift from reports to Congress from high-level commanders and political appointees to direct accounts from boots-on-the-ground soldiers and Marines about the situation in Iraq. Testifiers will detail the ineffectiveness of the “troop surge,” the dehumanization, abuse and killing of innocent Iraqi civilians, and the breakdown of the military as a result of the ongoing occupation of Iraq.

Testifiers will include Luis Montalvan, who served two tours in Iraq as an Army Captain; Jason Washburn, a US Marine Corps Infantry Rifleman who served three tours in Iraq; and Kristofer Goldsmith, who served in the Army as an Artillery Forward Observer in Sadr City, Iraq.

“The time has come for Congress to hear about the occupation from the soldiers and Marines who have seen it first-hand. Petraeus continues to repeat the administration’s talking points while ignoring what the soldiers on the ground know: the Iraq occupation is not working,” said Kelly Dougherty, a former Military Police Sergeant in Iraq and Executive Director of IVAW.

Winter Soldier on the Hill is a continuation of Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan (WSIA), held at the National Labor College from March 13-16, 2008. Named after Thomas Paine’s reference to soldiers who stand up for their country in its darkest hours, WSIA gathered over 250 members of IVAW and collected over 30 hours of testimony regarding the negative impact of the Iraq occupation on the military - including an overburdened Veterans’ Administration, demoralized service members and a crumbling military infrastructure.

Iraq Veterans Against the War was founded in 2004 to give those who have served in the military since September 11, 2001 a way to come together and speak out against an unjust, illegal and unwinnable occupation. Today, IVAW has over 1,000 members in 43 states, Washington, D.C. and Canada and on military bases overseas.

From Colonel Riley (USA, Ret) through email.

More at the Sniper here and here, here

GOE has created another petition (http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/ivawtruthintestimony/) asking the CPC to verifiy any info that the IVAW brings to them. This petition reads about the same as the petition that was circulated for the Senate Armed Services Committee. The CPC is more of an ad-hoc group than any sort of official committee, but since we’ve been out in front of IVAW on this, we should probably stay there.

Please circulate this petition among your mailing lists.

Although all things considered, I’m not sure how much good it will do beyond show them that we’re watching every move they make.

From Freedom Site

The list is growing. Van Helsing, Nice Deb, Michelle Malkin…people are offering their commentaries.

Frank Marshall Davis

Sam Graham-Felsen

Tim Wheeler

His Dad

Socialists for Obama

Marxists, Socialists, Communists For Obama

Democratic Socialists of America

Communist Party USA:

Bernie Sanders:

William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn

Fidel Castro

Daniel Ortega

Progressives for Obama

FARC

Hugo Chavez

Saul Alinsky

Not to mention other terrorists like Code Pink and Hamas. It’s really getting to be quite a shameful list.

I wonder who is counting the votes, or if the American people are just too dumb to care about this frightening list. Last night when I was live blogging over at STACLU with Jay and friends, it came out that it was expected that Obama would win North Carolina and that Clinton would win Indiana. I was getting that news from MSNBC, but Chris Matthews and company were lavishing all kinds of praise on Obama to the point it was making me want to puke. They were saying that Obama appeals to the younger people, and that Clinton appeals to the old folks…basically Clinton is out dated. Axelrod was declaring victory from this point forward, and it reminded me strangely of Odinga in Kenya when he declared victory before all the votes were tallied and after the votes were counted and it was shown that he had lost.

At Frontpage Magazine John Perazzo:

When Hillary and Obama speak of “change,” they mean the complete remaking of society via the radical, subversive methods of Saul Alinsky.

Read the whole thing; both Obama and Clinton agree with Alinsky-style tactics. Obama has taught Alinsky tactics:

[…] Obama was trained by the Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) in Chicago and worked for an affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation, whose modus operandi for the creation of “a more just and democratic society” is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method. As The Nation magazine puts it, “Obama worked in the organizing tradition of Saul Alinsky, who made Chicago the birthplace of modern community organizing.…” In fact, for several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method.

Clinton knew Alinsky personally and was so impressed by Alinsky’s theories and tactics vis a vis social change, that during her senior year at Wellesley College she interviewed him and wrote a 92-page thesis on his ideas. In the conclusion of that thesis, she wrote:

If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, [t]he result would be social revolution. Ironically, this is not a disjunctive projection if considered in the tradition of Western democratic theory. In the first chapter it was pointed out that Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent of a dangerous socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared — just as Eugene Debs or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths — democracy.

This ain’t your grandfather’s party…

In the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution”—a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted—a revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and wholly unworthy of salvation. Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle for nothing less than that status quo’s complete collapse—to be followed by the erection of an entirely new and different system upon its ruins. Toward that end, they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly understand what types of societal “changes” are needed.

Welcome Larry Sinclair readers!!!!

First, what the hell is George Soros-funded, Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen Litigation Group doing supporting Larry Sinclair’s detractors? The court filings representing mzmolly, TubeSockTedD, OWNINGLIARS and the Democratic Underground were put together by Public Citizen Litigation Group. I find this incredibly interesting. Public Citizen’s involvement shows that it is going to bat for the Obama campaign…and it’s not surprising, considering that Ted Kennedy and a bunch of democrats endorse it. To my knowledge, however, its purpose was not to defend citizens from litigation - it was to go after corporations. The last I knew, Larry Sinclair isn’t a corporation.

[Public Citizen] claims to represent the interests of American consumers by fighting “for openness and democratic accountability in government; for the right of consumers to seek redress in the courts; for clean, safe and sustainable energy sources; for social and economic justice in trade policies; for strong health, safety and environmental protections; and for safe, effective and affordable prescription drugs and health care.” The means by which PC generally believes these goals can be achieved is increased government intervention and litigation against corporations — a practice founded on the premise that American corporations, like the capitalist system of which they are a part, are inherently inclined toward corruption.

They don’t, of course, take any responsibility for their being corrupt themselves.

Litigation Group: Litigating at all levels of the federal and state judiciaries, this division of Public Citizen “specializes in cases involving health and safety regulation, consumer rights, access to the courts, open government, and the First Amendment, including Internet free speech.”

Well, we can strike out health and safety regulation (because they’re the ones making death threats against Larry Sinclair; if anyone has a fear about his health and safety it’s Sinclair), consumer rights, access to the courts and open government. I guess it falls under the heading of First Amendment, including internet free speech. I guess they consider “internet free speech” such that you can tell lies and defame people under stupid pseudonyms.

It’s a “consumer rights” organization. It’s interesting to me that the Democratic Underground is consider a “consumer” here. Not that that particular side of the aisle is interesting in abiding by its own rules or that of the court, anyway…they make them up as they go along!

These people have terrorized Sinclair, called him a mental patient, and a bunch of other lies - I think they should be held responsible for it.

They object to having their star, the shifty messiah, to be forced to show up in court to answer the allegations; but seeing how artful the campaign has been to skirt the issue, I don’t see that there’s any other way to even get through to Obama or his campaign -or Axelrod, since they don’t return phone calls, and they don’t behave like human beings, or act like they need to answer to anyone. That leads me to believe it will be much the same if Obama becomes president…he thinks he knows what’s best for the rest of us, just like the moonbats at the DU, and the marxists blogging for Obama who try to generate the most flattering propaganda for the knuckledragging masses who are treating him more like a rock star than a candidate for president.

If the fact that I’m not a “marxist” makes me “right wing”, then so be it, I’ll gladly take the hit for that distinction.

The expensive lawyers who’ve magically appeared in the court proceedings in the Larry Sinclair saga have featured this blog and the comments that Larry has made here, taking his comments out of context in order to prolong this thing. Also, my blog talk radio show has become somewhat of a hit in those filings, too.

What is concerning me is their tactic of trumping up hundreds of pages of lies that have to be answered by Larry’s attorney. Larry’s attorney is only one guy - and what he’s up against is legions of the National Lawyers Guild (commie) genre. They are betting that Larry’s limited resources will help them win in the end, rather than the truth.

The ‘other side’ has revealed Larry’s social security number and other information that was not required by the court, in order to purposely put his safety even further at risk.

They continue to break the law!!!

They complain that Larry is using the courts in order for the truth to come out, and use that as the reasoning for the truth not to come out.

Larry and his lawyer need all the support we can lend them. To me this is a classic modern day David and Goliath story!!

Kudos to Larry for hanging in there!

Though Public Citizen claims to be officially “nonpartisan,” its political criticisms are aimed disproportionately at Republicans. In 2003, for instance, PC launched the website Whitehouseforsale.org, which accuses President Bush of accomplishing “his mission of destroying the presidential public financing system.” Public Citizen has also initiated BushSecrecy.org, which blames the Bush administration for post-9/11 civil liberties violations, lax regulation of allegedly carcinogenic products, cover-ups of auto-safety violations, and inadequate food-inspection standards.

So I think it’s interesting that they’re using my blog as a weapon against Sinclair…I guess anyone who identifies themselves as ‘not a marxist’ is fair game to these moonbats.

These spoofs are getting more and more amusing…

From the last of the few.

Obama’s mysterious “Frank” who served as his mentor, according to his book “Dreams of My Father”, is in reality, Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the old Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA.

Obama’s Red Mentor Praised Red Army is an AIM (Accuracy In the Media) report. The poetry written by Frank attacks traditional Christianity and the work of Christian missionaries and hails the Soviet Union’s Red Army, with a call to “Smash on, victory-eating Red Army.”

Kincaid from AIM said in a statement on his USA Survival organization website, that a full report will be released May 22 on how communist and socialist forces have influenced Obama.

From WND:Obama mentor: ‘Smash on, victory-eating Red Army’: Poetry also lambastes ‘Sweet Jesus,’ mocks ‘Onward Christian Soldiers’

“Herbert Romerstein, a former investigator for the House Committee on Un-American Activities, will present a detailed report on Obama’s years in Hawaii, when he came into contact with and under the influence of a member of the Communist Party, Frank Marshall Davis,” Kincaid said.

He also will detail “Obama’s years in Chicago, when he came into contact with and under the influence of communists, socialists, and even communist terrorists. There is a very disturbing pattern here … It can be no accident that Obama always seems to gravitate to the most extreme, anti-American forces. If you think Rev. [Jeremiah] Wright [Obama’s pastor] is something, wait until you see the information that we have developed.”

Wow, I can’t wait to read about it.

Actually, we’ve learned quite a bit - even beyond the content of this video. What it is we’ve learned is not the story he is telling.

Yet here again we have an example of Obama going off into fantasyland when trying to explain away Reverend Wright’s ‘goddam America’. He claims that all blacks of Wright’s generation that had it tough are bitter and angry because of their meager beginnings. But I thought it was those folks that are hanging onto their guns and religion that were bitter and angry? He just likes using those words, I guess.

Wright didn’t come from an underprivileged home; he grew up in a middle class neighborhood; just like Bill Cosby. In fact, he even went to the same High School as Cosby, and Cosby has denounced Wright’s extremism.

It’s too bad Obama hasn’t had the sense to do that, because he looks like he’s driving himself further downstream out of the mainstream, if you catch my drift. I have confidence it won’t be long before everyone else catches up to it. You don’t have to look far to catch a glimpse of the lunacy that is attached to Obama. Look a little deeper and there is a lot of fishy stuff going on, not to mention terrorists of all different stripes - like Ayers, for example. Ayers might live in Hyde Park, but he still hates America.

What I don’t understand is if people hate it so much, why don’t they just leave?

I am by no means a Hillary supporter, but this is a funny video.

These flyers are incredible! Kudos to whoever thought them up! (The screengrab above is from the “Obama Come Clean about Larry Sinclair” flyer, click here.

FLYERS (Download for Printing & Distribution)

* Bad/Mad Magazine Flyer
* Hand-Held Placard
* HOPE YOU’VE CHANGED FLYER
* Limo Flyer B/W
* Limo Flyer Color
* LS Flyer
* Obama Come Clean about Larry Sinclair

Help bring Larry’s blog up in the search engines by searching for LarrySinclair0926.wordpress.com

Campaign journalist’s work appears in ‘revolutionary Marxist’ journal

Sam Graham-Felsen, a journalist-on-leave from The Nation, joined Obama for America in March 2007 where he works for the New Media department as the official blogger, daily presenting the campaign’s public face. Now he’s under fire for his reputed Marxist sympathies from bloggers at Common Ills on the left and Little Green Footballs on the right.

We’ve been saying for some time that Barack and Michell’s rhetoric is marxist, and not only that, their Reverend Jeremiah Wright subscribes to Liberation Theology, which is also marxist.

Graham-Felsen, according to a 2003 article in the Harvard Crimson, adorned one corner of his shared student apartment with “a Communist Party flag … bought on their trip to Russia the summer after sophomore year.”

This explains a lot, and it also explains a lot of why the truth about Obama - and the Larry Sinclair story hasn’t really hit the airwaves.

Regarding his new book “Exposing the Real Che Guevara: And the Useful Idiots who Idolize Him”.

I was in such awe of him that I think I forgot to thank him for coming on with me.

Thank you, Mr. Fontova.

Obama and his wife have said some curious thing…this video connects the dots on quite a bit of the Obama campaign’s socialist rhetoric.

From Moonbattery and Infidels are Cool. I can’t figure out how to embed it, so I’ll just link to their posts.

This is pretty scarey - from Maggie’s Notebook–Killing a God Who Isn’t Against White People - Jeremiah Wright’s Theology