These spoofs are getting more and more amusing…

From the last of the few.

I am by no means a Hillary supporter, but this is a funny video.

From Michelle Malkin I mentioned this before, and probably should create my own graphic–except I’m pressed for time at the moment.

Actually there are a lot of similarities betwee these two in terms of the Black Panthers and other terrorists.

Although Obama has Code Pink’s endorsement; which I think drives him over the top–I don’t think Code Pink thinks very highly of Clinton because Clinton has tried to appear hawkish on issues regarding the war.

They both had communists as mentors, so I see very little difference between the two.

Except I don’t think Louis Farrakhan has endorsed Clinton.

From Van Helsing - a list via Infidels Are Cool, where you can find background on some other Obama supporters, including:

* Jeremiah Wright
* Tony Rezko
* Louis Farrakhan
* Hamas
* Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades
* Raila Odinga
* Daniel Ortega
* Raul Castro
* Communist Party of Illinois
* Frank Marshall Davis
* New Black Panther Party

Other members of Obama Nation include:

* PLO propagandist Rashid Khalidi
* Digital communist Larry Lessig
* High-profile traitor Hanoi Jane Fonda
* Scuttling, troop-maligning cockroach Richard Belzer
* Racist demagogue James Meeks

Not that Clinton is all that different. Here is part of her husband’s record on terrorism: disaster.

The new three stooges

It’s been relatively well-documented now that Obama has a load of terrorists cheering him on in the wings. Now it’s coming to light that Hillary is in much the same boat.

Although even more of Hillary’s baggage was exposed, and in the debate she complained that it had all been ‘rummaged through’ for years (due I’m sure to the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy)-we should further examine her ties with known terrorist sympathizers and Hammas supporters.

Her relationship with terrorists began in the mid-1980s when she served on the board of the New World Foundation, which gave funds to the Palestine Liberation Organization, at a time when the PLO was officially recognized by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization.

When her husband was playing footsie with Yassar Arafat.

In 1996, the first lady initiated an outreach program to bring Muslim leaders to the White House. But, as terrorism expert Steve Emerson noted in The Wall Street Journal. Curiously, nearly all of the leaders with whom Mrs. Clinton elected to meet came from Islamic fundamentalist organizations.

“A review of the statements, publications, and conferences of the groups Mrs. Clinton embraced shows unambiguously that they have long advocated or justified violence. By meeting with these groups, the first lady lent them legitimacy as ‘mainstream’ and ‘moderate.’”

Just as they view their recent meeting with Jimmy Carter. Are all the democrats modern day Neville Chamberlain lookalikes, or what?

Among these radical groups was the American Muslim Alliance (AMA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, both groups that support Hamas, who attended a White House reception hosted by Hillary in February, 1996.

Emerson says that its leaders “have sanctioned terrorism, published anti-Semitic statements, and repeatedly hosted conferences that were forums for denunciations of Jews and exhortations to wage jihad.”

The American Muslim Alliance was headed in the ’90s by Abdulrahman Alamoudi who met with Clinton and Gore in 1995. Emerson notes that “Mrs. Clinton [allowed] the American Muslim Alliance to draw up the Muslim guest list for the first lady’s . . . White House reception.”

Alamoudi, Emerson says was “the primary defender of Musa Abu Marzug, the Hamas political bureau chief responsible for creating the group’s death squads.” Marzug took “credit” when Hamas brigades sprayed machine gun fire into a crowded Jerusalem mall. But less than three days after Marzug was arrested by the FBI in July of 1995, Alamoudi said that Marzug “had never been involved in terrorism” and called his arrest “an insult” to the Muslim community. Emerson reports that he elicited contributions fro Marzug’s defense fund and called him a ‘political prisoner.’

Read it all.

Yes, unbelievably, she was fired from the Nixon impeachment staff for unethical practices.

Parts One, Two and Three are up at Sweetness and Light with Gilbert’s usual snarky comments following the articles.

I’ve been laying off Hillary in favor of talking about Obama because of what Obama has in common with meatbrain.

But Hillary isn’t completely off my radar:

As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

Patterns of behavior are difficult to conceal after a while, I guess…

The New York Observer: Hillary’s Mystery Woman: Who Is Huma?

Huma Abedin & Hillary Clinton - Who is Funding Huma Abedin’s Lifestyle?

Is Huma Abedin an Agent of Saudi Intelligence?

Huma Abedin: Shrillary’s Mysterious Companion

Not all Democrat candidates can have a name like Barack Hussein Obama. Others have to compensate as best they can.

Van Helsing has to be the King of one-liners.

Shrillary: Suspension Not Good Enough for David Shuster

It’s odd when you consider what happened to Imus, and now what happened to Shuster. Political speech is now a very narrow - if not frightening corridor spiked with political correctness and speech codes.

Just like our college campuses.

Wow. I found this at Van Helsing’s when he was making another point…about her carefully timed coughing fit, here.

Hitler actually had an acting coach named Paul Devrient in the 1930s.

Why should Hitlery be any different?

A clue to how Hillary found her voice

Not to mention Bill sleeping.

Or both of them sleeping.

Or crying moments

Basically it’s all street theatre. Or just plain theatrics.

Iowa Student Explains How Hillary’s campaign had her plant questions

[college student] was typed on the list of questions so that obviously was for her! LOL

“When you’re planting questions, that takes the voter out of it“.

No kidding.

Redefeat Communism in 2008!

Reality is stranger than fiction. (the 1999 movie Election juxtaposed against Hitlery’s 2008 campaign talk.)

From Van Helsing by way of Houston’s Clear Thinkers-”Hillary’s Inner Tracy flick”.

For your entertainment, while we wait for the results from Florida.

Interesting.

Carolina Kennedy and Ted Kennedy and virtually the entire Kennedy clan come out in support of Obama.

And after they do so, Hillary must have been feeling the icy winds blowing her way from the stares to the back of her head.

Then, the infamous desperate handshake, while Obama turns away.

There are denials, of course, but a picture says a thousand words.

I guess Hillary and Bill must have gone too far….

“the snub” — Barack Obama declined to greet Democratic presidential rival Hillary Clinton before President Bush’s State of the Union speech on Monday night.

After Obama entered the House chamber, he greeted many House members, Supreme Court justices, the president’s cabinet and the military joint chiefs.

Then Obama walked to his seat next to Sen. Edward Kennedy, who had endorsed Obama earlier in the day.

As Hillary approached, she leaned toward Kennedy over a row of seats. Kennedy leaned toward her, and they shook hands.

“Obama stood icily starring at Clinton during this, then turned his back and stepped a few feet away,” Frank James writes on the Web site The Swamp.

“Kennedy may’ve wanted to make peace with Clinton, but Obama clearly wanted no part of that.”

James added: “Judging by how much conversation there was about this brush-off in the press gallery, Americans will be hearing a lot more about this.”

Indeed, Americans did not have to wait long to hear more about “the snub.” Joe Scarborough asked Obama’s top campaign strategist David Axelrod about it on MSNBC on Monday morning, and Axelrod sought to downplay to incident.

“I don’t think he snubbed her at all,” Axelrod said.

hehehe. Axelrod. What an evil genius. Axelrod is still paving the way for Obama.

Rezko was arrested, Obama vows to return all Rezko funds.

And a kinder, gentler Bill Clinton campaigns in New Jersey.

What more could Obama wish for?

This is a real shirt you can buy at any of these places:

Ebay

Prankplace

Funny online gifts

This news is making it all over the sphere. Ace talks about it briefly here. Bill Clinton in South Carolina:

“She and John McCain are very close,” Clinton said. “They always laugh that if they wound up being the nominees of their party, it would be the most civilized election in American history, and they’re afraid they’d put the voters to sleep because they like and respect each other.”

The Huffpo must be yearning for this coziness since Barack Obama and Hitlery have been leaving Edwards in their dust because of their loud and nasty public catfights.

It is incredibly odd to me that one of the most leftist blogs would be praising John McCain who is supposed to be a Republican candidate - as being such a great friend of Hitlery. I guess they’ve noticed there isn’t much of a difference between the two, like some of us who - realizing there is no real ‘choice’ in this race- are contemplating voting for our DOGs.

When will Arianna praise all three of them for receiving funding and support from George Soros?

It’s 10 years old!

Happy Birthday, Vast Rightwing Conspiracy!

Tomorow, January 27, 2008, marks the birth of a political movement, dubbed ten years ago by Hillary Clinton (the First Lady at that time), who went on television with Matt Lauer and said:

“This is the great story here for anybody willing to find and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.”

LOL!!!

Thus was born the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. Hillary expected serious Americans to believe that the Whitewater convictions (which put a sitting Arkansas governor in prison), the suicide of the Deputy White House Chief Counsel under mysterious circumstances, the unconscionable firing of the White House travel staff, Hillary’s strange acumen in predicting the cattle futures market, an allegation of brutal rape against her husband, the perjury of Bill Clinton in a federal grand jury proceeding, his affair with a White House intern, and the countless other moral debauches of the Clintons were created by some cabal with power greater than the president, the Democratic Party and the huge phalanx of media flacks, fawning Hollywood starlets, militant activists and nihilistic academicians.

Read this about Whitewater. I can’t believe these two aren’t in JAIL. Instead, in what seems like a real-life nightmare, Hitlery is running for President after they literally stole items from the whitehouse and pardoned over 100 criminals before they left.

Where in hell is the IRS???

Daily KOS urges Dems to vote for ROMNEY in Michigan!

Now here’s the thing — without a real Democratic contest on the ballot [Hitlery is on there alone], and a lack of party registration in Michigan, this is an open primary. Anyone can pick up a Republican ballot. So Michigan Democrats and independents who want to see the Republican battle royale continue should just take a few minutes on Tuesday, January 15th to cast a ballot for Mitt Romney in the Republican primary.

*snip*

If we can help push Mitt over the line, not only do we help keep their field fragmented, but we also pollute Romney’s victory. How “legitimate” will the Mittster’s victory look if liberals provide the margin of victory? Think of the hilarity that will ensue. We’ll simply be adding fuel to their civil war, never a bad thing from our vantage point.

I wonder if hilarity will ensue if this little nefarious plan backfires. I’ve heard some people say they’re loving this idiocy, because they think Mitt is the best candidate.

So why are we doing this? Because we can. Because it’ll be fun. And because we’ve suffered Republican meddling, stealing, and disenfranchisement in our elections for far too long.

What a great way to get back at them, KOS, order your KOS kids to vote for a Republican. Good luck with that, Markos–you’re breathing too much of that tainted air in moonbat infested Berkeley.

Update January 12: Let’s see the hilarity ensue. John Bambeneck filed a complaint with the Michigan Attorney General against Daily Kos’ blogger Markos Moulitsas, requesting an investigation into whether or not Moulitsas is encouraging voter fraud in next week’s Michigan GOP primary.

Moulitsas’ call could be felonious. Michigan state law clearly indicates that unqualified electors voting in elections is a felony. It also specifies that counseling or aiding someone to vote in an election they are unqualified for is also a felony. Election law clearly specifies that to vote in a party’s primary, one must actually belong to that party.

Read the rest.

Digg it here.

Remembering the different incidents of this, just makes one laugh.

In addition to her and Bill’s crying.

Dramatic, isn’t it.

And faces fraud charges in New York. Doesn’t reflect very well on Hillary, but what does? LOL

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - A judge on Friday sentenced disgraced political donor Norman Hsu to three years in state prison after rejecting the one-time Democratic rainmaker’s bid to throw out a 16-year-old fraud conviction.

It’s typical, isn’t it, that the lawyers would use a technicality of his being a fugitive and the fact that they didn’t pursue him as the reason to dismiss the 1992 no-contest plea. Not that he was really running…he was hosting fund raisers in California. But we all know that people affiliated with the Clintons get a free get out of jail pass usually, don’t we?

How Clinton lost her invincibility
By JAY NEWTON-SMALL/GRUNDY CENTER Mon Dec 24, 11:30 AM ET

When Hillary Clinton launched her campaign nearly a year ago, the media buzz deemed it near impossible for the likes of Barack Obama and John Edwards to overcome her daunting campaign machine. The endorsements, the money, and the cream-of-the-crop strategists combined with the former First Lady’s incumbent image to make her the clear-cut choice of the Democratic Party establishment.

Not to mention that Hillary and Barack Obama are funded and hand-picked George Soros candidates.

But the onset of the Iowa caucuses finds Clinton aides racing to lower expectations, bracing for a possible loss there and contemplating a dwindling lead in the polls in New Hampshire and South Carolina. So, what has stripped the mighty Clinton campaign juggernaut of its image of invincibility?

Other than the fact that she’s a complete communist bitch? Sweetness and Light’s fake staged photo op pictures of her warmth are starting to wear thin on me, I think that’s true of other onlookers.

For one thing, it has been a victim of the media hype it helped create. The campaign’s warnings that Iowa was going to be a tough state for Clinton fell mostly on deaf ears. “Iowa was always going to be a challenge and we consistently said that,” says Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson. “Nobody hands anyone a presidential nomination.” But her campaign also failed to invest in Iowa until it was nearly too late. While Obama and Edwards spent the better part of the year moving in hundreds of staff and building relationships with grassroots Democratic constituencies, Clinton in the last month belatedly added a hundred staffers.

It doesn’t sound to me as if this is very well-planned, but if the United Nations are going to be standing at the ballot boxes, this year might well be a case of ‘the only thing that matters is who is counting the votes.’

And while the Clinton campaign hired the best and brightest faces to run its Iowa shop, there’s only so much that can be done without the resources or the candidate. A month away from the caucuses, Clinton had spent 52 days in state, visiting just 38 counties compared with the 99 visited by Edwards and the 68 by Obama. Since then, her campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle has moved out to Iowa to personally oversee the operation here, while Clinton has spent an additional 11 of the last 14 days in the state, adding another 14 county visits.

“She has never really been ahead here in Iowa,” says Arthur B. Sanders, a politics professor at Drake University in Des Moines and author of Losing Control: Presidential Elections and the Decline of Democracy. “Her national lead made it easy to assume she would win here as well, especially since her national campaign gave off an image of her ‘inevitable’ victory. And a national press that had not spent time here, did not really understand how different the situation was here.”

Nor do they care, I surmise. Hillary’s campaign seems to be a theatrical display of plants in the audience, contrived photos with Bill showing their forced smiles, and a hard-to-believe ‘nice’ campaign.

Clinton has also shaken up her message in recent weeks, trying on different hats: angry Hilary; warm-and-fuzzy mommy Hillary; commander-in-chief Hillary; insurgent change-candidate Hillary. “It’s a very close race in Iowa, and quite naturally, the Clinton campaign has decided to throw in everything it’s got, plus the kitchen sink,” says Larry Sabato, head of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics. “She’s both the candidate of change and the candidate of experience, the candidate with a hard side and a soft side, and the candidate of the establishment past and the progressive future. Maybe voters are getting confused, or maybe she’s patching together just enough voters to win or tie. We’ll all find out together on January 3rd.”

She’s trying to appeal to every voter by being everything to everyone at some point. In the trailer to Hillary the movie, it was said that she’s still trying to define who she is, and how she wants to represent herself. But I think her days at Wellesley and her senior thesis apply now just as much as they did then. Her activities orchestrating the campaign to ‘free’ the murderous New Haven Nine during her days at Yale have also defined her “blackness”, and Al Sharpton and all the other black nazis continue to give a nod to that history.

In the last week, Clinton straddled both the past and future. She’s paraded an impressive stream of former Clinton administration officials - including former U.N. Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, former Veteran Affairs Secretaries Togo West and Hershel Gober, former NATO Supreme Commander General Wesley Clark and, of course, her husband, President Bill Clinton - through Iowa while declaring herself an agent of change. “Somebody said at one of my events a little while ago, ‘You know it looks like it take a Clinton to clean up after a Bush,’ and I’m ready for the job if that’s what it takes,” Clinton said at a town hall event in Johnston, Iowa last week.

In short: she’s trying to take credit for everything that happened under her husband’s administration, but as Barack Obama said, not taking credit for its failures. One has to wonder why nobody brings up the Lewinsky affair.

In harkening to the 1990s, Clinton risks alienating voters who want change. The majority of likely Democratic caucus-goers, 56%, believe change is more important than experience, according a December 19 ABC News/Washington Post poll of likely caucus-goers. Of those, half said they support Obama and 23% are committed to Edwards. Clinton only garnered 15% of the change vote. Conversely, 33% of those polled said they preferred experience over change, and Clinton lead amongst those voters 49% to Edwards’ 15% and Obama’s 8%.

Wolfson argues that it takes experience to bring about change: “Hillary brings a lifetime record of accomplishments to this campaign - and yes, some of them were during the ’90s. We think voters are asking - at a time when every candidate is talking about change - who actually has a record of accomplishing it their entire adult life?”

A lifetime of radical activism isn’t exactly a lifetime record of accomplishments.

Next week, Clinton will roll out her final pitch to Iowan voters, a tour entitled ‘Time to Pick a President’ in which she’s expected to underline her experience in the White House and promise to restore the nation’s good times. “Her closing argument is that America faces huge challenges and has enormous opportunities, and that the nation needs a president with the strength and experience to lead on day one and make the changes we need,” Wolfson says. The jury’s still out on whether the Democratic base in Iowa will buy the idea of insider experience as an effective force for change. But not for long.View this article on Time.com

The only ’strengths’ she seems to possess and display with consistency are that she has a hard time telling the truth (she lies), her campaign is riddled with scandal as her husband’s presidency was, and she has plants strategically positioned to make her talking points for her. And that doesn’t even include Media Matters and the Center for American Progress, two non-for-profit 501(c)(3)’s that are virtual shills for her campaign.

From Michelle Malkin and the Folks at Hot Air.

Also, order Hillary the movie and make sure it gets into the hands of people who adore her. Saw a link to the trailer at Jo’s Cafe.