5/9/2008

repugnitards get fired, demonrats overcome erectile dysfunction

Compare and contrast

Jennifer Locke, was on assignment with a camera crew to cover the entertainment angle of the event. When Sen. John McCain walked by, the assistant said, “I voted for you in the primary, you’re going to win.”

McCain was overheard saying to her, “You’re not supposed to reveal that.” Locke apparently continued to explain that she is the daughter of a Vietnam veteran.

Insiders who were at the event were surprised and shocked to hear the disclosure, which was recorded on videotape. A Fox News insider called it “journalistically unacceptable.” An FNC spokesperson would not comment on the personnel matter but did confirm Locke is no longer with the company, where she’d worked for a couple of years.

This is a quote from the link above, in case you didn’t notice.

From Cynics Party

A commenter at media bistro calls Fox “biased” for firing this young lady. How you can compare Chris Matthews KEEPING HIS JOB after talking about how he got hot in his nether regions over Obama and kept his job, and Fox firing the young lady for having a dad who’s a Vietnam Veteran, I’ll never know.

4/24/2008

another reason not to be a fan of McCain

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , General , McCain , Obama @ 6:37 pm

The flap is about McCain’s wimpy campaign complaining about North Carolina’s ad, above.

John Hawkins:

Sure, he may try to rip the jugular vein out of any Republican who crosses him, but when he goes up against a Democrat, he turns into a Care Bear. I’m not happy about that, but I’ve made peace with it. It’s his style, it seems to work pretty well for him, and he isn’t going to change it at this point anyway. So be it.

However, I’m not happy to see that the RNC is actually complaining because Jeremiah Wright’s own words are being used in an ad.

I’m not sure how you can exactly ‘make peace’ with McCain preferring to work with democrats rather than republicans; it’s what makes the majority of Republicans disgusted that we have no representation in this presidential election.

Michelle Malkin on this here and here.

It’s so hypocritical for McCain to take that stand, but it’s a warning for what the future holds if he should be elected President…

Reuters report here lies about the ad being pulled - they are asking for donations to keep it running. (SG)

3/28/2008

McCain

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , McCain @ 6:57 pm

It’s interesting to me what people are saying about John McCain…as though ‘he’s not all that bad’.

They say of course, that he’s not a traditional conservative, but he’s strong on the WoT, he has a pro life record, and he’s a “fiscal conservative”.

Yet, the Club For Growth recently published a report on McCain’s record, in pdf format, the third in a series.

While Senator McCain’s economic record contains a number of pro-growth positions, such as his support for school choice and free trade, and his steadfast opposition to wasteful government spending, his overall record is tainted by a marked antipathy towards the free market and individual freedom.

This antipathy is evidenced by the Senator’s vocal and class-warfare-laced opposition to the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts; his occasional but eager support for increased government regulation; his support for raising Social Security taxes; and his persistent attacks on political free speech in the form of the McCain-Feingold Act.

“The Bush tax cuts were a driving force behind the economic prosperity of the last couple of years and a cornerstone of a pro-growth philosophy,” said Club for Growth President Pat Toomey. “Not only did Senator McCain oppose these cuts, he aligned himself with the likes of Ted Kennedy in his rhetorical attacks in 2001 and 2003. Four years later, American taxpayers still have not heard the Senator disavow his misguided statements and votes.”

“There are certainly aspects of McCain’s economic record that are praiseworthy,” Mr. Toomey continued, “but the question facing American taxpayers is whether they can sufficiently trust a McCain administration to produce consistently strong economic policies. Unfortunately, both his rhetoric and record suggest that the answer is no.”

I’m no fan of any of the big George Soros candidates; and McCain is in that category, along with Clinton and Obama.

3/2/2008

Show notes from today: Rurik on John McCain

Filed under: General , McCain @ 5:18 pm

Old War Dogs


Veteran-American Voices

The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler

POW Network

US Veteran Dispatch

Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain

Republican Tea Party same site as GOP Tea Party

Vietnam Vote

They might also want to see this book

An Enormous Crime by Bill Hendon & Elizabeth Stewart

And of course, all are welcome to come listen to the Veteran-American Voices at http://veteranamerican.info/

McCain:

~Ignored pleas of POW/MIA Family Members for his political influence in the overall POW/MIA Issue as well as with their individual cases

~Verbally abused POW/MIA Family Members in public and private

~Attempted to negatively influence those who testified before the 1992 Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs

~Diminished legislation that gave oversight and protection to the families

~Dismantled protection to any future servicemen that go missing.

See

Pensito Review Vietnam POW Activists call Mccain Songbird and Manchurian Candidate

POW Warrior: – the Measure of the Man: Why John McCain Doesn’t Measure Up

And this is one of Rurik’s funniest on the subject-The McCain Mutiny

2/29/2008

Blogtalk Radio 3:00 CST Sunday with Rurik on John McCain

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , McCain @ 9:17 am

My show on Sunday will be with Rurik from Veteran-American Voices; the subject is John McCain. Tune in if you’re interested…it is not my intention to make it a John McCain bashing session, but pointing things out that should be a serious to concern to all of us should not be called ‘bashing’.

Here is the link where you can listen.

Sign up for an account on blogtalk radio - to be a listener. It’s free, and you don’t have to have a show to have an account.

The call in number is (347) 326-9917
The show is at 3:00 CST on Sunday.

2/9/2008

McCain has little conservative support: CPAC poll

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , General , McCain @ 4:39 pm

mccaincpac_hh_3.jpg

Read the whole article-click on the picture above.

What I feel is the most important excerpt from it is here:

Toward the end of his speech, after promising to prevent Iran from possessing, “…the weapons to advance their malevolent ambitions,” McCain promised to remain the maverick he has always been. He said:

“We have had a few disagreements, and none of us will pretend that we won’t continue to have a few. But even in disagreement, especially in disagreement, I will seek the counsel of my fellow conservatives. If I am convinced my judgment is in error, I will correct it. And if I stand by my position, even after benefit of your counsel, I hope you will not lose sight of the far more numerous occasions when we are in complete accord.”

This is vintage McCain. He promises to hear, not to listen. He promises to seek counsel, but not to respect it.

To be fair to McCain, there are times, in war, when a president has to make decisions based on facts the public does not and cannot know. But those decisions aren’t the ones Mr. McCain has made on many domestic issues conservatives care most about.

He pledged to protect the lives of the unborn, to protect the right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment, but he did not — as Gov. Romney did earlier that day — support a constitutional amendment to prevent gay marriage. And what he promises is that he will give conservatives a fair hearing.

That is less than we require of our leaders. We require them to adhere to our basic principles, and that those principles be the basis for their decisions.

I also received an email from Richard A. Viguerie at ConservativeHQ.com, showing some very interesting poll results from CPAC.

(Manassas, VA, February 9) Richard A. Viguerie, chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, today released the results of a true random poll of 1,000 conservative activists attending the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, D.C.

CPAC is the nation’s largest annual gathering of conservatives, and was chosen by former Gov. Mitt Romney as the place where he announced his withdrawal from the GOP presidential race on Thursday.

The questions posed and the results recorded are as follows.

“In your opinion, is Senator John McCain a true conservative?”

Yes 197 19.7%
No 595 59.5%
Undecided 208 20.8%

“If Senator John McCain is the Republican nominee, I will…”

299 29.9% Strongly support McCain
279 27.9% I will vote for McCain, but do not expect to work or contribute
35 3.5% I will vote for the Democratic nominee
90 9.0% I will vote for a conservative third party candidate if one is on the ballot in my state
40 4.0% I will not vote.
257 25.7% I am undecided at this time—I need to see if Senator McCain reaches out to conservatives in a serious and meaningful way

From these results, it is clear that Senator McCain has a challenge in gaining the conservative support he needs in order to win the general election,” says David Franke of ConservativeHQ.com.

“Only 3 in 10 conservative activists strongly support him. Even if you add in the people who will limit their activity to voting for him, and all of the undecided conservatives (not likely), he will have only 83.5% of the conservative vote. Historically, the Republican presidential candidate needs more than 80% of the conservative vote in order to win. The poll results show he can possibly reach that level of conservative support, but it will be dauntingly hard.”

Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, The Midnight Sun, Right Truth, DragonLady’s World, Shadowscope, A Newt One- BIG THURSDAY GUEST!, , Leaning Straight Up, Adeline and Hazel, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, , The Pink Flamingo, A Newt One, Wake Up America, Dumb Ox Daily News, Stageleft, Right Voices, Right Pundits, A Blog For All, The Random Yak, 123beta, A Newt One- Shared News!, Big Dog’s Weblog, Phastidio.net, , Conservative Cat, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Faultline USA, Nuke Gingrich, Allie is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Wolf Pangloss, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Ann Coulter’s speech at CPAC

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , McCain , News @ 9:28 am

You can watch it here.

She was down the hall since she wasn’t ‘invited’ to CPAC. This is her Young America’s Foundation CPAC speech to about 500 1000 people. It’s about an hour in length.

2/7/2008

Compromising with evil

Filed under: Faith in God , General , McCain @ 7:01 pm

I’ve been in some interesting conversations lately, regarding McCain. My husband actually voted for Hillary instead of McCain, and -although I didn’t do that-I can understand exactly how he feels.

To me, it’s completely about compromising with evil. And it’s about people selling us ‘the lesser of two evils’ as though it’s something worthy of doing.

IT IS NOT.

It’s not biblical,
and it’s not something I can do and look myself in the mirror.

Pray that you will not compromise with temptation. It’s in the Bible, Matthew 26:41, TLB. “Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the body is weak.”

Don’t even start down an evil path. It’s in the Bible, Proverbs 4:14-15, TLB. “Do not set foot on the path of the wicked or walk in the way of evil men. Avoid it, do not travel on it; turn from it and go on your way.”

Don’t let sinners influence you. It’s in the Bible, Proverbs 1:10, TLB. “My son, if sinners entice you, do not give in to them.”

The man who walks righteously does not compromise. It’s in the Bible, Isaiah 33:15-16, TLB. “He who walks righteously and speaks what is right, who rejects gain from extortion and keeps his hand from accepting bribes, who stops his ears against plots of murder and shuts his eyes against contemplating evil—this is the man who will dwell on the heights, whose refuge will be the mountain fortress. His bread will be supplied, and water will not fail him.”

You don’t have to give in to compromise. It’s in the Bible, I Corinthians 10:13, TLB. “No temptation has seized you except what is common to man. And God is faithful; He will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, He will also provide a way out so that you can stand up under it.”

Don’t give the devil a chance. It’s in the Bible, Ephesians 4:27, TLB. “And do not give the devil a foothold.”

There can be no compromise when it comes to the devil, we are either for Christ or Satan. It’s in the Bible, Matthew 12:30, NIV. “He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who does not gather with Me scatters.”

——————

The Bible is where it’s at, and it’s what is directing my decisionmaking.

Nobody else can or will do that.

This means that if there is no representation, I will not compromise with a candidate who doesn’t represent me.

I’ve had enough!

It’s time to join a third party!

McCain at CPAC

Filed under: McCain @ 7:00 pm

Michelle has a few details, she was sitting in the back of the room. WOW…I wish I was there.

Romney has dropped out and is endorsing McCain. It may not be official, but that’s the rumor…

There is a huge contingent of anti-McCain republicans out there. It will only grow as time wears on.

This is pukeworthy to me….

Particularly since CPAC told the attendees NOT TO BOO John McCain.

Personally, I’m pleased as punch that the older generation has turned out in large numbers and have shown up at CPAC to show their disdain for this despicable example of leftist values parading under the GOP banner.

I’m receiving emails from McCain’s people, too. Not that it makes any difference. There is no way in hell I’m going to back any guy who doesn’t favor capitalism…EVER.

2/6/2008

McCain has done the most to hurt the GOP-Tom DeLay

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , McCain @ 6:36 am

From Seeing Red AZ

Somewhere in someone’s comments section I saw a great long list of betrayals and problems with McCain’s record. If I come across it again, I’ll make sure to post it.

List of McCain’s betrayals to the GOP

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , General , McCain @ 6:30 am

From McCain: A conservative nightmare?

McCain:

1. supports amnesty for illegal aliens (McCain Kennedy Amnesty)

2. was behind the Gang of 14

3. is a gun grabber

4. opposed the Bush tax cuts

5. ran roughshod over the Constitution with McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform

6. opposes a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage

7. was rumored to be considering switching parties multiple times

8. talked with John Kerry about being his Vice-President

9. Teamed up with John Kerry to bury the POW/MIA issue and normalize relations with communist Vietnam

10. lines up with the global warming alarmists

11. wants to close Gitmo

12. demonizes Big Pharma — i.e., the private pharmaceutical companies that create, develop, and manufacture the drugs that all these socialized health-care systems in every corner of the planet are utterly dependent on.

13. He voted for Sarbanes-Oxley, a quintessential congressional overreaction (to Enron) that buries American companies in wasteful paperwork and hands huge advantages to stock exchanges in London, Hong Kong, and elsewhere…

14. McCain has an almost Edwardsian contempt for capitalism, for the people whose wit and innovation generate the revenue that pay for your average small-state senator’s retinue of staffers worthy of a Persian Gulf emir.”

15. McCain is no lover of Christians. Recall his comments about key religious leaders in 2000, calling them “agents of intolerance.” And McCain’s vitriolic vilification of Christians was not limited to a single occurrence, for he later said, “I must not and will not retract anything that I said in that speech at Virginia Beach. It was carefully crafted, it was carefully thought out.” (Hardball, 3/1/00). More recently, however, McCain, positioning himself for 2008, has repackaged himself as pro-Christian, lauding key religious leaders and duping the devout. (Is this not as reptilian as Bill Clinton’s waffling?)

16. In 2005, McCain opposed a federal gay-marriage ban (Los Angeles Times, 1/25/ and 3/8). Now, however, likely realizing that most Americans think otherwise, McCain says he supports a gay-marriage ban (Meet the Press, 4/2/06). Which is it? Given his penchant for progressive politics, we can only assume the former.

17. Regarding abortion, McCain most certainly is pro-choice. In the San Francisco Chronicle (8/20/99) McCain sided with the pro-abortion camp, suggesting that overturning Roe v. Wade would lead to illegal abortions. Realizing, however, that he could not inveigle the GOP nomination with such views, McCain more recently has resold himself as pro-life, even saying he would support the South Dakota ban on abortions. What are Americans to believe? He either is pro-choice or lacks any real conviction on the subject.

18. Is the Manchurian Candidate


McCain: A Liberal In Disguise

McCain’s liberal laundry list goes on and on. Senator Lindsey Graham, another liberal in disguise, comments correctly that the present is a defining moment for the Republican Party, although his underlying analysis is wrong. The choice is between a party of McCain’s vision, a party indistinguishable from the Democratic Party, or a party that at least maintains a modicum of conservatism. If McCain loses, hopefully he will depart for the Democratic Party (where he belongs); but if he wins, expect to see a mass exodus of conservative voters from the GOP, probably over to a third party.

Vietnam Veteran Russ Vaughn Speaks out on McCain and the primary results

Through email from Russ, posted also at Old War Dogs.

I am troubled by tonight’s primary results, especially troubled by the prospect that I may be forced to vote for an unprincipled political chameleon like McCain in order to save our country from two politicians, Bill and Hillary Clinton, who are even more unprincipled, even to the point of felonious criminality. I wrote this piece this morning and tonight stand by it even more. Hillary just slapped my face and that of many other honorable veterans with her sneering, gratuitous reference to swift boating in her gloating victory speech. It just demonstrates how twisted their leftist thinking is when they use this term of honor as a pejorative.

I will follow the dictates of my old regimental motto: Honor and Country,

Russ Vaughn

Entertaining Considerations

kerrymccain.jpg

I was afraid this was going to happen when McCain started coming on stronger in the primaries. To an even greater extent than John Kerry, John McCain possesses the ability to politically divide American veterans more than any other presidential candidate. With Kerry, a key determinant of which way veterans’ loyalties fell was party affiliation. I’m sure there were many liberal Democrat veterans, particularly Vietnam veterans, who held their noses and supported a man they viscerally disliked because he was their party’s candidate and represented their overall liberal positions. It was easy for those of us who were politically conservative Vietnam vets to take a hard, unrelenting stand against the man we knew had smeared us because he was the candidate of the party whose positions we opposed.

Today, this division among veterans in general and Vietnam veterans in particular has been turned by McCain’s candidacy into a family fight among Republican veterans that threatens our already diminished prospects for victory in November. While virtually all of us admire and respect McCain’s military service and POW sacrifice, there are millions of us who feel that is simply not enough for him to be able to command our political loyalties four decades later. Setting aside the fact that McCain sided with John Kerry in 2004 and denounced those of us who dared to question Kerry’s very questionable war record, there are many reasons why we do not see John McCain as being someone we can trust to represent the mainstream views of the Republican party. I will spare you a Sean Hannity, rapid-fire recitation of the litany of McCain’s transgressions against his own party because I think there is a single issue far more compelling.

Go ahead and Google “McCain switching parties?” and look at the pages of hits which take you to articles from every sector of the media examining whether or not John McCain was preparing to switch parties as far back as 2001 and continuing into the 2004 campaign. The most chilling of all these reports is one from the Boston Herald in which McCain is quoted as responding to ABC’s Charles Gibson’s question as to whether he would even entertain the idea of running as John Kerry’s VP if Kerry extended such an offer,

“John Kerry is a very close friend of mine. We’ve been friends for years. Obviously I would entertain it.”
Boston Herald

That is a very telling quote. In his own words, to further his political ambitions, John McCain would have considered abandoning his party and his supposedly conservative principles to serve on the ticket with one of the most liberal candidates ever to run as a Democrat presidential candidate. Even worse, reading down, one reads that Kerry now claims it was McCain’s people who initiated such a proposal, not that we’d be inclined to lend too much credibility to that particular source. Some very close friends, huh? No wonder then that McCain was able to denounce his fellow Navy Vietnam veterans as “dishonest and dishonorable” when they dared to attack Kerry’s self-promoting war record. McCain was selfishly attempting to curry favor with the man and the party which could do the most for his personal political future.
McCain on Swift Boats Veterans - Salon

Now I ask you, just who was being dishonest and dishonorable here? Was it the sailors who served in combat with Kerry and raised issues with his war record that Kerry never successfully refuted and refused to release the Navy records which he claimed would do so? Or was it the self-serving maverick politician who was entertaining the possibility of forsaking his Republican party to fill the number two position on the Democrat ticket?

A good friend and fellow Old War Dog, Bill Faith, cites Mitt Romney’s contradictory and self-serving statements about not serving in Vietnam as proving Romney unworthy of his vote. To that I would respond that talking out of both sides of one’s mouth is congenital in politicians and that perhaps Romney might have gone AWOL on the issue. But Romney’s transgression completely pales against John McCain’s admitted willingness to “entertain” the possibility of full-fledged desertion to the enemy in the midst of political combat.

I don’t know about you but I don’t want a commander-in-chief who even entertains such considerations.

Russ Vaughn

2d Bn, 327th Parachute Infantry Regiment
101st Airborne Division
Vietnam 65-66

2/3/2008

Vietnam-era Veteran on John McCain

Filed under: General , McCain @ 3:40 pm

Never buy a pig in a poke.

2/2/2008

McCain in “Missing, Presumed Dead”

Filed under: GOP And RINOs , McCain @ 8:37 am

This pisses me off more than you could ever know.

Trackposted to Rosemary’s Thoughts, guerrilla radio, 123beta, Right Truth, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog’s Weblog, The Pet Haven, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, third world county, Faultline USA, Nuke Gingrich, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Celebrity Smack, The Pink Flamingo, Wolf Pangloss, CORSARI D’ITALIA, A Newt One, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

1/26/2008

Huffpo quotes Bill on “civilized race”

Filed under: Demonrats , Hitlery , McCain @ 5:58 pm

huffpocivilizedrace.JPG

This news is making it all over the sphere. Ace talks about it briefly here. Bill Clinton in South Carolina:

“She and John McCain are very close,” Clinton said. “They always laugh that if they wound up being the nominees of their party, it would be the most civilized election in American history, and they’re afraid they’d put the voters to sleep because they like and respect each other.”

The Huffpo must be yearning for this coziness since Barack Obama and Hitlery have been leaving Edwards in their dust because of their loud and nasty public catfights.

It is incredibly odd to me that one of the most leftist blogs would be praising John McCain who is supposed to be a Republican candidate - as being such a great friend of Hitlery. I guess they’ve noticed there isn’t much of a difference between the two, like some of us who - realizing there is no real ‘choice’ in this race- are contemplating voting for our DOGs.

When will Arianna praise all three of them for receiving funding and support from George Soros?

hate talk and John McCain

mccain-clinton-kerry-small.jpg

What happened to honesty and decency in public life? What happened to the reasonable expectation that a republican candidate would vote for, ally himself with and live into republican principles? What happened to American sovereignty and people assimilating into our culture from foreign lands? Now they want to come here and raise the flag of Mexico over that of the US…or just burn the US flag after they get here, with no documentation. And our “leaders” - like John McCain, support ‘amnesty’ for illegals. What’s worse - McCain has even voted against barring felons from receiving amnesty benefits under the Kennedy/McCain amnesty plan. In addition, he viciously attacks those who disagree with him on ‘amnesty for illegals’, saying “F**k you!” and calling them “Chickensh*t”.

In addition, he promotes the idea of our importing drugs from third world nations like CHINA. Sounds like George Soros, doesn’t it?

Importing foreign drugs is a stupid idea because counterfeit knockoffs won’t do what the real drugs do. We have things like patents. Foreigners have slave labor and no safety standards. This has already been illustrated with lead-painted toys, toothpaste, dog food and other products (from China). Drugs imported from countries like Canada come from places like Pakistan, Bulgaria, Argentina and south africa. and the safey risks should be pretty obvious, and explains why the FDA has opposed importing drugs since at least 1969.

We should remember who the people are who are calling for ‘amnesty for illegals’, and then look back at McCain and think about what the ideas are that he represents. Just because you SAY you’re a republican doesn’t mean you ARE one. If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and talks like a duck, it has to be a duck, right?

mccainmonument.JPG
Remember the recognition that the Vietnamese communists gave John Kerry in the War Remnants Museum in Saigon? Well…it looks like they’ve done their own special best to do the same thing with John McCain at the site of his crash.

Why? Because he said in interviews soon after the crash- that he’d committed WAR CRIMES, just like John Kerry did during the Winter Soldier “investigation”. And now that his efforts to normalize relations with Vietnam have succeeded, they have that to thank him for, too. Not that he didn’t have anything personally to gain from it - Anheuser Busch profited from that move. It’s no coincidence that McCain and his wife Cindy hold millions of dollars worth of stock in Hensley & Company, the second largest Anheuser-Busch distributor in the nation and that Hensley & Company is owned by Cindy’s father. It is no coincidence that in 1994, pending normalized trade relations with Vietnam, Anheuser-Busch was planning to build a major distillery in Vietnam. Just like John Kerry’s interest in normalizing relations seems to have a family connection. His cousin C. Stewart Forbes is Chief Executive Officer of Colliers International, and Vietnam granted Colliers International, based in Boston, Massachusetts, a contract worth billions designating Colliers International as the exclusive real estate agent representing Vietnam.

McCain comes to Kerry’s defense
By Associated Press
Published August 6, 2004
WASHINGTON - Republican Sen. John McCain, a former prisoner of war in Vietnam, called an ad [Swift Boat Veterans for Truth] criticizing John Kerry’s military service “dishonest and dishonorable” . . . “I deplore this kind of politics,” McCain said. “I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable.”

There is nothing dishonorable about telling the truth - which is another thing he opposes. Which is obvious, when you look at the story that’s been spun about him being a ‘war hero’. This gives him the moral authority over everyone else to take the ACLU’s and ANSWER’s position on waterboarding.

John McCain, like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is an embarrassment to our country and our military. McCain joins his ideological brethren, the democrats-or should I say socialists and communists-with his pandering to the enemy, and he has a long history of it-going all the way back to when he gave information to the communists so they could shoot down more American pilots. I think it’s part of Soros’ strategy to place a virtual democrat on the Republican side, so there will be absolutely no difference between the presidential candidates come election time. McCain didn’t follow through on becoming an official democrat, but he sure seems to be more of a Clintonian democrat than a republican.

The fact that two on the democrat side have issues like dead bodies, Whitewater and Rezko in their past - McCain has the Keating Five. The dishonesty in these campaigns runs equally across party lines. Obama appears to be a muslim marxist along the lines of Fatah (which we’re funding) - and some of that can be clearly seen in his book entitled “The Dreams of my Father” - the muslim. McCain, wrote “The Faith of my Fathers”. We’ve seen numerous Hillary ‘plants’ in audiences to make political points as proof that fiction trumps reality today, but Hillary’s right when she says they should be highlighting the differences between what democrats stand for and what the republicans stand for. In McCain’s case, there is little difference.

We should be contrasting what McCain stands for in comparison to what republicans SHOULD be standing for.

And the war hero thing is a complete smokescreen for what actually happened. McCain claims he was afforded no special treatment while at the “Hanoi Hilton”. Tim Russert claimed on January 19th - that “McCain spent five years, in a box. Baking in the heat. He can’t raise his arms above this height. Because of the pain.”, which McCain’s campaign seized upon with glee. Yet when he was first interviewed by the North Vietnamese he is shown at a hospital reserved for Vietnamese military and he was seen by Soviet Surgeons. He was drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes while being interviewed. This is a far cry from the way the rest of the POWs were treated.

He was shot down October 26, 1967, and by November 9, 1967 he was giving interviews to foreign correspondents, providing information on his prior command, casualties and tactics, in direct violation of the Code of Conduct. (The U.S. military Code of Conduct is the definitive code specifying the responsibilities of American military personnel while in combat or captivity. Article V of the Code is very specific in ordering U.S. military personnel to avoid answering questions to the utmost of their ability and to make no oral or written statements disloyal to the United States and its allies, or harmful to their cause. Any willful violation of the Code is considered collaborating with the enemy.)

The Communist Vietnamese erected a bust of John McCain beside the lake where he was shot down. His defenders say that this is a tribute to the PAVN gunners that shot him down.

In the interview that he gave on November 9, 1967 to VNA International, he claims when he bailed out and landed in the lake, that locals pulled him out and took him to the hospital. Yet in the U.S. News and World Report - May 14, 1973. McCain is quoted as saying “I think it was on the fourth day (after being shot down) that two guards came in, instead of one. One of them pulled back the blanket to show the other guard my injury. I looked at my knee. It was about the size of a football . . . when I saw it, I said to the guard, Ok, get the officer’…an officer came in after a few minutes. It was the man that we came to know very well as ‘The Bug’. He was a psychotic torturer, one of the worst fiends that we had to deal with. I said, Ok, I’ll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital.”

mcain_bu1.jpgWhile testifying before the Senate Select Committee, the very man McCain claims was responsible for his own torture, his interrogator, “The Bug” appeared. During a break, McCain rose from his seat, walked from the podium to the floor and stood face to face with the man who was responsible for torturing him and countless other Prisoners of War…McCain then grabbed the man and embraced him!

This is the equivalent of Jack Idema hugging Amrullah Saleh.

McCain has been a consistent advocate of lenient treatment of Vietnam.

The War Secrets Senator John McCain Hides-Former POW Fights Public Access to POW/MIA Files

Some McCain watchers searching for answers point to his recently published best-selling autobiography, Faith of My Fathers, half of which is devoted to his years as a prisoner. In the book, he says he felt badly throughout his captivity because he knew he was being treated more leniently than his fellow POWs owing to his propaganda value as the son of Adm. John S. McCain II, who was then the CINCPAC — commander in chief of all U.S. forces in the Pacific region, including Vietnam. (His captors considered him a prize catch and nicknamed him the “Crown Prince.”)

Also in the book, the Arizona Senator repeatedly expresses guilt and disgrace at having broken under torture and given the North Vietnamese a taped confession, broadcast over the camp loudspeakers, saying he was a war criminal who had, among other acts, bombed a school. “I felt faithless and couldn’t control my despair,” he writes. He writes, revealing that he made two half-hearted attempts at suicide. Most tellingly, he said he lived in “dread” that his father would find out. “I still wince,” he says, “when I recall wondering if my father had heard of my disgrace.”

After McCain returned home, he says he told his father about the confession, but “never discussed it at length.” The admiral, McCain says, didn’t indicate he had heard anything about it before.

McCain’s father died in 1981. McCain writes: “I only recently learned that the tape … had been broadcast outside the prison and had come to the attention of my father.”

McCain wasn’t alone — it’s well-known that a sizeable percentage of prisoners of war will break down under torture. In fact, many of his supporters view McCain’s prison travails as evidence of his overall heroism. Fears unpublished details?

But how would McCain’s forced confession alone explain his endless campaign against releasing MIA/POW information?

Some veterans and other McCain watchers have speculated that McCain’s mortification, given his family’s proud military tradition (his grandfather was also an admiral), was so severe that it continues to haunt him and make him fear any opening up of information that could revive previously unpublished details of the era, including his own nagging history.

Another question that defies easy explanation is why there has never been any significant public outcry over the POWs who didn’t come home or about the machinations of public officials like McCain who carefully wove a blanket of secrecy around this issue. It can only be understood in the context of what the Vietnam War did to the American mind.

It’s one thing to hug a communist. It’s another thing to hug the person who tortured you. It’s another thing to give information to the communists that enabled them to kill American pilots.

While a member of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs (1991-1993) he referred to POW/MIA Family Members and POW/MIA Activists as whiners, vultures and the lunatic fringe.

But it would seem he’s simply describing himself.

The Kerry/McCain Campaign Against Ted Sampley
and the lies of DIA operative Susan Katz Keating

Back in 1972, while stationed at Fort Bragg, I volunteered my off-duty time to a small POW/MIA group (Americans Who Care) which helped Joe McCain when he traveled through North Carolina seeking to raise public awareness about his brother POW John McCain. Joe, like so many other citizens was concerned about Hanoi’s atrocious abuse of U.S. prisoners of war and wanted to ensure that POW McCain would be released when the war was over.

Yet, McCain categorizes me as “one of the most despicable people” he “ever had the misfortune to encounter?” What does that say about his relationship with the Vietnamese prison guards whom he claims brutally tortured him daily?

This whole propaganda thing defies the imagination. And how people can defend him is also confusing.