But he just withdrew his faux apology which really wasn’t an apology at all. What it amounted to was that everyone is ‘dumb’, that his stupidity was misconstrued, and it’s a republican conspiracy. SO WHAT’S NEW? He’s surrounded by people who worship the ground he walks on! He’s out of touch with reality! He’s not only out of touch, he’s too dumb to realize that-despite his rich upbringing as a Forbes family member, he’s not superior to everyone else, and his sitting on a fucking high horse is not only apparent to everyone watching, but is a slap in the face to most hard-working Americans. Since he went to a Swiss Boarding School, having gone to Harvard on his parents’ money, has his own manservant, married into Republican money and spends it on leftist causes, I find his entire story–all the way back to when his relatives chose the Kerry name to transform themselves from evil Jooos into WASPS…disgusting. At youtube there are so many new videos popping up in response to this, it’s evoking cheers in my house.

Because of pollution, global warming, and overfishing.

(11-02) 17:04 PST — The world’s oceans are under increasing assault from overfishing, pollution and global warming that threatens to wipe out vital fisheries and create a crisis for human food supplies before the middle of this century, an international team of scientists is warning.

Let’s get out our bullshit meters on this one!

The University of Pennsylvania’s president Amy Gutmann posed for this Halloween photo with a student in suicide bomber gear, and there is a growing outrage rising in the blogosphere as a result, led by Winfield Myers.

Was this students mocking terrorists, or was this just another leftist demonstration of adulation, admiration and acclaim of terrorism? We report, you decide.

Among the captions written by the student himself for his photos were “Another hostage shot,” “Influencing future Mujahideen,” and “freedom fighter . . . pose[s] for a picture.” We’re picking up a vibe here, and it’s not Charlie Chaplin dropping a banana peel in front of a goosestepping Hitler.

FYI: The electricity in Cao’s neighborhood went out for blocks last night. Unfortunately, when it came back on, it fried her computer. Her husband is running diagnostics on the motherboard and the rest of her system. So, in the meantime, several of us are going to help her maintain the blog until she’s able to come back online.

Since September 11th, our military under commander-in-chief George W. Bush have been kicking ass and taking names in the war against Islamic terrorism, particularly Al-Queda. We’ve taken the battle to two countries that have harbored and supported terrorists; Afghanistan and Iraq, we’ve almost depleted their financial network, and have captured over three quarters of their members. The war is long from over, but we are winning. Our military is protecting our country from another attack and also spreading democracy in nations that haven’t known freedom in quite some time in order to crush tyranny and terror.

But some have been less enthusiastic in our battle, and even seeming to root for the other side. That would be some of those on the left side of the political spectrum. Since 9/11, we’ve heard from Michael Moore that there “Is no terrorist threat” and other lies regarding the matter. We’ve seen the protesters in the streets with signs comparing the president to Adolf Hitler and calling Bush “the real terrorist” and the war “all about oil”. Our military has had almost no help or support from politicians such as Ted Kennedy who said the battle in Iraq was “concocted in Texas for political gain” and Dennis Kucinich who claimed that our forces were “targeting innocent Afghanis for assassination”. Some Hollywood celebrities go abroad and demean our president and our military in time of war. Our news media has been nothing but pessimistic in our fight against the terrorists and have even gone to alleging stories of U.S. guards at Guantanomo flushing the holy Qu’aran down a toilet enraging Muslims worldwide. Now you’ve got Amnesty International calling our holding prison for Al-Queda terrorists “gulags”. Maybe it’s me, but you guys on the Left.. I don’t see you trying to help here. See why I’m questioning your patriotism?

Question is…. Do they really want America to lose? Seems like it to me. Perhaps it’s because the Left view every single military encounter we’ve had since Vietnam, well.. like it’s Vietnam. Here’s something that they might not think of though. Our campaign in Vietnam was to HELP the South Vietnamese. And all they did was protest and call our brave veterans who served over there “babykillers” and hold Communist Party rallies in favor of Ho Chi Mihn. The Vietcong loved it, and used it to fuel their fire against us, and also to demoralize our troops, such as the Winter Soldier hearings. But where were the protesters when the gates fell down in Saigon and thousands of South Vietnamese were rounded up in prison camps or killed? Silent. Their job was done. We left, and the South Vietnamese were left to bear the ill fruits of our departure.

The same could happen here. Our job in Iraq is almost done, yet if we leave, Iraq leaves itself open for more terrorist insurgents to come in and cause unholy chaos for the Iraqi people. The American military is not committing a “war against brown people” as some on the Left would have you think, nor are we there to steal any resources that clearly belong to the Middle East. I’ll reiterate here because I could really go off on a tangent.. Our military is protecting us, annihilating the terrorists, and delivering freedom to people who have only known tyranny. So if you want to claim that the United States is committing “genocide”, that the war is “all for oil”, fine. That’s your First Amendment right. It’s also my First Amendment right to call you unpatriotic, a useful idiot to Al-Queda, and unworthy of even kissing the boots of the brave men and women who protect your sorry ass’s right to say dumb crap like that.

Post from The Right Dominion. Go check it out today.

The fast food chain Carl Jr’s is currently running a “sexy” ad featuring stupid, spoiled whore Paris Hilton trotting around in a dress with as much fabric as an eyepatch washing a car, getting herself wet, dry-humping the car, and chomping down on a big ol’ cheeseburger. A bunch of people, including the Parents Television Council have written the burger franchise to express their outrage.

Personally, I’m outraged too. Not in the same sense that these people are, but outraged at how in the hell can people think this skinny beanpole of a chick is sexy? I mean, she’s a carpenter’s dream (you probably heard the joke) and suffers from that new disease “Noasitall”. Maybe the ad points out that if anybody needs to eat a big 500 calorie burger bigger than their waist out there, it’s Paris. That’s what I’m guessing. I watched the 30 second clip with a bit of curiosity. I know that there’s a million different words out there for erection, but what’s the opposite of that? That’s what I got watching the commercial.

So if you’re outraged at the commerical, just don’t go to Carl Jr’s or Hardee’s for their Sh*tburgers. I won’t be upset until they get Rosie O’ Donnel to start seductively eating Twinkies during a commericial in the middle of dinnertime. Yuck City.

Point is, PARIS HILTON IS NOT HOT!

Post from The Right Dominion.

If you listen to the left-wing pundits, politicians, and bloggers, you’ll note that they are passing the term “right-wing extremists” around like a poorly rolled joint at a Grateful Dead concert. But who in fact ARE the extremists? Could it be judges like Priscilla Owens and Janice Rogers Brown that Bush has up for nominations to the federal courts? Granted, these are currently the most talked about “extremists” as of now, but according to some leftists, all of us who take the Constitution for what it is, have a strong support for gun rights, are against amnesty for illegal aliens, and all in all uphold conservative values are to them “extreme”. Perhaps if maybe we wanted all the wealth distribution Karl Marx could dream of, and unlimited abortion on demands for 12 year olds, and total appeasement and suurender on the war against terrorism we’d be more in the “mainstream”. See, most libs don’t ever talk or discuss politics with anyone outside of their own thinking. Kind of reminds me of that Pauline Kael quote after being befuddled by Richard Nixon’s historic landslide victory in 1972; “I don’t know ANYBODY that voted for Nixon!”

To understand the idea of “right wing radicals” by the Democratic left, read this article by J.B. Williams at ChronWatch.com.

According to Senate minority leader Harry Reid and his friends, Democrats must block the constitutional appointment process in order to protect you from right-wing radical judges. They say they use the filibuster only in the most extreme situations, to block confirmation of extremely dangerous radicals to the bench for sake of all mankind.

Heroes they are really, at least in their own minds.

I can almost see their point, too. Who would want some extreme right-wing wacko deciding justice in America? I mean, what if judges actually just stuck to the written law and constitution and applied them to cases without any re-draft from their own personal agenda? Can you imagine what chaos it might cause if our judges left all the legislating to our legislature? Who would single handedly thwart the will of the masses if not a judge?

In order to understand what Mr. Reid and his friends mean by this assertion, we must first understand what they mean by “right-wing radical.”

Let’s begin with the simple stuff. If you believe Teddy Kennedy is a drunken coward who should have gone to prison for leaving his girl friend to die in the icy waters of Chappaquiddick as he ran and hid from authorities, you are right. But if you believe this voids his credibility as a national leader, you are a right-wing radical and you are sadly mistaken.

If you believe Bill Clinton should have done more to protect this nation by strengthening the military and our intelligence community rather than destroying them while he focused his attention on using the White House as a personal play-pen, you are right again. But if you believe America was weakened by Larry Flint Lite living in the White House, you are a right-wing radical.

If you believe John Kerry should have produced real evidence to support his claim of war hero status instead of simply attacking the honor of decorated veterans and POW’s who called him a traitor, you are once again right. But if you think America should reject a traitor for president, you are a right-wing radical.

If you believe the founders got it all wrong, that America is one big feeding trough for the world, that the U.N. is more trustworthy than the U.S., that our weaknesses are our strengths and that only Democrats can save you from yourself, you are NOT a right-wing extremist.

If your idea of national security is negotiating away your freedom to avoid a fight, you could never be a right-wing extremist - you just don’t have what it takes.

So Priscilla Owens and Janice Rogers Brown are extremists, huh? What about someone like the 1993 Clinton appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg? Here’s someone SO extreme, that it sounds like she’d be great paired up with the likes of Ward Churchill or Michael Moore! Thing is, the leftists know that if Bush’s nominees get through, they’ve truly lost. The judiciary is the only stronghold they have left in government now that the GOP has overtaken the White House, Congress, most governorships and state legistatures, and their hold on the media is fading away. So the only chance the Dems have left is to block these nominees from ever getting an up or down vote like it’s Constitutionally intended. I mean after all, they WOULD go on to be nominated, so the Dems are pissing themselves in apprehension of it. Let’s hope they have their diapers on for their sake come Tuesday when it comes time to vote on the judicial filberbuster and it gets voted out.

But if this is what passes for “extreme”, then you can paint me a gun-toting, flag waving, military supporting right-wing whacko. Go ahead. I’ll take it as a compliment.

Cross posted at TS Right Dominion

This post belongs to TS Right Dominion, compliments of ThaSIckness. If you have a problem with this post, take it to the complaint department.

Guess who’s gonna be on TV?

After his scream heard ’round the world in Iowa in January of last year, most people thought former Vermont governor and current schizophrenic Howard Dean would drift off into obscurity other than the sound clips of his screech being played on the Sean Hannity radio show.

But now he’s the head of the DNC 100 days running is holding the reins of the Democratic Party and like a drunken pilot for Valujet, they’re about to crash and burn. Are the silent moderate Dems gonna let this happen?

Never before has a head of a political party been so psychotically partisan, calling the Republicans “evil, corrupt, and brain-dead”, threatening to use the Terri Schavio case as an election issue, imitating Rush Limbaugh snorting coke (does Dean snort his Oxycottin?), calling for the imprisonment of House leader Tom DeLay (even though he said last year that Bin Laden was basically innocent), and just being his normal screwy ass self.

Tomorrow, Dean is set to sit down for a full hour with Tim Russert on NBC’s Meet The Press (or as I call it, “Meet The Depressed” anytime they have a Dimocrat on there)for the first time since his canidacy for president. Will he explain his uncalled for rhetoric and his inability to raise money for his party (which is a large part of his job) or will he just scream at Russert the whole time? Or he might blame all this on a conspiracy by Karl Rove. You never know.

Yes, Dean being head of the DNC is the best thing to happen for us on our side, but it’s time for the moderate Democrats to wake up and see that their party is being hijacked. Yes, I know you guys are out there and I’m sure you’re fed up with it. Even most of the Dems in Congress are sick of him, but most moderate Democrats like Bill Nelson of Florida and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut are afraid to speak up because of the loudmouths of the Party like Nancy Pelosi and Teddy “Swimmer” Kennedy think he’s GREAT for their party! They can’t help it though. They’re delusional, as is with all their policies “Iraq is a quagmire!”, “There’s no problem with Social Security!”, “We don’t want these extreme judges (they need to take a look at judges like Ginsburg if they want ‘extreme’)!”.. it’s friggin’ laughable. But hey, if the Dems want to dig themselves further in a hole with the majority of the voting public, screw it. No skin off my nose if the GOP gets more seats in ‘06.

So we’ll see what happens tomorrow morning. Not me though.. I know Dean’s just going to spread more bullshit than Prairie Farms. Besides, I like sleeping in on Sunday.

This post is by TS Right Dominion, and NOT Cao. She’s having some problems with her arm recovery and wanted a post to help out.

Cross posted at TS Right Dominion