
Madonna pictured with an orphan from Malawi
So many times my response to certain things is ‘we are the world’ or ‘give peace a chance’ or ‘I’d like to buy the world a coke’. So along those lines, there is a buzz out there about Madonna’s adopting a child from Malawi, despite objections from the child advocacy group “Eye of the Child”. I find this growing celebrity interest in starving children in Africa, or other countries, baffling. This is probably the first time I can recall when Madonna hasn’t been the first to do this. She has historically burst through all kinds of barriers, which is one of her trademarks…she’s on the cutting edge of trends, and is a trendsetter.
So how is it they think that raising poor black children in a rich white home is going to help someone who came these meager beginnings? Does this demonstrate a belief that it’s better to be white and rich than black and poor? Spiritually and otherwise, I don’t believe this is the case.
From CBC.ca
Child advocacy group Eye of the Child is filing a court injunction asking the Malawian government to halt the adoption, arguing the process was fast-tracked because of the couple’s celebrity status.
And I thought this statement was well-put from that article:
“You cannot buy a child as if you are buying a house,” said spokesperson Boniface Mandere. “This process is too short, applying on Tuesday, and yesterday the court gave the OK. I don’t think that the High Court has any information about how Madonna is when it comes to child-rearing.”
Malawi law says adoptive parents must be residents in the country to adopt. On Thursday, government officials said the regulations would be eased but did not elaborate.
So they bend the rules so that Madonna can feel good, but she’s also donated a substantial amount of money to help the poor and orphans in Malawi. Still, it doesn’t make me feel very good to see these white people behaving in this way. This doesn’t help them keep in touch with their roots, and I wonder how many of these individuals go back to their home country or stay in touch with relatives after the adoption has gone through.
We actually don’t know how good of a mother Madonna is, just like we don’t know how good of a mother Mia Farrow is, or if Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are good parents, or if all of these people don’t just pawn off their parental duties on well-paid caretakers.
Granted, it’s much better to go to bed at night with a full stomach, but even Shania Twain grew up starving.
We have another example of this phenomenon; Mia Farrow. And another, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. We know they have money enough to care for the children with full-time nannies, but is this the kind of upbringing anyone from a third world country wants for its children? I think the needs for a third world country’s people boil down to having a roof over your head and a full stomach, free of diseases like malaria. But then “Silent Spring’ took care of that one; the bird population is more important than the lives of poor people, according to elitist environmentalists. At least that’s what they’d have you believe, because DDT hasn’t been actually proven to be detrimental to the environment or to the bird population; birds are like rats–they pop up very shortly after manmade disasters like oil spills and even events like the nuclear accident at Chernobyl.
Recently (give peace a chance)- Bono and Oprah launched a line of clothes and gadgets called “Red clothes” (I wonder why “Red”?) to help fight AIDS in Africa. I haven’t read how the clothing/gadgetry line is supposed to accomplish this, or precisely where the money goes to. It might, for all we know, be like Galloway’s charity, the “Miriam Appeal”.
I know celebrities do a lot of things to relieve themselves of the guilt of being rich, or to garner great publicity- thinking that they’re helping ‘mankind’ and ‘the world’, but to me for some reason these token acts of kindness ring somewhat shallow. All people who put money into the Salvation Army’s bucket want to do good; those who work in soup kitchens or donate to food pantries want to do good.
But do we have articles written about how we’ve done it? It almost seems like a PR ploy for the public to think well of them.