From Van Helsing. Hilarious!!!

There is a new website in town. I just noticed it when reviewing some of the old information having to do with Jack Idema.

She has a website up declaring that she’s a “journalist” and has links to some articles she wrote in the past.

It’s unfortunate that she doesn’t have some of the highlights of her career up; such as the lies she came up with in response to the lawsuit Idema brought against her for writing that hit piece. Blake is an example of the “journalists” that Columbia University has been pumping out for the last 30+ years or so - and now many of them are sitting in newsrooms and we read their garbage at illustrious “news” outlets such as the New York Times, which puts terrorists on a pedestal and condemns our own boys in uniform with a hatred of America comparable to that of Bin Laden himself.

Alas, now we “journalists” who have more power than even the politicians we elect - and lawyers and our courts do their part in helping our enemies. They are ruled and controlled by the political elite - which aren’t even following the law anymore. Judgments are arrived at based on political correctness and what side of the political aisle to you sit on, not because someone was ignoring the law and broke it.

In some cases, they don’t even have to read someone their miranda rights, or show a valid warrant.

Mariah Blake’s website is a testament to the fact that someone can reinvent themselves and appear legit after having written for the Miami New Times, a branch of the far left Village Voice Media.

Now she’s….”freelance” and living in Germany! I wonder if she ever makes trips to Romania?

It’s not like he didn’t TRY to commit an Ayers-like crime, though. After having delivered two gasoline bombs to some banks and shutting the town down; he took his self loathing one step further and drove somewhere only to blow his stupid brains out.

Like other moonbatty anarchist/communists who use the same type of rhetoric found in his suicide note, he had a rap sheet:

Blanning, who was on parole for a 1996 conviction on charges of racketeering, organized crime, fraud and larceny, lived in a small apartment a block off Colfax near Sloan’s Lake.

Another example of Ayers-like hatred of Amerikkka, courtesy of Van Helsing.

Except for the wishing he was dead part, sounds like a “good man” activist for ANSWER; or one of the anarchist bombers that targeted the military recruitment centers.

From Blanning’s typed letter delivered to Aspen banks Wednesday afternoon (Rocky Mountain News)

DO NOT F*CK WITH US OR THERE WILL BE MASS DEATH LIKE WE HAVE ALL BEEN PART OF OVER IN THAT F*CKING QUICKSAND TRAP THAT ROVE’S AND CHANEY’S MONKEY BUSH PUT US INTO WHERE SO MANY OF OUR SOUL MATES AND BROTHERS DIED VERY HORRIBLE DEATHS. …

THIS IS AS MUCH A SUICIDE MISSION AS A BANK ROBBERY, SO, IF IT GETS F*CKED UP, OUR SOULS HAVE ALREADY BEEN DESTROYED AND WE WILL ALL DIE LIKE THE RAG-HEAD MARTYRS THAT WE WERE KILLING OVER THERE. THEY TRAINED US GOOD FOR THIS SORT OF THING. …

Blanning’s handwritten note directed to the editor of the Aspen Times.

For the first 2 years I was in prison I woke up every (sic) wishing I was dead. Now it comes to pass. I was and am a good man. Too many people and I do hate Rove/Bush with a passion. Last Will & Testament - 2 crime scenes 1590 Wolff St Apt. 307 & 1615 Calif. St. #601 Denver. Also Storage Unit.

Psychiatrists are already helping fellows like this, through their books and descriptions of liberalism as a mental disorder and polls which demonstrate liberalism and mental problems are connected.

Terry Bisson, Legend in his own mind

Gribbit wrote a great piece about Kevin the chimp and the rest of the science blogs, and I’ve just got to chime in on this one since one of the biggest blowhards he refers to is Meatbrain, aka - who we THINK is Terry Bisson. Bisson also refers to himself as “thinking meat” - a reference to humans in one of his pathetic short stories where two aliens are sitting at a diner talking between themselves about the people walking around them. This “legend” in his own mind is a science fiction writer who’s Kathryn Cramer’s buddy and appears to travel in some of the same bloviating “intellectual circles”.

For all of the “science blogs” claims about being scientific, I haven’t seen one valid scientific claim.

What they DO do, however, is recycle myths that were long ago disproven; such as the boob from Millard Fillmore’s bathtub who is adamant that Rachel Carson’s claims that robins and cardinals are going extinct because of DDT use are still valid.

From Rachel Carson Was Wrong:

August 20, 2007—DDT DENIERS DENY SCIENCE
Angela Logomasini—Competitive Enterprise Institute
DDT-deniers—those who would rather let people die that allow DDT use to fight malaria-carrying mosquitoes—have been critiquing our blog posts on the topic. Last week they attacked us for highlighting recent scientific research that underscores the value of DDT in repelling mosquitoes. Apparently, they won’t even be swayed by scientific data, nor do they want anyone else to be convicted by the truth. But don’t be swayed by their hype

I’ll bet they were from some of the legions of “science” fanatics who are more about curbing dissent to the politically correct lines than they are about finding out truth from using the scientific method. Science is so politicized now, that educated minds are joking about it, as they did in this cartoon.

Source

If the socialist bloviators really cared to look at the subject, they would find some interesting stories about how safe DDT is in all actuality. The most compelling story that I was privy to read about came to light in some articles written by Professors J. Gordon Edwards. The main one being “The Lies of Rachel Carson”. Professor Edwards actually had the balls to EAT spoonfuls of DDT in front of his classrooms to show students how safe it is. I was so taken by this story and how he could write with such conviction about it, that I wrote about it, here. And he didn’t die from DDT poisoning, isn’t that interesting.? But of course, just as with most other subjects that contradict the politically correct line, the lemmings just go after you as though you’re a loon and attempt to discredit you if they don’t like your message. I see that Edwards’ work is relatively difficult to find when searching on Google, this is of little surprise.

Facts never bother leftists, as Yuri Bezmenov pointed out, so they just continue parroting the same phrases and slogans without bothering to examine it.

The peppered moths is another one; those moths were glued to the treetrunks (they were so desperate, I guess); the moths don’t naturally sit on tree trunks the way they were depicted in the experiment. That in itself should have rendered the experiment and the conclusions as voided. There are a few conclusions one can draw from the peppered moths experiments. One is - that the guy at Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub will gladly drink the koolaid of the environmentalists regardless as to the findings, and is drinking deeply from the leftist university teachings without questioning what he is being taught. Secondly, the experiments themselves actually yielded the conclusion that the peppered moth species contains within it two varieties of moth coloration within the species; much like human beings can have blue eyes or brown eyes. Both moth varieties were present at the beginning of the experiment, and the mix of genes producing the light-colored moth over the mix of genes producing the dark-colored moths existed also. As the story goes, the environment changed and the dark moth variety had greater opportunity to pass on their genetic mix, and percentages changed. All the while, the two types were interfertile. No new genes were produced, and certainly no new species emerged. This is natural selection in action, but not evolution. Adaptation happened, but the changes within that adaptation were limited to the species of moth.

The textbooks seldom point out that in recent decades, as England has cleaned its atmosphere, the shift reversed BACK, and now the light moths are the more common form again. This is merely a genetic shift within a species and has nothing whatsoever to do with the origin of moths, or how moths and people could share a common ancestor. This kind of thinking makes sense to the person who is looking at reality without the socialist-tinted glasses!

Hilariously, the socialists were so outraged from my going through and explaining why their arguments are just plain dumb and outdated, in response to a rant on global warming, they came here and made the assertion that I’m “not qualified” to talk about it! As if they are! bwahahaha!

Who in the hell do these little twirps think they are? Does being a bad science fiction writer make you an “authority” on science? According to the “science” blogs it does, they tout Terry Bisson as some sort of a GOD; when he’s actually a very ugly man who is a self-proclaimed socialist and a self-described former Black Panther, who supports the black cop killer and Islamic convert Mumia as “innocent”. (You gotta know that converting to Islam became all-the-rage among America-haters after 9-11, look at the Islamic names of Bill Ayers’ children!)

How they could keep putting retreads on these old antiquated and tired arguments in favor of evolution and global warming is completely beyond me, but it strikes me as somewhat similar to the Lysenko biologists who eventually were run out of Russia on a rail. THAT science is extinct, and so, too, should all “science” that follows evolution. Evolution, if you truly look at it, is an antiquated theory from the Victorian age; and so much has come to light in view of actual medical advances and REAL science, that it’s amazing that they would be so fierce in its support and defence.

Evolution and global warming are political viewpoints that are constructed to control the population.

Evolution controls the conversation of ‘creation’ and ‘God’ in science, and throws out the possibility that the reason they didn’t come across dust on the moon that was many feet thick - is because the universe isn’t as old as the evolutionists claim it is. And there are many other examples of the plain and simple fact that if you keep your mind open and actually test a hypothesis, you will come up with results that will point you in another direction.

That is what science is supposed to be; but as PhDs are pointing out, that’s not the way it’s going.

If you now mention global warming in your grant application, you will automatically be approved for the money. There was a time when scientists struggled with funding; but no more! Government and the EPA are happy as hell that scientists have fallen into the trap, despite the fact that computer generated models that “prove” global warming eliminate crucial warming elements such as the SUN. In order to “prove” global warming, they took the medieval warming period out of their graph which created the infamous hockey stick graph - but if you look to historical temperatures, you find that loading a computer model which eliminates all the facts and numbers is merely a magician’s move; not a scientific one.

They’ve also resorted to the ‘kill the messenger’ tactic when someone like Lord Monckton dared to read the IPCC literature and poke holes in their findings. Lord Monckton isn’t a “real Lord”, according to them, so you needn’t listen to what he has to say. That, of course, leaves out the fact that he’s a Lord because his father was a Lord and that’s the way it used to be. Now they’ve changed that - and you’re a Lord if they elect you to be one. It doesn’t take away the fact that Monckton is a Lord by the old rules.

But so it goes; politics and political maneuvering is changing the way we’re taught to view the world, and already they’re talking about American society as “post religious’. That’s a shame, when you consider a number of great scientists and adventurers attributed their scientific curiosity to their Christian faith and what is said in the Bible.

Let me cite some examples.

Evidence for God

Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Bacon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, “It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity.”

And there are many, many more.

Fact is, there are a lot of problems with what it is the atheist/socialists are trying to do while calling it “science”…when they’re not scientists at all - and what they’re promoting isn’t science.

To ignore the facts, fabricate computer generated models that leave out important components in order to “prove” their theories doesn’t amount to a hill of beans in the real world.

What is utterly fantastic to me - unbelievable and even astonishing - is the fact that all these idiots are so pompous in their standing on this propaganda that anyone who dares be a heretic to the global warming religion - or Rachel Carson’s ridiculous conclusions-should not be even allowed to voice their opinions on the subject.

As Gribbit mentioned, they have no respect for property rights!!! They think they’re entitled to littering and pooping their crap all over our comments sections and then when we object to their vile demonstration of how far away we’ve drifted from civility, they take it as though we’re “censoring” them.

There is a reason that people don’t allow comments on their blogs…reading the comments, chastising people for violating the rules, and providing rebuttals takes time; and it’s wasted time in my opinion, when there are just so many hours in the day.

Read also

Answering Islam Awareness’ claim: The bible says the earth is flat

Atheists’ and Islamists’ stupidity in 4 easy lessons

DDT the Myths and the Reality

I absolutely love the fact that they are so bothered by what Gribbit writes; and I’m delighted that they take issue with me, too. It proves that we are right on the mark.

Read the whole thing. Very interesting when you consider the lies that Congress is telling the American people about evil oil.

Energy: Another day, another oil company fleeing the country. No, this isn’t Ecuador, the banana republic that just defaulted on its debt after chasing out investors. It’s the United States, and what we’re seeing is self-defense.

Sure it isn’t. Via Michelle Malkin and Breitbart tv.

This guy is a smarmy weasel; but we already got a whiff of that stink when he was running away from the Fox producer who was asking relevant questions. And then had the balls to call the cops when at a different time in his anarchist/commie career he was conspiring to KILL cops.

I guess he figures they’re on his side, now that they’ve been through Soros-paid sensitivity training.

heh. “We ought to abolish the prisons. That’s what I believe.”

Yeah and have the criminals running around in the streets while they create more socialist agitators.

This long post of Malkin’s illustrates very clearly just exactly who is full of “rage”, and it sure isn’t coming from the side the Obamamedia claims it is.

Crush the Obamedia Narrative: Look Who’s Gripped By In Sane Rage

Excerpt from this post:

Reader Monica M. sent me a link to the Democratic Underground’s latest thread for commenters to come up with nicknames and posters to slime GOP Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — and then to “spread [them] all over the ‘net.” There are now nearly 100 filthy, hate-filled responses and counting. Among the “nicer” entries: “Cruella,” “Gidget,” “Governor Jesus Camp,” “VPILF,” “Fertilla the Huntress,” “Iditabroad,” and “KILLER PYSCHO FUNDIE BITCH FROM HELL!!”

The graphics, though, here, are sickening, if you can stomach reading and scrolling through the entire thing.

Bill O’Reilly Vs. Barney Frank SMACKDOWN - More amazing videos are a click away

From Ms U

Read it for yourself, LOL

Hat tip Hoosier Army Mom.

See it at Nice Deb’s - or just go to the White House press release. It also appears on Glenn Beck’s website, which I received through email without a link.

Here’s the link to it at Glenn Beck’s website.

People, people, people! If you’re going to send something out like that, provide the link to the source!!!

It’s hard to track all of the dishonest Palin smears, but here’s another one that defies the imagination: supposedly Palin charged raped victims for rape kits.

Hat tip Confederate Yankee here and here.

Actually I didn’t think this one was so bad. It shows what a byatch Hillary is, LOL

The rumored one about the dumb hick incest thing joked about on SNL really tops the cake; which I read about at worldnetdaily. Haven’t seen it yet, though…

It’s sickening what the artistic community has done to the concept of art; but it’s been going on for a long time. It’s one of the reasons I was arguing with my parents about going to art school over 30 years ago: it’s dominated by leftist flakes - and you’re promoted if you’re leftist, and left pretty much outside of the “popular” circles if you’re not.

We can recall the stellar rise of the Beatles, when they were singing “You say you want a Revolution” and “Back in the USSR”; when they were widely known as using drugs, were experimenting with religion that doesn’t mention the “C”-word and John and Yoko were “protesting” by staying in the sack and giving interviews from bed.

This perversion of art continues today when you look at OBEY, which plagiarizes images and designed the popular Obama posters - or the Firehouse Gallery and art by Eric Gibbons, who’s been recognized as some kind of revolutionary artiste. The entrypoint for Gibbons’ Firehouse Gallery website shows him holding a bunch of condoms in front of his face - and that’s what we’re supposed to recognize as hoity toity art these days - as long as it refers to things in an adoring kind of a way that tear apart conventional thinking, it’s a good thing.

Good is bad, bad is good, they live in and promote a world comprised of definitional contrarianism (if that’s a word).

Beautiful is ugly, ugly is beautiful - you can see their promotion of that kind of “expression” all over the place.

Take, for example, the director that led Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman through the “Eyes Wide Shut” project; who people were “ooohing and ‘ahhing’ over.

Case in point for when I was a fledging artist - was Andy Warhol and what was happening at Studio 54 (corrected due to a commenter that is having a problem with some of this text so has found it necessary to do the customary leftist nitpicking), but you can name any number of actors, actresses, painters, photographers, etc.- who have veered off the beaten path into noman’s land - and that includes Whoopi Goldberg, who thinks SLAVERY is in the constitution.

When you see some hack like Matt Damon talking about Palin’s lack of experience - you don’t have to wonder much about the rocket scientists who are making this stuff up, who are people like Michael Moore, Rosie O’donnell, and other screaming moonbat types…whose collective knowledge wouldn’t cover the head of a pin.

Michelle Malkin has two posts about Greenberg’s “art”, and her abuse of children in order to get 35 children to cry for her pictures.

The Atlantic should have Googled Jill Greenberg before hiring her

Abusing kids for “art”

It’s one thing for someone to say they suffer for their art, but it’s another to make someone else suffer - particularly when it’s a child. In this case, it was numerous children, and there is no excuse for that.

Decency is something that liberalism has flushed down the memory hole, but luckily there are some people who are striving to preserve it.

I just went to Greenberg’s website.

What a disgusting excuse for a human being; mocking McCain and conservatives for wanting to reverse Roe V. Wade; this reminds me of that disgusting blogger for the Edwards campaign, Amanda Marcotte, who agreed with Obama -that children are a burden and not a blessing.

Supposedly this is Jodie Evans “interrupting” one of Barack Obama’s speeches. Notice how she’s yelling, how she is trying to show a banner; how she has something written on the t-shirt over her dress, and secret service is all over her?

Oh. She’s not yelling? Showing a banner? Nobody’s stopping her? She doesn’t have something written on the t-shirt over her dress? Oh! That was at the RNC that she did that!

But that’s precisely what the WCCO reporter, Esme Murphy, CLAIMS it is; evidence that Code Pink goes after “both sides”.

Evans is smiling broadly at Obama and clapping her hands like a 5-year-old girl at a tea party, and they’re smiling at each other. There’s quite a bit difference between that and how she behaved at the RNC; just within yards of Palin as she began her speech, which prompted both Evans and Benjamin having to be strong armed out; Code Pinksters have been notoriously sickening where republicans are concerned.

Here they are being ushered out of the RNC in that same report:

Medea Benjamin getting the bum’s rush out of the RNC

Jodie Evans getting the bum’s rush out of the RNC for attempting to disrupt Palin’s speech

These are screen grabs from the video report by WCCO-4 in Minnesota about Jodie Evans and her Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin infiltrating the Republican National Convention the night of vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s speech Wednesday night. (Mel)

Allegedly, they got in with passes provided by MSNBC, although they deny it.

According to Shay at Booker Rising, which describes itself a newsite for black moderates and black conservatives [emphasis added] (Newsbusters):

I took the shuttle bus back to Minneapolis, and I overheard a convention organizer named Phil telling a convention delegate that the protesters on Wednesday night got through because of media credentials that were traced back to MSNBC (he told her that each credential has an individual bar code for each convention invitee). They suspect MSNBC this time as well.

Backstory here.

Hat tip, Mel.

See the youtube video here, and compare and contrast. The picture shows up at about 1:45-1:55.

SG at Sweetness and Light points out that Jodie Evans is a top Obama bundler, so that CRAP about going after “both sides” is another example of pulling a fast one.

Taking a short cruise around the blogosphere this morning, I’m finding some sickening examples of why liberalism is considered a mental disorder.

Take this one, as an example, at Van Helsing’s Moonbattery.com “Liberals Consider Gustav Proof There Is a God”

The Left has managed to squeeze so much propaganda out of Katrina, the approach of Gustav has them all but wetting their pants in anticipation. Here’s Michael Moore on a soapbox provided by the vile Keith Olbermann, gloating that a potentially devastating hurricane scheduled to hit New Orleans during the Republican convention is “proof that there is a god in heaven.”

Make sure you catch the video of Michael Moore on Keith Olbermann, and make sure you also catch that video of DNC chairman Don Fowler on an airplane, giddy with the news that Gustav is on its way.

How anyone could use the promise of a hurricane hitting an American city as reason to be happy and celebrate is beyond the imagination.

But so are the unhinged allegations that Sarah Palin’s son Trig’s having Downs Syndrome is Palin’s fault, or that Trig isn’t Sarah’s child at all, but actually was born to her teenage daughter. Read that at Sweetness and Light, SG’s notable post entitled “Things That Make You Hate All Democrats”.

Making up conflicting unhinged accusations in order to blame Palin in one way or another for having a downs syndrome baby - is disgusting. Palin had the courage to carry a downs syndrome child to term and love it, making a commitment to the child for the rest of her life, which is admirable. Having the child, rather than aborting him, is what’s admirable about this woman. Liberals condone aborting less-than-perfect children in their demented support of nazi-type euthanasia-a belief that making a judgment about whether or not you’ll keep your baby should be based on whether or not it will have ‘quality of life’. But who is to determine what qualifies as “quality”? Life itself is a gift; not something you should flush down the toilet because it’s at the wrong time, or ‘inconvenient’. But leave it to libs to promote fictional suppositions that merely serve their political purpose, even though it’s very clearly spelled out in numerous places including the entry at Wikipedia that “Current research (as of 2008) has shown that Down syndrome is due to a random event during the formation of sex cells or pregnancy. There has been no evidence that it is due to parental behavior or environmental factors.”

The likelihood of a teenage girl having a downs syndrome baby are incredibly slim. In fact, the probability increases as a woman’s age increases, which is one of the reasons why my parents encouraged me to have my children when I was young.

Alan Colmes has alleged that Track is illegitimate. But then…I haven’t seen the media mention that Barack Obama is illegitimate - since his father never divorced his first wife in Kenya when he took up with then 18-year old Stanley Ann Dunham. There isn’t even a marriage certificate.

So Colmes thinks that because Track was born 8 months after Sarah and her husband eloped, that the reason they eloped was because she was pregnant? These people are making a lot of desperate stretches in order to paint Palin as someone we shouldn’t believe in.

If you add up their hysteria over the RNC and McCain’s pick for VEEP, it’s no wonder they’re grasping at straws for a reason to enjoy some schadenfreude. Otherwise, Palin’s entrance as Vice Presidential candidate alongside McCain would continue to have them depressed and in need of more medication than usual.

See also The Harpies Are Out to Get Sarah Palin

Defending Sarah Palin’s Selection

Kat at Cathouse Chat discusses more about Alan Colmes idiocy:

Kim Preistap over at Wizbang! posted late last night (early this morning?) about a disgusting entry by Alan Colmes on his blog, Liberaland:Kat, CatHouse Chat, Aug 2008

Read the whole thing.

With a few name changes, this could be an episode of the Sopranos.

Two generations of Bidens have been meddling in the Sinclair/Obama saga…And Joe Biden could possibly become Obama’s veep choice. Can anyone say democrat politics as usual?

The mind boggles.

From Larry’s blog:

SON OF DEM VP CHOICE TRIES TO THREATEN ME WITH LIFE 2 DAYS BEFORE FATHER IS CHOSEN FOR VP SLOT

Doesn’t Biden’s son have a conflict of interest in his role regarding Larry Sinclair’s legal matter in Delaware?

They haven’t produced any documentation in support of their claims, they merely threaten that they will go after a life sentence in connection with Delaware’s habitual offender rule; so he must acquiesce to their demands.

From: Dwyer Susan (DOJ) [mailto:Susan.Dwyer@state.de.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:11 PM
Subject: RE: Larry Sinclair

FYI…in talking with John Barber about the case today I realized that Mr. Sinclair is actually habitual eligible. That means I need written approval from a superior in order to offer anything less the charge and habit. Makes my misdemeanor offer seem really good, doesn’t it? I am working on it, but not sure I will get approval for a straight up NP. If that is the case, why not take the chance at trial. Mr. Sinclair not willing to take a misdemeanor even if it means I am seeking habit status if I win at trial?

Susan

I sincerely doubt she’ll be able to win at trial; she doesn’t have any evidence, and what will be uncovered during discovery is a convoluted chain of conflicts of interest. But it’s nice to know that it’s not only the sychophants who are making threats, it’s paid members of the Delaware DOJ…

So, in essence, this is payback for Sinclair having dared to challenge Obama to admit that he was using drugs when Obama was a representative in Springfield in 1999 and well into his 30’s, rather than having quit using drugs as he had publicly claimed, when he was in his 20’s and in college.

Sinclair, you have some nerve baspheming the holy Obamessiah, now we’re going to put you away for the rest of your life! That in itself should be picked up as a story…why Obama’s sychophants would go after Sinclair like this with no proof. What they need to prove in court was that Sinclair knew that those money orders were no good. Proving that will be impossible. All you need to do is hear Sinclair out; he is very sincere and has changed his life since all this happened in the 80’s.

Sinclair has personally paid dearly for coming out with this story, and they’ve had the nerve to claim he’s in this to ‘make money’. How ludicrous! And what’s more ludicrous is how they’re not only getting away with it, but how they go around threatening supporters, dropping troll turds on blogs and in general terrorize anyone who’s in support of telling the story.

Even if they succeed in giving him a life sentence in Delaware, this story isn’t going away.

While they harp on the “change” mantra it’s obvious that Obama is about politics as usual in Washington and elsewhere, he covorts with criminals, bought his house with the help of a now convicted felon, hid the money that he actually gave to ACORN which is responsible for voter fraud…and on and on.

These are some of the facts that have managed to pierce through the shield of protection that the media and Axelrod have provided him, one can only wonder what hasn’t emerged yet.

We shouldn’t expect that someone who’d buy drugs and engage in homosexual adulterous sex would want to be honest about anything…and that we’ve seen repeatedly in this weird convoluted soap opera that we’re calling an election cycle.

Dr. Jerome Corsi also has a book out about Obama. This is getting very interesting. (Thanks to Larry for the tip)

the Book can be purchased online Here

Description from Amazon of the book:

In this thoroughly researched and documented book, the #1 New York Times bestselling co-author of Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry explains why the extreme leftism of an Obama presidency would leave the United States weakened, diminished and divided, why Obama must be defeated and how he can be.

THE OBAMA NATION Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality

Barack Obama stepped onto the national political stage when the then-Illinois State senator addressed the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Soon after Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate, author Jerome Corsi began researching Obama’s personal and political background.

Scrupulously sourced with more than 600 footnotes, THE OBAMA NATION is the result of that research. By tracing Obama’s career and influences from his early years in Hawaii and Indonesia, the beginnings of his political career in Chicago, his voting record in the Illinois legislature, his religious training and his adoption of Christianity through to his recent involvement in Kenyan politics, his political advisors and fundraising associates and his meteoric campaign for president, Jerome Corsi shows that an Obama presidency would, in his words, be a repeat of the failed extremist politics that have characterized and plagued Democratic Party politics since the late 1960s.

In this stunning and comprehensive new book, the reader will learn about:

-Obama’s extensive connections with Islam and radical politics, from his father and step-father’s Ilamic backgrounds, to his Communist and socialist mentors in Hawaii and Chicago, to his long-term and close associations with former Weather Underground heroes William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, associations much closer than heretofore revealed by the press

-Barack and Michelle’s 20-year-long religious affiliation with the black-liberation theology of former Trinity United Church of Christ Reverend Jeremiah Wright, whose sermons have always been steeped in a rage first expressed by Franz Fanon , Stokely Carmichael and Malcolm X, a rage that Corsi shows has deep meaning for Obama

-Obama’s continuing connections with Kenya, the homeland of his father, through his support for the candidacy of Raila Odinga, the radical socialist presidential contender who came to power amid Islamist violence and church burnings

-Obama’s involvement in the slum-landlord empire of the Chicago political fixer Tony Rezko, who helped to bankroll Obama’s initial campaigns and to purchase of Barack and Michelles dream-home property.

-the background and techniques of the Obama campaign’s cult of personality, including the derivation of the words “hope and “change”.

-Obama’s far left domestic policy, his controversial votes on abortion, his history of opposition to the Second Amendment, his determination to raise capital-gains taxes, his impractical plan to achieve universal health care, and his radical plan to tax Americans to fund a global-poverty-reduction program

-Obamas naïve, anti-war, anti-nuclear foreign-policy, predicated on the reduction of the military, the eradication of nuclear weapons and an overconfidence in the power of his personality, as if belief in change alone could somehow transform international politics, achieve nuclear-weapons disarmament and withdrawal from Iraq without adverse consequences, for us, for the Iraqis or for Israel.

Meticulously researched and documented, THE OBAMA NATION is the definitive source for information on why and how Barack Obama must be defeatednot by invective and general attacks, but by detailed arguments that are well-researched and fact-based.

About the Author

DR. JEROME CORSI received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in political science in 1972 and has written many books and articles, including the No. 1 New York Times best-seller, Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry. His latest best-seller was The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada. He is a senior staff reporter for WorldNetDaily.com and the author of two books on contemporary Iran: Atomic Iran and Showdown with Nuclear Iran. In his 2005 book Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil, which he co-authored with Craig. R. Smith, Dr. Corsi predicted oil prices at over $100 a barrel.

I am not here today. So don’t demand that I answer you; or complain that the ‘cat has my tongue’.

I have a life outside this blog and the internet!

If your comments don’t immediately publish, they are held in moderation until I get back so I can approve them. That’s the way comment moderation USUALLY works.